Understanding the physical and anthropometric profiles of students in sciences and techniques of physical and sports activities (STPSA) programs is crucial for developing effective training strategies. This study aimed to examine the impact of gender and academic specialization on the physical fitness and body composition of 136 Cameroonian STPSA students (98 males, 38 females) aged 18 to 25. Various parameters were assessed, including anthropometric measurements (height, weight, body mass index), body composition (fat percentage, muscle mass), hemodynamic parameters (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, resting heart rate), and physical fitness tests (upper body, leg, and trunk strength, as well as aerobic endurance). Results showed no significant differences in height and weight across academic levels, suggesting that these traits stabilize before university. However, significant gender differences were found, with males being taller and heavier than females (p<0.001). Females also had higher body fat percentages and lower muscle mass compared to males (p<0.001). Regarding hemodynamic, level 3 students exhibited significantly higher diastolic blood pressure than those in levels 1 and 2 (p<0.05). Gender differences were also significant, with females showing lower systolic blood pressure and higher resting heart rates than males (p<0.001 and p<0.01, respectively). In physical performance, no significant differences were found based on academic level, but females demonstrated lower endurance in upper and lower limbs, and reduced trunk strength compared to males (p<0.01 - p<0.001). Additionally, female students had significantly lower aerobic endurance (p<0.05). These results highlight the importance of gender-specific interventions in STPSA programs. While academic level did not significantly affect physical fitness, gender differences in body composition and performance suggest that tailored training programs are needed to improve overall fitness outcomes for female students.
Published in | American Journal of Sports Science (Volume 13, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajss.20251302.11 |
Page(s) | 24-31 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Physical Profiles, Anthropometry, Body Composition, Gender Differences, Stpsa Students, Physical Fitness
Ages (Years) | Height (m) | Weight (kg) | BMI (kg/m2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Level 1 undergraduate (N=60) | 20.92±1.82 | 172.33±8.17 | 67.25±9.29 | 22.70±2.59 |
Level 2 undergraduate (N=55) | 22.42±2.09 | 172.38±8.41 | 68.97±11.74 | 23.20±4.30 |
Level 3 undergraduate (N=21) | 23.95±1.24*** | 168.05±11.0ns | 64.64±9.86ns | 22.60±2.3ns |
Male student (N=98) | 22.07±2.10 | 175.26±6.67 | 69.76±9.92 | 22.56±3.11 |
Female student (N=38) | 21.79±2.28ns | 162.30±6.68*** | 62.23±10.04*** | 23.72±3.ns |
% Graisse | % MM | |
---|---|---|
Level 1 undergraduate (N=60) | 17.14±6.22 | 78.77±6.01 |
Level 2 undergraduate (N=55) | 16.42±6.06 | 74.60±11.82 |
Level 3 undergraduate (N=21) | 20.45±7.87ns | 75.46±7.56* |
Male student (N=98) | 15.10±4.05 | 78.04±9.20 |
Female student (N=38) | 28.42±4.11*** | 67.55±4.44*** |
SBP (mmHg) | DBP (mmHg) | HRR (bpm) | |
---|---|---|---|
Level 1 undergraduate (N=60) | 118.38±18.92 | 75.28±13.99 | 77.53±14.72 |
Level 2 undergraduate (N=55) | 123.06±15.32 | 80.06±13.31 | 84.53±31.92 |
Level 3 undergraduate (N=21) | 122.48±17.70ns | 84.62±10.51* | 82.19±13.40ns |
Male student (N=98) | 123.64±17.60 | 79.39±13.94 | 77.55±23.26 |
Female student (N=38) | 113.33±14.54*** | 76.58±12.46ns | 90.18±20.79** |
Arm Endurance (seconds) | Trunk Strength (number of sit-ups) | Leg Endurance (seconds) | |
---|---|---|---|
Level 1 undergraduate (N=60) | 28.31±8.40 | 20.38±5.52 | 130.59±46.35 |
Level 2 undergraduate (N=55) | 32.13±9.39 | 22.42±3.63 | 147.00±62.91 |
Level 3 undergraduate (N=21) | 30.86±7.17ns | 20.57±6.11ns | 146.36±52.12ns |
Male student (N=98) | 32.34±7.82 | 21.88±4.84 | 147.33±50.58 |
Female student (N=38) | 21.23±6.57*** | 17.31±4.15*** | 108.15±63.85** |
Ruffier Index | VO2max (ml/kg/min) | |
---|---|---|
Level 1 undergraduate (N=60) | 12.85±4.94 | 28.11±5.46 |
Level 2 undergraduate (N=55) | 13.60±5.84 | 27.86±5.06 |
Level 3 undergraduate (N=21) | 11.78±3.97ns | 26.03±4.91ns |
Male student (N=98) | 12.97±5.04 | 29.93±4.06 |
Female student (N=38) | 12.94±6.01ns | 21.91±3.01*** |
BMI | Body Mass Index |
STPSA | Sciences and Techniques of Physical and Sports Activities |
SBP | Systolic Blood Pressure |
DBP | Diastolic Blood Pressure |
HRR | Resting Heart Rate |
[1] | Stagner, L. (2009). Gender Differences in Aerobic and Work Capacity during Plantar Flexion Exercise. A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the College of Health and Human Performance East Carolina University. |
[2] | Winsley, R. J., Fulford, J., Roberts, A. C., Welsman, J. R., Armstrong, N. Sex difference in peak oxygen uptake in prepubertal children. J Sci Med Sport. 2009, 12, 647-651. |
[3] | Bara, C. L. B. P., Alves, D. L., Ruy-Barbosa, M. A., Palumbo, D. P., Sotomaior, B. B., da Silva, L., Leitão, M. B., Osiecki, R. Changes in the Cardiorespiratory Fitness of Men and Women in Various Age Groups. JEPonline. 2019, 22(1), 1-10. |
[4] | Rascon, J., Trujillo, E., Morales-Acuña, F., Gurovich, A. N. Differences between Males and Females in Determining Exercise Intensity. International Journal of Exercise Science. 2020, 13(4), 1305-1316. |
[5] | Santana, C. C. A., Azevedo, L. B., Cattuzzo, M. T., Hill, J. O., Andrade, L. P., Prado, W. L. Physical stress and academic performance in youth: a systematic review. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017, 27, 579-603. |
[6] | Bass, R. W., Brown, D. D., Laurson, K. R., Coleman, M. M. Physical fitness and academic performance in middle school students. Acta Pædiatrica. 2018, 1-6. |
[7] | Joyner, M. J., Wallin, B. G., and Charkoudian, N. Sex differences and blood pressure regulation in humans. Exp. Physiol. 2016, 101, 349-355. |
[8] | Sharma, H. B., Kailashiya, J. Gender Difference in Aerobic Capacity and the Contribution by Body Composition and Haemoglobin Concentration: A Study in Young Indian National Hockey Players. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2016, 10(11), CC09-CC13. |
[9] | Diaz-Canestro, C., Pentz, B., Sehgal, A., and Montero, D. Differences in Cardiac Output and Aerobic Capacity Between Sexes Are Explained by Blood Volume and Oxygen Carrying Capacity. Front. Physiol. 2022, 13, 747903. |
[10] | Montero, D., Diaz-Canestro, C., Oberholzer, L., and Lundby, C. The role of blood volume in cardiac dysfunction and reduced exercise tolerance in patients with diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019, 7, 807-816. |
[11] | Tanja, G. M., Vrijkotte, Lorenz J. P., van Doornen, Eco J. C., de Geus. Effects of Work Stress on Ambulatory Blood Pressure, Heart Rate, and Heart Rate Variability. Hypertension. 2000, 35, 880-886. |
[12] | Carter, J. R., Ray, C. A. Sympathetic neural responses to mental stress: responders, non-responders and sex differences. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009, 296, H847-H853. |
[13] | Huang, C-J., Webb, H. E., Zourdos, M. C., and Acevedo, E. O. Cardiovascular reactivity, stress, and physical activity. Front. Physiol. 2013, 4, 314. |
[14] | Léger, L. A., Mercier, D., Gadouri, C., and Lambert, J. A multistage 20 m shuttle run test for aerobic fitness. Journal of Sports Sciences. 1988, 6, 93-101. |
[15] | Malina, R. M., Bouchard, C., Bar-Or, O. (2004). Growth, Maturation, and Physical Activity (2nd ed.). Champaign: Human Kinetics. |
[16] | Doré, E., Martin, R., Ratel, S., Duché, P., Bedu, M., Van Praagh, E. Gender differences in peak muscle performance during growth. Int J Sports Med. 2005, 26(4), 274-280. |
[17] | Mansour, G. B., Kacem, A., Ishak, M., Grélot, L., and Ftaiti, F. The effect of body composition on strength and power in male and female students. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2021, 13, 150. |
[18] | Handelsman, D. J., Hirschberg, A. L., and Bermon, S. Circulating Testosterone as the Hormonal Basis of Sex Differences in Athletic Performance. Endocrine Reviews. 2018, 39, 803-829. |
[19] | Geer, E. B., Shen, W. Gender Differences in Insulin Resistance, Body Composition, and Energy Balance. Gend Med. 2009, 6(l1), 60-75. |
[20] | Palmer, B. F. Clegg, D. J. The sexual dimorphism of obesity. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2015, 402, 113-119. |
[21] | Jeffery, E., Wing, A., Holtrup, B., Sebo, Z., Kaplan, J. L., Saavedra-Peña, R., Church, C. D., Colman, L., Berry, R., Rodeheffer, M. S. The Adipose Tissue Microenvironment Regulates Depot-Specific Adipogenesis in Obesity. Cell Metab. 2016, 24, 142-150. |
[22] | White, U. A., Tchoukalova, Y. D. Sex dimorphism and depot differences in adipose tissue function. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2014, 1842, 377-392. |
[23] | Dinenno, F. A., Dietz, N. M., Joyner, M. J. Aging and forearm post junctional alpha-adrenergicvaso-constriction in healthy men. Circulation. 2002, 106, 1349-1354. |
[24] | Casey, D. P., Curry, T. B., Joyner, M. J., Charkoudian, N., Hart, E. C. Relationship between muscle sympathetic nerve activity and aortic wave reflection characteristics in young men and women. Hyper-tension. 2011, 57, 421-427. |
[25] | Dart, A. M., Du, X. J., and Kingwell, B. A. Gender, sex hormones and autonomic nervous control of the cardiovascular system. Cardiovasc. Res. 2002, 53(3), 678-687. |
[26] | Wittnich, C., Tan, L., Wallen, J., and Belanger, M. Sex differences in myocardial metabolism and cardiac function: an emerging concept. Pflügers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 2013, 465, 719-729. |
[27] | Song, J. J., Ma, Z., Wang, J., Chen, L. X., Zhong, J. C. Gender differences in hypertension. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2020, 13, 47-54. |
APA Style
Lamou, B., Nchegang, B., Jean-Pierre, M. (2025). The Influence of Gender and Academic Specialization on the Physical and Anthropometric Traits of Cameroonian Students in Sports Programs. American Journal of Sports Science, 13(2), 24-31. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20251302.11
ACS Style
Lamou, B.; Nchegang, B.; Jean-Pierre, M. The Influence of Gender and Academic Specialization on the Physical and Anthropometric Traits of Cameroonian Students in Sports Programs. Am. J. Sports Sci. 2025, 13(2), 24-31. doi: 10.11648/j.ajss.20251302.11
@article{10.11648/j.ajss.20251302.11, author = {Bonoy Lamou and Benjamin Nchegang and Mbame Jean-Pierre}, title = {The Influence of Gender and Academic Specialization on the Physical and Anthropometric Traits of Cameroonian Students in Sports Programs }, journal = {American Journal of Sports Science}, volume = {13}, number = {2}, pages = {24-31}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajss.20251302.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20251302.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajss.20251302.11}, abstract = {Understanding the physical and anthropometric profiles of students in sciences and techniques of physical and sports activities (STPSA) programs is crucial for developing effective training strategies. This study aimed to examine the impact of gender and academic specialization on the physical fitness and body composition of 136 Cameroonian STPSA students (98 males, 38 females) aged 18 to 25. Various parameters were assessed, including anthropometric measurements (height, weight, body mass index), body composition (fat percentage, muscle mass), hemodynamic parameters (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, resting heart rate), and physical fitness tests (upper body, leg, and trunk strength, as well as aerobic endurance). Results showed no significant differences in height and weight across academic levels, suggesting that these traits stabilize before university. However, significant gender differences were found, with males being taller and heavier than females (p<0.001). Females also had higher body fat percentages and lower muscle mass compared to males (p<0.001). Regarding hemodynamic, level 3 students exhibited significantly higher diastolic blood pressure than those in levels 1 and 2 (p<0.05). Gender differences were also significant, with females showing lower systolic blood pressure and higher resting heart rates than males (p<0.001 and p<0.01, respectively). In physical performance, no significant differences were found based on academic level, but females demonstrated lower endurance in upper and lower limbs, and reduced trunk strength compared to males (p<0.01 - p<0.001). Additionally, female students had significantly lower aerobic endurance (p<0.05). These results highlight the importance of gender-specific interventions in STPSA programs. While academic level did not significantly affect physical fitness, gender differences in body composition and performance suggest that tailored training programs are needed to improve overall fitness outcomes for female students. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Influence of Gender and Academic Specialization on the Physical and Anthropometric Traits of Cameroonian Students in Sports Programs AU - Bonoy Lamou AU - Benjamin Nchegang AU - Mbame Jean-Pierre Y1 - 2025/04/10 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20251302.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ajss.20251302.11 T2 - American Journal of Sports Science JF - American Journal of Sports Science JO - American Journal of Sports Science SP - 24 EP - 31 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8540 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20251302.11 AB - Understanding the physical and anthropometric profiles of students in sciences and techniques of physical and sports activities (STPSA) programs is crucial for developing effective training strategies. This study aimed to examine the impact of gender and academic specialization on the physical fitness and body composition of 136 Cameroonian STPSA students (98 males, 38 females) aged 18 to 25. Various parameters were assessed, including anthropometric measurements (height, weight, body mass index), body composition (fat percentage, muscle mass), hemodynamic parameters (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, resting heart rate), and physical fitness tests (upper body, leg, and trunk strength, as well as aerobic endurance). Results showed no significant differences in height and weight across academic levels, suggesting that these traits stabilize before university. However, significant gender differences were found, with males being taller and heavier than females (p<0.001). Females also had higher body fat percentages and lower muscle mass compared to males (p<0.001). Regarding hemodynamic, level 3 students exhibited significantly higher diastolic blood pressure than those in levels 1 and 2 (p<0.05). Gender differences were also significant, with females showing lower systolic blood pressure and higher resting heart rates than males (p<0.001 and p<0.01, respectively). In physical performance, no significant differences were found based on academic level, but females demonstrated lower endurance in upper and lower limbs, and reduced trunk strength compared to males (p<0.01 - p<0.001). Additionally, female students had significantly lower aerobic endurance (p<0.05). These results highlight the importance of gender-specific interventions in STPSA programs. While academic level did not significantly affect physical fitness, gender differences in body composition and performance suggest that tailored training programs are needed to improve overall fitness outcomes for female students. VL - 13 IS - 2 ER -