Evaluation of Quality Assurance of Elementary School Education in Ponorogo District

Tri Budhi Susilowati; Rudi Handoko; Bambang Koesbandrijo

doi:doi:10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.13

| Peer-Reviewed

Evaluation of Quality Assurance of Elementary School Education in Ponorogo District

Tri Budhi Susilowati, Rudi Handoko, Bambang Koesbandrijo

Published in Journal of Public Policy and Administration (Volume 6, Issue 4)

Received: 30 September 2022 Accepted: 5 December 2022 Published: 15 December 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This study focuses on evaluating the quality assurance policy of primary school education at the Education Office of Ponorogo Regency. The basic education quality assurance policy that will be considered is the Minister of Education and Culture Regulation Number 28 of 2016 concerning the Quality Assurance System for Primary and Secondary Education; from the aspect of quality assurance. This study used a qualitative descriptive research method. The data analysis technique used was evaluation. Data were analyzed interactively. Single Program evaluation model, with ongoing evaluation (ongoing/concurrent evaluation), is carried out when the program is implemented. The criteria for evaluating public policies are effectiveness, efficiency, adequacy, equity, responsiveness, and accuracy—the study's results. The quality assurance of primary school education has met the evaluation criteria of public policy, but the results of quality assurance have yet to reach the expected SNP. All schools have implemented SPMI and have implemented SPME through accreditation activities. Quality assurance has not come from the SNP because the SPMI induction system influences it through model schools, the occurrence of information reduction has an impact on the availability and ability of resources, and the quality audit team has not worked according to their duties and functions, not all schools use the quality report card/report card of the education unit in the preparation of plans School work, and assistance from school supervisors is less than optimal.

Published in	Journal of Public Policy and Administration (Volume 6, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.13
Page(s)	174-181
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Evaluation, Quality, School, Program, Education, Public

References

[1]	Anggarawati, W. S. (2017). Implementasi Kebijakan Peningkatan Mutu Sekolah Tinggi Dan Akademi Bidang Kesehatan Melalui Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Internal (SPMI) Di Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (Doctoral dissertation). Universitas 17 Agustus 1945.
[2]	Arcaro, S Joremo.(2005). Pendidikan Berbasis Mutu, Prinsip-Prinsip Perumusan dan Tata Langkah Penerapan. Jakarta: Riene Cipta.
[3]	Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
[4]	Creswell, J. W. (2015). Penelitian Kualitatif & Riset. Yogyakarta: Pustaka pelajar.
[5]	Crosby, Philip. B. (1979). Quality is Free: The Art of Making Quality Certain. NewYork.
[6]	Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. (2017). Indikator Mutu dalam Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Dirjend Dikdasmen.
[7]	Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. (2017). Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan Oleh Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Dirjend Dikdasmen.
[8]	Dit. PSMA Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. (2017). Implementasi Pengembangan Kecakapan Abad 21 Dalam Perencanaan Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP). Jakarta: Dit. PSMA Ditjen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
[9]	Dunn, W. N. (1981). Public Policy Analysis-An Introduction. New jersey: Pearson education.
[10]	Dunn, Willian N. 2000. Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Edisi Kedua. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
[11]	Elassy, N. (2015). The concepts of quality, quality assurance and quality enhancement. Quality Assurance In Education, 23 (3), 250-261. doi: 10.1108/qae-11-2012-0046.
[12]	Ginting, R. B. (2016). Implementasi Kebijakan Penjaminan Mutu Pada Perguruan Tinggi Swasta Di Kota Semarang (Doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Social and Political Science).
[13]	Matovu, M. (2019). An analysis of quality assurance key performance indicators in research in Ugandan Universities. International Journal of Instruction. 12 (1), 1567-1584.
[14]	Miles, M. B, Huberman, A. M, & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis, AMethods Sourcebook, Edition 3. USA: Sage Publications. Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohindi Rohidi, UI-Press.
[15]	Patton, Michael Quinn. (1987). Qualitative Education Methods. Beverly Hills: Sage Publication.
[16]	Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2020 Tentang Rencana Strategis Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Tahun 2020-2024.
[17]	Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan.
[18]	Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 32 Tahun 2013 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan.
[19]	Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2015 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan.
[20]	Raharjo, S. B., Handayani, M., Jauhari, M. R. A., Juanita, F., & Waspodo, R. M. (2019). Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Badan Penelitian dan Pengambangan Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan.
[21]	Surat Edaran Mendikbud Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 Tentang Pencegahan Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19) Pada Satuan Pendidikan.
[22]	Surat Edaran Mendikbud Nomor 4 Tahun 2020 Tentang Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Pendidikan dalam Masa Darurat Penyebaran Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19).
[23]	Surat Edaran Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Pedoman Penyelenggaraan Belajar Dari Rumah Dalam Masa Darurat Penyebaran Corona Virus Dsease (COVID-19).
[24]	Undang-Undang Nomor 20 tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
[25]	Williams, J., & Harvey, L. (2015). Quality assurance in higher education. The Palgrave international handbook of higher education policy and governance, 506-525. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
[26]	Williams, J. (2016). Quality assurance and quality enhancement: is there a relationship?. Quality in Higher Education, 22 (2). 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2016.1227207

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Tri Budhi Susilowati, Rudi Handoko, Bambang Koesbandrijo. (2022). Evaluation of Quality Assurance of Elementary School Education in Ponorogo District. Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 6(4), 174-181. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Tri Budhi Susilowati; Rudi Handoko; Bambang Koesbandrijo. Evaluation of Quality Assurance of Elementary School Education in Ponorogo District. J. Public Policy Adm. 2022, 6(4), 174-181. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Tri Budhi Susilowati, Rudi Handoko, Bambang Koesbandrijo. Evaluation of Quality Assurance of Elementary School Education in Ponorogo District. J Public Policy Adm. 2022;6(4):174-181. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.13,
  author = {Tri Budhi Susilowati and Rudi Handoko and Bambang Koesbandrijo},
  title = {Evaluation of Quality Assurance of Elementary School Education in Ponorogo District},
  journal = {Journal of Public Policy and Administration},
  volume = {6},
  number = {4},
  pages = {174-181},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jppa.20220604.13},
  abstract = {This study focuses on evaluating the quality assurance policy of primary school education at the Education Office of Ponorogo Regency. The basic education quality assurance policy that will be considered is the Minister of Education and Culture Regulation Number 28 of 2016 concerning the Quality Assurance System for Primary and Secondary Education; from the aspect of quality assurance. This study used a qualitative descriptive research method. The data analysis technique used was evaluation. Data were analyzed interactively. Single Program evaluation model, with ongoing evaluation (ongoing/concurrent evaluation), is carried out when the program is implemented. The criteria for evaluating public policies are effectiveness, efficiency, adequacy, equity, responsiveness, and accuracy—the study's results. The quality assurance of primary school education has met the evaluation criteria of public policy, but the results of quality assurance have yet to reach the expected SNP. All schools have implemented SPMI and have implemented SPME through accreditation activities. Quality assurance has not come from the SNP because the SPMI induction system influences it through model schools, the occurrence of information reduction has an impact on the availability and ability of resources, and the quality audit team has not worked according to their duties and functions, not all schools use the quality report card/report card of the education unit in the preparation of plans School work, and assistance from school supervisors is less than optimal.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Evaluation of Quality Assurance of Elementary School Education in Ponorogo District
AU  - Tri Budhi Susilowati
AU  - Rudi Handoko
AU  - Bambang Koesbandrijo
Y1  - 2022/12/15
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.13
T2  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
JF  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
JO  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
SP  - 174
EP  - 181
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-2696
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.13
AB  - This study focuses on evaluating the quality assurance policy of primary school education at the Education Office of Ponorogo Regency. The basic education quality assurance policy that will be considered is the Minister of Education and Culture Regulation Number 28 of 2016 concerning the Quality Assurance System for Primary and Secondary Education; from the aspect of quality assurance. This study used a qualitative descriptive research method. The data analysis technique used was evaluation. Data were analyzed interactively. Single Program evaluation model, with ongoing evaluation (ongoing/concurrent evaluation), is carried out when the program is implemented. The criteria for evaluating public policies are effectiveness, efficiency, adequacy, equity, responsiveness, and accuracy—the study's results. The quality assurance of primary school education has met the evaluation criteria of public policy, but the results of quality assurance have yet to reach the expected SNP. All schools have implemented SPMI and have implemented SPME through accreditation activities. Quality assurance has not come from the SNP because the SPMI induction system influences it through model schools, the occurrence of information reduction has an impact on the availability and ability of resources, and the quality audit team has not worked according to their duties and functions, not all schools use the quality report card/report card of the education unit in the preparation of plans School work, and assistance from school supervisors is less than optimal.
VL  - 6
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Tri Budhi Susilowati

Faculty of Social and Political, University of 17 Augustus 1945 Surabaya, Kota SBY, Indonesia
Rudi Handoko

Faculty of Social and Political, University of 17 Augustus 1945 Surabaya, Kota SBY, Indonesia
Bambang Koesbandrijo

Faculty of Social and Political, University of 17 Augustus 1945 Surabaya, Kota SBY, Indonesia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Tri Budhi Susilowati, Rudi Handoko, Bambang Koesbandrijo. (2022). Evaluation of Quality Assurance of Elementary School Education in Ponorogo District. Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 6(4), 174-181. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Tri Budhi Susilowati; Rudi Handoko; Bambang Koesbandrijo. Evaluation of Quality Assurance of Elementary School Education in Ponorogo District. J. Public Policy Adm. 2022, 6(4), 174-181. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Tri Budhi Susilowati, Rudi Handoko, Bambang Koesbandrijo. Evaluation of Quality Assurance of Elementary School Education in Ponorogo District. J Public Policy Adm. 2022;6(4):174-181. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.13,
  author = {Tri Budhi Susilowati and Rudi Handoko and Bambang Koesbandrijo},
  title = {Evaluation of Quality Assurance of Elementary School Education in Ponorogo District},
  journal = {Journal of Public Policy and Administration},
  volume = {6},
  number = {4},
  pages = {174-181},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jppa.20220604.13},
  abstract = {This study focuses on evaluating the quality assurance policy of primary school education at the Education Office of Ponorogo Regency. The basic education quality assurance policy that will be considered is the Minister of Education and Culture Regulation Number 28 of 2016 concerning the Quality Assurance System for Primary and Secondary Education; from the aspect of quality assurance. This study used a qualitative descriptive research method. The data analysis technique used was evaluation. Data were analyzed interactively. Single Program evaluation model, with ongoing evaluation (ongoing/concurrent evaluation), is carried out when the program is implemented. The criteria for evaluating public policies are effectiveness, efficiency, adequacy, equity, responsiveness, and accuracy—the study's results. The quality assurance of primary school education has met the evaluation criteria of public policy, but the results of quality assurance have yet to reach the expected SNP. All schools have implemented SPMI and have implemented SPME through accreditation activities. Quality assurance has not come from the SNP because the SPMI induction system influences it through model schools, the occurrence of information reduction has an impact on the availability and ability of resources, and the quality audit team has not worked according to their duties and functions, not all schools use the quality report card/report card of the education unit in the preparation of plans School work, and assistance from school supervisors is less than optimal.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Evaluation of Quality Assurance of Elementary School Education in Ponorogo District
AU  - Tri Budhi Susilowati
AU  - Rudi Handoko
AU  - Bambang Koesbandrijo
Y1  - 2022/12/15
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.13
T2  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
JF  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
JO  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
SP  - 174
EP  - 181
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-2696
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.13
AB  - This study focuses on evaluating the quality assurance policy of primary school education at the Education Office of Ponorogo Regency. The basic education quality assurance policy that will be considered is the Minister of Education and Culture Regulation Number 28 of 2016 concerning the Quality Assurance System for Primary and Secondary Education; from the aspect of quality assurance. This study used a qualitative descriptive research method. The data analysis technique used was evaluation. Data were analyzed interactively. Single Program evaluation model, with ongoing evaluation (ongoing/concurrent evaluation), is carried out when the program is implemented. The criteria for evaluating public policies are effectiveness, efficiency, adequacy, equity, responsiveness, and accuracy—the study's results. The quality assurance of primary school education has met the evaluation criteria of public policy, but the results of quality assurance have yet to reach the expected SNP. All schools have implemented SPMI and have implemented SPME through accreditation activities. Quality assurance has not come from the SNP because the SPMI induction system influences it through model schools, the occurrence of information reduction has an impact on the availability and ability of resources, and the quality audit team has not worked according to their duties and functions, not all schools use the quality report card/report card of the education unit in the preparation of plans School work, and assistance from school supervisors is less than optimal.
VL  - 6
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download