| Peer-Reviewed

Evaluation of Improved Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) Varieties at Adola, Guji Zone of Oromia

Received: 6 January 2021     Accepted: 26 January 2021     Published: 30 January 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

A study was conducted with the objective to identify adaptable, high biomass, good quality and seed yield of Pegeon pea cultivars at Adola sub-site of Bore Agricultural research center. Four pegeon pea cultivars Tsigas, Degagsa-75, Belabas-27 and 16555 were tested in RCBD with three replications. The analysis of variation revealed that significant (P<0.05) differ in days to 90% maturity were observed among cultivars. Among tested cultivars Belabas 27 was significantly earlier (162 days) to maturity, while late matured cultivar was Degagsa (203 days). Analysis of variance showed highly significant differences (P<0.01) were observed among cultivars for number of primary branches per plant. Higher branch number was recorded for Tsigas cultivar (21.6) whereas the lowest branch number was obtained from cultivar Degagsa-75 (9.75). The cultivars were significant (P<0.05) differ for pod length. The long pod was recorded from cultivar 16555 (5 cm) while the short pod length was recorded from cultivar Belabas -27 (3.14 cm). Cultivars were significant (P<0.05) varied for plant height. The long plant height was measured from cultivar Degagsa-75 (159.75 cm) followed by Tsigas (104.9 cm) whereas the short pant height was obtained from cultivar Belabas-27 (78.63 cm). Significant variations (P<0.05) in biomass yield between genotypes were observed (Table 2). Superior biomass yield was produced from Tsigas cultivar (2.17 ton/ha) followed by cultivar 16555 (1.27 ton/ha) while the low biomass yield was obtained from Degagsa-75 cultivar (0.97 ton/ha). In addition to the nutritional values were promising particularly the crude protein (CP) content in cultivar Tsigas. Based up on its adaptability, high biomass yield, seed yield and good CP of cultivar Tsigas and 16555 is recommended for further promotion in the midland of Guji zone and similar agro- ecologies.

Published in Advances in Biochemistry (Volume 9, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ab.20210901.11
Page(s) 1-5
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Cajanus cajan, Nutritive Value, Adola, Cultivar, Variety

References
[1] Samuel M, Azage T, Hegde B (2008). Labour availability and use pattern in smallholder livestock production system in Yerer watershed of Adaa Liben district: In Proceedings of the 16th annual conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP) held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, October 8 to 10, 2008.
[2] Legesse G, Siegmund-Schultze M, Abebe G (2010). Economic performance of small ruminants in mixed-farming systems of Southern Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health Production World Journal of Dairy and Food Science 4 (2): 185-192.
[3] Sefa S (2017). Estimation of feeds and fodders for livestock population of Ethiopia and mitigation of feed shortage. Journal of Natural Science and Research 7 (11): 45-49
[4] Central statistical agency (CSA), 2017. Agricultural sample survey 2016/2017 (2009 E.C). volume I report on area and production of major crops (private peasant holdings, Meher season), Addis Ababa.
[5] Alemayehu M, Gezahagn K, Fekede F, Getnet A (2017). Review on major feed resources in Ethiopia: conditions, challenges and opportunities. Agricultural. Science and Research 5 (3): 176-185.
[6] Zewdie W (2010). Livestock production systems in relation with feed availability in the highlands and central rift valley of Ethiopia. An MSc thesis presented to Haramaya University. 160p.
[7] Melese G, Berhan T, Mengistu U (2014). Effect of supplementation with non-conventional feeds on feed intake and body weight change of Washera sheep fed urea treated finger millet straw. Greener Journal of Agricultural Science 4 (2): 067-074.
[8] Multipurpose, drought resistant forage, grain and vegetable crop for sustainable southern farms. Natural resources forum 31: 297 - 305. New crop for the southeastern United States. In: J. Janick and J. E. Simon (eds.).
[9] Rao, S. C., Coleman, S. W., Mayeux, H. S., 2002. Forage production and nutritive value of selected pigeonpea ecotypes in the southern greatplains. Crop Science, 42: 1259–1263.
[10] Bekele-Tessema, A., 2007. Profitable agroforestry innovations for eastern Africa: experience from 10 agroclimatic zones of Ethiopia, India, Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Eastern Africa Region
[11] Crop Trust, 2014 Crop Trust, 2014. Pigeon Pea: Food for Drought. www.croptrust.org.
[12] Phatak, S. C. Nadimpalli, R. G. Tiwari, S. C. Bhardwaj, H. L., 1993. Pigeon peas: Potential Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 50: 201-209.
[13] Orwa, C.; Mutua, A.; Kindt, R.; Jamnadass, R.; Anthony, S., 2009. Agroforestree Database: a tree reference and selection guide version 4.0. World Agroforestry Centre, Kenya
[14] Cook, B. G.; Pengelly, B. C.; Brown, S. D.; Donnelly, J. L.; Eagles, D. A.; Franco, M. A. ; Hanson, J.; Mullen, B. F.; Partridge, I. J.; Peters, M.; Schultze-Kraft, R., 2005. Tropical forages. CSIRO, DPI&F(Qld), CIAT and ILRI, Brisbane, Australia
[15] Damaris, A. O. (2007). The potential of pigeon pea (Cajanus Cajan (L.) Millsp.) In Africa. Editions. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA
[16] ICRISAT (2009) Socioeconomic Assessment of Baseline Pigeon pea and Groundnut Production
[17] Yazachew E, Kasahun D (2011). The National regional government of Oromia, Physical and socio economic profile of Guji zone districts. Bureau of Finance and Economic Development. The National Regional Government of Oromia, Addis Abeba.
[18] AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). 1995. Official Methods of Analysis. PP. 5-13. (16th edition), Washington DC, USA. Araújo, G. G. L. does Socorro, E. P. Oliveira, and R.
[19] Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB (1985). Analysis of Forages and Fibrous Foods. A Laboratory manual for Animal Science 613. Cornel University, Ithaca. New York, USA, P. 202.
[20] Statistical Analysis System (SAS). 2002. SAS/STAT guide for personal computers, version 9.0 the national Regional Government of Oromia, Addis Abeba
[21] James AD, (1983). Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. Handbook of Energy Crops. S, Sharma TR, Rosen B, Carrasquilla-Garcia N, Farmer AD, Dubey A, Saxena KB, Gao J, Fakrudin B, Singh MN, Singh BP, Wanjari KB, Yuan M, Srivastava RK, Kilian A, Upadhyaya
[22] Varshney RK, Close TJ, Singh NK, Hoisington DA, Cook DR: Orphan legume crops enter the genomics era!. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2009, 11: 1-9. Ezeaku et al.,(2016). The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 26 (1): 2016, Page: 163-169.
[23] Remanandan P, Sastry DVSSR, Mengesha MH. ICRISAT Pigeon Pea Germplasm Catalog: Evaluation and Analysis. Pantacheru AP. India, ICRISAT, 1988; 40.
[24] Chattopadhyay, K. and K. R. Dhiman, 2006. Characterization, variability, diversity and path coefficient analysis of pigeon pea genotypes. Indian J. Genet., 34: 56-63.
[25] Dahat DV, Deshmukh RB, Patil JV (2006). Genetic variability and character association in pigeon pea grown as sole and intercrop in pearl millet. Indian J. Agric. Res., 34: 413-420.
[26] Sharma D. Reddy LJ. Green JM, Jain KC. International Adaptation of Pigeon Peas. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Pigeon peas. ICRISAT Centre, India. Pantacheru AP, India, ICRISAT. 1981; 71 – 81.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Teshale Jabessa, Ketema Bekele. (2021). Evaluation of Improved Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) Varieties at Adola, Guji Zone of Oromia. Advances in Biochemistry, 9(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ab.20210901.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Teshale Jabessa; Ketema Bekele. Evaluation of Improved Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) Varieties at Adola, Guji Zone of Oromia. Adv. Biochem. 2021, 9(1), 1-5. doi: 10.11648/j.ab.20210901.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Teshale Jabessa, Ketema Bekele. Evaluation of Improved Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) Varieties at Adola, Guji Zone of Oromia. Adv Biochem. 2021;9(1):1-5. doi: 10.11648/j.ab.20210901.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ab.20210901.11,
      author = {Teshale Jabessa and Ketema Bekele},
      title = {Evaluation of Improved Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) Varieties at Adola, Guji Zone of Oromia},
      journal = {Advances in Biochemistry},
      volume = {9},
      number = {1},
      pages = {1-5},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ab.20210901.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ab.20210901.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ab.20210901.11},
      abstract = {A study was conducted with the objective to identify adaptable, high biomass, good quality and seed yield of Pegeon pea cultivars at Adola sub-site of Bore Agricultural research center. Four pegeon pea cultivars Tsigas, Degagsa-75, Belabas-27 and 16555 were tested in RCBD with three replications. The analysis of variation revealed that significant (P<0.05) differ in days to 90% maturity were observed among cultivars. Among tested cultivars Belabas 27 was significantly earlier (162 days) to maturity, while late matured cultivar was Degagsa (203 days). Analysis of variance showed highly significant differences (P<0.01) were observed among cultivars for number of primary branches per plant. Higher branch number was recorded for Tsigas cultivar (21.6) whereas the lowest branch number was obtained from cultivar Degagsa-75 (9.75). The cultivars were significant (P<0.05) differ for pod length. The long pod was recorded from cultivar 16555 (5 cm) while the short pod length was recorded from cultivar Belabas -27 (3.14 cm). Cultivars were significant (P<0.05) varied for plant height. The long plant height was measured from cultivar Degagsa-75 (159.75 cm) followed by Tsigas (104.9 cm) whereas the short pant height was obtained from cultivar Belabas-27 (78.63 cm). Significant variations (P<0.05) in biomass yield between genotypes were observed (Table 2). Superior biomass yield was produced from Tsigas cultivar (2.17 ton/ha) followed by cultivar 16555 (1.27 ton/ha) while the low biomass yield was obtained from Degagsa-75 cultivar (0.97 ton/ha). In addition to the nutritional values were promising particularly the crude protein (CP) content in cultivar Tsigas. Based up on its adaptability, high biomass yield, seed yield and good CP of cultivar Tsigas and 16555 is recommended for further promotion in the midland of Guji zone and similar agro- ecologies.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Evaluation of Improved Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) Varieties at Adola, Guji Zone of Oromia
    AU  - Teshale Jabessa
    AU  - Ketema Bekele
    Y1  - 2021/01/30
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ab.20210901.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ab.20210901.11
    T2  - Advances in Biochemistry
    JF  - Advances in Biochemistry
    JO  - Advances in Biochemistry
    SP  - 1
    EP  - 5
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2329-0862
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ab.20210901.11
    AB  - A study was conducted with the objective to identify adaptable, high biomass, good quality and seed yield of Pegeon pea cultivars at Adola sub-site of Bore Agricultural research center. Four pegeon pea cultivars Tsigas, Degagsa-75, Belabas-27 and 16555 were tested in RCBD with three replications. The analysis of variation revealed that significant (P<0.05) differ in days to 90% maturity were observed among cultivars. Among tested cultivars Belabas 27 was significantly earlier (162 days) to maturity, while late matured cultivar was Degagsa (203 days). Analysis of variance showed highly significant differences (P<0.01) were observed among cultivars for number of primary branches per plant. Higher branch number was recorded for Tsigas cultivar (21.6) whereas the lowest branch number was obtained from cultivar Degagsa-75 (9.75). The cultivars were significant (P<0.05) differ for pod length. The long pod was recorded from cultivar 16555 (5 cm) while the short pod length was recorded from cultivar Belabas -27 (3.14 cm). Cultivars were significant (P<0.05) varied for plant height. The long plant height was measured from cultivar Degagsa-75 (159.75 cm) followed by Tsigas (104.9 cm) whereas the short pant height was obtained from cultivar Belabas-27 (78.63 cm). Significant variations (P<0.05) in biomass yield between genotypes were observed (Table 2). Superior biomass yield was produced from Tsigas cultivar (2.17 ton/ha) followed by cultivar 16555 (1.27 ton/ha) while the low biomass yield was obtained from Degagsa-75 cultivar (0.97 ton/ha). In addition to the nutritional values were promising particularly the crude protein (CP) content in cultivar Tsigas. Based up on its adaptability, high biomass yield, seed yield and good CP of cultivar Tsigas and 16555 is recommended for further promotion in the midland of Guji zone and similar agro- ecologies.
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute (IQQO), Bore Agricultural Research Center (BOARC), Bore, Ethiopia

  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute (IQQO), Bore Agricultural Research Center (BOARC), Bore, Ethiopia

  • Sections