This review synthesizes recent evidence on how specific design choices in small-sided games (SSGs) in football influence decision-making speed. The objective is to map concrete manipulation levers—tactical formation, pitch geometry, player number and area per player, target distribution, and rule design, as well as cognitive or motor dual-task overlays—to mechanisms that shorten perception-action cycles and reduce option-selection latency, and to summarize outcomes across playing levels and roles. Methods comprise comparative analysis, narrative synthesis, and evidence mapping of studies published between 2023 and 2025 that report quantitative markers related to rapid choice behavior (e.g., one-touch actions, latency proxies, scanning frequency) and training loads. The literature indicates that formation and pitch geometry delimit scanning breadth and the emergence of first-option passing windows; target distribution and rule constraints steer information search; player number and area per player tune interaction density; and dual-task overlays expose attentional bottlenecks relevant for staged perturbation. Youth cohorts show greater tactical degradation under motor interference than under cognitive overlays, suggesting conservative progression when execution stability is developing. Reports on elite female groups associate multi-goal layouts with higher head-up scanning and improved decision-making indices, alongside increased exertional costs. Positional analyses imply distinct sensitivity profiles among defenders, midfielders, and forwards. On this basis, a practical sequencing emerges: begin by widening affordances to cultivate earlier cue pick-up, then compress time and space to consolidate rapid commitment while monitoring proxies of decision speed to avoid accuracy loss. The review consolidates transferable guidance for academies and professional environments seeking to program decision-speed adaptations through purposeful SSG architecture.
| Published in | American Journal of Sports Science (Volume 13, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajss.20251304.14 |
| Page(s) | 108-115 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Small-sided Games, Decision Speed, Constraint Design, Formation, Pitch Size, Player Number, Dual-task, Perceptual-cognitive Load
| [1] | Alaune, D., Snieckus, A., Travassos, B., Chmura, P., Pizarro, D., & Coutinho, D. (2025). How does the number of small goals affect national-level female soccer players in game-based situations? Effects on technical-tactical, physical, and physiological variables. Sensors (Basel), 25(13), 4035. |
| [2] | Coutinho, D., Kelly, A. L., Santos, S., Figueiredo, P., Pizarro, D., & Travassos, B. (2023). Exploring the effects of tasks with different decision-making levels on ball control, passing performance, and external load in youth football. Children, 10(2), 220. |
| [3] | González-Rodenas, J., Ferrandis, J., Valdó, J. C., Claver-Rabaz, F., Ballester, R., & Gil-Arias, A. (2024). Effects of Different Tactical Formations on Positional Team Behaviors during Small-Sided Games in Youth Soccer Players. Journal of Human Kinetics, 97, 237-247. |
| [4] | Habekost, T., Ovesen, J., & Madsen, J. B. (2024). Cognition in elite soccer players: A general model. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1477262. |
| [5] | Matos, R., Moreira, C., Alves, E., Teixeira, J. E., Rodrigues, F., Monteiro, D., Antunes, R., & Forte, P. (2023). Tactical knowledge by decision making and motor efficiency of young football players in different playing positions during a three-a-side small-sided game. Behavioral Sciences, 13(4), 310. |
| [6] | Moreira, P. E. D., Albuquerque, M. R., Fortes, L. S., & Praça, G. M. (2024). How do cognitive and motor dual-tasks during small-sided games impact the tactical performance of youth soccer players? Journal of Human Kinetics, 97, 249-261. |
| [7] | Nunes, N. A., Comber, G., Petiot, G. H., & Coley, M. (2024). Analysis of the internal and external loads and technical actions of small-sided games in soccer. Insight - Sports Science, 6(1), 638. |
| [8] | Skala, F., & Zemková, E. (2023). Neuromuscular and perceptual-cognitive response to 4v4 small-sided game in youth soccer players. Frontiers in Physiology, 14, 1260096. |
| [9] | Ramsey, H., Miller-Dicks, M., Reddy, V., & Hope, L. (2025). Decision-making in action: How international-level professional football players gain an advantage. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 76, 102722. |
| [10] | Toivonen, R. M., Rantalainen, T., & Walker, S. (2025). The impact of varying small-sided games’ pitch sizes on replicating official match physical demands during effective playing time in male professional soccer players. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 1-18. |
| [11] | Hintermann, M., Romann, M., Born, D. P., Taube, W., & Fuchslocher, J. (2025, June 27). “Heads up girls!” A training intervention to improve scanning behavior in youth female football. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 7, 1602099. |
| [12] | Praça, G. M., de Almeida Oliveira, P. H., & Santos Resende, V. H. (2024). Dual-tasks in soccer: Effects of players' experience and task condition on physical performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 131(4), 1378-1397. |
| [13] | Riboli, A., Esposito, F., & Coratella, G. (2023). Small-sided games in elite football: Practical solutions to replicate the 4-min match-derived maximal intensities. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 37(2), 366-374. |
| [14] | Ueda, L. S. C., Milistetd, M., Praça, G. M., da Maia, G. S. G., da Silva, J. F., & Borges, P. H. (2023). Impact of the number of players on the emergence of creative movements in small-sided soccer games: A systematic review emphasizing deliberate practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1253654. |
| [15] | Yılmaz, O., & Soylu, Y. (2024). A comparative study of the effects of small-sided game formats on internal load and technical responses in soccer. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences, 15(2), 416-431. |
APA Style
Andriy, B. (2025). Use of Small-Sided Game Formats to Develop Cognitive Decision-Making Speed in Footballers. American Journal of Sports Science, 13(4), 108-115. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20251304.14
ACS Style
Andriy, B. Use of Small-Sided Game Formats to Develop Cognitive Decision-Making Speed in Footballers. Am. J. Sports Sci. 2025, 13(4), 108-115. doi: 10.11648/j.ajss.20251304.14
@article{10.11648/j.ajss.20251304.14,
author = {Batsula Andriy},
title = {Use of Small-Sided Game Formats to Develop Cognitive Decision-Making Speed in Footballers},
journal = {American Journal of Sports Science},
volume = {13},
number = {4},
pages = {108-115},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajss.20251304.14},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20251304.14},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajss.20251304.14},
abstract = {This review synthesizes recent evidence on how specific design choices in small-sided games (SSGs) in football influence decision-making speed. The objective is to map concrete manipulation levers—tactical formation, pitch geometry, player number and area per player, target distribution, and rule design, as well as cognitive or motor dual-task overlays—to mechanisms that shorten perception-action cycles and reduce option-selection latency, and to summarize outcomes across playing levels and roles. Methods comprise comparative analysis, narrative synthesis, and evidence mapping of studies published between 2023 and 2025 that report quantitative markers related to rapid choice behavior (e.g., one-touch actions, latency proxies, scanning frequency) and training loads. The literature indicates that formation and pitch geometry delimit scanning breadth and the emergence of first-option passing windows; target distribution and rule constraints steer information search; player number and area per player tune interaction density; and dual-task overlays expose attentional bottlenecks relevant for staged perturbation. Youth cohorts show greater tactical degradation under motor interference than under cognitive overlays, suggesting conservative progression when execution stability is developing. Reports on elite female groups associate multi-goal layouts with higher head-up scanning and improved decision-making indices, alongside increased exertional costs. Positional analyses imply distinct sensitivity profiles among defenders, midfielders, and forwards. On this basis, a practical sequencing emerges: begin by widening affordances to cultivate earlier cue pick-up, then compress time and space to consolidate rapid commitment while monitoring proxies of decision speed to avoid accuracy loss. The review consolidates transferable guidance for academies and professional environments seeking to program decision-speed adaptations through purposeful SSG architecture.},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Use of Small-Sided Game Formats to Develop Cognitive Decision-Making Speed in Footballers AU - Batsula Andriy Y1 - 2025/12/17 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20251304.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ajss.20251304.14 T2 - American Journal of Sports Science JF - American Journal of Sports Science JO - American Journal of Sports Science SP - 108 EP - 115 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8540 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20251304.14 AB - This review synthesizes recent evidence on how specific design choices in small-sided games (SSGs) in football influence decision-making speed. The objective is to map concrete manipulation levers—tactical formation, pitch geometry, player number and area per player, target distribution, and rule design, as well as cognitive or motor dual-task overlays—to mechanisms that shorten perception-action cycles and reduce option-selection latency, and to summarize outcomes across playing levels and roles. Methods comprise comparative analysis, narrative synthesis, and evidence mapping of studies published between 2023 and 2025 that report quantitative markers related to rapid choice behavior (e.g., one-touch actions, latency proxies, scanning frequency) and training loads. The literature indicates that formation and pitch geometry delimit scanning breadth and the emergence of first-option passing windows; target distribution and rule constraints steer information search; player number and area per player tune interaction density; and dual-task overlays expose attentional bottlenecks relevant for staged perturbation. Youth cohorts show greater tactical degradation under motor interference than under cognitive overlays, suggesting conservative progression when execution stability is developing. Reports on elite female groups associate multi-goal layouts with higher head-up scanning and improved decision-making indices, alongside increased exertional costs. Positional analyses imply distinct sensitivity profiles among defenders, midfielders, and forwards. On this basis, a practical sequencing emerges: begin by widening affordances to cultivate earlier cue pick-up, then compress time and space to consolidate rapid commitment while monitoring proxies of decision speed to avoid accuracy loss. The review consolidates transferable guidance for academies and professional environments seeking to program decision-speed adaptations through purposeful SSG architecture. VL - 13 IS - 4 ER -