The article is devoted to the disclosure of the concept of legal certainty, the problem of finding certainty in law, since the emergence of legal conflicts and legal disputes are often associated with the search for certainty in law. It is advisable to find out whether the principle of legal certainty is a principle of law or is it a non-legal nature. It is argued that the principle of legal certainty is a general principle of law and, together with other fundamental legal maxims, such as the principle of the rule of law, underlies all legal systems, both international and national. The aim of the study is a comprehensive theoretical understanding of the principle of legal certainty: the formulation of its concept, the disclosure of its content and system of requirements based on the analysis of legislation and judicial practice, the clarification of its place in the system of principles of Russian and foreign law and the relationship with other principles of law, the definition of its role and functions in the implementation of legal regulation. The conclusions are drawn that, despite its name, the principle of legal certainty is perhaps the most uncertain in its content. Its provisions, repeatedly repeated in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, cannot be considered exhaustive and final, since the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, following the concept of an evolutionary interpretation of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950, continues to reveal new facets and meanings this principle.
Published in | Advances in Sciences and Humanities (Volume 9, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ash.20230902.18 |
Page(s) | 68-75 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Principle of Law, Legal Certainty, Rule of Law, Realization of Law
[1] | Alekseev, S. S. (1981). General theory of law. The course in 2 volumes. Legal Literature, 77. |
[2] | Alekseev, S. S. (2001). Ascent to the right. Norma, 668. |
[3] | Alekseev, S. S. (2010). Collected works in 10 vols. v. 3: Problems of the theory of law: Course of lectures. Statute, 101. |
[4] | Anishina, V. I., & Nazarenko, T. N. (2013). Implementation of the principle of legal certainty in the Russian judicial system. Foundation for the Support of Education and Science in the Rostov Region, 40. |
[5] | Barenboim, P. D. (2011). The concept of Zorkin & Tanchev on the correlation of modern doctrines of the rule of law and the rule of law. LOOOM, 17-25. |
[6] | Betti, E. (2011). Hermeneutics as a General Methodology of the Spiritual Sciences. Canon + ROOI “Rehabilitation”, 23. |
[7] | Borisova, E. A. (2013). Appeal, cassation, supervision of civil cases: a training manual. Norma, 309. |
[8] | Gadzhiev, G. A. (2008). Principles of Law and Law of Principles. Independent non-governmental non-profit organization Institute of Law and Public Policy, 22. |
[9] | Gadzhiev, G. A. (2012). The principle of legal certainty and the role of the courts in ensuring it. The quality of laws from a Russian point of view. Independent non-governmental non-profit organization Institute of Law and Public Policy, 16-28. |
[10] | Gadzhiev, G. A., & Kovalenko, K. A. (2012). The principle of legal certainty. Jurist, 17-19. |
[11] | Gracheva, S. A. (2014). The doctrine of the rule of law and judicial legal positions. Norma, 33-45. |
[12] | Hegel, G. W. (1934). The philosophy of law v. VII. Publisher of Social and Economic Literature, 263. |
[13] | Leist, O. E. (2002). The essence of law. Zertsalo-M, 70. |
[14] | Pankova, O. V. (2014). Consideration of cases of administrative offenses in courts of general jurisdiction. Statute, 440. |
[15] | Pokrovsky, I. A. (1917). The main problems of civil law. Statute, 279. |
[16] | Pryakhina, T. M. (2014). The principle of legal certainty: a general description and normative content. Russian State University of Justice, 109. |
[17] | Rekhtina, I. V. (2014). Prerequisites of the principle of legal certainty (res judicata) in the sources of law of Ancient Russia X - XVI centuries. Jurist, 16-21. |
[18] | Schlang, P. J. (1985). Rules and Standards. UCLA School of Law 1985, 412-413. |
[19] | Wildhaber, L. (2001). Case-law at the European Court of Human Rights. The science, 5-12. |
[20] | Zorkin, V. D. (2005). The rule of law and constitutional justice. Norma, 31-32. |
[21] | Zorkin, V. D. (2008). The rule of law and the meeting of civilizations. Jurist. |
[22] | Federal law № 113 “On Alternative Civil Service”, 25th July 2002. |
APA Style
Gribova Evangelina Nikolaevna. (2023). The Principle of Legal Certainty: Concept and Main Characteristics. Advances in Sciences and Humanities, 9(2), 68-75. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20230902.18
ACS Style
Gribova Evangelina Nikolaevna. The Principle of Legal Certainty: Concept and Main Characteristics. Adv. Sci. Humanit. 2023, 9(2), 68-75. doi: 10.11648/j.ash.20230902.18
AMA Style
Gribova Evangelina Nikolaevna. The Principle of Legal Certainty: Concept and Main Characteristics. Adv Sci Humanit. 2023;9(2):68-75. doi: 10.11648/j.ash.20230902.18
@article{10.11648/j.ash.20230902.18, author = {Gribova Evangelina Nikolaevna}, title = {The Principle of Legal Certainty: Concept and Main Characteristics}, journal = {Advances in Sciences and Humanities}, volume = {9}, number = {2}, pages = {68-75}, doi = {10.11648/j.ash.20230902.18}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20230902.18}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ash.20230902.18}, abstract = {The article is devoted to the disclosure of the concept of legal certainty, the problem of finding certainty in law, since the emergence of legal conflicts and legal disputes are often associated with the search for certainty in law. It is advisable to find out whether the principle of legal certainty is a principle of law or is it a non-legal nature. It is argued that the principle of legal certainty is a general principle of law and, together with other fundamental legal maxims, such as the principle of the rule of law, underlies all legal systems, both international and national. The aim of the study is a comprehensive theoretical understanding of the principle of legal certainty: the formulation of its concept, the disclosure of its content and system of requirements based on the analysis of legislation and judicial practice, the clarification of its place in the system of principles of Russian and foreign law and the relationship with other principles of law, the definition of its role and functions in the implementation of legal regulation. The conclusions are drawn that, despite its name, the principle of legal certainty is perhaps the most uncertain in its content. Its provisions, repeatedly repeated in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, cannot be considered exhaustive and final, since the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, following the concept of an evolutionary interpretation of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950, continues to reveal new facets and meanings this principle.}, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Principle of Legal Certainty: Concept and Main Characteristics AU - Gribova Evangelina Nikolaevna Y1 - 2023/06/10 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20230902.18 DO - 10.11648/j.ash.20230902.18 T2 - Advances in Sciences and Humanities JF - Advances in Sciences and Humanities JO - Advances in Sciences and Humanities SP - 68 EP - 75 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2472-0984 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20230902.18 AB - The article is devoted to the disclosure of the concept of legal certainty, the problem of finding certainty in law, since the emergence of legal conflicts and legal disputes are often associated with the search for certainty in law. It is advisable to find out whether the principle of legal certainty is a principle of law or is it a non-legal nature. It is argued that the principle of legal certainty is a general principle of law and, together with other fundamental legal maxims, such as the principle of the rule of law, underlies all legal systems, both international and national. The aim of the study is a comprehensive theoretical understanding of the principle of legal certainty: the formulation of its concept, the disclosure of its content and system of requirements based on the analysis of legislation and judicial practice, the clarification of its place in the system of principles of Russian and foreign law and the relationship with other principles of law, the definition of its role and functions in the implementation of legal regulation. The conclusions are drawn that, despite its name, the principle of legal certainty is perhaps the most uncertain in its content. Its provisions, repeatedly repeated in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, cannot be considered exhaustive and final, since the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, following the concept of an evolutionary interpretation of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950, continues to reveal new facets and meanings this principle. VL - 9 IS - 2 ER -