| Peer-Reviewed

Role of Agricultural Mechanization Technologies in Transforming Agriculture: The Case of Wheat Row Planter in Ethiopia

Received: 2 December 2016     Accepted: 27 December 2016     Published: 16 February 2017
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Wheat is one of the major staple food crops in many parts of Ethiopia covering about 11% of total land cultivated and production share of 17% of total cereals. However, land productivity is found to be among the lowest in the country from the world which is about 2.01tons/ha. To increase this lowest productivity, among all others, good agronomic practices is the most important and to facilitate this practice row planting was the one major action to be taken by farmers. But even though farmers were convinced to practice row planting, absence of appropriate technology was the most bottlenecks for development. To overcome the problem considerable researchers and individuals were engaged to development and adaptation of wheat row planters. However, before the embark of mass production and wider dissemination of the technologies, technical viability and socioeconomic feasibility of the technologies and selection of the best out of the options was found to be crucial activity. Therefore, this research activity was initiated to verify available prototypes for wheat row planting and recommend suitable ones for further demonstration and scaling up. Accordingly, seven row planters were collected from different sources in the country and on field evaluation were conducted in Tiyo district, Arsi zone with the presence of FRG during the major activities like planting, cultivation/weeding and harvesting and threshing. All necessary data from planting to harvest was collected. In addition to these different field days were organized to incorporate farmers’ and experts’ comments to strengthen the field data. Farmers’ preferences, technical viability and economic data analysis using partial budgeting technique and Gross Social Return were assessed and OARI-AAMRC type wheat row planter was ranked superior to others in all aspects.

Published in American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics (Volume 3, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajbes.20170301.13
Page(s) 10-19
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Wheat Row Planters, Partial Budgeting, Gross Social Return, Agricultural Mechanization Technologies, Evaluation, and Farm Implements

References
[1] Alimi T, Manyong VM. Partial budget analysis for on-farm research IITA research guide. P. 65. 2000.
[2] American Society of Agricultural Engineering Standards ASAE D497.4 MAR99. Agricultural Machinery Management Data. 2000.
[3] Burton Pflueger. Farm Financial Management (How to calculate Machinery Ownership and operating costs) SDSU college of Agricultural and Biological Sciences publications http://agbiopubs.sdstate.edu/articles/EC920e.pdf. 2005.
[4] G. A. Stewart and T. J. Vyn. Evaluation of row crop planter modifications for corn production within conservation tillage systems. Final Report on SWEEP-TED Project. DSSC No. XSE90-00079-302 Contract No. 01686-0-0085/01-XSE. Crop Science Department, University of Guelph http://www.ag.ndsu.edu/burkecountyextension/crops/how-many-seeds-per-acre (accessed on January, 05/2015).
[5] Hayami, Y., and V. W. Ruttan. Agricultural Development: An International Perspective. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins. 1985.
[6] Jelle Bruinsma. “By how much do land, water and crop yields need to increase by 2050?” Paper presented at the FAO Expert Meeting, 24-26 June 2009, Rome, on “How to Feed the World in 2050”. The resource outlook to 2050. 2009.
[7] Khandker, Shahidur R. Handbook on impact evaluation: quantitative methods and practices. 2010.
[8] Kossila, V. The availability of crop residues in developing countries in relation to livestock populations (access on 8/18/2015) available on http://www.fao.org/wairdocs/ilri/x5495e/x5495e03.htm#TopOfPage. 1998.
[9] Lee, C. and J. Herbek. Wheat Yield Response to Wide Rows. Wheat Science Research Report. Pages 1-2. 67. Maintain Kentucky soybean rust commentary and KY-specific documents on USDA Soybean Rust Public Website, present 68, 2005.
[10] Maurya V. N., Singh B., Vashist S., Arneja C. S., Ogubazghi G. and Shukla K. K.., Food security evaluation of grain and sugar yields of improved sweet sorghum varieties for sustainable renewable energy supply using matrix correlation, American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics, Science Publishing Group, USA, Vol. 1(1), pp.38-45, 2015.
[11] Robert N. Klein, Drew J. Lyon and Greg R. Kruger. Seeding rates for winter wheat in Nebraska: university of Nebraska Lincoln Extension, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resource. (http://extension.unl.edu/publication. 2011).
[12] Schemiz A. and Seckler D. Mechanized agriculture and social welfare. Amer. J. of Ag. Econ. Vol. 52, Number 4, pp. 569-577. 1970.
[13] The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Central Statistical Agency Agricultural Sample Survey. Volume I report on area and production of major crops. 2014.
[14] Tolesa A., Bezabih E., Jema H., and Belaineh L. Impact of Wheat Row Planting on Yield of Smallholders in Selected Highland and Lowland Areas of Ethiopia. International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 4 (5): pp. 386-393 2014.
[15] Maurya Vishwa Nath, Singh Bijay, Vashsit Swammy Ogubazghi Ghebrebrhan, and Singh Vijay Vir. Effectiveness performance analysis of soil minerals (Fe/Zn) on soil fertility and cropping patterns using x-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF) and ANOVA method, American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics. Vol. 1 (1), pp. 9-18, 2015.
[16] William Edwards, Ag Decision Maker. Estimating Farm Machinery Costs. File A3-29, Iowa State University. Revised Extension Publication PM-710, May 2015. http://www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm/cdmachinery.html.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Tamrat Gebiso, Ayalew Bekele, Ephrem Boka. (2017). Role of Agricultural Mechanization Technologies in Transforming Agriculture: The Case of Wheat Row Planter in Ethiopia. American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics, 3(1), 10-19. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20170301.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Tamrat Gebiso; Ayalew Bekele; Ephrem Boka. Role of Agricultural Mechanization Technologies in Transforming Agriculture: The Case of Wheat Row Planter in Ethiopia. Am. J. Biol. Environ. Stat. 2017, 3(1), 10-19. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbes.20170301.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Tamrat Gebiso, Ayalew Bekele, Ephrem Boka. Role of Agricultural Mechanization Technologies in Transforming Agriculture: The Case of Wheat Row Planter in Ethiopia. Am J Biol Environ Stat. 2017;3(1):10-19. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbes.20170301.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajbes.20170301.13,
      author = {Tamrat Gebiso and Ayalew Bekele and Ephrem Boka},
      title = {Role of Agricultural Mechanization Technologies in Transforming Agriculture: The Case of Wheat Row Planter in Ethiopia},
      journal = {American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics},
      volume = {3},
      number = {1},
      pages = {10-19},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajbes.20170301.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20170301.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajbes.20170301.13},
      abstract = {Wheat is one of the major staple food crops in many parts of Ethiopia covering about 11% of total land cultivated and production share of 17% of total cereals. However, land productivity is found to be among the lowest in the country from the world which is about 2.01tons/ha. To increase this lowest productivity, among all others, good agronomic practices is the most important and to facilitate this practice row planting was the one major action to be taken by farmers. But even though farmers were convinced to practice row planting, absence of appropriate technology was the most bottlenecks for development. To overcome the problem considerable researchers and individuals were engaged to development and adaptation of wheat row planters. However, before the embark of mass production and wider dissemination of the technologies, technical viability and socioeconomic feasibility of the technologies and selection of the best out of the options was found to be crucial activity. Therefore, this research activity was initiated to verify available prototypes for wheat row planting and recommend suitable ones for further demonstration and scaling up. Accordingly, seven row planters were collected from different sources in the country and on field evaluation were conducted in Tiyo district, Arsi zone with the presence of FRG during the major activities like planting, cultivation/weeding and harvesting and threshing. All necessary data from planting to harvest was collected. In addition to these different field days were organized to incorporate farmers’ and experts’ comments to strengthen the field data. Farmers’ preferences, technical viability and economic data analysis using partial budgeting technique and Gross Social Return were assessed and OARI-AAMRC type wheat row planter was ranked superior to others in all aspects.},
     year = {2017}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Role of Agricultural Mechanization Technologies in Transforming Agriculture: The Case of Wheat Row Planter in Ethiopia
    AU  - Tamrat Gebiso
    AU  - Ayalew Bekele
    AU  - Ephrem Boka
    Y1  - 2017/02/16
    PY  - 2017
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20170301.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajbes.20170301.13
    T2  - American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics
    JF  - American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics
    JO  - American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics
    SP  - 10
    EP  - 19
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2471-979X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20170301.13
    AB  - Wheat is one of the major staple food crops in many parts of Ethiopia covering about 11% of total land cultivated and production share of 17% of total cereals. However, land productivity is found to be among the lowest in the country from the world which is about 2.01tons/ha. To increase this lowest productivity, among all others, good agronomic practices is the most important and to facilitate this practice row planting was the one major action to be taken by farmers. But even though farmers were convinced to practice row planting, absence of appropriate technology was the most bottlenecks for development. To overcome the problem considerable researchers and individuals were engaged to development and adaptation of wheat row planters. However, before the embark of mass production and wider dissemination of the technologies, technical viability and socioeconomic feasibility of the technologies and selection of the best out of the options was found to be crucial activity. Therefore, this research activity was initiated to verify available prototypes for wheat row planting and recommend suitable ones for further demonstration and scaling up. Accordingly, seven row planters were collected from different sources in the country and on field evaluation were conducted in Tiyo district, Arsi zone with the presence of FRG during the major activities like planting, cultivation/weeding and harvesting and threshing. All necessary data from planting to harvest was collected. In addition to these different field days were organized to incorporate farmers’ and experts’ comments to strengthen the field data. Farmers’ preferences, technical viability and economic data analysis using partial budgeting technique and Gross Social Return were assessed and OARI-AAMRC type wheat row planter was ranked superior to others in all aspects.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Socioeconomics Research Team, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Asella Agricultural Engineering Research Center, Asella, Ethiopia

  • Rural Energy Research Team, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Asella Agricultural Engineering Research Center, Asella, Ethiopia

  • Socioeconomics Research Team, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Asella Agricultural Engineering Research Center, Asella, Ethiopia

  • Sections