| Peer-Reviewed

Genetic Evaluation and Phenotypic Trend for Some Lactation Traits of Dromedary Camels

Received: 25 June 2022    Accepted: 25 July 2022    Published: 28 September 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

There is a paucity of published work on genetic evaluation of lactation traits in camels using modern methodologies such as MTDFREML (Maximum Likelihood Restricted by Multiple Trait Derivatives Free of Maximum). The current study aimed to estimate the genetic parameters (direct heritability, repeatability and breeding values), and to estimate the phenotypic trend. The studies were including total milk yield (TMY/kg), day milk yield (DMY/ kg) and length of lactation period (LP). Actual means of TMY, DMY and LP were 1464.90 kg, 4.00 and 418.84, respectively. LP was significantly (P≤0.05) affected by the year and season of calving. Additive heritability (h2a) estimates for TMY, DMY and LP was 0.25, 0.30 and 0.17, respectively. These are promising values for the potential of genetic improvement. Repeatability (t) values recorded a medium value for LP (0.19), while the values were high for both TMY (0.36) and DMY (0.43). The range of predicted breeding values (PBVs) of animals for TMY, DMY and LP were 143.07 kg, 1.5 kg and 113.9 days, respectively. Regression coefficients for she-camels showed a negative annual phenotypic trend (PT) of about -3.58 kg and -0.012 kg per year for TMY and DMY, respectively. A genetic improvement program should be followed to allow exploiting the higher estimates of genetic parameters by relying on animals with positive breeding values.

Published in Animal and Veterinary Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 5)
DOI 10.11648/j.avs.20221005.11
Page(s) 119-125
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Genetic, Phenotypic Trend, Lactation, Dromedary Camels

References
[1] Raziq, A., Younas, M., & Kakar, M. A. (2008). Camel a potential dairy animal in difficult environments. Pak. J. Agri. Sci., 45 (2), 263-267. ‏
[2] Sallam, A. M. (2020). Future opportunities for genetic improvement of the Egyptian camels. Egyptian journal of animal production, 57 (suppl. Issue), 39-45. ‏
[3] Njiru, GK, (1993). Economics of camel production. In: S. P. Simpkin (Ed.): Camel Production. A series of lectures given by FARM-Africa at Nairobi University, Nairobi, Kenya.
[4] FAOSTAT, (2022). Status of Animal Genetic Resources. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL
[5] Hermas, S. A. (1998). Genetic improvement and the future role of the camel in the Arab World: Problems and opportunities. In Proceedings of the Third Annual Meeting for Animal Production under Arid Conditions. Volume 2: 56-68.
[6] Hermas, S. A., Abushuashi, H., and Abusaud, F. (1998). A primary investigation on heritability of growth measures in the Magrabi camel in Libya. Proceedings of the 3rd Animal Production under Arid Conditions, 1, 65-70.
[7] Khalil, M. H., Al-Sobayil, K. A., Al-Jobeile, H. S., Mohamed, K. M., & Salal, S. A. (2006). Quantitative genetic analysis and evaluation lactation traits in Saudi camels. In Proccedings of the International Scientific Conference on Camels (pp. 9-11). ‏
[8] Almutairi, S. E., Boujenane, I., Musaad, A., and Awad-Acharari, F. (2010). Genetic and nongenetic effects for milk yield and growth traits in Saudi camels. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 42 (8), 1845-1853. ‏
[9] Banerjee, G. (1988). Feeds and Principles of Animal Nutrition. Oxford and IBH Publishing, New Delhi, India.
[10] SAS, (2003). Statistical analysis system. SAS Release 9.1.3. For windows, SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA.
[11] Duncan, D. B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11 (1): 1-42.
[12] Boldman, K. G; Kriese, L. A; Van Vleck, L. D; Van Tassell, C. P. and Kachman, S. D. (1995). A manual for the use of MTDFREML. ARS, USDA, Clay Center, NE, USA.
[13] Powell, R. L. (1972). Estimation of genetic trends and effect of genetic trends on sire evaluation "Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 4769. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/4769
[14] Amimo, J. O; Wakhungu, J. W; Inyangala, B. O. and Mosi, R. O. (2007). The effects of non-genetic factors and estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters and trends for milk yield in Ayrshire cattle in Kenya. J. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., 19 (1): 1-9.
[15] Mustafa, I. A. R. (2008). Camel reproduction and production in Egypt. WBC / ICAR 2008 satellite meeting on camelid reproduction, 12-13 July 2008, Budapest, Hungary.
[16] Seioudy, A. F. H. (2013). Some productive traits in Maghrebi she-camels. M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Egypt.
[17] Musaad, A. M.; Faye, B. and Al-Mutairi, S. E. (2013a). Seasonal and physiological variation of gross composition of camel milk in Saudi Arabia. Emir. J. Food Agric. 25 (8): 618-624.
[18] Abdallah, E., A. Ashmay, M. Farouk, O. Salama, F. Khalil and A. Seioudy (2015). Milk production potential in Maghrebi she-camels. Small Rumin. Res, 123 (1): 129-135.
[19] Ashour, A. M., Zeidan, A. E. B., Badr, M. I., Abd El-Hamid, A. A and Aboul-Rayat, M. T. A. (2019). Milk yield and its composition of the Maghrebi she-camels in the different parities. ‏Egypt. J. of Appl. Sci., 34 (9) 30-43.
[20] Khalil, M. H., Al-Sobayil, K. A., Al-Saef, A. M., Mohamed, K. M., & Salal, S. A. (2007). Genetic aspects for milk traits in Saudi Camels. Journal of Camel Practice and Research, 14 (1), 55. ‏
[21] Zaky, M. S., Abdel-Khalek, A. E., Mostafa, T. H., Gabr, S. A., & Hammad, M. E. (2020). Productive and Reproductive Characterization, Breeding Season and Calving Season in Reference with the Effect of Parity Order on Milk Production of Camel in Egypt. Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 11 (12), 573-581. ‏
[22] Musaad, A., B. Faye, B. and Abu-Nikhela, A. (2013b). Lactation curves of dairy camels in an intensive system. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 45: 1039–1046.
[23] Ismail, M. D. and Al-Mutairi, S. E. (1991). Production parameters of Saudi camels under improved management systems. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Camel Production and Improvement. Tabruk, 10-13 December 1991, Libya, 159-172.
[24] Wardeh, M. F., Zaied, A. A and Horier, H. S. (1991). Camel breed types in North Africa. In International Conference on Camel Production and Improvement, Tobruk (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya), 10-13 Dec 1990. ACSAD.
[25] ‏Khan, B. B and Iqbal, A. (2001). Production and composition of camel milk. Review. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 38, 64-68. ‏
[26] Musa, H. H., Shuiep, E. S., Ibtissam, El Zubier, E. M. and Chen, G. H., (2006). Some reproductive and productive traits of camel (Camelus dromedarius) in Western Sudan, Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 5, 590-592.
[27] Abdel-Aziz, B. E., Elbasheir, H. M., Elbashir, M. H. M and Altigani, M. A. (2016). Estimating of some productive traits of Sudanese Arabi camel (Darfur ecotype) reared under intensive management system. ‏ SUST Journal of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences. 17 (1); 15-24.
[28] Ayadi, M., Hammadi, M., Khorchani, T., Barmat, A., Atigui M. and Caja, G, (2009). Effect of milking interval and cisternal udder evaluation in Tunisian Maghrebi Dairy Dromedaries (Camelus dromedarius L.), Journal of Dairy Science, 92, 1452–1459.
[29] Aslam, M.; Nawaz, M.; Ali, M. and Zia–ur–Rahman, M. A. (2002). Determination of productive and reproductive traits in mountain camel, Appl. Livest. Prod. 30: 549-552.
[30] Farrag, F. H. H.; N. A. Shalaby; T. H. Moustafa; A. M. Abdel-Salam and Shahdan A. Ismail (2019). Evaluation of productive, reproductive, longevity and lifetime traits of camel in Egypt's. Animal and Poultry Prod., Mansoura Univ., Vol. 10 (7): 203-214.
[31] Bekele, T.; Zeleke, M. and Baars, R. M. T. (2002). Milk production performance of the one humped camel (Camelus dromedarius) under pastoral management in semi-arid eastern Ethiopia. Livestock Prod. Sci., 76: 37-44.
[32] Mehta, S. C., Yadav, S. B. S., Singh, S., and Bissa, U. K. (2014). Sire evaluation and selection of Indian dromedary females for milk production: Issues and strategies. J. Camel Pract. Res, 21, 93-98. ‏
[33] Shehab El-Din, M. I. (2020). Genetic evaluation for some productive and reproductive traits of Friesian cattle raised in Egypt. PhD thesis, Fac. Agric., al-Azhar Univ, Nasr city- Cairo, Egypt.
[34] Abou-Bakr, S. (2009). Genetic and phenotypic trends of 305-day milk yield of Holstein cows raised at commercial farm in Egypt. Egypt. J. Anim. Prod., 46 (2): 85-92. ‏
[35] Katok, N. and Yanar, M. (2012). Milk traits and estimation of genetic, phenotypic and environmental trends for milk and milk fat yields in Holstein Friesian cows. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 14 (2): ‏311-314.
[36] Hossein-Zadeh, N. G. (2012). Genetic parameters and trends for lactation length in the first three lactations of Holstein cows. Arch. Anim. Breed., 55 (6): 533-539.
[37] Javed, K; Babar, M. E. and Abdullah, M. (2007). Within-herd phenotypic and genetic trend lines for milk yield in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. J. Cell Anim. Bio. 1 (4): 66-70. ‏
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Mohamed Ibrahim Shehab El-Din, Ahmed Mousa Amer, Amal Abdel-Kareem Othman, Mona Mohamed Sobhy, Mohammed Atef Kamal El-den. (2022). Genetic Evaluation and Phenotypic Trend for Some Lactation Traits of Dromedary Camels. Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 10(5), 119-125. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20221005.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Mohamed Ibrahim Shehab El-Din; Ahmed Mousa Amer; Amal Abdel-Kareem Othman; Mona Mohamed Sobhy; Mohammed Atef Kamal El-den. Genetic Evaluation and Phenotypic Trend for Some Lactation Traits of Dromedary Camels. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2022, 10(5), 119-125. doi: 10.11648/j.avs.20221005.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Mohamed Ibrahim Shehab El-Din, Ahmed Mousa Amer, Amal Abdel-Kareem Othman, Mona Mohamed Sobhy, Mohammed Atef Kamal El-den. Genetic Evaluation and Phenotypic Trend for Some Lactation Traits of Dromedary Camels. Anim Vet Sci. 2022;10(5):119-125. doi: 10.11648/j.avs.20221005.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.avs.20221005.11,
      author = {Mohamed Ibrahim Shehab El-Din and Ahmed Mousa Amer and Amal Abdel-Kareem Othman and Mona Mohamed Sobhy and Mohammed Atef Kamal El-den},
      title = {Genetic Evaluation and Phenotypic Trend for Some Lactation Traits of Dromedary Camels},
      journal = {Animal and Veterinary Sciences},
      volume = {10},
      number = {5},
      pages = {119-125},
      doi = {10.11648/j.avs.20221005.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20221005.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.avs.20221005.11},
      abstract = {There is a paucity of published work on genetic evaluation of lactation traits in camels using modern methodologies such as MTDFREML (Maximum Likelihood Restricted by Multiple Trait Derivatives Free of Maximum). The current study aimed to estimate the genetic parameters (direct heritability, repeatability and breeding values), and to estimate the phenotypic trend. The studies were including total milk yield (TMY/kg), day milk yield (DMY/ kg) and length of lactation period (LP). Actual means of TMY, DMY and LP were 1464.90 kg, 4.00 and 418.84, respectively. LP was significantly (P≤0.05) affected by the year and season of calving. Additive heritability (h2a) estimates for TMY, DMY and LP was 0.25, 0.30 and 0.17, respectively. These are promising values for the potential of genetic improvement. Repeatability (t) values recorded a medium value for LP (0.19), while the values were high for both TMY (0.36) and DMY (0.43). The range of predicted breeding values (PBVs) of animals for TMY, DMY and LP were 143.07 kg, 1.5 kg and 113.9 days, respectively. Regression coefficients for she-camels showed a negative annual phenotypic trend (PT) of about -3.58 kg and -0.012 kg per year for TMY and DMY, respectively. A genetic improvement program should be followed to allow exploiting the higher estimates of genetic parameters by relying on animals with positive breeding values.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Genetic Evaluation and Phenotypic Trend for Some Lactation Traits of Dromedary Camels
    AU  - Mohamed Ibrahim Shehab El-Din
    AU  - Ahmed Mousa Amer
    AU  - Amal Abdel-Kareem Othman
    AU  - Mona Mohamed Sobhy
    AU  - Mohammed Atef Kamal El-den
    Y1  - 2022/09/28
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20221005.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.avs.20221005.11
    T2  - Animal and Veterinary Sciences
    JF  - Animal and Veterinary Sciences
    JO  - Animal and Veterinary Sciences
    SP  - 119
    EP  - 125
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-5850
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20221005.11
    AB  - There is a paucity of published work on genetic evaluation of lactation traits in camels using modern methodologies such as MTDFREML (Maximum Likelihood Restricted by Multiple Trait Derivatives Free of Maximum). The current study aimed to estimate the genetic parameters (direct heritability, repeatability and breeding values), and to estimate the phenotypic trend. The studies were including total milk yield (TMY/kg), day milk yield (DMY/ kg) and length of lactation period (LP). Actual means of TMY, DMY and LP were 1464.90 kg, 4.00 and 418.84, respectively. LP was significantly (P≤0.05) affected by the year and season of calving. Additive heritability (h2a) estimates for TMY, DMY and LP was 0.25, 0.30 and 0.17, respectively. These are promising values for the potential of genetic improvement. Repeatability (t) values recorded a medium value for LP (0.19), while the values were high for both TMY (0.36) and DMY (0.43). The range of predicted breeding values (PBVs) of animals for TMY, DMY and LP were 143.07 kg, 1.5 kg and 113.9 days, respectively. Regression coefficients for she-camels showed a negative annual phenotypic trend (PT) of about -3.58 kg and -0.012 kg per year for TMY and DMY, respectively. A genetic improvement program should be followed to allow exploiting the higher estimates of genetic parameters by relying on animals with positive breeding values.
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Animal Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt

  • Animal Production Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Giza, Egypt

  • Animal Production Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Giza, Egypt

  • Animal Reproduction Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Giza, Egypt

  • Animal Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Al-Azhar University, Assuit Branch, Assuit, Egypt

  • Sections