Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Assessing Various Accessions of Napier (Pennisetum Purpureum) Grass in North Western Ethiopia

Received: 28 December 2024     Accepted: 13 January 2025     Published: 17 February 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

One of Ethiopia's the chief uncertainties with the livestock industry is the year-round scarcity of optimum quality animal feed. To overcame the supply of quality feed cultivation of tropically adapted forage species, which gives a reasonable yield under rain deficit and unstable climatic conditions. Napier grass accessions were evaluated at Pawe and Jawi localtions for their adaptionn and yield performance. Ten Napier accessions with three replications were used in the randomized complete block design of the study. Mean comparisons between accessions were made using the least significant differences and the general linear model was used to analyze data for growth parameters and nutritional quality traits, such as tillering performance, plant height, forage dry matter, leaf and stem fractions, and nutritional quality. Sixty days following the establishment, in September, the first cut was made; forty days later, in October, the second cut was made. For most variables, there was a substantial (P<0.05) difference between accessions, locations, cuts, years, and the interaction impact of location by accessions. While the leaf-to-stem ratio is significant at p<0.05 and the combined mean square for the number of tillers per plant, fresh biomass yield t/ha, and nutritional quality parameters did indicate substantial (p<0.001) variation among Napier accessions, plant height is not significant (p>0.05). In terms of fresh and dry matter yield t/ha, accessions 14984, 15743, and 16791 perform better. Accessions 14984 and local responses (64.72 and 64.95) were the most significant (p<0.001) differences in in vitro dry matter digestibility, followed by 16813 and 15743 (63.5 and 63.3). According to the findings, the ILRI-14984, 15743, and 16791 accessions produced results that were comparable to the standard checks for superior yield and nutritional quality. So we recommended the demonstration of selected accessions for Metekel and Awi mid and low land areas and other comparable agro-ecologies in the country at farmer level was essintal.

Published in American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 13, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.12
Page(s) 7-17
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Morphology, Nutritional, Quality, Trait, Parameter, Performance

1. Introduction
The livestock feed problem in quality, as well as quantity, is the fundamental challenge for livestock production and productivity in Ethiopia. Natural pasture and crop residue are the major feed resources, but they are poor in quality and provide inadequate protein, energy, vitamins, and minerals . Ethiopian roughages don't meet the needs of rumen microbes since their crude protein (CP) level is less than 7%. These feeds can't even meet livestock's maintenance needs when fed alone .
For that reason, the feed supply to livestock can be improved by the cultivation of tropically adapted forage species, which gives a reasonable yield under rain deficit and unstable climatic conditions. One such forage is the Napier (Pennisetum purpureum) grass; it is a well-performed grass species amongst different forage crops that are advised for various agro-ecological zones . It is a tall perennial grass well adapted to altitudes of up to 2500m and 600-1000mm rainfall and occurs naturally throughout tropical Africa and particularly in East Africa According to Fekede et al. Napier grass grows best at high temperatures but can tolerate low air temperatures under which the yield can be reduced and ceases to grow at a temperature below 10°C. It is propagated vegetatively by using stem cuttings, root splits, or shoot tips which usually vary across agroecologies . Its leafy nature, considerable plant height, high tiller, and re-growth ability made it a highly productive fodder crop per unit area of land as compared to other grass species . According to multiple publications, there are only few Napier accessions that have been studied and suggested for lowland agroecology.
Hence, evaluation of the adaptability and yield potential of promising Napier accessions for lowland agroecological zones is very important. Therefore, the study aimed to evaluate the forage yield and quality performance of agronomic and management recommendations for different Napier grass accessions in the lowlands of northwestern Ethiopia.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experiment Locations
The experiment was conducted in rain feed by Pawe agricultural research centers at Pawe on-station and Jawi district for two years from 2020 to the 2022 cropping season. The trial locations represent mid areas ranging in altitude from 1100 to 1300 m.a.s.l. The farming system of the study area is a mixed crop-livestock production system. The description of the test environments is presented in Table 1.
Figure 1. Map of study locations.
Table 1. Description of the test locations for the physiographic location and physicochemical soil properties.

Parameter

Research location

Pawe

Jawi

Latitude

11°19'N

11o33’22.68”

Longitude

36°24'E

36o29’17.58”

Altitude (m.a.s.l)

1100

700-1500

Distance to Addis Ababa (km)

567

602

Annual rainfall (mm)

900-1587

1250mm

Daily minimum temperature (°C)

16.3Co

16Co

Daily maximum temperature (°C)

32.6Co

32C0

Soil type

Loam

Loam

Texture class

Clay

Clay loam

PH (1:2.5 H2O)

5.51

5.79

Organic matter (%)

3.58

3.57

Total nitrogen (%)

0.149

0.153

Organic Carbon (%)

2.079

2.075

Sources: Pawe metrological station data
2.2. Experimental Design and Accessions
Twelve Napier accessions including the standard check (ILRI-16819) and local check were brought from Holetta Agricultural Research Center. The accessions were evaluated at the Pawe and Jawi locations to select the paramount-performing varieties. The following Napier accessions were used 14983, 14984, 15743, 16783, 16791, 16792, 16794, 16783, 16813, 16815, 16817, standard check (16819), and local check for evaluation. A randomized complete block design with three replications was used to evaluated these accessions in a 3 x 4 m plot size. The accessions were then allocated at random among the plots in the block. Twelve root splits were planted in each plot, with a 45° angle, 0.5 and 1 m between plant and row, and a depth of 15 to 20 cm. There was a spacing that was one meter wide between plots and two meters wide between blocks. All plots were evenly treated with nitrogen phosphate and sulfur (NPS) fertilizer at a rate of 100 kg/ha.
2.3. Data Collection and Measurements
Counts were taken from the bottom of the main stem of five plants per plot to determine the number of tillers per plant (TPP). Using plastic tape, the height of five randomly selected plants from each plot was measured from ground level to the tree's tip. In order to calculate the biomass yield, each accession was picked from the plot 5–10 cm above ground level at 60 days of planting and 40 days for the first harvest. The weight of the total fresh biomass yield was recorded from each plot in the field and an estimated 300g sample was taken from each plot to the laboratory. The samples were fractioned into leaf and stem parts to determine the proportion of leaf and stem in forage. The sample taken from each plot was weighed to determine the total sample fresh weight using a sensitive table balance.
2.4. Laboratory Analysis
The sample was used for laboratory examination to ascertain the chemical composition and in-vitro dry matter digestibility of the treatments after being oven-dried for 72 hours at 65°C. In order to test nutritional parameters (ash, CP, NDF, ADF, ADL, and IVDMD), the dried samples were pulverized until they passed through a 1-mm sieve. The samples were oven-dried for a full night at 105°C and then burned for six hours at 550°C in a muffle furnace to calculate the total ash content . The micro-Kjeldahl digestion, distillation, and titration processes were used to calculate the nitrogen (N) content. The N content was then multiplied by 6.25 to estimate the crude protein (CP) level. According to Van Soest and Robertson's method of determine the structural plant ingredients (NDF, ADF, and ADL) was used. Invitro organic matter digestibility (IVDMD) was determined according to the Tilley and Terry procedure
2.5. Statistical Analysis
Differences between accessions were tested using analysis of variance procedures of the SAS general linear model to compare treatment means . Means of significant variation were separated using the least significant difference (LSD) at a 95% probability level. The data was analyzed using the following model: Yijk = µ + Gi +Ej +Cj + (GE) ij+ Bk(j) + eijk; Where Yijk = measured response of genotype i in block k of environment j; µ = grand mean; Gi = effect of genotype i; Ej = effect of environment j; Cj=effect of cut j; GE= genotype and environment interaction; Bk (j) = effect of block k in environment j; eijk = random error effect of genotype i and in block k of environment j.
3. Results
3.1. Analysis of Variance
The combined mean square of growth and yield performance of the Napier grass accessions are presented in Table 2. A year had a significant effect on a leaf-to-stem ratio and dry matter yield t/ha, but, a non-significant effect on the number of tillers per plant, plant height and fresh weight. On the other hand, cuts had a significant effect on all growth parameters except plant height, ash and NDF content.
Table 2. The combined mean analysis of variance of measured morphological features of Napier genotype's.

Sources

Mean square for parameters

DF

NT

PH

LSR

FBY t/ha

DMY t/ha

Year

1

74

931

9.5***

0.63

551.8***

Location

1

13749***

4047***

2*

8865.8***

343.3***

Cut

1

31519.5***

326.8

0.45

7011.9***

3414***

Genotype

11

1521***

5293.3***

0.34

819.36***

23.9**

Genotype*location

23

1024.5***

3569***

0.34

25.8***

5.87***

Error

273

102.2

541.6

0.32

104.3

6.9

Grand Mean

30.7

136.5

1.18

25.8

5.87

LSD

5.7

13.2

0.32

5.8

1.5

R2

0.67

0.33

0.15

0.43

0.38

PH=plant height; DMY=dry matter yield; LSR=leaf to stem ratio; G=genotype; L=location; NT=number of tillers; Y=year; G*L=genotype by location interaction; G*C=genotype by cut; interaction; NS = non-significant; * = significant at 0.05; ** = significant at 0.01; *** = significant at 0.001.
The genotype*environment (G×E) interaction effects were highly significant (p<0.001) differences for tiller per plant, height, fresh biomass, and DM yield with an expectation of leaf-to-stem ratio.
Table 3. Napier grass accessions' mean morphological and qualitative characteristics for two consecutive cuts made over the area and in 202/021 and 2021/22.

Year

Parameters

NT

PH cm

LSR

FBY t/ha

DMY t/ha

DM

Ash

CP

NDF

ADF

ADL

IVDMD%

2020/21

27.3b

138.69

1.38a

24.4

7a

93.4a

7.78a

14.3a

66.2b

34.3b

2.49b

63.27a

2021/22

34.1a

134.37

0.98b

27.2

4.73b

93.2b

5.69b

12.4b

67.3a

34.8a

2.63a

62.49b

GM

30.7

136.5

1.18

25.8

5.87

93.3

6.7

13.3

66.7

34.5

2.5

62.8

LSD

3.9

6.4

0.13

0.36

0.71

0.14

0.56

0.38

0.65

0.45

0.12

0.61

P-value

***

NS

***

NS

***

*

***

***

**

*

*

*

PH=plant height; DMY=dry matter yield; LSR=leaf to stem ratio; NT=number of tillers; CP=crude protein; NDF=neutral detergent fiber; ADF=acid detergent fiber; ADL=neutral detergent lignin; IVDMD=invitro dry matter digestibility; NS = non-significant; * = significant at 0.05; ** = significant at 0.01; *** = significant at 0.001.
3.2. Combined Effects of Location on Morphological and Nutritional Qualities of Napier Accession
The effects of tested location on the tillering ability of plants, plant height, leaf-to-stem proportion and dry matter yield of Pennisetum purpureum grass accessions were presented in Table 4. The results from this study revealed that except ADL the other tiller numbers, plant height, leaf proportion, fresh forage yield, dry matter yield, and other nutritional quality parameters were significantly (p>0.001) affected by the tested location.
3.3. Combined Effects of Cuts on Morphological and Nutritional Qualities of Napier Accession
Table 4. The morphological and qualitative characteristics of Napier grass accessions were examined over location for two successive cuts between 2020 and 2021.

Locations

Parameters

NT

PH cm

LSR

FBY t/ha

DMY t/ha

DM

Ash

CP

NDF

ADF

ADL

IVDMD%

Pawe

35a

143.4a

1.2a

30.2a

6.7a

92.9b

5.1b

13b

67.4a

34.2b

2.5

64.6a

Jawi

26.4b

129.5b

1.08b

21.4b

5b

93.6a

8.3a

13.6a

66.1b

34.8a

2.6

61.1b

GM

30.7

136.5

1.18

25.8

5.87

93.3

6.7

13.3

66.7

34.5

2.5

62.8

LSD

2.3

5.4

0.31

2.3

0.69

0.11

0.47

0.4

0.6

0.4

0.11

0.4

P-value

***

***

*

***

***

**

***

***

***

***

NS

***

PH=plant height; DMY=dry matter yield; LSR=leaf to stem ratio; NT=number of tillers; CP=crude protein; NDF=neutral detergent fiber; ADF=acid detergent fiber; ADL=neutral detergent lignin; IVDMD=invitro dry matter digestibility; NS = non-significant; * = significant at 0.05; ** = significant at 0.01; *** = significant at 0.001.
Table 5. Morphological and quality traits of Napier grass accessions tested over location from 2020 to 2021 for two consecutive cuts.

Cuts

Parameters

NT

PH cm

LSR

FBY t/ha

DMY t/ha

DM

Ash

CP

NDF

ADF

ADL

IVDMD%

Cut-I

18.4b

136.8

1.33a

20.8b

5.2b

93.2b

6.66

14a

66.9

34.98a

2.64a

63.5b

Cut-II

38.1a

136.3

1.08b

28.7a

6.2a

93.37a

6.7

12.9b

66.6

34.33b

2.5b

62.5b

GM

30.7

136.5

1.18

25.8

5.87

93.3

6.7

13.3

66.7

34.5

2.5

62.8

LSD

2.4

5.5

0.14

2.4

0.7

0.11

0.49

0.41

0.64

0.42

o.11

0.42

P-value

***

NS

*

***

**

*

NS

**

NS

**

**

**

PH=plant height; DMY=dry matter yield; LSR=leaf to stem ratio; NT=number of tillers; CP=crude protein; NDF=neutral detergent fiber; ADF=acid detergent fiber; ADL=neutral detergent lignin; IVDMD=invitro dry matter digestibility; NS = non-significant; * = significant at 0.05; ** = significant at 0.01; *** = significant at 0.001.
As shown in Table 5 cuts had a significant effect on measured growth parameters and percentage of all the nutritional quality components. The number of tillers per plant and fresh weight had a highly significant (p<0.001) difference for each cut.
3.4. Combined Effects of Accessions on Morphological Parameters of Napier Accession
As shown in Table 6. the number of tillers varied significantly (p< 0.001) across accessions in the present study. Accession-14983 (47.4) and 16794 (42.98) followed by 16819 (34.6) constantly produced a higher number of tillers, but accession 15743 (20.4). The combined mean of plant height among Napier accessions significantly differed (p<0.05), which ranged from 115.29 to 168.1cm with a mean of 136.5 cm. The response of Napier accessions for dry matter yield performance at the forage harvesting stage across locations and over years showed significant (p<0.01) variation in the combined analysis as indicated in Table 6. In combined mean analysis, the DM yield of analysis ranged from 4.68 to 7.9 t/ha with a mean of 5.87 t/ha.
Table 6. Morphological traits of Napier grass accessions tested over two locations from 2020 to 2021 for two consecutive cuts.

Accessions

Parameters

NT

PH cm

LSR

FBY t/ha

DMY t/ha

14983

47.4a

132.7cde

1.16ab

24.94d

5.57cd

14984

31.1bc

121.9ef

1.11b

30.89bc

6.4abc

15743

20.4e

123.1ef

1.46a

31.3abc

6.3abcd

16783

31.7bc

149.2b

0.97b

17.97e

4.68d

16791

23.2de

151.8b

1.22ab

31.9ab

7.4ab

16792

23.5de

168.1a

1.1b

25.53cd

5.79bcd

16794

42.98a

139bcd

1.14ab

24.77d

5.68cd

16813

29.6bc

115.29f

1.25ab

20.9de

4.72cd

16815

29.9bc

129.5de

1.25ab

21.23de

5.11cd

16817

26.4cd

131.2de

1.13ab

20.5de

5.33cd

16819

34.6b

131.59cde

1.23ab

22.48de

5.48cd

Local

26.6cd

144.6bc

1.12b

37.4a

7.9a

GM

30.73

136.5

1.18

25.8

5.87

LSD

5.7

13.2

0.33

5.79

1.7

P-value

***

NS

*

***

**

PH=plant height; DMY=dry matter yield; LSR=leaf to stem ratio; NT=number of tillers; NS = non-significant; * = significant at 0.05; ** = significant at 0.01; *** = significant at 0.001.
3.5. Combined Effects of the Nutritional Characteristic of Napier Accessions
The mean DM, ash, crude protein, NDF, ADF, ADL, and in-vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) contents of Napier accessions harvested at 60 days to planting and 40 days to first harvest for the first and second cut are indicated in Table 7. The result revealed that DM, ash, CP, NDF, ADF, ADL, and IVDMD varied significantly (P<0.001) among Napier accessions.
Table 7. Nutritional quality traits of Napier grass accessions tested over two locations from 2020 to 2021 for two consecutive cuts.

Accessions

Parameters

DM%

Ash%

CP%

NDF%

ADF%

ADL%

IVDMD%

14983

93.45ab

7.56a

14.37a

66.06de

34.53bc

2.59bcd

62.44cd

14984

93.13c

7.02abc

13.59abcd

65.57e

33.29d

2.25e

64.72a

15743

93.22bc

7.48a

13bcde

66.34cde

35.12ab

2.56cd

63.3bc

16783

93.38abc

5.93c

12.62de

68.86a

35.64a

2.87a

61.1f

16791

93.25abc

6.3bc

12.66cde

67.93ab

34.66ab

2.33de

63.04bcd

16792

93.4abc

6.09bc

13.75ab

67.36abcd

34.8ab

2.85ab

62.75bcd

16794

93.38abc

7.03abc

13.89ab

67.33bcd

35.4ab

2.7abc

62.76bcd

16813

93.19bc

7.18ab

13.64abc

65.28e

34.49bc

2.39de

63.55b

16815

93.25abc

5.88c

12.48e

66.09cde

33.59bc

2.78abc

62.37cde

16817

93.5a

7.12ab

13.34bcde

66.08cde

35.31ab

2.74abc

61.43ef

16819

93.38abc

6.78abc

13.29bcde

67.59abc

34.75ab

2.5cd

62.15de

Local

93.13c

6.48abc

13.67ab

66.73bcde

33.35d

2.21e

64.95a

GM

93.31

6.74

13.36

66.77

34.58

2.5

62.88

LSD

0.28

1.17

0.99

1.52

1

0.28

0.99

P-value

***

***

***

***

***

***

***

DM=dry matter; CP=crude protein; NDF=neutral detergent fiber; ADF=acid detergent fiber; ADL=neutral detergent lignin; IVDMD=invitro dry matter digestibility; NS = non-significant; * = significant at 0.05; ** = significant at 0.01; *** = significant at 0.001.
4. Discussion
4.1. Analysis of Variance
The leaf-to-stem ratio and dry matter yield t/ha were significantly differnt by the year, while plant height, fresh weight, and the number of tillers per plant were not. All growth characters, however, with the exception of plant height, ash, and NDF content, were significantly impacted by cuts. According to our findings, which were in agreement with those of Ansa and Garjila , cutting frequency for Pennisetum purpureum grasses had observable impacts on fresh weight and dry matter yield t/ha. But the results contradict to those of Wen and Jiang , who found that ryegrass produced more leaves when cutting more frequently, or at shorter intervals. This reduction in growth rate and shoot development might be an indication that high cutting frequency may suppress grass regeneration and reduce re-growth potential. This result shows that each genotype is affected by cutting frequency positively and negatively, so classifying accessions under cutting frequency is necessary.
4.2. Combined Effects of Location on Morphological and Nutritional Qualities of Napier Accession
This supports earlier findings by Gemechu Keneni , who found that selecting accessions that perform better in one environment might not allow for the identification of accessions that can replicate almost the same performance in different environments. According to , variety by environmental interaction changes the relative performance of a cultivar in different environments because different accessions react differently to different biotic, climatic, and edaphic factors. This helps determine which accessions are appropriate for a given location. Generally speaking, the location interaction effect meant that almost every measured morphological trait of Napier accessions was strongly influenced by genotype. For a certain setting, special registration is therefore necessary for the effective use of specific accessions.
4.3. Combined Effects of Cuts on Morphological and Nutritional Qualities of Napier Accession
There was a significantly significant (p<0.001) difference in fresh weight and the number of tillers per plant for each cut. With the exception of plant height, ash, and NDF values, all other growth and quality metrics between cuttings differed significantly (p<0.01). In comparison, the number of tillers per plant, fresh and dry matter yield, and crude protein or ADF and ADL content, as well as the leaf-to-stem ratio, were all higher at the first cut. Our results are consistent with the report that as plants matured, the number of tillers per plant rose for Napier grass. By restoring lost photosynthetic area and preserving basal area, recurrent defoliation may be tolerated by a high number of tillerings . The heights of plant, ash and NDF content were not affected by different cuts. Fresh and dry matter yield was negatively correlated with crude protein content. Hence, the dry matter yield variation among accessions for different harvesting intervals in the present study was due to the differences in the amount and distribution of rainfall received during the growth period. The moisture availability following the wetter season triggers the development of root, tiller and shoot of Napier grass and then dramatically increases the yield . According to cutting at the late maturity stage (42 days) given higher dry matter yields, the protein content and metabolizable energy are higher at the early maturity (35 days) stage because the degradation is directly proportional to the age of the grass.
4.4. Combined Effects of Accessions on Morphological Parameters of Napier Accession
The current result was greater than the result for accession 14983 (19.9) indicated by . The variation in tiller number among accessions was due to the yielding ability of the genotype as the result of its interaction with the environment and environmental factors such as soil characteristics, moisture, and temperature . Tillering performance is an important morphological characteristic to be considered during the selection of appropriate forage crops to improve production and productivity . The variance in tillers produced per plant among the varieties of Pennisetum purpureum grass from this study might be exaggerated due to genetic variations among the varieties. The best three Napier grasses recommended for future promotion are shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2. The three Napier grass varieties.
Accessions 16792, 16791, and 16783 typically had the highest mean plant height, while accession 14984 and 15743 had the lowest, with the remaining accessions falling in middle. This discrepancy might result from how different accessions' genetic potential reacts to the soil fertility and moisture content of the testing conditions. According to , the height of the plant at cutting influences both the growth traits and the amount of forage yield produced by Napier grass. To increase DM yield and grass nutritive values, it is crucial to harvest Napier grass at the proper cutting height and frequencies . Generally, the presence of genetic variation among the tested accessions, the response of accessions to environmental factors and their interactions are the major reasons for plant height differences in Napier accessions.
During the 2020 and 2021 cropping seasons, as well as in the combined study displayed in Table 6, there was a substantial (p<0.05) variation in the leaf-to-stem ratio of Napier accessions at both locations. According to the results, accession 15743 (1.46) had the highest leaf proportion, while accession 16783 (0.97) had the lowest. In two cuts at the Pawe location throughout both cropping seasons, the other accessions had an intermediate leaf-to-stem ratio value. The studied Napier grass accessions respond differentially to the leaf-to-stem ratio because of genetic differences. Plant height, cut age, and tillering performance all have an impact on the plant's leaf proportion. The proportion of leaves in forage crops has important influences on the nutritional quality of any forage crop as leaves contain higher levels of nutrients and less fiber than stems. As indicated by Tessema Zewdu the leaf and stem fractions were affected by tillering performance, plant height and age of harvesting. The leaf fraction has significant implications on the nutritive quality of the grass as leaves contain higher levels of nutrients and less fiber than stems. The leaf proportion is associated with the high nutritive value of the forage because the leaf is generally of higher nutritive value described by the performance of animals is closely related to the amount of leaf in the diet.
Generally, local check gave the highest mean DM yield followed by 16791, 14984 and 15743. On the other hand, accession 16783 provided the lowest DM yield. Furthermore, DM yield differences occurred due to variations among the tested accessions, testing years, location and cut effects. The earlier studies described by proved that the wider range of dry matter yield variance among accessions could be attributed to differences in the genetic potential of varieties. The dry matter yield obtained from this study for all tested Pennisetum purpureum grass accessions was higher than previously reported values by reported 1.4-7 t/ha for ten elephant grass accessions in rain-fed conditions. However, it is lower than the value by indicated 6.95-17.9 t/ha for ten Napier accessions at Areka, the southern part of Ethiopia.
4.5. Combined Effects of the Nutritional Characteristic of Napier Accessions
Mineral concentrations in the feed can be inferred from the amount of ash in the forage. The ash proportion was lowest in accession 16783, 16791, and 16815, while it was highest in accession 14983 and 15743. McDowell supposed that some of the possible causes of variation in mineral concentration in forage plants are soil properties, morphological components, meteorological conditions, and plant developmental stage.
The highest CP yield was recorded for the Napier genotype 14983 followed by 16794, 16792, and local. On the other hand, Napier accessions 16815, 16783 and 16791 gave the lowest CP yield while the remaining accessions produced an intermediate CP yield. The crude protein content among Napier accessions was varied might be due to genetic variation, stage of harvesting and differences in soil fertility. The overall mean in CP harvested at 60 to planting and 40 days harvest from the first cut in the present study (13.36%) is higher than the value (5.42%) reported by .
Among the accessions that were examined, the greatest IVDMD values were recorded by 14894 and local, followed by 15743 and 16813. The lowest values were reported from16873 and 16817 accessions. In tropical grasses, the decrease in OMD with maturity has typically been attributed to a rise in the structural components of the cell wall and digestibility content, which is ranked as the decline in the leaf-to-stem ratio that did the best . The percentage of leaves to stems decreased as the plants grew older, lowering the levels of CP and IVDMD . The highest digestible yield was likewise obtained by Napier accessions that produced the highest CP yield.
The contents of NDF, ADF, and ADL varied significantly (P<0.001) among the Napier grass accessions. In Napier accessions, variations in NDF and ADF content are mostly caused by variations in genetic components, harvesting stage, climate, and soil variables. All of the Napier accessions in the current investigation had NDF and ADF contents between 65.28 and 68.86 and 33.29 and 35.64 percent, respectively, which were lower than the values between 61.05 and 70 and 49.59 and 50.82 reported by .
Napier accessions may be more digestible than the other grasses, as evidenced by their lower levels of NDF, ADF, and ADL content. The average NDF level of the Napier accessions in this study, however, was greater than the 45–65 NDF concentration of medium-quality roughage feeds that are recommended . Forage feeds' digestibility is negatively impacted by the current study's lower ADL value. According to , the digestibility of the feed may suffer if the ADL value is higher than 60 g/kg DM. In general, insoluble fiber, especially lignin, reduces the feed's total digestibility by reducing the availability of nutrients .
5. Conclusions
The Napier accession ILRI-14983 was best performed in terms of the number of tillers, ash, and crude protein. Accession ILRI-15743 was better-performed leaf-to-stem ratio and ash content. The local check was given the high amount of dry matter yield per ton per hectare. Accession ILRI-14984, 15743, 16791, 16792, and 16819 were intermediate values in terms of the number of tillers, leaf-to-stem ratio, dry matter yield t/ha, ash, crude protein content, and invitro dry matter digestibility. Based on the overall performance accession 14984, 15743, 16791, and 16819 were recommended for better growth characteristics and nutritional quality parameters. So we recommended the demonstration of selected accessions for Metekel and Awi mid and low land areas and other compa-rable agro-ecologies in the country at farmer level was essintal.
Abbreviations

ADF

Acidic Detergent Fiber

ADL

Acidic Detergent Liginin

CP

Crude Protien

DM

Dry Matter

ILRI

International livestock Research Institute

IVDMD

In-vitro Dry Matter Digestibility

NDF

Neutral Detergent Fiber

OMD

Organic Matter Digestibility

TPP

Tiller Per Plant

Acknowledgments
I am extremely gratified to the Holetta Agricultural Research Centre Animal Nutrition Laboratory staff; especially Mr. Dereje Fekadu, Mr. Gebermarim Terefe, Dr Mesfin Dejene and Dr Getu Kitew are highly acknowledged.
Author Contributions
Esubalew Shitaneh: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Habtie Arega: Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Temesgen Fentahun: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Funding
No funding sources for this activity.
Data Availability Statement
Data is available with the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] Alemayehu Mengistu, Gezahagn Kebede, Fekede Feyissa and Getenet Assefa. 2017. Review on major feed resources in Ethiopia, conditions, challenges and opportunities. Academic Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Research. 5(3): 176-185pp.
[2] Keftasa D (1996) Effects of Nitrogen Application and Stage of Development on Yield and Nutritional Value of Rhodes Grass (Chloris gayana). Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences.
[3] McDonald, P., R. A. Edwards, J. F. D. Greenhalgh, C. A. Morgan, L. A. Sinclair and R. G. Wilkinson. 2010. Animal Nutrition (7th ed.). Prentice Hall, Harlow, England, London. 714p.
[4] Seyoum B, Zinash S, Tadesse T, AND Liyusew A. 1998. Evaluation of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) and Pennisetum Hybrids (Pennisetum purpureum x Pennisetum typhoides) in the central highlands of Ethiopia. In: Fifth National Conference of Ethiopian Society of Animal Production. 15-17 May 1997, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[5] Tessema Zewdu. 2005. Variation in growth, yield, chemical composition, and in-vitro dry matter digestibility of Napier grass varieties (Pennisetum purpureum). Trop. Sci. 45: 67- 73.
[6] Feyissa, F., G. Assefa, L. Hiwot, M. Minta and T. Tsadik, 2005. Evaluation of Napier grass-vetch mixture to improve total herbage yield in the central highlands. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP), August 25-26, 2005, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, pp: 155-163.
[7] Getnet Assefa and Gezahagn Kebede. 2012. Seed Research and Development of Perennial Forage Crops in the Central Highlands. In: Getnet Assefa, Mesfin Dejene, Jean Hanson, Getachew Anemut, Solomon Mengistu and Alemayehu Mengistu (eds.). Forage Seed Research and Development in Ethiopia. Proceedings of a workshop held on 12-14 May 2011 at EIAR, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[8] Anderson WF, Dien BS, Brandon SK, Peterson JD (2008) Assessment of Bermuda grass and bunch grasses as feedstocks for conversion to ethanol. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 145: 13-21:
[9] AOAC., 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th Edn., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC., USA., Pages: 684.
[10] Van Soest, P. J. and J. B. Robertson, 1985. Analysis of Forages and Fibrous Foods. Cornell University Press, New York, USA.
[11] Tilley, J. M. A. and Terry, R. A, 1963. A two-stage technique for in-vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18: 104.
[12] SAS (Statistical Analysis System). (2003). SAS/STAT guide to personal computers (9th ed., pp. 245–477). Prentice Hall.
[13] Ansa, J. E. O. 1, Garjila, Y. A, 2019. Effect of Cutting Frequency on Forage Growth and Yield in Elephant Grass in the Southern Rainforest of Nigeria. International Journal of Environmental & Agriculture Research, 5(7).
[14] Wen Y., and Jiang H., 2005. Cutting effects on growth characteristics, yield composition, and population relationships of perennial ryegrass and white clover in mixed pasture. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol. 48: 349-358.
[15] Gemechu Keneni, (2012): Genetic potential and limitations of Ethiopian chickpea (Cicer arietinumal) germplasm for improving attributes of symbiotic nitrogen fixation, phosphorus uptake and use efficiency, and adzuki bean beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis L.) resistance. PhD. Thesis. Addis Ababa University faculty of life science, Ethiopia.
[16] Gamachu, N. and G. Wekgari, 2017. Adaptation study of improved elephant grasses (Pennisetum purpureum) and Oats (Avena sativa L.) at Haro Sabu, Kelem Wollega zone, Ethiopia. J. Biol. Agric. Healthcare, 7(17): 51-60.
[17] Anindo, D. O. and H. L. Potter, 1994. Seasonal variation in productivity and nutritive value of Napier grass at Muguga, Kenya. East Afr. Agric. For. J., 59: 177-185.
[18] Tessema Z, Baars R, Alemu Y, Dawit N (2003) Effect of plant height at cutting and fertilizer on growth of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum (L.) Schumach.) Tropical Sci 43: 57-61.
[19] Mamaru, T., 2018. Evaluation of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum (L.) Schumach) accessions for agronomic traits under acidic soil conditions of Nejo Area, Ethiopia. Int. J. Agric. Biosci., 7: 30-35.
[20] Tessema Tesfaye, Getachew Gudero, Milkias Fanta, Getinet Kebede, 2022. Yield Dynamics and Nutrient Quality of Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum) Varieties under Consecutive Harvests, Ethiopian Journal of Science and Sustainable Development, 9(1).
[21] Haryani, H., Norlindawati, A. P., Norfadzrin, F., Aswanimiyuni, A. and Azman, A., 2018. Yield and nutritive values of six Napier (Pennisetum purpureum) cultivars at different cutting ages. Malaysian J. Vet. Res, 9, pp. 6-12.
[22] Getiso A, Mijena D (2021) Performance Evaluation of Napier Grass (Penisetum Purpuruem (L.) Schumach) accessions under rain fed and Irrigation System at Wondo Genet. Glob J Ecol 6(1): 028-033.
[23] Gezahagn Kebede, Fekede Feyissa, Getnet Assefa, Mengistu Alemayehu, Alemayehu Mengistu, Aemiro Kehaliew, Kassahun Melese, Solomon Mengistu, Estifanos Tadesse, Shewangizaw Wolde & Mergia Abera 2-016. Evaluation of Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum (L.) Schumach) Accessions for Agronomic Traits under Different Environmental Conditions of Ethiopia. International Journal of Advanced Research, 4(4); 1029-1035.
[24] Mureithi JG, Thorpe W (1996) The effects of herbaceous legume intercropping and mulching on the productivity of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) and total forage yield in coastal lowland Kenya. In: Jean Ndikumana and Peterde Leeuw (eds.) Sustainable Feed Production and Utilization for Smallholder Livestock Enterprises in Sub-Saharan Africa. African Feed Resources Network (AFRNET) Workshop held in Harare, Zimbabwe, 6-10 December, 1993. AFRNET, Nairobi, Kenya 45-50.
[25] Muinga RW, Thorpe W, Topps JH (1992) Voluntary food intake, live weight change and lactation performance of crossbred dairy cows given ad libitum Pennisetum purpureum (Napier grass var. Bana) supplemented with leucaena forage in the lowland semi-humid tropics. Anim Prod 55: 331-337.
[26] Xie, X. M., X. Q. Zhang, Z. X. Dong and H. R. Guo, 2011. Dynamic changes of lignin contents of MT-1 elephant grass and its closely related cultivars. Biomass Bioenergy, 35: 1732-1738.
[27] Skerman, P. J. and F. Riveros, 1990. Tropical Grasses. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp: 83.
[28] Gemiyo, D., A. Jimma and S. Wolde, 2017. Biomass yield and nutritive value of ten Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) accessions at Areka, Southern Ethiopia. World J. Agric. Sci., 13: 185-190.
[29] McDowell, L. R. and Valle, G., 2000. Major minerals in forages. Forage evaluation in ruminant nutrition, pp. 373-397.
[30] Kabuga, J. D. and C. A. Darko, 1993. In Saco degradation of dry matter and nitrogen in oven, dried and fresh tropical grasses and some relations to in vitro dry matter digestibility. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 40: 191-205.
[31] Humphreys L R. (1991): Tropical pasture utilization. Camb. University Press. Great Britain.
[32] Denbela Hidosa and Sintayehu Kibiret, 2020. Evaluation of Pennisetum perpureum Grass Variety to Improve Feed Availability in South Omo. Trends in Applied Sciences Research, 15: 193-200.
[33] Singh, G. P. and S. J. Oosting, 1992. A model for describing the energy value of straws. Indian dairyman XLI: 322-327.
[34] Van Soest, P. J., 1994. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. 2nd Edn, Cornell University Press, London, UK., Pages: 476.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Shitaneh, E., Arega, H., Fentahun, T. (2025). Assessing Various Accessions of Napier (Pennisetum Purpureum) Grass in North Western Ethiopia. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 13(1), 7-17. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Shitaneh, E.; Arega, H.; Fentahun, T. Assessing Various Accessions of Napier (Pennisetum Purpureum) Grass in North Western Ethiopia. Am. J. Agric. For. 2025, 13(1), 7-17. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Shitaneh E, Arega H, Fentahun T. Assessing Various Accessions of Napier (Pennisetum Purpureum) Grass in North Western Ethiopia. Am J Agric For. 2025;13(1):7-17. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.12,
      author = {Esubalew Shitaneh and Habtie Arega and Temesgen Fentahun},
      title = {Assessing Various Accessions of Napier (Pennisetum Purpureum) Grass in North Western Ethiopia},
      journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry},
      volume = {13},
      number = {1},
      pages = {7-17},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20251301.12},
      abstract = {One of Ethiopia's the chief uncertainties with the livestock industry is the year-round scarcity of optimum quality animal feed. To overcame the supply of quality feed cultivation of tropically adapted forage species, which gives a reasonable yield under rain deficit and unstable climatic conditions. Napier grass accessions were evaluated at Pawe and Jawi localtions for their adaptionn and yield performance. Ten Napier accessions with three replications were used in the randomized complete block design of the study. Mean comparisons between accessions were made using the least significant differences and the general linear model was used to analyze data for growth parameters and nutritional quality traits, such as tillering performance, plant height, forage dry matter, leaf and stem fractions, and nutritional quality. Sixty days following the establishment, in September, the first cut was made; forty days later, in October, the second cut was made. For most variables, there was a substantial (P0.05). In terms of fresh and dry matter yield t/ha, accessions 14984, 15743, and 16791 perform better. Accessions 14984 and local responses (64.72 and 64.95) were the most significant (p<0.001) differences in in vitro dry matter digestibility, followed by 16813 and 15743 (63.5 and 63.3). According to the findings, the ILRI-14984, 15743, and 16791 accessions produced results that were comparable to the standard checks for superior yield and nutritional quality. So we recommended the demonstration of selected accessions for Metekel and Awi mid and low land areas and other comparable agro-ecologies in the country at farmer level was essintal.},
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Assessing Various Accessions of Napier (Pennisetum Purpureum) Grass in North Western Ethiopia
    AU  - Esubalew Shitaneh
    AU  - Habtie Arega
    AU  - Temesgen Fentahun
    Y1  - 2025/02/17
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.12
    T2  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    JF  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    JO  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    SP  - 7
    EP  - 17
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8591
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.12
    AB  - One of Ethiopia's the chief uncertainties with the livestock industry is the year-round scarcity of optimum quality animal feed. To overcame the supply of quality feed cultivation of tropically adapted forage species, which gives a reasonable yield under rain deficit and unstable climatic conditions. Napier grass accessions were evaluated at Pawe and Jawi localtions for their adaptionn and yield performance. Ten Napier accessions with three replications were used in the randomized complete block design of the study. Mean comparisons between accessions were made using the least significant differences and the general linear model was used to analyze data for growth parameters and nutritional quality traits, such as tillering performance, plant height, forage dry matter, leaf and stem fractions, and nutritional quality. Sixty days following the establishment, in September, the first cut was made; forty days later, in October, the second cut was made. For most variables, there was a substantial (P0.05). In terms of fresh and dry matter yield t/ha, accessions 14984, 15743, and 16791 perform better. Accessions 14984 and local responses (64.72 and 64.95) were the most significant (p<0.001) differences in in vitro dry matter digestibility, followed by 16813 and 15743 (63.5 and 63.3). According to the findings, the ILRI-14984, 15743, and 16791 accessions produced results that were comparable to the standard checks for superior yield and nutritional quality. So we recommended the demonstration of selected accessions for Metekel and Awi mid and low land areas and other comparable agro-ecologies in the country at farmer level was essintal.
    VL  - 13
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Pawe Agriculture Research Center, Livestock Research Directorate, Pawe, Ethiopia

    Biography: Esubalew Shitaneh is a researcher at the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research Pawe Agricultural Research Center. He completed his MSc in Animal Production from Bahir Dar University in 2020. He currently serves on the reviewing different manuscripts of numerous international journals and local proceedings.

    Research Fields: Animal feeds and nutrition, poultry nutrition, improved forage, pasture management, dairy production, apiculture and dairy cow management.

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Pawe Agriculture Research Center, Livestock Research Directorate, Pawe, Ethiopia

    Biography: Habtie Arega is a researcher at the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research Pawe Agricultural Research Center. He completed his MSc in Animal genetics and Breeding from Haramaya University in 2019. He currently serves on the research of different manuscripts of numerous international journals and local proceedings.

    Research Fields: Animal production, Animal genetics and breeding, goat production, poultry breeding, dairy breeding and apiculture.

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Pawe Agriculture Research Center, Livestock Research Directorate, Pawe, Ethiopia

    Biography: Temesgen Fentahun is a researcher at the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research Pawe Agricultural Research Center. He completed his MSc in Irrigation Engineering from Bahir Dar University in 2020. He currently working on research on irrigation.

    Research Fields: irrigation, cereal crop irrigation, Water harvesting technology, Irrigation drainage and geographical mapping.

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Document Sections

    1. 1. Introduction
    2. 2. Materials and Methods
    3. 3. Results
    4. 4. Discussion
    5. 5. Conclusions
    Show Full Outline
  • Abbreviations
  • Acknowledgments
  • Author Contributions
  • Funding
  • Data Availability Statement
  • Conflicts of Interest
  • References
  • Cite This Article
  • Author Information