| Peer-Reviewed

Genetic Variability, Heritability and Correlation Coefficient in Production Traits of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes

Received: 29 October 2021    Accepted: 15 November 2021    Published: 27 November 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

An experiment was carried out to measure variability, heritability, genetic advance and correlation coefficient for yield and yield related traits in ten Pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes at Tarnab-Peshawar, during cropping season 2016-17. To identify the best genotypes for further breeding these genotypes were evaluated in a randomized complete block design with three replications. All genotypes were grown in 3m long ridges, which were kept 60cm apart where plant to plant distance was 30cm. To reduce experimental error, cultural practices were performed uniformly for all genotypes. Data was collected from ten randomly selected plants from each genotype in each replication. Highly significant (p ≤ 0.01) differences were observed for days to 50% flowering, plant height, primary branches plant-1, days to maturity, pods plant-1, pod length, fresh pod shelling percentage, 100-seeds fresh and dry weight, seeds pod-1 and seed yield plant-1. Among genotypes Sultan was best for 50% flowering (50.38), days to maturity (122.08) and fresh pod shelling percentage (65.29%). Genotype PL-4 had maximum plant height (142.08 cm), pods plant-1 (39.96) and seed yield plant-1 (52.04 g). Anmol had maximum 100-seed fresh (43.90 g) and dry (21.29 g) weight. Genotype Sarsabz had maximum primary branches plant-1 whereas Adventa Selection had maximum pod length (8.86 cm) and seeds pod-1 (6.26). The estimates of heritability and genetic advance were high for days to 50% flowering (0.99, 35.38%), plant height (0.95, 46.88%) and seed yield plant-1 (0.97, 62.47%). High heritability with moderate genetic advance were observed for days to maturity (0.97, 20.20%), pod length (0.95, 15.37%) fresh pod shelling percentage (0.82, 21.58%), 100-seed fresh (0.90, 29.52%) and dry weight (0.93, 22.68%). Significant and positive phenotypic coefficient of correlation was exhibited by seed yield plant-1 with plant height (rp = 0.64), days to 50% flowering (rp= 0.63), days to maturity (rp = 0.78), pods plant-1 (rp = 0.72), pod length (rp = 0.66), fresh pod shelling percentage (rp = 0.64), 100-seed fresh weight (rp = 0.65) and 100-seed dry weight (rp = 0.62). Significant and positive genotypic coefficient of correlation was exhibited by seed yield plant-1 with plant height (rg= 0.81), days to maturity (rg= 0.70) and pods plant-1 (rg= 0.84). Among tested genotypes Sultan, PL-4, Anmol and Sarsabz performed better, therefore could be used in future breeding programs.

Published in International Journal of Genetics and Genomics (Volume 9, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijgg.20210904.13
Page(s) 78-88
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Peas, Variability, Heritability, Genetic Advances and Correlation Coefficient

References
[1] Javaid, A., Ghafoorm, A and Anwar, R. (2002). Evaluation of local and exotic pea (Pisum sativum L.) germplasm for vegetable and dry grain traits. Pak. J. Bot. 34 (4): 419-427.
[2] Santalla, M., Amurrio, J. M., & De Ron, A. M. (2001). Food and feed potential breeding value of green, dry and vegetable pea germplasm. Canadian Journal of plant science, 81 (4): 601-610.
[3] Ouafi, L., Alane, F., Rahal-Bouziane, H., & Abdelguerfi, A. (2016). Agro-morphological diversity within field pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 11 (40): 4039-4047.
[4] Munir, K. (2013). Comparative advantage and competitiveness of pea crop in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 29 (2): 299-306.
[5] FAOSTAT. (2007). Food and Agricultural Organization of United Nations. UN statistics department report, top five green pea producing countries, New York.
[6] PBS. 2015. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, Government of Pakistan. Statistics House, G-9/1, Islamabad, Pakistan.
[7] Georgieva, N., Nikolova, I., & Kosev, V. (2016). Evaluation of genetic divergence and heritability in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Journal of BioScience & Biotechnology, 5 (1): 61-67.
[8] Pallavi, A. S., & Pandey, K. K. (2013). Estimation of heritability on pea (Pisum sativum L.). Ad. Biores, 4, 89-92.
[9] Steel, R. G. and Torrie, J. H. (1980). Principles and Procedures of Statistics. 2nd Ed. New York. McGraw-Hill.
[10] Choudhary, D. K., Sharma, R. R. and Sureja, A. K. (2004). Correlation and path analysis studies across the generations in garden pea. Indian J. Hortic., 61: 163-167.
[11] Panse, V. G., & Sukhatme, P. V. (1954). Statistical methods for agricultural workers. Statistical methods for agricultural workers. Indian Council Agric. Res. New Dehli. 381.
[12] Chaudhary S. P., Sharma S. S. N & Singh A. K. (1997). Line × tester analysis in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Indian General Journal., 57 (2): 168-173.
[13] Gudadinni, P., Bahadur, V., Ligade, P., Topno, S. E and Prasad, V. M. (2017). Study on genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in garden pea (Pisum sativum var. hortense L.). Int. J. Biol. Appl. Sci. 6 (8): 2384-2391.
[14] Singh, R. K. (1984). Genotypic and phenotypic variability correlations in Pea. Ind. J. Agric. Sci. 55 (3): 147-50.
[15] Ahmad, H. B., Rauf, S., Rafiq, C. M., Mohsin, A. U and Iqbal, A. (2014). Estimation of genetic variability in pea (Pisum sativum L.). J. Glob. Inno. Agric. Soc. Sci. 2 (2): 62-64.
[16] Singh J. D & Singh I. A. (2006). Genetic variability, heritability, expected genetic advance and character association in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Legume Research., 29 (1): 65- 67.
[17] Fikreselassie, M. (2012). Variability, heritability and association of some morpho-agronomic traits in field pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 15 (8): 358-366.
[18] Siddika, A., Islam, A. K. M. A., Rasul, M. G., Mian, M. A. K and Ahmed, J. U. (2013). Genetic variability in advanced generations of vegetable pea (Pisum sativum L.). Int. J. Pl. Bree., 7 (2): 124-128.
[19] Jaiswal, N. K., Gupta, A. K., Dewangan, H and Lavanya, G. R. (2013). Genetic variability analysis in field Pea (Pisum sativum L.). Int. J. Sci. Res, 4 (1): 1-2.
[20] Gul, I., Sumerli, M., Bicer, B. T., & Yilmaz, Y. (2005). Heritability and correlation studies in pea (Pisum arvense L.) lines. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 4 (2): 154-158.
[21] Habtamu, S., & Million, F. (2013). Multivariate analysis of some Ethiopian field pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes. International Journal of Genetics and Molecular Biology, 5 (6), 78-87.
[22] Afreen, S., Singh, A. K., Moharana, D. P., Singh, V., Singh, P., & Singh, B. (2017). Genetic evaluation for yield and yield attributes in garden pea (Pisum sativum var. hortense L.) under North Indian gangetic plain conditions. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci, 6 (2), 1399-1404.
[23] Avci M. A & Ceyhan E. (2006). Correlations and genetic analysis of pod characteristics in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Asian Journal of Plant Science., (5): 1-4.
[24] Kumar, T. V., Alloli, T. B., Hadimani, H. P., Ajjappalavar, P. S., Satish, D., Abdul, K., & Hanchinamani, C. N. (2019). Studies on Genetic Variability, Heritability and Genetic Advance in Garden Pea (Pisum sativum L.) varieties. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci, 8 (12): 3032-3038.
[25] Ramzan A., Noor T., Khan T. N & Hina A. (2014). Correlation, cluster and regression analysis of seed yield and its contributing traits in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Journal of Agricultural Research., 52 (4): 481-488.
[26] Tolessa, T. T. (2017). Genetic variation, heritability and advances from selection in elite breeding materials of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes. Agri. Res. Tech, 8 (4): 55-57.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Barkat Ali, Sujon Kumar, Waleed Ahmed. (2021). Genetic Variability, Heritability and Correlation Coefficient in Production Traits of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes. International Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 9(4), 78-88. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20210904.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Barkat Ali; Sujon Kumar; Waleed Ahmed. Genetic Variability, Heritability and Correlation Coefficient in Production Traits of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes. Int. J. Genet. Genomics 2021, 9(4), 78-88. doi: 10.11648/j.ijgg.20210904.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Barkat Ali, Sujon Kumar, Waleed Ahmed. Genetic Variability, Heritability and Correlation Coefficient in Production Traits of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes. Int J Genet Genomics. 2021;9(4):78-88. doi: 10.11648/j.ijgg.20210904.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijgg.20210904.13,
      author = {Barkat Ali and Sujon Kumar and Waleed Ahmed},
      title = {Genetic Variability, Heritability and Correlation Coefficient in Production Traits of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes},
      journal = {International Journal of Genetics and Genomics},
      volume = {9},
      number = {4},
      pages = {78-88},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijgg.20210904.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20210904.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijgg.20210904.13},
      abstract = {An experiment was carried out to measure variability, heritability, genetic advance and correlation coefficient for yield and yield related traits in ten Pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes at Tarnab-Peshawar, during cropping season 2016-17. To identify the best genotypes for further breeding these genotypes were evaluated in a randomized complete block design with three replications. All genotypes were grown in 3m long ridges, which were kept 60cm apart where plant to plant distance was 30cm. To reduce experimental error, cultural practices were performed uniformly for all genotypes. Data was collected from ten randomly selected plants from each genotype in each replication. Highly significant (p ≤ 0.01) differences were observed for days to 50% flowering, plant height, primary branches plant-1, days to maturity, pods plant-1, pod length, fresh pod shelling percentage, 100-seeds fresh and dry weight, seeds pod-1 and seed yield plant-1. Among genotypes Sultan was best for 50% flowering (50.38), days to maturity (122.08) and fresh pod shelling percentage (65.29%). Genotype PL-4 had maximum plant height (142.08 cm), pods plant-1 (39.96) and seed yield plant-1 (52.04 g). Anmol had maximum 100-seed fresh (43.90 g) and dry (21.29 g) weight. Genotype Sarsabz had maximum primary branches plant-1 whereas Adventa Selection had maximum pod length (8.86 cm) and seeds pod-1 (6.26). The estimates of heritability and genetic advance were high for days to 50% flowering (0.99, 35.38%), plant height (0.95, 46.88%) and seed yield plant-1 (0.97, 62.47%). High heritability with moderate genetic advance were observed for days to maturity (0.97, 20.20%), pod length (0.95, 15.37%) fresh pod shelling percentage (0.82, 21.58%), 100-seed fresh (0.90, 29.52%) and dry weight (0.93, 22.68%). Significant and positive phenotypic coefficient of correlation was exhibited by seed yield plant-1 with plant height (rp = 0.64), days to 50% flowering (rp= 0.63), days to maturity (rp = 0.78), pods plant-1 (rp = 0.72), pod length (rp = 0.66), fresh pod shelling percentage (rp = 0.64), 100-seed fresh weight (rp = 0.65) and 100-seed dry weight (rp = 0.62). Significant and positive genotypic coefficient of correlation was exhibited by seed yield plant-1 with plant height (rg= 0.81), days to maturity (rg= 0.70) and pods plant-1 (rg= 0.84). Among tested genotypes Sultan, PL-4, Anmol and Sarsabz performed better, therefore could be used in future breeding programs.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Genetic Variability, Heritability and Correlation Coefficient in Production Traits of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes
    AU  - Barkat Ali
    AU  - Sujon Kumar
    AU  - Waleed Ahmed
    Y1  - 2021/11/27
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20210904.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijgg.20210904.13
    T2  - International Journal of Genetics and Genomics
    JF  - International Journal of Genetics and Genomics
    JO  - International Journal of Genetics and Genomics
    SP  - 78
    EP  - 88
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2376-7359
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20210904.13
    AB  - An experiment was carried out to measure variability, heritability, genetic advance and correlation coefficient for yield and yield related traits in ten Pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes at Tarnab-Peshawar, during cropping season 2016-17. To identify the best genotypes for further breeding these genotypes were evaluated in a randomized complete block design with three replications. All genotypes were grown in 3m long ridges, which were kept 60cm apart where plant to plant distance was 30cm. To reduce experimental error, cultural practices were performed uniformly for all genotypes. Data was collected from ten randomly selected plants from each genotype in each replication. Highly significant (p ≤ 0.01) differences were observed for days to 50% flowering, plant height, primary branches plant-1, days to maturity, pods plant-1, pod length, fresh pod shelling percentage, 100-seeds fresh and dry weight, seeds pod-1 and seed yield plant-1. Among genotypes Sultan was best for 50% flowering (50.38), days to maturity (122.08) and fresh pod shelling percentage (65.29%). Genotype PL-4 had maximum plant height (142.08 cm), pods plant-1 (39.96) and seed yield plant-1 (52.04 g). Anmol had maximum 100-seed fresh (43.90 g) and dry (21.29 g) weight. Genotype Sarsabz had maximum primary branches plant-1 whereas Adventa Selection had maximum pod length (8.86 cm) and seeds pod-1 (6.26). The estimates of heritability and genetic advance were high for days to 50% flowering (0.99, 35.38%), plant height (0.95, 46.88%) and seed yield plant-1 (0.97, 62.47%). High heritability with moderate genetic advance were observed for days to maturity (0.97, 20.20%), pod length (0.95, 15.37%) fresh pod shelling percentage (0.82, 21.58%), 100-seed fresh (0.90, 29.52%) and dry weight (0.93, 22.68%). Significant and positive phenotypic coefficient of correlation was exhibited by seed yield plant-1 with plant height (rp = 0.64), days to 50% flowering (rp= 0.63), days to maturity (rp = 0.78), pods plant-1 (rp = 0.72), pod length (rp = 0.66), fresh pod shelling percentage (rp = 0.64), 100-seed fresh weight (rp = 0.65) and 100-seed dry weight (rp = 0.62). Significant and positive genotypic coefficient of correlation was exhibited by seed yield plant-1 with plant height (rg= 0.81), days to maturity (rg= 0.70) and pods plant-1 (rg= 0.84). Among tested genotypes Sultan, PL-4, Anmol and Sarsabz performed better, therefore could be used in future breeding programs.
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • College of Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China

  • Triticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China

  • College of Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China

  • Sections