Abstract
In northern Nigeria's crystalline basement terrains, where surface water resources are seasonal and poorly distributed, groundwater is the primary source of drinkable water. In order to identify groundwater potential zones in the Lere Local Government Area of Kaduna State, Nigeria, this study used an integrated Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System (GIS) approach. Landsat-8 OLI images, the ASTER Digital Elevation Model (30 m resolution), and pre-existing geological and soil maps were used to determine six groundwater-influencing parameters: geology, lineament density, slope, soil texture, drainage density, and land use/land cover (LULC). The studied area's drainage density ranges from 0 to 2.172 km/km², and its slope extends from 0° to 72.86°. Bare terrain makes up the majority of the region (84.57%), followed by settlements (8.44%), hills (6.16%), water bodies (0.82%), and vegetation (0.001%), according to LULC research. Thematic layers were given weights using a modified DRASTIC-based multi-criteria evaluation technique, including geology (5), lineament density (4), slope (4), soil texture (3), drainage density (2), and land use/land cover (1). A Groundwater Potential Index (GPI) map that divided the region into high, moderate, and low groundwater potential zones was created using weighted overlay analysis in a GIS context. Fractured granite gneiss and migmatite, high lineament density (0.656–1.365 km/km2), mild slopes (0–9.429°), permeable soils, and low drainage density (0–0.564 km/km2) are all associated with high potential zones, while steep slopes and severely dissected terrains are associated with low potential areas. The findings show that lithology and structural characteristics play a major role in the occurrence of groundwater and show that integrated remote sensing and GIS techniques offer a dependable and affordable tool for sustainable borehole siting and groundwater exploration in basement complex terrains.
Keywords
Basement Complex, GIS, Groundwater Potential, Kaduna State, Modified DRASTIC Model, Nigeria, Remote Sensing
1. Introduction
Particularly in crystalline basement terrains where surface water bodies are seasonal, transient, and irregularly distributed, groundwater is an essential freshwater resource
| [1] | Todd, D. K., & Mays, L. W. (2005). Groundwater hydrology (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. |
[1]
. Groundwater development is crucial to reliable availability to drinkable water in many northern Nigerian regions
| [2] | World Bank. (2018). Nigeria – Sustainable urban and rural water supply, sanitation and hygiene program. World Bank Publications. |
[2]
. However, the presence of groundwater in complex basement environments varies greatly and is influenced by the degree of weathering, lithology, and structural discontinuities like lineaments and fractures
| [3] | Kortas, L., & Younger, P. L. (2007). Using the GRAM model to reconstruct the important factors in historic groundwater rebound in part of the Durham Coalfield, UK. Mine Water and the Environment, 26(2), 60-69. |
[3]
. Therefore, before conducting in-depth field research and borehole drilling, locations with high groundwater potential must be identified using methodical and economical techniques. The geographical, spectral, and temporal data coverage of remote sensing has made it a useful tool for groundwater assessment, allowing for the quick mapping of vast and difficult-to-reach areas
| [4] | Jha, M. K., Chowdary, V. M., & Chowdhury, A. (2010). Groundwater assessment in Salboni Block, West Bengal (India) using remote sensing, geographical information system and multi-criteria decision analysis techniques. Hydrogeology journal, 18(7), 1713-1728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-010-0636-5 |
[4]
.
Surface indicators like geology, geomorphology, soil properties, drainage patterns, and land use/land cover can be taken from satellite data and used as stand-ins for groundwater occurrence even though satellite sensors cannot directly detect groundwater
| [5] | Sener, E., Davraz, A., & Ozcelik, M. (2005). An integration of GIS and remote sensing in groundwater investigations: A case study in Burdur, Turkey. Hydrogeology Journal, 13(5), 826–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-004-0373-1 |
[5]
. Important details on the variables affecting groundwater entry, storage, and movement within subsurface formations are provided by these theme levels
| [6] | Fitts, C. R. (2013). 10—Groundwater Chemistry. Groundwater Science, 2nd ed.; Fitts, CR, Ed.; Academic Press: Boston, MA, USA, 421-497. |
[6]
. By offering a strong platform for storing, organizing, evaluating, and combining vast amounts of spatial and attribute data, geographic information systems (GIS) enhance remote sensing
| [7] | Longley, P. A., Goodchild, M. F., Maguire, D. J., & Rhind, D. W. (2015). Geographic information science and systems. John Wiley & Sons. |
[7]
. GIS makes it easier to combine groundwater-influencing factors in order to discover and rank possible zones through spatial modeling and multi-criteria evaluation procedures
| [4] | Jha, M. K., Chowdary, V. M., & Chowdhury, A. (2010). Groundwater assessment in Salboni Block, West Bengal (India) using remote sensing, geographical information system and multi-criteria decision analysis techniques. Hydrogeology journal, 18(7), 1713-1728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-010-0636-5 |
[4]
.
The cost, time, and uncertainty associated with traditional hydrogeological exploration techniques are greatly decreased by this integrated remote sensing–GIS strategy, which also aids in identifying target locations for in-depth geophysical investigations and drill siting
| [5] | Sener, E., Davraz, A., & Ozcelik, M. (2005). An integration of GIS and remote sensing in groundwater investigations: A case study in Burdur, Turkey. Hydrogeology Journal, 13(5), 826–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-004-0373-1 |
[5]
. In order to identify groundwater potential zones in the Lere Local Government Area of Kaduna State, Nigeria, this study uses geospatial modeling approaches. Geology, soil properties, land use/cover, topography (slope), and drainage density are some of the important hydrogeological elements that affect groundwater accumulation and are taken into account in this research. Each thematic layer is given a relative relevance using a modified DRASTIC-based weighting and rating scheme developed by Aller
et al.
| [8] | Aller, L., Bennett, T., Lehr, J. H., Petty, R. J., & Hackett, G. (1987). DRASTIC: A standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings (EPA/600/2-87/035). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 455. |
[8]
. A groundwater potential index map is then produced using weighted overlay analysis.
In order to confirm model outputs, field verification and GPS measurements were carried out. In Lere LGA and other basement complex terrains, the final groundwater potential map and the resulting thematic maps are meant to be used as decision-support aids for sustainable groundwater research and development.
2. Study Area and Geological Setting
In Kaduna State, northwest Nigeria, the Lere Local Government Area (LGA) lies between latitudes 10°23′N and 10°43′N and longitudes 7°17′E and 7°37′E (
Figure 1). The region is in Nigeria's sub-humid ecological zone, which is defined by Guinea savannah flora
| [9] | Aregheore, E. M. (2009). Country pasture/forage resource profiles: Nigeria. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Italy. |
| [10] | Oyenuga, V. A. (1967). Agriculture in Nigeria. An introduction. |
[9, 10]
, and is situated on a gently sloping plain on the outskirts of the Jos Plateau
| [11] | Udo, R. K. (2023). Geographical regions of Nigeria. Univ of California Press. |
[11]
. With an average yearly rainfall of more than 1600 mm, the climate is characterized by a clear wet and dry season
| [12] | Ojo, O. (1977). The climates of West Africa. Heinemann, (p. 219 pp). |
[12]
. Rain-fed agriculture benefits from the favorable conditions of the rainy season, which normally lasts from May to October
| [13] | Nigerian Meteorological Agency (NIMET). (2020). Annual climate review bulletin. Federal Ministry of Aviation, Abuja, Nigeria. |
[13]
. The majority of the population is agrarian, growing basic crops such rice, millet, and maize that rely heavily on seasonal rainfall and additional groundwater supplies
| [14] | Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2015). AQUASTAT country profile – Nigeria. FAO Water Reports. Rome, Italy. |
[14]
.
The Nigerian Basement Complex's Precambrian rocks form the geological foundation of the research region
| [15] | Rahaman, M. A. (1988). Recent advances in the study of the basement complex of Nigeria. Pre Cambrian geology of Nigeria, 11-41. |
| [16] | Obaje, N. G. (2009). Geology and mineral resources of Nigeria (Vol. 120, p. 221). Berlin: Springer. |
[15, 16]
. Because of the extended weathering of these crystalline rocks in tropical climates, a variable layer of unconsolidated regolith has developed on top of the newly formed bedrock
| [17] | Wright, J. B., & McCurry, P. (1970). The geology of Nigeria. In C. A. Kogbe (Ed.), Geology of Nigeria (pp. 1–26). Elizabethan Publishing Company. |
| [18] | Olorunfemi, M. O., & Okhue, E. T. (1992). Hydrogeologic and geologic significance of a geoelectric survey at Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Journal of mining and geology, 28(2), 221-229. |
[17, 18]
.
The majority of the migmatite–gneiss complexes, Pan-African granitoids, metasedimentary and metavolcanic rocks (including schists, quartzites, amphibolites, and banded iron formations), calc-alkaline granites, and minor Jurassic volcanic rocks make up the Basement Complex in the area
| [17] | Wright, J. B., & McCurry, P. (1970). The geology of Nigeria. In C. A. Kogbe (Ed.), Geology of Nigeria (pp. 1–26). Elizabethan Publishing Company. |
| [18] | Olorunfemi, M. O., & Okhue, E. T. (1992). Hydrogeologic and geologic significance of a geoelectric survey at Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Journal of mining and geology, 28(2), 221-229. |
[17, 18]
. The presence of groundwater in this basement terrain is mostly regulated by secondary permeability and porosity that are created by weathering and structural deformation. In such cases, the primary determinants of groundwater storage and transmissivity are the thickness of the weathered overburden and the size, density, and connectedness of fractures and other structural discontinuities within the bedrock
| [15] | Rahaman, M. A. (1988). Recent advances in the study of the basement complex of Nigeria. Pre Cambrian geology of Nigeria, 11-41. |
| [16] | Obaje, N. G. (2009). Geology and mineral resources of Nigeria (Vol. 120, p. 221). Berlin: Springer. |
[15, 16]
. Although groundwater is important for residential and agricultural use, it is still underdeveloped in Lere LGA, and there is a lack of thorough hydrogeological data on its potential and dynamics. Given the hydroclimatic and geological features of the region, a comprehensive assessment of the groundwater potential is necessary.
Figure 1. Location map of the Study Area.
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Data Types and Sources
In order to identify groundwater potential zones in Lere LGA, Kaduna State, this study integrated field data, thematic maps, and remotely sensed imagery within a GIS environment. The dataset employed in this study are summarized in
Table 1. Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) (30 m resolution, Path/Row 189/53, acquired in 2019) was used to extract Land use/land cover (LULC) and lineament features. The Seven bands make up the imagery: one panchromatic band at 15 m resolution and six multispectral bands at 30 m resolution. Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection (ASTER) images (30 m resolution, obtained 2015) were used to extract slope and drainage extraction. Geological map (1: 250,000 scale) 2008 obtained from the Nigerian Geological Survey Agency (NGSA), 2008 was scanned in order to identify lithological units. Soil map (1: 100,000 scale, 2010) obtained from the Kaduna State Ministry of Agriculture was digitally altered to identify soil types that are important for groundwater infiltration and storage. Data obtained from the Global Positioning System (GPS) was used for land use ground trothing and lithology.
Table 1. Summary of data types and sources.
Data | Source | Year | Relevance |
Soil map | Kaduna State Ministry of Agriculture | 2010 | Soil characteristics |
Geologic map | NGSA | 2008 | Lithology/rock types |
ASTER DEM | Earth Explorer | 2015 | Slope and drainage |
Landsat 8 OLI | USGS | 2019 | Land use/cover and Lineaments |
3.2. Methods
The methodology combines remote sensing, GIS, and a modified DRASTIC-based multi-criteria evaluation to map groundwater potential. Six theme parameters—geology, lineament density, slope, soil texture, drainage density, and land use/cover—were chosen because of their impact on the occurrence of groundwater.
Land Use/Land Cover (LULC): The Maximum Likelihood approach was used to classify Landsat 8 imagery after it had been reprocessed (radiometric correction, layer stacking, sub-setting). GPS ground truthing was used to confirm the classification.
Lineaments: Converted into lineament density maps using GIS tools after being extracted visually with the aid of edge enhancement and directional filtering.
Slope and Drainage: were extracted from the ASTER DEM using the spatial analyst toolkit. The ratio of total stream length to drainage basin area was used to compute drainage density. Five categories were used to classify slope based on the possibility of infiltration.
Geology and Soil: Permeability and groundwater storage properties were used to scan, georeference, digitize, and reclassify maps.
3.3. Conceptual Framework: DRASTIC and Modified DRASTIC Models
A standardized method for assessing groundwater vulnerability is the DRASTIC model
| [8] | Aller, L., Bennett, T., Lehr, J. H., Petty, R. J., & Hackett, G. (1987). DRASTIC: A standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings (EPA/600/2-87/035). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 455. |
[8]
(Aller
et al., 1987), which makes use of seven hydrogeological factors:
D = Depth of water;
R = net recharge;
A = Aquifer media;
S = Soil media;
T = Topography/Slope;
I = Impact of vadose zone;
C = Hydraulic conductivity.
The traditional DRASTIC index is calculated as follows:
GPP = DrDw+ RrRw+ ArAw+ SrSw+ TrTw+ IrIw+ CrCw(1)
Where:
GPP = Groundwater Pollution Potential
r = rating of each parameter
w = assigned weight
A modified DRASTIC model was used for mapping groundwater potential
| [8] | Aller, L., Bennett, T., Lehr, J. H., Petty, R. J., & Hackett, G. (1987). DRASTIC: A standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings (EPA/600/2-87/035). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 455. |
[8]
, substituting hydrogeological variables that govern groundwater occurrence for vulnerability factors:
GP = G + L + SL + S + D + Lu(2)
Where:
GP = Groundwater Potential
G = Geology, L = Lineament density, SL = Slope, S = Soil, D = Drainage density, and Lu = Land use/cover
The weighted form of the modified DRASTIC index is as follows:
GP = GrGw+ LrLw+ SLrSLw+ SrSw+ DrDw+ LurLuw(3)
Where:
r = rating for each class within the thematic layer and
w = weight given to each parameter according to its proportional importance in groundwater occurrence
This method is frequently used to combine several hydrogeological factors into a single index in GIS-based groundwater assessment. Using easily accessible hydrogeological data to assess groundwater potential, identifying target zones for groundwater exploration at a reasonable cost, and effectively adapting to regional-scale mapping in complex basement terrains are some of the benefits of the Modified DRASTIC approach.
3.4. GIS-based Weighted Overlay Analyisis
The Raster Calculator in ArcGIS 10.7 was used to multiply each theme layer by the weight that was provided to it
| [19] | Malczewski, J. (1999). GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. John Wiley & Sons. |
| [20] | Eastman, J. R. (2012). IDRISI Selva manual. Clark labs-Clark University. Worcester, Mass. USA. |
[19, 20]
. A composite raster depicting groundwater potential was created by adding up all of the weighted layers. Whereas lower values indicate poor groundwater prospects, higher values indicate regions with substantial groundwater potential
| [4] | Jha, M. K., Chowdary, V. M., & Chowdhury, A. (2010). Groundwater assessment in Salboni Block, West Bengal (India) using remote sensing, geographical information system and multi-criteria decision analysis techniques. Hydrogeology journal, 18(7), 1713-1728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-010-0636-5 |
[4]
. Using the natural breaks (Jenks) categorization approach, the resulting groundwater potential map was divided into three zones: high, moderate, and low potential
| [21] | Jenks, G. F. (1967). The data model concept in statistical mapping. International Yearbook of Cartography, 7, 186–190. |
| [22] | Slocum, T. A., McMaster, R. B., Kessler, F. C., & Howard, H. H. (2022). Thematic cartography and geovisualization. CRC Press. |
[21, 22]
. The flowchart of the Modified DRASTIC model is shown in
Figure 2. In profoundly complex terrains, this integrated technique guarantees a methodical, repeatable, and economical approach to assessing regional groundwater potential
| [4] | Jha, M. K., Chowdary, V. M., & Chowdhury, A. (2010). Groundwater assessment in Salboni Block, West Bengal (India) using remote sensing, geographical information system and multi-criteria decision analysis techniques. Hydrogeology journal, 18(7), 1713-1728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-010-0636-5 |
| [21] | Jenks, G. F. (1967). The data model concept in statistical mapping. International Yearbook of Cartography, 7, 186–190. |
[4, 21]
.
Figure 2. Modified DRASTIC model flowchart.
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Slope
According to Gupta and Srivastava
| [23] | Gupta, M., & Srivastava, P. K. (2010). Integrating GIS and remote sensing for groundwater potential assessment in hard rock terrain. Water Resources Management, 24(13), 3959–3976.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9636-9 |
[23]
, slope is an important topographic feature that influences groundwater recharge potential, infiltration capability, and surface runoff. While moderate slopes enhance penetration, steep slopes prevent groundwater recharging in basement complex terrains by promoting fast runoff. There are five sets of slope values in the research area: gentle (3.143–9.429°), moderate (9.429–20.287°), steep (20.287–37.431°), flat (0–3.143°), and very steep (37.431–72.861°) as summarized in
Table 2. The slope values range from 0° to 72.86°.
Table 2. Slope classification.
Slope Classes | Degree | Modified DRASTIC Rating |
Flat | 0 - 3.143 | 10 |
Gentle | 3.143 - 9.429 | 8 |
Moderate | 9.429 - 20.287 | 6 |
Steep | 20.287 - 37.431 | 3 |
Very Steep | 37.431 - 72.861 | 1 |
Figure 3. Slope map of Lere LGA, Kaduna.
Given that infiltration is inversely correlated with slope gradient
| [24] | Nag, S. K., & Anindita, D. (2011). Applications of remote sensing and GIS in groundwater potential mapping in hard rock terrain. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 1(5), 1085–1096. |
[24]
, flatter terrains received higher Modified DRASTIC ratings (rating = 10), while steeper slopes received progressively lower ratings (rating = 1). Because of the improved recharge conditions and decreased runoff, low-gradient regions are more suited for groundwater accumulation, according to the spatial distribution of slope classes (
Figure 3).
4.2. Lineament Density
In crystalline basement rocks, lineaments are structural discontinuities that improve secondary porosity and permeability. These discontinuities include joints, faults, and fractures
| [15] | Rahaman, M. A. (1988). Recent advances in the study of the basement complex of Nigeria. Pre Cambrian geology of Nigeria, 11-41. |
| [17] | Wright, J. B., & McCurry, P. (1970). The geology of Nigeria. In C. A. Kogbe (Ed.), Geology of Nigeria (pp. 1–26). Elizabethan Publishing Company. |
[15, 17]
. The density and connectedness of these structural elements play a major role in controlling the presence of groundwater in various types of terrains. Based on their contribution to groundwater storage, lineament density values were divided into five groups and given Modified DRASTIC ratings
| [4] | Jha, M. K., Chowdary, V. M., & Chowdhury, A. (2010). Groundwater assessment in Salboni Block, West Bengal (India) using remote sensing, geographical information system and multi-criteria decision analysis techniques. Hydrogeology journal, 18(7), 1713-1728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-010-0636-5 |
| [8] | Aller, L., Bennett, T., Lehr, J. H., Petty, R. J., & Hackett, G. (1987). DRASTIC: A standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings (EPA/600/2-87/035). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 455. |
[4, 8]
as shown in
Table 3. Because of their increased groundwater potential, locations with higher lineament densities were rated higher than those with sparser structural features. Structurally controlled zones that could act as preferred routes for groundwater transport and storage are visible on the lineament density map (
Figure 4).
Figure 4. Lineament map of Lere LGA, Kaduna.
Table 3. Lineament classification.
Lineament Classes (km) | Modified DRASTIC Rating |
0 – 0.110 | 10 |
0.110 – 0.259 | 8 |
0.259 – 0.432 | 6 |
0.432 – 0.656 | 3 |
0.656 – 1.365 | 1 |
4.3. Land Use/Land Cover
The processes of infiltration, evapotranspiration, and runoff are all greatly impacted by land use/land cover (LULC). Vegetation, barren ground, settlement, hills, and water bodies are the five main LULC categories into which the research region was divided. Because of their enhanced soil structure and root-induced permeability, agricultural and vegetated lands encourage infiltration
| [1] | Todd, D. K., & Mays, L. W. (2005). Groundwater hydrology (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. |
[1]
. Consequently, the highest ranking (10) was given to vegetation. Water bodies received a high rating (8) because they immediately contribute to recharge. Because of its varying infiltration characteristics based on surface compaction, bare land, which makes up the majority of the research region (about 84.57%), was rated as moderate. Because of their impermeable surfaces, which prevent infiltration, settlements received a low grade (3). Because of their steep slopes and increased drainage, hills get the lowest grade (1).
Table 4 displays the quantitative distribution for each LULC class. According to the spatial distribution of LULC (
Figure 5), low-lying and vegetated areas are strongly associated with groundwater recharge capacity.
Table 4. Land use/cover classification.
Land Use/Cover | Area (Hectares) | Area (%) | Modified DRASTIC Ratings |
Water body | 7147.8900 | 0.818 | 8 |
Settlement | 73760.4900 | 8.444 | 3 |
Vegetation | 8.7400 | 0.001 | 10 |
Bare-Land | 738756.5400 | 84.574 | 6 |
Hills | 53833.6800 | 6.163 | 1 |
Figure 5. Land use/cover Map of Lere LGA, Kaduna.
4.4. Soil Texture
Permeability, infiltration rate, and water retention capacity are all directly impacted by soil texture
| [25] | Hillel, D. (2004). Introduction to environmental soil physics. Elsevier Academic Press. |
[25]
. While clay-rich soils tend to limit percolation, sandy and gravelly soils typically show higher infiltration rates
| [6] | Fitts, C. R. (2013). 10—Groundwater Chemistry. Groundwater Science, 2nd ed.; Fitts, CR, Ed.; Academic Press: Boston, MA, USA, 421-497. |
| [26] | Brady, N. C., & Weil, R. R. (2016). The nature and properties of soils. Columbus. EUA Pearson Education. |
[6, 26]
. The classification and corresponding Modified DRASTIC ratings of the soil texture are presented in
Table 5. Permeability parameters were used to identify and rate six soil units. Because of their advantageous infiltration qualities, sandy loam and shallow, well-drained loamy sand soils were rated higher (9) than other types
| [8] | Aller, L., Bennett, T., Lehr, J. H., Petty, R. J., & Hackett, G. (1987). DRASTIC: A standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings (EPA/600/2-87/035). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 455. |
[8]
. On the other hand, because of their relatively lesser permeability, deeper sandy clay units were rated lower. Permeable soil textures are geographically related with zones of moderate to high groundwater potential
| [27] | Singhal, B. B. S., & Gupta, R. P. (2010). Applied hydrogeology of fractured rocks. Springer Science & Business Media. |
[27]
, according to the soil distribution map (
Figure 6).
4.5. Geology
Because groundwater storage is mostly limited to weathered and fractured zones, geology has the greatest influence over groundwater occurrence in crystalline basement terrains
| [28] | Freeze, R. A., & Cherry, J. A. (1979). Groundwater prentice-hall. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 176, 161-177. |
| [27] | Singhal, B. B. S., & Gupta, R. P. (2010). Applied hydrogeology of fractured rocks. Springer Science & Business Media. |
[28, 27]
. The classification and corresponding Modified DRASTIC ratings of the geology are presented in
Table 6. Amphibolite, porphyritic biotite granite, leucocratic granite, migmatite, pyroxene fayalite granite, biotite granite, leucocratic granite, and undifferentiated schist are all found in the research region
| [6] | Fitts, C. R. (2013). 10—Groundwater Chemistry. Groundwater Science, 2nd ed.; Fitts, CR, Ed.; Academic Press: Boston, MA, USA, 421-497. |
| [18] | Olorunfemi, M. O., & Okhue, E. T. (1992). Hydrogeologic and geologic significance of a geoelectric survey at Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Journal of mining and geology, 28(2), 221-229. |
[6, 18]
. Because of its improved fracture and weathering properties, granite gneiss was given the highest grade (10) among these units. Because of their structural characteristics, amphibolite and undifferentiated schist were also given comparatively high ratings
| [27] | Singhal, B. B. S., & Gupta, R. P. (2010). Applied hydrogeology of fractured rocks. Springer Science & Business Media. |
[27]
. Because of their decreased primary porosity, massive granitic units with little fracture received lower scores. The major role of lithology in groundwater distribution throughout the region is confirmed by the geological map (
Figure 7), which shows that areas of higher groundwater potential correspond to structurally deformed and weathered lithologies.
Table 5. Soil Classification.
Soil Type | Modified DRASTIC Rating |
Very deep well drained sandy loamy sand to sandy clay | 3 |
Very shallow well drained loamy sand to sandy loam | 9 |
Very deep well drained sandy loamy to sandy clay | 4 |
Very deep well drained sandy loamy to loamy sand | 9 |
Moderately deep well drained sandy loam gravelly | 7 |
Deep well drained sandy loam to sandy clay gravelly | 5 |
Figure 6. Soil Map of Lere LGA, Kaduna.
Table 6. Geology Classification.
Geology | Modified DRASTIC Rating |
Amphibolite | 8 |
Biotite Granite | 2 |
Porphyritic Biotite and Biotite Hornblend | 1 |
Granite Genies | 10 |
Medium to Coarse Grained Biotite Granite | 2 |
Migmatite | 4 |
Pyroxene Fayalite Granite | 1 |
Undifferentiated Schist | 7 |
Figure 7. Geological Map of Lere LGA, Kaduna.
4.6. Drainage Density
Infiltration capacity and subsurface permeability are indirectly indicated by drainage density, which also reflects the extent of landscape dissection
| [29] | Wisler, C. O., & Brater, E. F. (1959). Hydrology. John Willey and Sons. Inc. NY 408 p. |
[29]
. It is defined as the ratio of total stream length to basin area. From very low to very high, the drainage density values were divided into five groups as presented in
Table 7. Areas with very low drainage density received the highest ranking (10), as they promote infiltration and groundwater recharging. However, areas with very high drainage density were given the lowest grade (1) due to their increased runoff and restricted recharge
| [1] | Todd, D. K., & Mays, L. W. (2005). Groundwater hydrology (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. |
[1]
. The drainage density map (
Figure 8) is dominated by dendritic patterns, which show consistent lithological conditions with regional structural control.
Table 7. Drainage Density Classification.
Drainage Density | Classes | Modified DRASTIC Rating |
0 - 0.564 | Very low | 10 |
0.564 - 0.819 | Low | 8 |
0.819- 1.081 | Moderate | 6 |
1.081 - 1.368 | High | 4 |
1.368- 2.172 | Very high | 1 |
Figure 8. Drainage Density Map of Lere LGA, Kaduna.
4.7. Groundwater Potential Map
Within a GIS framework, a weighted linear combination strategy was used to merge all theme layers as summarized in
Table 8. Geology received the highest weight (5), followed by lineament density (4) and slope (4), soil texture (3), drainage density (2), and land use/land cover (1), all of which were ranked according to their relative hydrogeological relevance
| [4] | Jha, M. K., Chowdary, V. M., & Chowdhury, A. (2010). Groundwater assessment in Salboni Block, West Bengal (India) using remote sensing, geographical information system and multi-criteria decision analysis techniques. Hydrogeology journal, 18(7), 1713-1728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-010-0636-5 |
[4]
. A composite Groundwater Potential Index (GPI), which reflects the combined impact of all characteristics, was produced using the weighted overlay analysis
| [8] | Aller, L., Bennett, T., Lehr, J. H., Petty, R. J., & Hackett, G. (1987). DRASTIC: A standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings (EPA/600/2-87/035). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 455. |
| [30] | Machiwal, D., Jha, M. K., & Mal, B. C. (2011). Assessment of groundwater potential in a semi-arid region of India using remote sensing, GIS and MCDM techniques. Water resources management, 25, 1359-1386.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9749-y |
[8, 30]
. The study region is divided into three main classes—high, moderate, and low potential zones—by the resulting groundwater potential map (
Figure 9). Low slopes, low drainage density, permeable soils, vegetative land cover, granite gneiss, and fractured lithologies are the main characteristics of high potential zones. The combined effects of intermediate slope gradients and soil properties are reflected in moderate zones. Large unfractured granitic rocks, steep topography, and regions with high drainage densities are the main locations for low potential zones
| [27] | Singhal, B. B. S., & Gupta, R. P. (2010). Applied hydrogeology of fractured rocks. Springer Science & Business Media. |
| [29] | Wisler, C. O., & Brater, E. F. (1959). Hydrology. John Willey and Sons. Inc. NY 408 p. |
[27, 29]
. The spatial patterns indicate that the lithological and structural regulation of groundwater occurrence in Lere LGA is significantly influenced by secondary porosity.
Table 8. Weighted Table Overlay.
RASTER | WEIGHT | ATTRIBUTES | RATINGS |
| | Biotite Granite | 2 |
| | Porphyritic Biotite and biotite hornblend | 1 |
| | Fine Grained Leucocratic Granite | 4 |
| | Granite Gneiss | 10 |
| | Medium to coarse grained biotite gneiss | 2 |
| | Migmatite | 4 |
| | Pyroxene Fayalite Granite | 1 |
| | Undifferentiated Schist | 7 |
Lineament | 4 | 0 - 0.110 | 1 |
| | 0.110 - 0.259 | 3 |
| | 0.259 - 0.432 | 5 |
| | 0.432 - 0.656 | 7 |
| | 0.656 - 1.365 | 10 |
Slope | 4 | 0 - 3.143 | 10 |
| | 3.143 - 9.429 | 8 |
| | 9.429 - 20.287 | 6 |
| | 20.287 - 37.431 | 3 |
| | 37.431 - 72.861 | 1 |
Soil Texture | 3 | Very deep well drained sandy loamy sand to sandy clay | 3 |
| | Very shallow well drained loamy sand to sandy loam | 9 |
| | Very deep well drained sandy loamy to sandy clay | 4 |
| | Very deep well drained sandy loamy to loamy sand | 9 |
| | Moderately deep well drained sandy loam gravelly | 7 |
| | Deep well drained sandy loam to sandy clay gravelly | 5 |
Drainage Density | 2 | Very Low Drainage (0-0.010-0.564) | 10 |
| | Low Drainage (0.564-0.819) | 8 |
| | Moderate (0.819-1.081) | 6 |
| | High Drainage (1.081-1.368) | 4 |
| | Very High Drainage (1.368-2.172) | 1 |
Land use/cover | 1 | Vegetation | 10 |
| | Hills | 1 |
| | Water Body | 8 |
| | Bare surface | 6 |
| | Settlement | 3 |
Figure 9. Groundwater potential map of Lere LGA, Kaduna.
Figure 10. Groundwater potential map showing all hydrogeological parameters used.
The integrated modeling technique (
Figure 10) demonstrates how effectively remote sensing and GIS approaches complement each other for groundwater research in complex subsurface ecosystems.
5. Conclusion
This study used a modified DRASTIC multi-criteria evaluation model and an integrated remote sensing and GIS technique to define groundwater potential zones in Lere Local Government Area, Kaduna State, Nigeria. To create a Groundwater Potential Index (GPI), six important hydrogeological factors were combined and weighted: geology, lineament density, slope, soil texture, drainage density, and land use/land cover. The findings show that lithology and structural characteristics have a major role in regulating groundwater occurrence in the crystalline basement terrain of Lere LGA. Because of their increased secondary porosity and permeability, worn and fractured rocks like schist, amphibolite, migmatite, and granite gneiss have higher groundwater potential. While steep slopes, large unfractured granites, and highly dissected terrains correspond to limited groundwater potential, high lineament density, gentle slopes, low drainage density, permeable soils, and vegetative land cover further encourage infiltration and recharge. The region was divided into high, moderate, and low potential zones on the final groundwater potential map. Low-potential zones are primarily linked to upland and poorly broken terrains, moderate zones exhibit intermediate traits, and high-potential areas correspond with good geological and structural conditions. Overall, the study shows that combining remote sensing and GIS offers a practical decision-support tool for borehole siting and sustainable groundwater development in Lere LGA and similar basement complex environments, as well as a dependable and affordable framework for groundwater assessment.
Abbreviations
ASTER | Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer |
DEM | Digital Elevation Model |
DRASTIC | Depth, Recharge, Aquifer Media, Soil Media, Topography, Impact of Vadose Zone, Hydraulic Conductivity |
FAO | Food and Agriculture Organization |
G | Geology |
GIS | Geographic Information System |
GPI | Groundwater Potential Index |
GP | Groundwater Potential |
GPP | Groundwater Pollution Potential |
GPS | Global Positioning System |
LGA | Local Government Area |
LD | Lineament Density |
LULC | Land Use/Land Cover |
MCE | Multi-Criteria Evaluation |
MCDM | Multi-Criteria Decision Making |
NWRI | National Water Resources Institute |
OLI | Operational Land Imager |
RS | Remote Sensing |
S | Soil |
SL | Slope |
ST | Soil Texture |
USGS | The United States Geological Survey |
WOA | Weighted Overlay Analysis |
NIMET | Nigerian Meteorological Agency |
NGSA | Nigerian Geological Survey Agency |
r | Rating |
w | Weight |
km/km² | Kilometers per Square Kilometer |
m | Meter |
mm | Millimeter |
° | Degree |
Acknowledgments
The authors appreciate the authorities of the Department of Groundwater, National Water Resources Institute, Kaduna for assisting them with both equipment and facilities at the field experimentation. The authors particularly acknowledged the contributions of the Head of Department in person of Dr. Omoloju Omogbemi Yaya for the major role he played in coordinating and supervising the project.
Author Contributions
Alfred Habila Zingchang: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project Administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Tavershima Stephen Ingoroko: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Project Administration, Writing – review & editing
Segun Peter Michaels: Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing, Formal Analysis
Toyin Akintayo: Data curation, Software, Writing – review & editing
Ashe Abubakar Wulet: Methodology, Resources, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Abdul-Qadir Dauda Aliyu: Formal Analysis, Resources, Writing – review & editing
Kassim Abdullahi Baba: Investigation, Resources, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Funding
This work is not supported by any external funding.
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting the outcome of this research work has been reported in the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
| [1] |
Todd, D. K., & Mays, L. W. (2005). Groundwater hydrology (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
|
| [2] |
World Bank. (2018). Nigeria – Sustainable urban and rural water supply, sanitation and hygiene program. World Bank Publications.
|
| [3] |
Kortas, L., & Younger, P. L. (2007). Using the GRAM model to reconstruct the important factors in historic groundwater rebound in part of the Durham Coalfield, UK. Mine Water and the Environment, 26(2), 60-69.
|
| [4] |
Jha, M. K., Chowdary, V. M., & Chowdhury, A. (2010). Groundwater assessment in Salboni Block, West Bengal (India) using remote sensing, geographical information system and multi-criteria decision analysis techniques. Hydrogeology journal, 18(7), 1713-1728.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-010-0636-5
|
| [5] |
Sener, E., Davraz, A., & Ozcelik, M. (2005). An integration of GIS and remote sensing in groundwater investigations: A case study in Burdur, Turkey. Hydrogeology Journal, 13(5), 826–834.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-004-0373-1
|
| [6] |
Fitts, C. R. (2013). 10—Groundwater Chemistry. Groundwater Science, 2nd ed.; Fitts, CR, Ed.; Academic Press: Boston, MA, USA, 421-497.
|
| [7] |
Longley, P. A., Goodchild, M. F., Maguire, D. J., & Rhind, D. W. (2015). Geographic information science and systems. John Wiley & Sons.
|
| [8] |
Aller, L., Bennett, T., Lehr, J. H., Petty, R. J., & Hackett, G. (1987). DRASTIC: A standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings (EPA/600/2-87/035). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 455.
|
| [9] |
Aregheore, E. M. (2009). Country pasture/forage resource profiles: Nigeria. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Italy.
|
| [10] |
Oyenuga, V. A. (1967). Agriculture in Nigeria. An introduction.
|
| [11] |
Udo, R. K. (2023). Geographical regions of Nigeria. Univ of California Press.
|
| [12] |
Ojo, O. (1977). The climates of West Africa. Heinemann, (p. 219 pp).
|
| [13] |
Nigerian Meteorological Agency (NIMET). (2020). Annual climate review bulletin. Federal Ministry of Aviation, Abuja, Nigeria.
|
| [14] |
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2015). AQUASTAT country profile – Nigeria. FAO Water Reports. Rome, Italy.
|
| [15] |
Rahaman, M. A. (1988). Recent advances in the study of the basement complex of Nigeria. Pre Cambrian geology of Nigeria, 11-41.
|
| [16] |
Obaje, N. G. (2009). Geology and mineral resources of Nigeria (Vol. 120, p. 221). Berlin: Springer.
|
| [17] |
Wright, J. B., & McCurry, P. (1970). The geology of Nigeria. In C. A. Kogbe (Ed.), Geology of Nigeria (pp. 1–26). Elizabethan Publishing Company.
|
| [18] |
Olorunfemi, M. O., & Okhue, E. T. (1992). Hydrogeologic and geologic significance of a geoelectric survey at Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Journal of mining and geology, 28(2), 221-229.
|
| [19] |
Malczewski, J. (1999). GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
|
| [20] |
Eastman, J. R. (2012). IDRISI Selva manual. Clark labs-Clark University. Worcester, Mass. USA.
|
| [21] |
Jenks, G. F. (1967). The data model concept in statistical mapping. International Yearbook of Cartography, 7, 186–190.
|
| [22] |
Slocum, T. A., McMaster, R. B., Kessler, F. C., & Howard, H. H. (2022). Thematic cartography and geovisualization. CRC Press.
|
| [23] |
Gupta, M., & Srivastava, P. K. (2010). Integrating GIS and remote sensing for groundwater potential assessment in hard rock terrain. Water Resources Management, 24(13), 3959–3976.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9636-9
|
| [24] |
Nag, S. K., & Anindita, D. (2011). Applications of remote sensing and GIS in groundwater potential mapping in hard rock terrain. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 1(5), 1085–1096.
|
| [25] |
Hillel, D. (2004). Introduction to environmental soil physics. Elsevier Academic Press.
|
| [26] |
Brady, N. C., & Weil, R. R. (2016). The nature and properties of soils. Columbus. EUA Pearson Education.
|
| [27] |
Singhal, B. B. S., & Gupta, R. P. (2010). Applied hydrogeology of fractured rocks. Springer Science & Business Media.
|
| [28] |
Freeze, R. A., & Cherry, J. A. (1979). Groundwater prentice-hall. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 176, 161-177.
|
| [29] |
Wisler, C. O., & Brater, E. F. (1959). Hydrology. John Willey and Sons. Inc. NY 408 p.
|
| [30] |
Machiwal, D., Jha, M. K., & Mal, B. C. (2011). Assessment of groundwater potential in a semi-arid region of India using remote sensing, GIS and MCDM techniques. Water resources management, 25, 1359-1386.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9749-y
|
Cite This Article
-
APA Style
Zingchang, A. H., Ingoroko, T. S., Michaels, S. P., Akintayo, T., Wulet, A. A., et al. (2026). Delineation of Groundwater Potential Zones Using a Modified DRASTIC–GIS Approach in a Crystalline Basement Terrain, Northwestern Nigeria. American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, 10(2), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajese.20261002.11
Copy
|
Download
ACS Style
Zingchang, A. H.; Ingoroko, T. S.; Michaels, S. P.; Akintayo, T.; Wulet, A. A., et al. Delineation of Groundwater Potential Zones Using a Modified DRASTIC–GIS Approach in a Crystalline Basement Terrain, Northwestern Nigeria. Am. J. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2026, 10(2), 37-53. doi: 10.11648/j.ajese.20261002.11
Copy
|
Download
AMA Style
Zingchang AH, Ingoroko TS, Michaels SP, Akintayo T, Wulet AA, et al. Delineation of Groundwater Potential Zones Using a Modified DRASTIC–GIS Approach in a Crystalline Basement Terrain, Northwestern Nigeria. Am J Environ Sci Eng. 2026;10(2):37-53. doi: 10.11648/j.ajese.20261002.11
Copy
|
Download
-
@article{10.11648/j.ajese.20261002.11,
author = {Alfred Habila Zingchang and Tavershima Stephen Ingoroko and Segun Peter Michaels and Toyin Akintayo and Ashe Abubakar Wulet and Abdul-Qadir Dauda Aliyu and Kassim Abdullahi Baba},
title = {Delineation of Groundwater Potential Zones Using a Modified DRASTIC–GIS Approach in a Crystalline Basement Terrain, Northwestern Nigeria},
journal = {American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering},
volume = {10},
number = {2},
pages = {37-53},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajese.20261002.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajese.20261002.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajese.20261002.11},
abstract = {In northern Nigeria's crystalline basement terrains, where surface water resources are seasonal and poorly distributed, groundwater is the primary source of drinkable water. In order to identify groundwater potential zones in the Lere Local Government Area of Kaduna State, Nigeria, this study used an integrated Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System (GIS) approach. Landsat-8 OLI images, the ASTER Digital Elevation Model (30 m resolution), and pre-existing geological and soil maps were used to determine six groundwater-influencing parameters: geology, lineament density, slope, soil texture, drainage density, and land use/land cover (LULC). The studied area's drainage density ranges from 0 to 2.172 km/km², and its slope extends from 0° to 72.86°. Bare terrain makes up the majority of the region (84.57%), followed by settlements (8.44%), hills (6.16%), water bodies (0.82%), and vegetation (0.001%), according to LULC research. Thematic layers were given weights using a modified DRASTIC-based multi-criteria evaluation technique, including geology (5), lineament density (4), slope (4), soil texture (3), drainage density (2), and land use/land cover (1). A Groundwater Potential Index (GPI) map that divided the region into high, moderate, and low groundwater potential zones was created using weighted overlay analysis in a GIS context. Fractured granite gneiss and migmatite, high lineament density (0.656–1.365 km/km2), mild slopes (0–9.429°), permeable soils, and low drainage density (0–0.564 km/km2) are all associated with high potential zones, while steep slopes and severely dissected terrains are associated with low potential areas. The findings show that lithology and structural characteristics play a major role in the occurrence of groundwater and show that integrated remote sensing and GIS techniques offer a dependable and affordable tool for sustainable borehole siting and groundwater exploration in basement complex terrains.},
year = {2026}
}
Copy
|
Download
-
TY - JOUR
T1 - Delineation of Groundwater Potential Zones Using a Modified DRASTIC–GIS Approach in a Crystalline Basement Terrain, Northwestern Nigeria
AU - Alfred Habila Zingchang
AU - Tavershima Stephen Ingoroko
AU - Segun Peter Michaels
AU - Toyin Akintayo
AU - Ashe Abubakar Wulet
AU - Abdul-Qadir Dauda Aliyu
AU - Kassim Abdullahi Baba
Y1 - 2026/05/14
PY - 2026
N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajese.20261002.11
DO - 10.11648/j.ajese.20261002.11
T2 - American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering
JF - American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering
JO - American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering
SP - 37
EP - 53
PB - Science Publishing Group
SN - 2578-7993
UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajese.20261002.11
AB - In northern Nigeria's crystalline basement terrains, where surface water resources are seasonal and poorly distributed, groundwater is the primary source of drinkable water. In order to identify groundwater potential zones in the Lere Local Government Area of Kaduna State, Nigeria, this study used an integrated Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System (GIS) approach. Landsat-8 OLI images, the ASTER Digital Elevation Model (30 m resolution), and pre-existing geological and soil maps were used to determine six groundwater-influencing parameters: geology, lineament density, slope, soil texture, drainage density, and land use/land cover (LULC). The studied area's drainage density ranges from 0 to 2.172 km/km², and its slope extends from 0° to 72.86°. Bare terrain makes up the majority of the region (84.57%), followed by settlements (8.44%), hills (6.16%), water bodies (0.82%), and vegetation (0.001%), according to LULC research. Thematic layers were given weights using a modified DRASTIC-based multi-criteria evaluation technique, including geology (5), lineament density (4), slope (4), soil texture (3), drainage density (2), and land use/land cover (1). A Groundwater Potential Index (GPI) map that divided the region into high, moderate, and low groundwater potential zones was created using weighted overlay analysis in a GIS context. Fractured granite gneiss and migmatite, high lineament density (0.656–1.365 km/km2), mild slopes (0–9.429°), permeable soils, and low drainage density (0–0.564 km/km2) are all associated with high potential zones, while steep slopes and severely dissected terrains are associated with low potential areas. The findings show that lithology and structural characteristics play a major role in the occurrence of groundwater and show that integrated remote sensing and GIS techniques offer a dependable and affordable tool for sustainable borehole siting and groundwater exploration in basement complex terrains.
VL - 10
IS - 2
ER -
Copy
|
Download