In order to meet the challenges posed by dependence on fossil fuels, it is essential to develop an energy alternative based on renewable sources. Among alternative energy solutions, biogas occupies a prime position. However, before biogas can be used, it must be purified, which involves removing the carbon dioxide (CO2) and recovering the methane (CH4), thereby increasing the calorific value of the methane. The most innovative purification solution is cryogenics. Our aim in this work is to use cryogenics to purify biogas by liquefying the carbon dioxide it contains. To achieve this, we have designed and dimensioned the various components of a cryogenic purification unit for biogas production. Using the incremental method based on heat conservation equations, we simulated this purification process on the Aspen plus calculation code. Using the ADMI calculation code, we modeled the model equations to visualize the behavior of the various parameters to be controlled. The temperature, pressure and mass flow profiles affecting the desublimation of carbon dioxide were obtained. Furthermore, the sizing results show that a 450 W compressor and a condenser with a capacity of 2.5 kg are required. The temperature and pressure of the biomethane and carbon dioxide at the condenser outlet are -130°C and 15 bars. Simulations show curves for variations in temperature, pressure, rate of bio-methane recovery and carbon dioxide evacuation. They show that it is possible to produce biomethane with a purity of 96%, with a very negligible amount of carbon dioxide and a high lower calorific value (LCV) than raw biogas (9.83 kWh/m3 higher than 6 kWh/m3), a significant value in energy terms, showing that this biomethane could be used for a variety of purposes.
Published in | Applied Engineering (Volume 9, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ae.20250901.11 |
Page(s) | 1-8 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Biogas, Biomethane, Cryogenic Upgrading, Purification
[1] | ADEME (2016). S3D (Paul Laurent – Sophie Benchimol - David Guianvarc). Technical, economic and environmental study on the injection of biomethane carried into the gas network. France. Study report. |
[2] |
Boubon J. (2017). Not much is missing for the biogas industry to take off.
https://www.the-cross.with/Economy/France/There-is-not-much-missing-the-biogas-sector-takes-off-2017-10-10-1200883086 Accessed July 17, 2019. |
[3] | Fu S., Angelidaki I. and Zhang Y. (2021). Biogas upgrading by bioconversion of CO2 to CH4. Trends in bio-technology. Volume 39, Issue 4, pages 336-347. |
[4] | Xin Y., Qingbo Y., Guowei X., Zhengri H., Huaqing X., and Wenjung D. (2018). Characteristics of syngas production from bio-oil dry reforming using waste heat from granulated blast furnace slag. International journal of hydrogen energy. Volume 43, Issue 49, Pages 2210-2211. |
[5] | Aspelund A., Gundersen T., Myklebyst J., Nowak M., & Tomasgard A. (2010). An optimization-simulaion model for a simple LNG process. Computers and Chemical Engineering, vol. 34, pp. 1606-1617. |
[6] | Noyola A., Morgan-Sagastume, and López-Hernández J. (2006). Treatment of Biogas Produced in Anaerobic Reactors for Domestic Wastewater: Odor Control and Energy/Resource Recovery. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 93–114. |
[7] | Chen X., Vinh-Thang H., Ramirez A., Rodrigue D. And Kaliaguine S. (2015), “Membrane gas separation technologies for biogas upgrading,” RSC Advances, vol. 5, no. 31, pp. 24399–24448. |
[8] | Farhi M., (1982): Liquefaction of gases by the Philips machine: Final Dissertation: Mechanical Engineering: Algiers, National Polytechnic School France vol 110, pages 342. |
[9] | Pellegrini L., Guido S., and Langé S. (2018). From biogas to liquefied biomethane via cryogenic upgrading technologies. Renewable Energy. Volume 124, pages 75-83. |
[10] | Awe O., Zhao Y., Nzihou A., Minh D. and Lyczko N. (2017). A Review of Biogas Utilisation, Purification and Upgrading Technologies. Waste and Biomass Valorization, vol. 8, pp. 267-283. |
[11] | Aasadnia M., Mehrpooya M. and Ghorbani B. (2020). A novel integrated structure for cryogenic hydrogen purification. Journal of cleaner production. Volume 278. |
[12] | Birgen C. and Jarque S. (2015). Investigation of the cryogenic technique for upgrading synthetic natural gas. International journal of hydrogen energy. Volume 40, pages 1116-1116. |
[13] | Mehrpooya M., Ghorbani B. and Manizadeh A. (2020). Cryogenic biogas upgrading process using solar energy-process integration, development and energy analysis. Energy. Volume 203. |
[14] | Mariana A., Ana M., Ferreira A. and Alírio E. (2016). Cryogenic temperature and pressure swing adsorption process for natural gas upgrading. Separation and purification technology. Volume 173, pages 339-356. |
[15] | Sayed H., Shiplu S., Kristian M., Sondre K. and Bjørn A. (2019). Cryogenic vs. absorption biogas upgrading in liquefied biomethane production - An energy efficiency analysis. Fuel. Volume 245, pages 294-304. |
[16] | Abatzoglou N. and Boivin S. (2009). Review of biogas purification processes. Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefinery. Volume 3, Issue 1, pages 42-71. |
[17] | Giauque W. and Egan C. (1937). Carbon dioxide. Heat capacity and vapor pressure of the solid. The heat of sublimation. Thermodynamic and spectroscopic values of entropy. J. Chem. Phys. Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 45-54. |
[18] | Niesner J., Jecha D. and Stehlík P. (2013). Biogas upgrading technologies: state of the art in the European region. Transactions of chemical engineering. Volume 35, pages 1974-9791. |
[19] | Charlotte R. (2007) Biogas what you need to know; Journal of renewable energies; Study No. 17, 2007, 4 pages |
[20] | Oudghiri Y. (2019). Design, exergy analysis and optimization of refrigerant mixture cycles: Application to the liquefaction of biomethane, Doctoral thesis, Paris Sciences Research University, 2019. doctoral school n°432, 159 pages. |
[21] | Lee C., Song K., Lee Y. and Han C. (2016). A decomposition methodology for dynamic modeling of cold box in offshore natural gas liquefaction process. Computers and Chemical Engineering. Volume 84, pages 546-557. |
[22] | Yuting T., Worrada N., Hailong L., Thorrin E. and Jinyue Y. (2017). Cryogenic technology for biogas upgrading combined with carbon capture - a review of systems and property impacts. Energy Procedure. Volume 142, pages 3741-3746. |
[23] | Yousef A., Wael M., Yehia A. and Abdelhamid A. (2018). New approach for biogas purification using cryogenic separation and CO2 distillation process.Capture.Energy. Volume 156, pages 328-35. |
[24] | Hilaire F. (2016). Report on the characterization and interpretation of the specificities of biogas and biomethane, Journal ESPCI ParisTech, Study No. 15-0155/1A. 292 pages. |
[25] | Riva M., Campestrini M. Toubassy J., Clodic D. and Stringari P. (2014). Solid-liquid-vapor equilibrium models for cryogenic biogas upgrading.Research in industrial and technical chemistry. Pages 17506-17514. |
APA Style
Ghratien, T. A., Wilfred, G. T. N., Marcel, E., Maxwell, T. N., Alexis, K. (2025). Numerical Modeling and Performance Evaluation of a New Biogas Purification System. Applied Engineering, 9(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ae.20250901.11
ACS Style
Ghratien, T. A.; Wilfred, G. T. N.; Marcel, E.; Maxwell, T. N.; Alexis, K. Numerical Modeling and Performance Evaluation of a New Biogas Purification System. Appl. Eng. 2025, 9(1), 1-8. doi: 10.11648/j.ae.20250901.11
@article{10.11648/j.ae.20250901.11, author = {Tchatcha Abanda Ghratien and Gnepie Takam Nicolas Wilfred and Edoun Marcel and Tientcheu Nsiewe Maxwell and Kuitche Alexis}, title = {Numerical Modeling and Performance Evaluation of a New Biogas Purification System }, journal = {Applied Engineering}, volume = {9}, number = {1}, pages = {1-8}, doi = {10.11648/j.ae.20250901.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ae.20250901.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ae.20250901.11}, abstract = {In order to meet the challenges posed by dependence on fossil fuels, it is essential to develop an energy alternative based on renewable sources. Among alternative energy solutions, biogas occupies a prime position. However, before biogas can be used, it must be purified, which involves removing the carbon dioxide (CO2) and recovering the methane (CH4), thereby increasing the calorific value of the methane. The most innovative purification solution is cryogenics. Our aim in this work is to use cryogenics to purify biogas by liquefying the carbon dioxide it contains. To achieve this, we have designed and dimensioned the various components of a cryogenic purification unit for biogas production. Using the incremental method based on heat conservation equations, we simulated this purification process on the Aspen plus calculation code. Using the ADMI calculation code, we modeled the model equations to visualize the behavior of the various parameters to be controlled. The temperature, pressure and mass flow profiles affecting the desublimation of carbon dioxide were obtained. Furthermore, the sizing results show that a 450 W compressor and a condenser with a capacity of 2.5 kg are required. The temperature and pressure of the biomethane and carbon dioxide at the condenser outlet are -130°C and 15 bars. Simulations show curves for variations in temperature, pressure, rate of bio-methane recovery and carbon dioxide evacuation. They show that it is possible to produce biomethane with a purity of 96%, with a very negligible amount of carbon dioxide and a high lower calorific value (LCV) than raw biogas (9.83 kWh/m3 higher than 6 kWh/m3), a significant value in energy terms, showing that this biomethane could be used for a variety of purposes. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Numerical Modeling and Performance Evaluation of a New Biogas Purification System AU - Tchatcha Abanda Ghratien AU - Gnepie Takam Nicolas Wilfred AU - Edoun Marcel AU - Tientcheu Nsiewe Maxwell AU - Kuitche Alexis Y1 - 2025/03/21 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ae.20250901.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ae.20250901.11 T2 - Applied Engineering JF - Applied Engineering JO - Applied Engineering SP - 1 EP - 8 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2994-7456 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ae.20250901.11 AB - In order to meet the challenges posed by dependence on fossil fuels, it is essential to develop an energy alternative based on renewable sources. Among alternative energy solutions, biogas occupies a prime position. However, before biogas can be used, it must be purified, which involves removing the carbon dioxide (CO2) and recovering the methane (CH4), thereby increasing the calorific value of the methane. The most innovative purification solution is cryogenics. Our aim in this work is to use cryogenics to purify biogas by liquefying the carbon dioxide it contains. To achieve this, we have designed and dimensioned the various components of a cryogenic purification unit for biogas production. Using the incremental method based on heat conservation equations, we simulated this purification process on the Aspen plus calculation code. Using the ADMI calculation code, we modeled the model equations to visualize the behavior of the various parameters to be controlled. The temperature, pressure and mass flow profiles affecting the desublimation of carbon dioxide were obtained. Furthermore, the sizing results show that a 450 W compressor and a condenser with a capacity of 2.5 kg are required. The temperature and pressure of the biomethane and carbon dioxide at the condenser outlet are -130°C and 15 bars. Simulations show curves for variations in temperature, pressure, rate of bio-methane recovery and carbon dioxide evacuation. They show that it is possible to produce biomethane with a purity of 96%, with a very negligible amount of carbon dioxide and a high lower calorific value (LCV) than raw biogas (9.83 kWh/m3 higher than 6 kWh/m3), a significant value in energy terms, showing that this biomethane could be used for a variety of purposes. VL - 9 IS - 1 ER -