In order to promote government innovation, this article outlines the overall goal of bureaucratic reform in Indonesia as well as how it is being implemented in North Moluccas Province. An exploratory qualitative methodology is used in this article's data analysis, which is complemented by theoretical evaluations of many sources on public administration innovation trends, public service innovation, and government innovation strategies. According to the theoretical review analysis, it indicates how a notion has changed from the most recent trend to the previous trend. This study must be done in order to comprehend the paradigm change in Indonesian economic innovation from conventional models to digital-based innovation. It is crucial to do this study to learn more about Indonesia's regional innovation's paradigm change from traditional models to bureaucratic innovation based on digital technologies. How come? By focusing this research in North Moluccas, it needs a new innovation in island-based administration since its topography comprises of isolated islands that are challenging to link in the public service network. The internal dynamics of Indonesia's Grand Design Bureaucracy from 2010 to 2014, 2015 to 2019, and 2020 to 2024 are related to this change in the trend. A number of conclusions are drawn from the discussion of this article, including the need that the North Maluku Provincial Government compare its accomplishments to those of other regional innovation indexes. By empowering state employees to carry out the digital transformation of public administration and services, North Maluku Province may accomplish public service innovation. The future of civilization, collective intelligence, and creative public service methods will be impacted by these autonomous data-based decision-making processes.
| Published in | Journal of Public Policy and Administration (Volume 6, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.12 |
| Page(s) | 165-173 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Bureaucratic Reform, Public Services, Decision-Making, Collective Intelligence, Innovative Government
| [1] | Akil, S. R. (2021). Influence of Knowledge Management and Collaboration on Regency/City Local Government Innovations in South Sulawesi Province. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11 (5), 4325-4339, ISSN 2146-0353, https://doi.org/10.48047/rigeo.11.05.312 |
| [2] | Al-Mansour, J. (2021). The interrelationship between strategy as practice and public service innovation and delivery: Academic history and evidence from kuwait. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 5 (2), 151-162, ISSN 2561-8148, https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2021.1.001 |
| [3] | Azizi, Y. Mohammed (2020). Government innovation as a driver for the modernization of public Algerian administration. Innovations, 62 (2), 45-73, ISSN 1267-4982, https://doi.org/10.3917/inno.062.0045 |
| [4] | Bharosa, N. (2020). Innovation in public service design: Developing a co-creation tool for public service innovation journeys. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 275-284, https://doi.org/10.1145/3396956.3396981 |
| [5] | Bharosa, N. (2021). Engaging citizens in digital public service innovation ecosystems-insights from the Netherlands and Italy. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 509-512, https://doi.org/10.1145/3494193.3494269 |
| [6] | Chen, J. (2020). Public service innovation: a typology. Public Management Review, 22 (11), 1674-1695, ISSN 1471- 9037, https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1645874 |
| [7] | Choi, T. (2020). Knowledge vacuum: An organizational learning dynamic of how e-government innovations fail. |
| [8] | Government Information Quarterly, 37 (1), ISSN 0740-624X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101416 Chung, C. S. (2022). Analysis of Digital Governance Transition in South Korea: Focusing on the Leadership of the. |
| [9] | President for Government Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8 (1), ISSN 2199-8531, https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010002 |
| [10] | Desmarchelier, B. (2020). Public service innovation networks (PSINs): An instrument for collaborative innovation and value co-creation in public service (s). Revue Europeenne d' Economie et Management des Services (10), 133-169, ISSN 2497-0107, https://doi.org/10.15122/ISBN.978-2-406-11028-6.P.0133 |
| [11] | Desmarchelier, B. (2021). Which innovation regime for public service innovation networks for social innovation (PSINSIs)? Lessons from a European cases database. Research Policy, 50 (9), ISSN 0048-7333, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104341 |
| [12] | Gong, C. (2021). The Effects of Government Innovation Investment on the Development of Computer Industry. Proceedings - 2021 7th Annual International Conference on Network and Information Systems for Computers, ICNISC 2021, 831-835, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNISC54316.2021.00154 |
| [13] | Graaf, S. Van Der (2020). Editorial: Sharing economy pathways to government innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10 (5), 3-5, ISSN 1927-0321, https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1351 |
| [14] | Hardyman, W. (2021). Enhancing public service innovation through value co-creation: Capacity building and the ‘innovative imagination’. Public Money and Management, ISSN 0954-0962, https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1981042 |
| [15] | Hawi, T. Al (2020). A proposed innovation model for public organizations: empirical results from federal government innovation experts in the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management, 11 (6), 1362-1379, ISSN 0975-6809, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-020-00994-9 |
| [16] | Jenhaug, L. M. (2020). Employees’ resistance to users’ ideas in public service innovation. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 79 (4), 444-461, ISSN 0313-6647, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12415 |
| [17] | Jiang, Z. (2020). Does the Supervision Mechanism Promote the Incentive Effects of Government Innovation Support on the R& #x0026; D Input of Agricultural Enterprises? IEEE Access, ISSN 2169-3536, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3047839 |
| [18] | Jiang, Z. (2021). Does the Supervision Mechanism Promote the Incentive Effects of Government Innovation Support on the RD Input of Agricultural Enterprises?. IEEE Access, 9, 3339-3359, ISSN 2169-3536, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3047839 |
| [19] | Johnston, K. (2020). Debate: Failing to learn? The impact of new public management on public service innovation. Public Money and Management, 40 (6), 473-474, ISSN 0954-0962, https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1746058 |
| [20] | Kassen, M. (2022). Blockchain and e-government innovation: Automation of public information processes. Information Systems, 103, ISSN 0306-4379, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2021.101862 |
| [21] | Kholief, M. (2020). Government innovation 4.0: The roadmap to digital transformation in Egypt. Towards the Digital World and Industry X.0 - Proceedings of the 29th International Conference of the International Association for Management of Technology, IAMOT 2020, 761-784. |
| [22] | Lee, C. H. (2021). TRIZ Evolution Trend-Based Public Service Innovation for Enhancing Social Participation of Life Garbage Classification. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 635, 57-73, ISSN 1868-4238, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86614-3_5 |
| [23] | Misuraca, G. (2020). HICSS2020 - Mini track on digital government innovation: Social and service innovation in the digital age. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2020, 2040- 2041, ISSN 1530-1605. |
| [24] | Mok, K. H. (2020). Government innovation policy and higher education: the case of Shenzhen, China. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 42 (2), 194-212, ISSN 1360-080X, https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2019.1701851 |
| [25] | Muluk, M. R. K. (2021). PUBLIC SECTOR INNOVATION in A DEVELOPING COUNTRY: PROGRESS and CHALLENGES in the COMPETITION for PUBLIC SERVICE INNOVATION in INDONESIA. Public. |
| [26] | Policy and Administration, 20 (4), 452-465, ISSN 1648-2603, https://doi.org/10.13165/VPA-21-20-4-08 Munro, J. (2020). Leading for collaborative public service innovation. Public Money and Management, 40 (4), 316-325, |
| [27] | ISSN 0954-0962, https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1665391 |
| [28] | Osborne, S. (2020). Risking innovation. Understanding risk and public service innovation—evidence from a four nation study. Public Money and Management, 40 (1), 52-62, ISSN 0954-0962, https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1621051 |
| [29] | Pratama, A. B. (2020). The landscape of public service innovation in Indonesia: A comprehensive analysis of its characteristic and trend. Innovation and Management Review, 17 (1), 25-40, ISSN 2515-8961, https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-11-2018-0080 |
| [30] | Roberts, P. S. (2022). Government-led innovation acceleration: Case studies of US federal government innovation and technology acceleration organizations. Review of Policy Research, ISSN 1541-132X, https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12474 |
| [31] | Rubalcaba, L. (2022). Value processes and lifecycles in networks for public service innovation. Public Management Review, ISSN 1471-9037, https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2039952 |
| [32] | Senshaw, D. (2020). Designing for Digital Government Innovation in Resource Constrained Countries: The Case of Woredas in Ethiopia. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 12388, 42-55, ISSN 0302-9743, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64823-7_5 |
| [33] | Senshaw, D. (2020). The Influence of Public Service Experience on Adopting Digital Government Innovations in Ethiopia. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 618, 569-580, ISSN 1868-4238, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64861-9_50 |
| [34] | Shin, S. C. (2020). Digital Transformation through e-Government Innovation in Uzbekistan. International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, ICACT, 2020, 632-639, ISSN 1738-9445, https://doi.org/10.23919/ICACT48636.2020.9061507 |
| [35] | Sperling, K. (2020). Local government innovation in the energy sector: A study of key actors’ strategies and arguments. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 126, ISSN 1364-0321, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109837 |
| [36] | Suhendra, A. (2020). The assessment of local government's innovation using regional innovation index. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7 (6), 660-666, ISSN 2394-5125, https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.06.116 |
| [37] | Thøgersen, D. (2022). Windows of Translation in Public Service Innovation. Introducing a New Mission in Public Childcare. Journal of Change Management, ISSN 1469-7017, https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2022.2051061 |
| [38] | Yang, S. (2020). Fiscal decentralization, preference for government innovation and city innovation: Evidence from China. Chinese Management Studies, 14 (2), 391-409, ISSN 1750-614X, https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-12- 2018-0778 |
| [39] | Zhu, W. (2020). Research on relationship between government innovation funding and firms value creation using clustering-rough sets. Kybernetes, 49 (2), 578-600, ISSN 0368-492X, https://doi.org/10.1108/K-03-2019- 0208 |
| [40] | Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS), 2020 https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/node/10984_fr#trends). |
| [41] | Minister of Home Affairs Decree no. 002.6-5848 of 2021 concerning the Innovation Index for Provinces, Districts and Cities in 2021). |
| [42] | Regulation of the Minister for Empowerment of State Apparatuses and Bureaucratic Reform of the Republic of Indonesia Number 60 of 2020 concerning Development of the Integrity of State Civil Apparatus Employees). |
| [43] | Regulation of the Minister for Empowerment of State Apparatus and Bureaucratic Reform of the Republic of Indonesia Number 14 of 2017 concerning Guidelines for Compiling a Community Satisfaction Survey for Public Service Providers). |
| [44] | Regulation of the Minister of State Apparatus Empowerment and Bureaucratic Reform of the Republic of Indonesia Number 7 of 2021 concerning Public Service Innovation Competitions in Ministries/Agencies, Regional Governments, State-Owned Enterprises, and Regional-Owned Enterprises. |
| [45] | Government Regulation Number 96 of 2012 concerning the Implementation of Law Number 25 of 2009 concerning Public Services. |
| [46] | Regulation of the Minister for Empowerment of State Apparatus and Bureaucratic Reform of the Republic of Indonesia Number 25 of 2020 concerning the Road Map of Bureaucratic Reform 2020-2024. |
| [47] | Form Letter of Minister of PANRB N0. 22 of 2021. |
| [48] | Transparency International Indonesia, 2021. |
| [49] | Indonesian Law No. 25 of 2009 concerning Public Services. |
APA Style
Saiful Deni, Aji Deni, Thamrin Husain. (2022). The Grand Model of Bureaucratic Reform in Strengthening Government Innovation: A Review of North Maluku Province, Indonesia. Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 6(4), 165-173. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.12
ACS Style
Saiful Deni; Aji Deni; Thamrin Husain. The Grand Model of Bureaucratic Reform in Strengthening Government Innovation: A Review of North Maluku Province, Indonesia. J. Public Policy Adm. 2022, 6(4), 165-173. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.12
AMA Style
Saiful Deni, Aji Deni, Thamrin Husain. The Grand Model of Bureaucratic Reform in Strengthening Government Innovation: A Review of North Maluku Province, Indonesia. J Public Policy Adm. 2022;6(4):165-173. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.12,
author = {Saiful Deni and Aji Deni and Thamrin Husain},
title = {The Grand Model of Bureaucratic Reform in Strengthening Government Innovation: A Review of North Maluku Province, Indonesia},
journal = {Journal of Public Policy and Administration},
volume = {6},
number = {4},
pages = {165-173},
doi = {10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jppa.20220604.12},
abstract = {In order to promote government innovation, this article outlines the overall goal of bureaucratic reform in Indonesia as well as how it is being implemented in North Moluccas Province. An exploratory qualitative methodology is used in this article's data analysis, which is complemented by theoretical evaluations of many sources on public administration innovation trends, public service innovation, and government innovation strategies. According to the theoretical review analysis, it indicates how a notion has changed from the most recent trend to the previous trend. This study must be done in order to comprehend the paradigm change in Indonesian economic innovation from conventional models to digital-based innovation. It is crucial to do this study to learn more about Indonesia's regional innovation's paradigm change from traditional models to bureaucratic innovation based on digital technologies. How come? By focusing this research in North Moluccas, it needs a new innovation in island-based administration since its topography comprises of isolated islands that are challenging to link in the public service network. The internal dynamics of Indonesia's Grand Design Bureaucracy from 2010 to 2014, 2015 to 2019, and 2020 to 2024 are related to this change in the trend. A number of conclusions are drawn from the discussion of this article, including the need that the North Maluku Provincial Government compare its accomplishments to those of other regional innovation indexes. By empowering state employees to carry out the digital transformation of public administration and services, North Maluku Province may accomplish public service innovation. The future of civilization, collective intelligence, and creative public service methods will be impacted by these autonomous data-based decision-making processes.},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - The Grand Model of Bureaucratic Reform in Strengthening Government Innovation: A Review of North Maluku Province, Indonesia AU - Saiful Deni AU - Aji Deni AU - Thamrin Husain Y1 - 2022/12/08 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.12 DO - 10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.12 T2 - Journal of Public Policy and Administration JF - Journal of Public Policy and Administration JO - Journal of Public Policy and Administration SP - 165 EP - 173 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-2696 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20220604.12 AB - In order to promote government innovation, this article outlines the overall goal of bureaucratic reform in Indonesia as well as how it is being implemented in North Moluccas Province. An exploratory qualitative methodology is used in this article's data analysis, which is complemented by theoretical evaluations of many sources on public administration innovation trends, public service innovation, and government innovation strategies. According to the theoretical review analysis, it indicates how a notion has changed from the most recent trend to the previous trend. This study must be done in order to comprehend the paradigm change in Indonesian economic innovation from conventional models to digital-based innovation. It is crucial to do this study to learn more about Indonesia's regional innovation's paradigm change from traditional models to bureaucratic innovation based on digital technologies. How come? By focusing this research in North Moluccas, it needs a new innovation in island-based administration since its topography comprises of isolated islands that are challenging to link in the public service network. The internal dynamics of Indonesia's Grand Design Bureaucracy from 2010 to 2014, 2015 to 2019, and 2020 to 2024 are related to this change in the trend. A number of conclusions are drawn from the discussion of this article, including the need that the North Maluku Provincial Government compare its accomplishments to those of other regional innovation indexes. By empowering state employees to carry out the digital transformation of public administration and services, North Maluku Province may accomplish public service innovation. The future of civilization, collective intelligence, and creative public service methods will be impacted by these autonomous data-based decision-making processes. VL - 6 IS - 4 ER -
Information
Email: