In this study, the effect of various modal: wool blend ratios on yarn count and plain weave fabric parameters are analyzed. The blends analyzed consist of 100% wool, 70: Seven fabrics were prepared using wool-modal, 50:50 wool-modal, 30:70 wool-modal and 100% modal blended yarns with three counts, 20 Ne, 30 Ne and 40 Ne each. The aim is to assess properties of fabric including but not limited to stretchiness, tensile strength, elongation and air permeability and, if so, how adjusted blend and yarn count might impact the result. The results of research reveal that performance of fabric gives dissimilar outcomes depending on wo/ modal ratio. Fabrics produced from 50: The 50; 70 blends had shown higher tensile strength and air permeability than those fabrics fabricated from 100% wool or modal. Notably, the 70: Another interesting feature of 30 blend was that the optimum balance of softness and strength was attained, and it was ideal for application areas that require both properties, to the maximum extent. However, the degree of fabric irregularity came out to be highly dependent on yarn count; the finer yarn-count fabrics (30 Ne & 40 Ne yarn-count) also had low irregularity and high elongation. In the light of the above findings, it is concluded that both blend ratio and yarn count should be well needed to achieve the required fabric properties. This work offers significant recommendations to the textile industry, especially to those producers interested in developing fabrics based on wool and models having the mentioned benefits. Finally, this study helps to progress the development of eco-friendly textile options relevant to the apparel and fashion industries’ many sectors, including garments and fabrics. The purpose for undertaking this study was to assess fabric variations as resulting from changes in blend ratios and thread counts with the aim of establishing the optimum blend and thread count combination to produce fabrics with certain stipulated indicators like softness, strength and air permeability desirable in a particular application.
Published in | American Journal of Art and Design (Volume 10, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajad.20251001.11 |
Page(s) | 1-10 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Wool-Modal Blend, Fabric Performance, Air Permeability, Textile Sustainability, Blend Ratio
Property/Characteristic | Wool | Modal |
---|---|---|
Source | Natural fiber from sheep | Semi-synthetic fiber from beechwood pulp |
Softness | Soft, especially fine grades like Merino wool | Extremely soft and smooth, silk-like feel |
Moisture Absorption | Absorbs up to 30% of its weight in moisture | High moisture absorption, more than cotton |
Breathability | Highly breathable, regulates temperature | Breathable, helps to keep the body cool and dry |
Thermal Insulation | Excellent insulator, retains warmth even when wet | Moderate insulation, not as warm as wool |
Elasticity & Resilience | Naturally elastic, retains shape, resists wrinkles | Moderate elasticity, does not wrinkle easily |
Durability | Durable, but can be susceptible to wear and tear | Stronger than cotton, resistant to shrinkage |
Resistance to Shrinkage | Prone to shrinkage if exposed to heat | Resistant to shrinkage, maintains size |
Color Retention | Retains color well, but can fade over time | Holds dye well, colors stay vibrant after washing |
Eco-Friendliness | Biodegradable, renewable, lower carbon footprint | Biodegradable, made from renewable resources, more eco-friendly than cotton |
Flame Resistance | Naturally flame-resistant | Not flame-resistant |
Antibacterial Properties | Natural antibacterial properties (due to lanolin) | No inherent antibacterial properties |
Smoothness | Rougher texture in coarser grades | Smooth, soft texture, silk-like feel |
Care Requirements | Requires special care (gentle washing, no hot water) | Easy to care for, machine washable |
Comfort | Comfortable for colder weather | Comfortable, ideal for warmer climates or as a layer |
Drape | Good drape, especially in finer grades | Excellent drape, fluid and elegant appearance |
Fiber Type | Standard Fiber Length | Description |
---|---|---|
Modal | 38–50 mm (staple fiber length) | Modal fibers are engineered with consistent staple lengths for ease of blending. |
Merino Wool | 20–40 mm (fine and ultra-fine wool) | Merino wool fibers are shorter, providing a soft and luxurious texture. |
Fabric Type | Yarn Count (20 Ne) | Yarn Count (30 Ne) | Yarn Count (40 Ne) |
---|---|---|---|
30% Wool / 70% Modal | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.7 |
50% Wool / 50% Modal | 3.9 | 4.1 | 4.3 |
100% Wool | 4.6 | 4.8 | 4.9 |
100% Modal | 4.8 | 4.9 | 5.0 |
Fabric Type | Yarn Count (20 Ne) | Yarn Count (30 Ne) | Yarn Count (40 Ne) |
---|---|---|---|
30% Wool / 70% Modal | 10.5 | 11.2 | 12.0 |
50% Wool / 50% Modal | 9.8 | 10.4 | 10.9 |
100% Wool | 8.2 | 8.5 | 9.0 |
100% Modal | 14.1 | 15.3 | 16.0 |
Fabric Type | Yarn Count (20 Ne) | Yarn Count (30 Ne) | Yarn Count (40 Ne) |
---|---|---|---|
30% Wool / 70% Modal | 24.0 | 23.5 | 23.0 |
50% Wool / 50% Modal | 22.5 | 22.0 | 21.8 |
100% Wool | 28.0 | 29.2 | 30.0 |
100% Modal | 34.5 | 35.0 | 36.0 |
Fabric Type | Yarn Count (20 Ne) | Yarn Count (30 Ne) | Yarn Count (40 Ne) |
---|---|---|---|
30% Wool / 70% Modal | 15,000 | 17,000 | 18,000 |
50% Wool / 50% Modal | 14,000 | 15,500 | 16,000 |
100% Wool | 16,500 | 17,500 | 18,200 |
100% Modal | 12,000 | 13,000 | 14,000 |
Fabric Type | Yarn Count (20 Ne) | Yarn Count (30 Ne) | Yarn Count (40 Ne) |
---|---|---|---|
30% Wool / 70% Modal | 3.0 | 2.8 | 2.6 |
50% Wool / 50% Modal | 4.0 | 3.7 | 3.5 |
100% Wool | 6.2 | 5.8 | 5.4 |
100% Modal | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.4 |
Blend Ratio | Parameter | 20 Ne | 30 Ne | 40 Ne |
---|---|---|---|---|
50:50 Blend | CVTPI (%) | 13.5 | 12.5 | 14.0 |
Irregularity (CV%) | 15.8 | 15.2 | 16.5 | |
Thin Places (/km) | 9 | 8 | 11 | |
Thick Places (/km) | 14 | 12 | 16 | |
Breaking Force (CN) | 510 | 540 | 480 | |
RKM (Kgf·Nm) | 17.0 | 18.4 | 16.2 | |
RKM (CV%) | 10.5 | 9.6 | 11.2 | |
Elongation (%) | 21.0 | 22.0 | 20.5 | |
Elongation (CV%) | 11.2 | 10.2 | 11.8 | |
Hairiness (H) | 6.8 | 6.5 | 7.0 | |
Air Permeability | 335 | 320 | 340 | |
70:30 Blend | CVTPI (%) | 12.8 | 11.8 | 13.2 |
Irregularity (CV%) | 14.8 | 14.6 | 15.5 | |
Thin Places (/km) | 7 | 5 | 8 | |
Thick Places (/km) | 12 | 10 | 13 | |
Breaking Force (CN) | 580 | 590 | 560 | |
RKM (Kgf·Nm) | 19.0 | 19.8 | 18.5 | |
RKM (CV%) | 9.4 | 8.8 | 9.6 | |
Elongation (%) | 21.8 | 21.5 | 21.0 | |
Elongation (CV%) | 9.8 | 9.4 | 10.0 | |
Hairiness (H) | 6.0 | 5.8 | 6.2 | |
Air Permeability | 295 | 285 | 300 |
Blend Ratio | Yarn Count (Ne) | Fabric Weight (g/m²) | Warp Yarns (ends/cm) | Weft Yarns (picks/cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|
50:50 Wool-Modal | 30 Ne | 150 | 30 | 25 |
70:30 Wool-Modal | 20 Ne | 180 | 28 | 22 |
100% Wool | 40 Ne | 140 | 32 | 28 |
Ne | Number English (Yarn Count) |
LCA | Life Cycle Assessment |
CVTPI | Coefficient of Variation of Total Imperfections |
CV | Coefficient of Variation |
CN | Centi Newton |
RKM | Reiss Kilometer |
EPC | Ends per Centimeter |
PPC | Picks per Centimeter |
[1] | Carter, E. & Day, A. (2015). Textile Fibers and Their Applications: Natural and Synthetic Blends. Textile Science Journal, 12(3), 245-267. |
[2] | Singh, P., & Gupta, R. (2018). The Role of Wool in High-Performance Fabrics. Journal of Textile Engineering, 45(2), 89-103. |
[3] | Green, S., & Ali, M. (2019). Modal: A Sustainable Fiber for the Future. Journal of Sustainable Materials, 22(4), 410-422. |
[4] | Li, X., & Chen, W. (2020). The Synergistic Effect of Wool-Modal Blends in Textile Fabrics. International Journal of Textile Science, 18(1), 12-28. |
[5] | Smith, R., & Zhang, T. (2017). Sustainability in Textile Blends: Evaluating Wool and Modal. Journal of Eco-Textiles, 30(2), 55-71. |
[6] | Jones, M., & Patel, K. (2016). The Influence of Yarn Count on Fabric Properties. Textile Research Journal, 85(6), 634-650. |
[7] | Liu, Y., & Zhao, H. (2021). Comparative Analysis of Wool, Modal, Acrylic, and Cotton Properties. Fiber & Polymer Science, 19(3), 214-227. |
[8] | Hernandez, R., & Kim, J. (2020). Effect of fiber blends on fabric performance and properties. Textile Research Journal, 90(8), 1457-1467. |
[9] | Sharma, P., & Gupta, V. (2018). Modal and wool blend fabrics: A comparative study on performance characteristics. Journal of Textile Engineering, 60(4), 233-240. |
[10] | Li, Y., & Zhou, F. (2017). Impact of yarn count on the physical properties of wool-modal blend fabrics. Journal of Fiber Materials, 10(3), 121-129. |
[11] | Jiang, H., & Zhang, W. (2019). Sustainable textile production: The role of wool and modal fibers. International Journal of Textile Science, 14(1), 45-50. |
[12] | Chaudhary, S., & Kumar, M. (2021). Performance and environmental impact of wool-modal blended fabrics in textile manufacturing. Textile Sustainability, 9(2), 58-65. |
[13] | Patel, R., & Shah, V. (2016). Properties and applications of modal fibers in textile products. Journal of Textile Research and Technology, 32(6), 112-120. |
[14] | Ghosh, M., & Dutta, D. (2017). A review of the performance characteristics of wool-modal blend fabrics. Textile Research Review, 11(2), 97-105. |
[15] | Mohammad, S., & Rashid, M. (2022). Impact of wool-modal blend ratio on fabric quality and comfort. International Journal of Clothing Science, 18(4), 201-210. |
[16] | Zhao, L., & Wu, H. (2015). Evaluation of blending ratios in wool-modal yarns for performance enhancement in textiles. Journal of Textile Engineering and Technology, 22(4), 303-311. |
[17] | Yang, Y., & Wu, Z. (2018). Exploring the potential of sustainable wool-modal blends in textile applications. Environmental Textile Science Journal, 4(3), 91-98. |
APA Style
Meabed, H. S. A. (2025). The Impact of Blending Wool-Modal Fibers on the Properties of Fabrics Produced at Varying Yarn Counts. American Journal of Art and Design, 10(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajad.20251001.11
ACS Style
Meabed, H. S. A. The Impact of Blending Wool-Modal Fibers on the Properties of Fabrics Produced at Varying Yarn Counts. Am. J. Art Des. 2025, 10(1), 1-10. doi: 10.11648/j.ajad.20251001.11
@article{10.11648/j.ajad.20251001.11, author = {Hussein Sayed Ali Meabed}, title = {The Impact of Blending Wool-Modal Fibers on the Properties of Fabrics Produced at Varying Yarn Counts }, journal = {American Journal of Art and Design}, volume = {10}, number = {1}, pages = {1-10}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajad.20251001.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajad.20251001.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajad.20251001.11}, abstract = {In this study, the effect of various modal: wool blend ratios on yarn count and plain weave fabric parameters are analyzed. The blends analyzed consist of 100% wool, 70: Seven fabrics were prepared using wool-modal, 50:50 wool-modal, 30:70 wool-modal and 100% modal blended yarns with three counts, 20 Ne, 30 Ne and 40 Ne each. The aim is to assess properties of fabric including but not limited to stretchiness, tensile strength, elongation and air permeability and, if so, how adjusted blend and yarn count might impact the result. The results of research reveal that performance of fabric gives dissimilar outcomes depending on wo/ modal ratio. Fabrics produced from 50: The 50; 70 blends had shown higher tensile strength and air permeability than those fabrics fabricated from 100% wool or modal. Notably, the 70: Another interesting feature of 30 blend was that the optimum balance of softness and strength was attained, and it was ideal for application areas that require both properties, to the maximum extent. However, the degree of fabric irregularity came out to be highly dependent on yarn count; the finer yarn-count fabrics (30 Ne & 40 Ne yarn-count) also had low irregularity and high elongation. In the light of the above findings, it is concluded that both blend ratio and yarn count should be well needed to achieve the required fabric properties. This work offers significant recommendations to the textile industry, especially to those producers interested in developing fabrics based on wool and models having the mentioned benefits. Finally, this study helps to progress the development of eco-friendly textile options relevant to the apparel and fashion industries’ many sectors, including garments and fabrics. The purpose for undertaking this study was to assess fabric variations as resulting from changes in blend ratios and thread counts with the aim of establishing the optimum blend and thread count combination to produce fabrics with certain stipulated indicators like softness, strength and air permeability desirable in a particular application. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Impact of Blending Wool-Modal Fibers on the Properties of Fabrics Produced at Varying Yarn Counts AU - Hussein Sayed Ali Meabed Y1 - 2025/01/16 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajad.20251001.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ajad.20251001.11 T2 - American Journal of Art and Design JF - American Journal of Art and Design JO - American Journal of Art and Design SP - 1 EP - 10 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-7802 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajad.20251001.11 AB - In this study, the effect of various modal: wool blend ratios on yarn count and plain weave fabric parameters are analyzed. The blends analyzed consist of 100% wool, 70: Seven fabrics were prepared using wool-modal, 50:50 wool-modal, 30:70 wool-modal and 100% modal blended yarns with three counts, 20 Ne, 30 Ne and 40 Ne each. The aim is to assess properties of fabric including but not limited to stretchiness, tensile strength, elongation and air permeability and, if so, how adjusted blend and yarn count might impact the result. The results of research reveal that performance of fabric gives dissimilar outcomes depending on wo/ modal ratio. Fabrics produced from 50: The 50; 70 blends had shown higher tensile strength and air permeability than those fabrics fabricated from 100% wool or modal. Notably, the 70: Another interesting feature of 30 blend was that the optimum balance of softness and strength was attained, and it was ideal for application areas that require both properties, to the maximum extent. However, the degree of fabric irregularity came out to be highly dependent on yarn count; the finer yarn-count fabrics (30 Ne & 40 Ne yarn-count) also had low irregularity and high elongation. In the light of the above findings, it is concluded that both blend ratio and yarn count should be well needed to achieve the required fabric properties. This work offers significant recommendations to the textile industry, especially to those producers interested in developing fabrics based on wool and models having the mentioned benefits. Finally, this study helps to progress the development of eco-friendly textile options relevant to the apparel and fashion industries’ many sectors, including garments and fabrics. The purpose for undertaking this study was to assess fabric variations as resulting from changes in blend ratios and thread counts with the aim of establishing the optimum blend and thread count combination to produce fabrics with certain stipulated indicators like softness, strength and air permeability desirable in a particular application. VL - 10 IS - 1 ER -