The study took place at onstation of Yabello Pastoral and Dryland Agriculture Research Center at long rainy-season Onset.. Its goal was to see how different cassava varieties adapt and to measure their above- and below-ground biomass yields. Four cassava varieties stem cut at 25-30 cm were collected as evaluated adaptation trials. These varieties are Chichu, Hawassa 4, Qulle and Kello varieties were taken from Sidama region of southern Ethiopia. The stems were planted at 1 m spacing, between plants and rows by using a RCBD. Each row had five plants and totaly twenty stems were planted per plot. Collected data were analyzed by SAS software, and used LSD to compare means at a significance level of p≤0.05. Of evaluated cassava trials chichu variety had the lagest leaves and tuber drymatter yields by 39 kg/ha and 0.323 t/ha respectively and and followed by Qulle and Hawassa 4 varieties. In terms of foilage canopy diameters, tubers lengths and vertical growth (height) measurements, chichu variety had the largest values than evaluated cassava varieties while Hawassa 4 was the lowest.. Therefore, chichu variety was selected in pramarly and followed by Qulle and Hawassa varieties as options for demonestion at pastoral and agropastoral of Borana rangeland areas for both human consumtion and animal forage purposes.
Published in | Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering (Volume 10, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.cbe.20251003.12 |
Page(s) | 44-48 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Yields, Biomass, Tubers, Variety, Feed and Food Resources
ANOVA | Analysis Of Variance |
RCBD | Randomized Complete Block Design |
SAS | Statistical Analysis System Software |
LSD | Least Significant Difference |
DM | Dry Matter |
Cm | Centimeter |
M | Meter |
T | Tone |
Ha | Hector |
[1] | Tewodros Mulualem. 2012. Production, Storage and Post- harvest Utilization System of Cassava, Lambert Acadamic Publishing. Saarbrucken, Germany. |
[2] | Ruiz, M. E., Lozano, E. and Ruiz, A. 1981 Utilization of sweet potatoes (Ipomeabatatas (L.) Lam) in animal Feeding III. Addition of various levels of roots and urea to sweet potato forage silage. Tropical Animal Production 6 (3): 234-244. |
[3] | Nweke, F. I and Enete, A. A. 1999. Gender Surprise in Food Production, Processing and Marketing with Emphasis on Cassava in Africa,. Volume 19: Collaborative Study on Cassava in Africa, IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria. |
[4] | Edossa Etissa. 1996. Root and Tuber Crops:” Potential as Food Crops in the Humid Areas of Ethiopia”. Institute of Agricultural Research, pp 2. |
[5] | Edwards, S. 1991. Crops with Wild Relatives Found in Ethiopia. In: Engels, J. M. M, Hawkes J. G. and MelakuWorede (ed): Plant Genetic Resource of Ethiopia. Cambridge. |
[6] | Wanapat, M. and Petlum, A. 2001. Feeding cassava chip-based rations to lactating dairy cows. In: Proc. International Workshop on Current Research and Development on Use of Cassava as Animal feed. (Eds, Preston T R, Ogle B and Wanapat M), organized by KhonKaen University and SIDA-SAREC, Sweden. July 23-24, 2001. |
[7] | Wanapat, M., Pimpa, O., Petlum, A. and Boontao, U. 1997 Cassava hay: A new strategic feed for ruminants during the dry season. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 9(2). |
[8] | McCarthy N, Kamara A, Kirk M (2002). The effect of environmental variability on Livestock and land use management: The Borana Plateau, Southern Ethiopia. Socioeconomics and Policy research Working Paper 35. ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute), Nairobi, Kenya, and IFPRI (International Food Policy Research Institute), Washington, DC, USA. pp. 35. |
[9] | Tewodros Mulualem and BirukAyenew. 2012. Cassava (MannihotesculentaCranz) Varieties and Harvesting Stages Influenced Yield and Yield Related Components, International Institute of Science and technology, pp, 4-6. |
[10] | SAS (Statistical Analysis Systems). 2002. Statistical Analysis System software, Version 9.0, SAS Institute, Inc. Cary, NC, USA. |
[11] | Phoncharoen, P., Banterng, P., Vorasoot, N., Jogloy, S. and Theerakulpisut, P., 2022. Determination of Cassava Leaf Area for Breeding Programs. Agronomy, 12(12), p. 3013. |
[12] | Chanie Derso Misgana and Walelign Demisie Bayou (2020). Tuber Yield and Yield Component Performance of Cassava (Manihot esculenta) Varieties in Fafen District, Ethiopia. |
[13] | Frediansyah, A. ed., 2024. Cassava: Recent Updates on Food, Feed, and Industry. BoD–Books on Demand. |
[14] | Korir, B. K., 2024. Performance of East African Short Horned Zebu Heifers Fed on Grass Supplemented With Cassava Leaf Meal and Azolla (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi). |
[15] | Ellison, K., 2023. Climate change adaptations of Vietnamese robusta coffee (Coffea canephora) farmers: analysis of potential strategies. |
APA Style
Ejo, A. (2025). Adaptation Trials of Cassava Varieties at Semi-arid of Borana Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, 10(3), 44-48. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbe.20251003.12
ACS Style
Ejo, A. Adaptation Trials of Cassava Varieties at Semi-arid of Borana Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 2025, 10(3), 44-48. doi: 10.11648/j.cbe.20251003.12
@article{10.11648/j.cbe.20251003.12, author = {Asfaw Ejo}, title = {Adaptation Trials of Cassava Varieties at Semi-arid of Borana Zone, Southern Ethiopia }, journal = {Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering}, volume = {10}, number = {3}, pages = {44-48}, doi = {10.11648/j.cbe.20251003.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbe.20251003.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.cbe.20251003.12}, abstract = {The study took place at onstation of Yabello Pastoral and Dryland Agriculture Research Center at long rainy-season Onset.. Its goal was to see how different cassava varieties adapt and to measure their above- and below-ground biomass yields. Four cassava varieties stem cut at 25-30 cm were collected as evaluated adaptation trials. These varieties are Chichu, Hawassa 4, Qulle and Kello varieties were taken from Sidama region of southern Ethiopia. The stems were planted at 1 m spacing, between plants and rows by using a RCBD. Each row had five plants and totaly twenty stems were planted per plot. Collected data were analyzed by SAS software, and used LSD to compare means at a significance level of p≤0.05. Of evaluated cassava trials chichu variety had the lagest leaves and tuber drymatter yields by 39 kg/ha and 0.323 t/ha respectively and and followed by Qulle and Hawassa 4 varieties. In terms of foilage canopy diameters, tubers lengths and vertical growth (height) measurements, chichu variety had the largest values than evaluated cassava varieties while Hawassa 4 was the lowest.. Therefore, chichu variety was selected in pramarly and followed by Qulle and Hawassa varieties as options for demonestion at pastoral and agropastoral of Borana rangeland areas for both human consumtion and animal forage purposes. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Adaptation Trials of Cassava Varieties at Semi-arid of Borana Zone, Southern Ethiopia AU - Asfaw Ejo Y1 - 2025/10/09 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbe.20251003.12 DO - 10.11648/j.cbe.20251003.12 T2 - Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering JF - Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering JO - Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering SP - 44 EP - 48 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-8884 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbe.20251003.12 AB - The study took place at onstation of Yabello Pastoral and Dryland Agriculture Research Center at long rainy-season Onset.. Its goal was to see how different cassava varieties adapt and to measure their above- and below-ground biomass yields. Four cassava varieties stem cut at 25-30 cm were collected as evaluated adaptation trials. These varieties are Chichu, Hawassa 4, Qulle and Kello varieties were taken from Sidama region of southern Ethiopia. The stems were planted at 1 m spacing, between plants and rows by using a RCBD. Each row had five plants and totaly twenty stems were planted per plot. Collected data were analyzed by SAS software, and used LSD to compare means at a significance level of p≤0.05. Of evaluated cassava trials chichu variety had the lagest leaves and tuber drymatter yields by 39 kg/ha and 0.323 t/ha respectively and and followed by Qulle and Hawassa 4 varieties. In terms of foilage canopy diameters, tubers lengths and vertical growth (height) measurements, chichu variety had the largest values than evaluated cassava varieties while Hawassa 4 was the lowest.. Therefore, chichu variety was selected in pramarly and followed by Qulle and Hawassa varieties as options for demonestion at pastoral and agropastoral of Borana rangeland areas for both human consumtion and animal forage purposes. VL - 10 IS - 3 ER -