Since there is little prior knowledge on the effects of case management on offenders behavioral patterns, this paper aims to identify how the activities carried out by probation officers has impacted supervised persons, but also to draw useful conclusions regarding ethical standards in case management. The topic of this paper is of real interest to probation practitioners, as conducting the supervision process, preparing pre- and post-sentence reports in the course of assistance and counseling activities, and the specific nature of interactions with beneficiaries of Probation Services inherently lead to the emergence of ethically challenging situations. The foundation of this topic lies in the need to explore and analyze the nature of these dilemmas, their frequency, the ways counselors respond when faced with ethical ambiguity, identifying optimal responses and reactions from a deontological and ethical perspective, and ultimately outlining best practices. Although this topic is extremely broad, in this paper the focus is on the counselor-beneficiary relationship, being mindful of the numerous aspects that can be addressed, as highlighted in discussions with colleagues from various services and in the final question of the questionnaire used in this study. As a result of the research undertaken, I aimed to present how we, as probation counselors, analyze and manage various dilemmas encountered in daily practice, relevant legislative guidelines, and optimized response strategies. In the end, the conclusions provide an opportunity for reflection and learning, which can offer a greater degree of confidence, security, and control over these situations.
Published in | American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management (Volume 9, Issue 5) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajetm.20240905.12 |
Page(s) | 107-111 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Case Management, Deviance, Probation, Risk of Recidivism, Social Reintegration
[1] | Apostu A., Palaghia M., Cocârță D., Nică R. (2017). Dezvoltarea abilităţilor sociale la minori. Manualul de probațiune, Bucureşti: Editura Euro Standard., pp. 341-349. |
[2] | Brooker, C., Sirdifield, C., & Parkhouse, T. (2022). Identifying mental illness and monitoring mental health in probation service settings. European Journal of Probation, 14(3), 179-203. |
[3] | Canton, R. (2024). Probation as social work. Probation Journal,214-233. |
[4] | Dowden C., Andrews D. (2004). The Importance of Staff Practice in Delivering Effective Correctional Treatment: A Meta-Analytic Review of Core Correctional Practice. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology,203-206. |
[5] | Dominey, J., & Canton, R. (2022). Probation and the ethics of care. Probation Journal, 69(4), 417-433. |
[6] | Dumitrașcu L., Schianu V. (2017). Supravegherea în comunitate. Manualul de probațiune. Bucureşti: Editura Euro Standard, pp. 160-191. |
[7] | Durnescu I. (2011). Probațiunea. Teorii, legislație, Practică. București: Editura Polirom, p. 215. |
[8] | Guilfoyle, M. (2022). Book review: Probation: Butter Side Up. Probation Journal, 69(2), 250-251. |
[9] | Henley, A. (2022). Criminalisation, criminal records and rehabilitation: From supervision to citizenship? Probation Journal,273–277. |
[10] | Järveläinen, E., Rantanen, T., & Toikko, T. (2024). Finnish supervised probationary freedom as support for a desistance from crime. European Journal of Probation, 16(2), 115-134. |
[11] | Maruna S. & Mann R. (2019). Learning Desistance Together. Journal of Prison Education and Reentry, p. 97. |
[12] | Sirdifield, C., & Brooker, C. (2023). Probation, mental health and the criminal justice system: An introduction. In C. Brooker & C. Sirdifeld (Eds.), Probation, mental health and criminal justice: Towards equivalence (pp. 1–4). |
[13] | Teasdale J. (2017). Pro-social Modeling., Probation Handbook. Euro Standard Publishing House, pp. 401-407. |
[14] | Turner S., Stelman A. (2017).Management şi leadership într-o perioadă de schimbare., Probation Handbook. Euro Standard Publishing House, p. 411. |
[15] | Zaharia V., Stey H.-G., Popa V. (2017). Manualul Consilierului de Probaţiune., Chișinău, Editura „Cu drag” SRL, pp. 35-36. |
[16] | Law no. 253/2013 on the execution of punishments, educational measures and other non-custodial measures ordered by judicial bodies during the criminal trial. |
APA Style
Koblicska, L. (2024). Case Management Organization and Implementation in Probation Services in Romania. American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 9(5), 107-111. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajetm.20240905.12
ACS Style
Koblicska, L. Case Management Organization and Implementation in Probation Services in Romania. Am. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 2024, 9(5), 107-111. doi: 10.11648/j.ajetm.20240905.12
AMA Style
Koblicska L. Case Management Organization and Implementation in Probation Services in Romania. Am J Eng Technol Manag. 2024;9(5):107-111. doi: 10.11648/j.ajetm.20240905.12
@article{10.11648/j.ajetm.20240905.12, author = {Laura-Julia Koblicska}, title = {Case Management Organization and Implementation in Probation Services in Romania }, journal = {American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management}, volume = {9}, number = {5}, pages = {107-111}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajetm.20240905.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajetm.20240905.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajetm.20240905.12}, abstract = {Since there is little prior knowledge on the effects of case management on offenders behavioral patterns, this paper aims to identify how the activities carried out by probation officers has impacted supervised persons, but also to draw useful conclusions regarding ethical standards in case management. The topic of this paper is of real interest to probation practitioners, as conducting the supervision process, preparing pre- and post-sentence reports in the course of assistance and counseling activities, and the specific nature of interactions with beneficiaries of Probation Services inherently lead to the emergence of ethically challenging situations. The foundation of this topic lies in the need to explore and analyze the nature of these dilemmas, their frequency, the ways counselors respond when faced with ethical ambiguity, identifying optimal responses and reactions from a deontological and ethical perspective, and ultimately outlining best practices. Although this topic is extremely broad, in this paper the focus is on the counselor-beneficiary relationship, being mindful of the numerous aspects that can be addressed, as highlighted in discussions with colleagues from various services and in the final question of the questionnaire used in this study. As a result of the research undertaken, I aimed to present how we, as probation counselors, analyze and manage various dilemmas encountered in daily practice, relevant legislative guidelines, and optimized response strategies. In the end, the conclusions provide an opportunity for reflection and learning, which can offer a greater degree of confidence, security, and control over these situations. }, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Case Management Organization and Implementation in Probation Services in Romania AU - Laura-Julia Koblicska Y1 - 2024/11/28 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajetm.20240905.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ajetm.20240905.12 T2 - American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management JF - American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management JO - American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management SP - 107 EP - 111 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1441 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajetm.20240905.12 AB - Since there is little prior knowledge on the effects of case management on offenders behavioral patterns, this paper aims to identify how the activities carried out by probation officers has impacted supervised persons, but also to draw useful conclusions regarding ethical standards in case management. The topic of this paper is of real interest to probation practitioners, as conducting the supervision process, preparing pre- and post-sentence reports in the course of assistance and counseling activities, and the specific nature of interactions with beneficiaries of Probation Services inherently lead to the emergence of ethically challenging situations. The foundation of this topic lies in the need to explore and analyze the nature of these dilemmas, their frequency, the ways counselors respond when faced with ethical ambiguity, identifying optimal responses and reactions from a deontological and ethical perspective, and ultimately outlining best practices. Although this topic is extremely broad, in this paper the focus is on the counselor-beneficiary relationship, being mindful of the numerous aspects that can be addressed, as highlighted in discussions with colleagues from various services and in the final question of the questionnaire used in this study. As a result of the research undertaken, I aimed to present how we, as probation counselors, analyze and manage various dilemmas encountered in daily practice, relevant legislative guidelines, and optimized response strategies. In the end, the conclusions provide an opportunity for reflection and learning, which can offer a greater degree of confidence, security, and control over these situations. VL - 9 IS - 5 ER -