Introduction: Shisha smoking, also known as waterpipe smoking, is a growing social phenomenon around the world, particularly among young adults, yet it remains understudied. This study aims to examine the sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of shisha smokers in Oman. Methods: An observational, analytical, cross-sectional study was carried out using secondary data from the WHO STEPS, 2017 survey in Oman. The study participants involved adult shisha smokers aged 18 and older who participated in the STEPS survey. The primary survey was approved by the Central Research and Ethical Review and Approval Committee of the Ministry of Health, Sultanate of Oman. Descriptive analysis was performed to examine the sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of shisha smokers. Univariate analysis, utilizing chi-square (x2), was conducted to investigate the association between the frequency of shisha smoking (the outcome of interest) and various determinants of shisha smoking. The analysis was conducted using SPSS version 27, with a level of significance set at p < 0.05. Results: A total of 512 (7.6%) of the primary survey participants used tobacco products, with only 36 (7.0%) of all tobacco users were shisha smokers. Most shisha smokers were under 40 years old (n = 27, 81.8%), male (n = 34, 94.4%), employed (n = 35, 97.2%), and with middle/higher educational attainment (n = 31, 86.1%). Most shisha smokers used flavoured shisha (n = 28, 80.0%) and smoked in public places (n = 28, 77.8%). Over one-third (n = 12, 37.5%) of shisha smokers consumed shisha that has been mixed with other substances. One-third (n = 13, 38.2%) were asked about their smoking status by their healthcare providers, and less than half of shisha smokers attempted to quit. Nearly 17% of shisha smokers believed that shisha smoking is "a little less harmful" than other tobacco products. Most shisha smokers were in favour of banning smoking in stadiums (n = 27, 79.4%), traditional markets (n = 29, 85.3%), private transport carrying children (n = 33, 94.3%), car parks (n = 24, 61.8%), and beaches (n = 21, 61.8%). Nearly half (n = 15, 41.7%) opposed laws that increase tobacco taxes; most of them were daily smokers (n = 11, 73.3%). No significant association was observed between the frequency of shisha smoking and different determinants of shisha smoking. Conclusion: The current study showed that 7.0% of tobacco smokers in Oman were shisha smokers and most of them were young, male, married, employed, and had higher educational status. Only one-third of shisha smokers wanted to quit, and nearly one-fifth believed it was less harmful than other tobacco products. Increased awareness about smoking shisha and stringent shisha-specific tobacco control measures are required to reduce shisha smoking. Further research is required to better understand the determinants of shisha smoking in Oman.
Published in | Frontiers (Volume 5, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.frontiers.20250501.14 |
Page(s) | 53-61 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Shisha Smoking, Perception of Shisha Smoking, Quitting Shisha Smoking, Oman
Variable | Total n (%) | Frequency of shisha smoking n (%) | p value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Daily | Less than daily | |||
Age in years (n=33) | ||||
< 40 | 27(81.8%) | 16(59.3%) | 11(40.7%) | 0.379a |
≥ 40 | 6(18.2%) | 5(83.3%) | 1(16.7%) | |
Sex (n=34) | ||||
Male | 34(94.4%) | 23(67.6%) | 11(32.4%) | 1.000a |
Female | 2(5.6%) | 1(50.0%) | 1(50.0%) | |
Nationality (n=36) | ||||
Omani | 27(75.0%) | 20(74.1%) | 7(25.9%) | 0.126a |
No-Omani | 9(25.0%) | 4(44.4%) | 5(55.6%) | |
Marital status (n=36) | ||||
Married | 30(83.3%) | 20(66.7%) | 10(33.3%) | |
Unmarried2 | 6(16.7%) | 4(66.7%) | 2(33.3%) | 1.000a |
Education (n=36) | ||||
Low, primary school | 5(13.9%) | 5(100.0%) | 0(0.0%) | 0.146a |
Middle, higher education | 31(86.1%) | 19(61.3%) | 12(38.7%) | |
Employment (n=36) | ||||
Employed | 35(97.2%) | 24(68.6%) | 11(31.4%) | 0.333a |
Unemploed1 | 1(2.8%) | 0(0.0%) | 1(100.0%) | |
Monthly spending on shisha products (n=32) | ||||
<10 OMR | 15(46.9%) | 11(73.3%) | 4(26.7%) | 0.712a |
≥10 OMR | 17(53.1%) | 11(64.7%) | 6(35.3%) | |
1including students; 2 unmarried, separated but not divorced, divorced and widowed; 3 in the last 12 months from the survey; achi-square (x2); level of significance p < 0.05 |
Variable | Total n (%) | Frequency of shisha smoking n (%) | p value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Daily | Less than daily | |||
Age of initiation (year, n=36) | ||||
< 25 | 17(47.2%) | 12(70.6%) | 5(29.4%) | 0.732a |
≥ 25 | 19(52.8%) | 12(63.2%) | 7(36.8%) | |
Place of smoking shisha (n=36) | ||||
Home | 4(11.1%) | 3(75.0%) | 1(25.0%) | 0.725a |
Public spaces, cafés, restaurants, nightclubs, bars | 28(77.8%) | 19(67.9%) | 9(32.1%) | |
Others1 | 4(11.1%) | 2(50.0%) | 2(50.0%) | |
Type of shisha used (n=35) | ||||
Flavoured | 28(80.0%) | 20(71.4%) | 8(28.6%) | 0.233a |
Unflavoured | 5(14.3%) | 2(40.0%) | 3(60.0%) | |
Both | 2(5.7%) | 2(100.0%) | 0(0.0%) | |
Smoked shisha that is mixed with other substances (n=32) | ||||
Yes | 12(37.5%) | 8(66.7%) | 4(33.3%) | 1.000a |
No | 20(62.5%) | 14(70.0%) | 6(30.0%) | |
Asked about smoking status by healthcare providers2 (n=34) | ||||
Yes | 13(38.2%) | 10(76.9%) | 3(23.1%) | 0.704a |
No | 21(61.8%) | 14(66.7%) | 7(33.3%) | |
Advised to quit by healthcare providers 2 (n=29) | ||||
Yes | 11(33.3%) | 9(81.8%) | 2(18.2%) | 0.265a |
No | 19(57.6%) | 13(68.4%) | 6(31.6%) | |
Attempt to quit2 (n=36) | ||||
Yes | 17(47.2%) | 11(64.7%) | 6(35.3%) | 1.000a |
No | 19(52.8%) | 13(68.4%) | 6(31.6%) | |
1other places than home and public spaces; 2 in the last 12 months from the survey; achi-square (x2); level of significance p < 0.05 |
Variable | Total n(%) | Frequency of shisha smoking n(%) | p value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Daily | Less than daily | |||
Beliefs in shisha smoking (n=36) | ||||
Little less harmful | 6(16.7%) | 5(83.3%) | 1(16.7%) | 0.733a |
No difference | 7(19.4%) | 5(71.4%) | 2(28.6%) | |
Little more harmful | 21(58.3%) | 13(61.9%) | 8(38.1%) | |
Don't know | 2(5.6%) | 1(50.0%) | 1(50.0%) | |
Attitude toward increase taxes (n=36) | ||||
Favour | 20 (55.6%) | 12(60.0%) | 8(40.0%) | 0.549a |
Oppose | 15(41.7%) | 11(73.3%) | 4(26.7%) | |
Don't know | 1(2.8%) | 1(100.0%) | 0(0.0%) | |
How far shisha bar from residential area (n=34) | ||||
< 100 meters | 1(2.9%) | 0(0.0%) | 1(100.0%) | 0.324a |
≥ 100 meters | 33(97.1%) | 23(69.7%) | 10(30.3%) | |
Smoking in restaurants and cafés that offer shisha (n=35) | ||||
Should be allowed | 11(31.4%) | 6(54.5%) | 5(45.5%) | 0.263a |
Should not be allowed | 24(68.6%) | 18(75.0%) | 6(25.0%) | |
Smoking within private transportations carrying children (n=35) | ||||
Should be allowed | 2(5.7%) | 1(50.0%) | 1(50.0%) | 0.536a |
Should not be allowed | 33(94.3%) | 23(69.7%) | 10(30.3%) | |
Smoking within public parks (n=34) | ||||
Should be allowed | 8(23.5%) | 7(87.5%) | 1(12.5%) | 0.227a |
Should not be allowed | 26(76.5%) | 16(61.5%) | 10(38.5%) | |
Smoking within beaches (n=34) | ||||
Should be allowed | 13(38.2%) | 10(76.9%) | 3(23.1%) | 0.465a |
Should not be allowed | 21(61.8%) | 13(61.9%) | 8(38.1%) | |
Smoking within traditional markets (n=34) | ||||
Should be allowed | 5(14.7%) | 3(60.0%) | 2(40.0%) | 1:000a |
Should not be allowed | 29(85.3%) | 20(69.0%) | 9(31.0%) | |
Smoking within car parks (n=34) | ||||
Should be allowed | 13(38.2%) | 8(61.5%) | 5(38.5%) | 1:000a |
Should not be allowed | 21(61.8%) | 14(66.7%) | 7(58.3%) | |
Smoking within stadiums (n=34) | ||||
Should be allowed | 7(20.6%) | 6(85.7%) | 1(14.3%) | 0.384a |
Should not be allowed | 27(79.4%) | 17(63.0%) | 10(37.0%) | |
achi-square (x2); level of significance p < 0.05 |
CO | Carbon Monoxide |
COHb | Carboxyhaemoglobin |
FCTC | Framework Convention on Tobacco Control |
GBD | Global Burden of Disease |
PPM | Parts per Million |
STEPS | STEPwise Approach to Surveillance |
WHO | World Health Organization |
[1] | WHO. Advisory note: waterpipe tobacco smoking: health effects, research needs and recommended actions by regulators, 2nd edition 2024 [Internet]. [cited 2024 Dec 28]. Available from: |
[2] |
American Lung Association. Facts about hookah [Internet]. [cited 2025 Feb 28]. Available from:
https://www.lung.org/quit-smoking/smoking-facts/health-effects/facts-about-hookah |
[3] | Darawshy F, Abu Rmeileh A, Kuint R, Berkman N. Waterpipe smoking: a review of pulmonary and health effects. Eur Respir Rev. 2021; 30(160). |
[4] | Akl EA, Gunukula SK, Aleem S, Obeid R, Jaoude PA, Honeine R, et al. The Prevalence of Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking Among the General and Specific Populations. BMC Public Health; 2011. |
[5] | Cobb C, Ward KD, Maziak W, Shihadeh AL, Eissenberg T. Waterpipe tobacco smoking: an emerging health crisis in the United States. Am J Health Behav. 2010; 34(3). |
[6] | Kumar SR, Davies S, Weitzman M, Sherman S. A review of air quality, biological indicators and health effects of second-hand waterpipe smoke exposure. Tob Control. 2015; 24 Suppl 1(Suppl 1): i54-i9. |
[7] | Maziak W, Taleb ZB, Bahelah R, Islam F, Jaber R, Auf R, et al. The global epidemiology of waterpipe smoking. Tobacco Control. 2015; 24(Suppl 1): i3. |
[8] | Shihadeh A, Saleh R. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, “tar”, and nicotine in the mainstream smoke aerosol of the narghile water pipe. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2005; 43(5): 655-61. |
[9] | Eissenberg T, Shihadeh A. Waterpipe tobacco and cigarette smoking: direct comparison of toxicant exposure. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 37(6): 518-23. |
[10] | Qasim H, Alarabi AB, Alzoubi KH, Karim ZA, Alshbool FZ, Khasawneh FT. The effects of hookah/waterpipe smoking on general health and the cardiovascular system. Environ Health Prev Med. 2019; 24(1): 58. |
[11] |
WHO. Core Questionnaire of Reporting Instrument of WHO FCTC 2020, Oman. 2020. [cited 2024 Dec 20]. Available from:
https://extranet.who.int/fctcapps/sites/default/files/2023-04/Oman_2020_WHOFCTCreport.pdf |
[12] | The Tobacco Atlas. Country fact sheet: Oman. 2019. [cited 2024 Dec 20]. Available from: |
[13] | Evaluation IoHMa. GBD compare IHME; 2019. [cited 2024 Dec 20]. Available from: |
[14] | WHO. 2017 STEPS Fact sheet Oman: WHO; 2017. [cited 2024 Dec 20]. Available from: |
[15] | Al-Mawali A, Jayapal SK, Morsi M, Al-Shekaili W, Pinto AD, Al-Kharusi H, et al. Prevalence of risk factors of non-communicable diseases in the Sultanate of Oman: STEPS survey 2017. PLoS One. 2021; 16(10): e0259239. |
[16] | Smith-Simone S, Maziak W, Ward KD, Eissenberg T. Waterpipe tobacco smoking: knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and behavior in two U.S. samples. Nicotine Tob Res. 2008; 10(2): 393-8. |
[17] | Moran S, Wechsler H, Rigotti NA. Social smoking among US college students. Pediatrics. 2004; 114(4): 1028-1034. |
[18] | Soule EK, Ramôa C, Eissenberg T, Cobb CO. Differences in puff topography, toxicant exposure, and subjective response between waterpipe tobacco smoking men and women Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018; 26(5): 440-7. |
[19] | Muzammil, Al Asmari D, Al Rethaiaa A, Al Mutairi A, Al Rashidi T, Al Rasheedi H, et al. Prevalence and Perception of Shisha Smoking among University Students: A Cross-sectional Study. Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry 9(3): p 275-281, May-Jun 2019. |
[20] | Mohammed Jawad, Legislation Enforcement of the Waterpipe Tobacco Industry: A Qualitative Analysis of the London Experience, Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Volume 16, Issue 7, July 2014, Pages 1000-1008. |
[21] | AlKalbani SR, Kavanagh P. Building On Success in Tobacco Control: A Roadmap Towards Tobacco-Free Oman (Perspective Review). Journal of public health international. 2023 Sep 16; 6(4): 1-17. |
[22] |
CDC. Hookah 2024[cited 2024 Dec 20]. Available from:
https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/other-tobacco-products/hookahs.html |
APA Style
Al-Kalbani, S. R. (2025). The Characteristics of Shisha Smokers in Oman: A Cross-Sectional Study. Frontiers, 5(1), 53-61. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.frontiers.20250501.14
ACS Style
Al-Kalbani, S. R. The Characteristics of Shisha Smokers in Oman: A Cross-Sectional Study. Frontiers. 2025, 5(1), 53-61. doi: 10.11648/j.frontiers.20250501.14
@article{10.11648/j.frontiers.20250501.14, author = {Salma Rashid Al-Kalbani}, title = {The Characteristics of Shisha Smokers in Oman: A Cross-Sectional Study}, journal = {Frontiers}, volume = {5}, number = {1}, pages = {53-61}, doi = {10.11648/j.frontiers.20250501.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.frontiers.20250501.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.frontiers.20250501.14}, abstract = {Introduction: Shisha smoking, also known as waterpipe smoking, is a growing social phenomenon around the world, particularly among young adults, yet it remains understudied. This study aims to examine the sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of shisha smokers in Oman. Methods: An observational, analytical, cross-sectional study was carried out using secondary data from the WHO STEPS, 2017 survey in Oman. The study participants involved adult shisha smokers aged 18 and older who participated in the STEPS survey. The primary survey was approved by the Central Research and Ethical Review and Approval Committee of the Ministry of Health, Sultanate of Oman. Descriptive analysis was performed to examine the sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of shisha smokers. Univariate analysis, utilizing chi-square (x2), was conducted to investigate the association between the frequency of shisha smoking (the outcome of interest) and various determinants of shisha smoking. The analysis was conducted using SPSS version 27, with a level of significance set at p Results: A total of 512 (7.6%) of the primary survey participants used tobacco products, with only 36 (7.0%) of all tobacco users were shisha smokers. Most shisha smokers were under 40 years old (n = 27, 81.8%), male (n = 34, 94.4%), employed (n = 35, 97.2%), and with middle/higher educational attainment (n = 31, 86.1%). Most shisha smokers used flavoured shisha (n = 28, 80.0%) and smoked in public places (n = 28, 77.8%). Over one-third (n = 12, 37.5%) of shisha smokers consumed shisha that has been mixed with other substances. One-third (n = 13, 38.2%) were asked about their smoking status by their healthcare providers, and less than half of shisha smokers attempted to quit. Nearly 17% of shisha smokers believed that shisha smoking is "a little less harmful" than other tobacco products. Most shisha smokers were in favour of banning smoking in stadiums (n = 27, 79.4%), traditional markets (n = 29, 85.3%), private transport carrying children (n = 33, 94.3%), car parks (n = 24, 61.8%), and beaches (n = 21, 61.8%). Nearly half (n = 15, 41.7%) opposed laws that increase tobacco taxes; most of them were daily smokers (n = 11, 73.3%). No significant association was observed between the frequency of shisha smoking and different determinants of shisha smoking. Conclusion: The current study showed that 7.0% of tobacco smokers in Oman were shisha smokers and most of them were young, male, married, employed, and had higher educational status. Only one-third of shisha smokers wanted to quit, and nearly one-fifth believed it was less harmful than other tobacco products. Increased awareness about smoking shisha and stringent shisha-specific tobacco control measures are required to reduce shisha smoking. Further research is required to better understand the determinants of shisha smoking in Oman.}, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Characteristics of Shisha Smokers in Oman: A Cross-Sectional Study AU - Salma Rashid Al-Kalbani Y1 - 2025/03/18 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.frontiers.20250501.14 DO - 10.11648/j.frontiers.20250501.14 T2 - Frontiers JF - Frontiers JO - Frontiers SP - 53 EP - 61 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2994-7197 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.frontiers.20250501.14 AB - Introduction: Shisha smoking, also known as waterpipe smoking, is a growing social phenomenon around the world, particularly among young adults, yet it remains understudied. This study aims to examine the sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of shisha smokers in Oman. Methods: An observational, analytical, cross-sectional study was carried out using secondary data from the WHO STEPS, 2017 survey in Oman. The study participants involved adult shisha smokers aged 18 and older who participated in the STEPS survey. The primary survey was approved by the Central Research and Ethical Review and Approval Committee of the Ministry of Health, Sultanate of Oman. Descriptive analysis was performed to examine the sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of shisha smokers. Univariate analysis, utilizing chi-square (x2), was conducted to investigate the association between the frequency of shisha smoking (the outcome of interest) and various determinants of shisha smoking. The analysis was conducted using SPSS version 27, with a level of significance set at p Results: A total of 512 (7.6%) of the primary survey participants used tobacco products, with only 36 (7.0%) of all tobacco users were shisha smokers. Most shisha smokers were under 40 years old (n = 27, 81.8%), male (n = 34, 94.4%), employed (n = 35, 97.2%), and with middle/higher educational attainment (n = 31, 86.1%). Most shisha smokers used flavoured shisha (n = 28, 80.0%) and smoked in public places (n = 28, 77.8%). Over one-third (n = 12, 37.5%) of shisha smokers consumed shisha that has been mixed with other substances. One-third (n = 13, 38.2%) were asked about their smoking status by their healthcare providers, and less than half of shisha smokers attempted to quit. Nearly 17% of shisha smokers believed that shisha smoking is "a little less harmful" than other tobacco products. Most shisha smokers were in favour of banning smoking in stadiums (n = 27, 79.4%), traditional markets (n = 29, 85.3%), private transport carrying children (n = 33, 94.3%), car parks (n = 24, 61.8%), and beaches (n = 21, 61.8%). Nearly half (n = 15, 41.7%) opposed laws that increase tobacco taxes; most of them were daily smokers (n = 11, 73.3%). No significant association was observed between the frequency of shisha smoking and different determinants of shisha smoking. Conclusion: The current study showed that 7.0% of tobacco smokers in Oman were shisha smokers and most of them were young, male, married, employed, and had higher educational status. Only one-third of shisha smokers wanted to quit, and nearly one-fifth believed it was less harmful than other tobacco products. Increased awareness about smoking shisha and stringent shisha-specific tobacco control measures are required to reduce shisha smoking. Further research is required to better understand the determinants of shisha smoking in Oman. VL - 5 IS - 1 ER -