American Journal of Health Research

| Peer-Reviewed |

Facebook as a Tool for Health Research: A Systematic Review

Received: 22 March 2020    Accepted: 09 April 2020    Published: 30 April 2020
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Background: A lot of researches have been conducted on public health; however few studies have used social media such as Facebook as data source. Objectives: To conduct a systematic review on the use of Facebook in public health research, define a terminology to describe Facebook use and classify the current state of Facebook in health research. Search Methods: Researchers performed a wide literature search in PubMed, Southern University Online Library, Google Scholar and SCOPUS through December 2019. Data Collection and Analysis: Four authors independently screened studies and extracted data related to analysis of Facebook, methodology used to study Facebook and current state of Facebook Research. Main Results: Of the 2506 articles identified in the interim database search, researchers found 727 unique articles. Of these, 103 of these articles met the eligibility criteria (see appendix). Researchers identified ways in which Facebook data were used by other researchers: Network Analysis of Facebook post (16.5%; n=17), Intervention based post (12.6%; n=13), Advertisement (6.8%; n=7), Survey (3%; n=3), Content Analysis (15.5%, n=16), Engagement (7.8%; n=8), Recruitment (29%; n=30), Focus Group (3.9%; n=4; Table 1). Studies that used more than one methodology in studying Facebook was also included. Conclusions: New terminologies was used to describe Facebook’s role in health research with 8 categories. Facebook-based health research is a continuous rapidly growing area funded by numerous funding agencies. Public Health Implications: Future work should concentrate on Communicable and infectious diseases such as COVID-19, Ebola Viral Disease, Lassa Fever, SARS. Secondly issues of privacy and ethical concerns in social media research must be standardized in terms of reporting.

DOI 10.11648/j.ajhr.20200802.11
Published in American Journal of Health Research (Volume 8, Issue 2, March 2020)
Page(s) 6-10
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Facebook, Systematic Review, Public Health, Infectious Diseases, Social Media

References
[1] World Health Organization. (2020). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): situation report, 67.
[2] Gunning, D., Wenke, R., Ward, E. C., Chalk, S., Lawrie, M., Romano, M., & Cardell, E. (2017). Clinicians’ perceptions of delivering new models of high intensity aphasia treatment. Aphasiology, 31 (4), 406-426.
[3] Clement, E., & Scott, P. A. (2020). No food, no drink, no noise. College & research libraries news, 55 (2), 81-83.
[4] Chugh, R., & Ruhi, U. (2018). Social media in higher education: A literature review of Facebook. Education and Information Technologies, 23 (2), 605-616.
[5] A., N. J., A., A. K., A., M. L., & J., B. S. (2016). The future of mental health care: peer-to-peer support and social media. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 113-122.
[6] Z. M. (2017). Perceptions of Health-Related Information on Facebook: Cross-Sectional Study Among Vietnamese Youths. Interactive Journal of Medical Research.
[7] Brosseau, L., Wells, G. A., Brooks, S., Angelis, G. D., Bell, M., Egan, M.,. Novikov, M. (2014). People getting a grip on arthritis II: An innovative strategy to implement clinical practice guidelines for rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis patients through Facebook. Health Education Journal.
[8] Cheung, Y. T., Chan, C. H., Wang, M. P., Li, H. C., & Lam, T.-h. (2017). Online Social Support for the Prevention of Smoking Relapse: A Content Analysis of the WhatsApp and Facebook Social Groups. Telemedicine and e-Health.
[9] Choudhury, M. D., Counts, S., Horvitz, E. J., & Hoff, A. (2014). Characterizing and Predicting Postpartum Depression from Shared Facebook Data. Social Technologies and Well-Being.
[10] Dhar, V. K., Kim, Y., Graff, J. T., Jung, A. D., Garrett, J., Dick, L. E.,. Shah, S. A. (2017). Benefit of social media on patient engagement and satisfaction: Results of a 9-month, qualitative pilot study using Facebook. Central Surgical Association.
[11] George, D. R., Kime, L., & Riley, T. D. (2015). How are healthcare institutions using Facebook to interact with online communities? Results from a case study in Central Pennsylvania. Journal of Hospital Administration.
[12] Gunasekaran, B., Jayasinghe, Y., Brotherton, J. M., Fenner, Y., Moore, E. E., Wark, J. D.,. Garland, S. M. (2015). Asking about human papillomavirus vaccination and the usefulness of registry validation: A study of young women recruited using Facebook. Vaccine, 826-831.
[13] Haimson, O. L., Brubaker, J. R., Dombrowski, L., & Hayes, G. R. (2015). Disclosure, Stress, and Support During Gender Transition on Facebook. Gender and Sexual Identity, 1176-1190.
[14] HP, C., AS, H., MY, B. N., & Nasir, M. (2018). A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Facebook-based Physical Activity Intervention for Government Employees with Metabolic Syndrome. 165-181.
[15] Jones, K., Williams, J., Sipsma, H., & Patil, C. (2018). Adolescent and emerging adults’ evaluation of a Facebook site providing sexual health education. Publiv Health Nursing.
[16] Kent, E. E., Prestin, A., Gaysynsky, A., Galica, K., Rinker, R., Graff, K., & Chou, W.-Y. S. (2015). Obesity is the New Major Cause of Cancer^: Connections Between Obesity and Cancer on Facebook and Twitter. Journal of Cancer Education.
[17] Lawless, M., Augoustinos, M., & LeCouteur, A. (Discourse, Context & Media). Dementia on Facebook: Requesting information and advice about dementia risk-prevention on social media. 2018.
[18] Lim, M. S., Hare, J. D., Carrotte, E. R., & Dietze, P. M. (2016). An investigation of strategies used in alcohol brand marketing and alcohol-related health promotion on Facebook. Digital Health, 1-7.
[19] Roccetti, M., Prandi, C., Salomoni, P., & Marfia, G. (2016). Unleashing the true potential of social networks: confirming infliximab medical trials through Facebook posts. Netw Model Anal Health Inform Bioinforma.
[20] Roccetti, M., Salomoni, P., Prandi, C., Marfia, G., & Mirri, S. (2017). On the interpretation of the effects of the Infliximab treatment on Crohn’s disease patients from Facebook posts: a human vs. machine comparison. Netw Model Anal Health Inform Bioinforma.
[21] Savas, J. A., Huang, K. E., Tuchayi, S. M., & Feldman, S. R. (2014). Understanding the influence of social media in medicine: lesson learned from facebook. Dermatology Online Journal.
[22] Taiminen, H., & Taiminen, K. (2016). Usage of Facebook- and Anonymous Forum–Based Peer Support Groups Online and Their Influence on Perceived Social Support Types in Weight Loss.
[23] Tang, S. Y., Israel, J. S., Poore, S. O., & Afifi, A. M. (2018). Facebook Facts: Breast Reconstruction Patient-Reported Outcomes Using Social Media.
Author Information
  • Global Technology Management and Policy Research Group, Southern University and A & M College, Baton Rouge, USA

  • Global Technology Management and Policy Research Group, Southern University and A & M College, Baton Rouge, USA

  • Global Technology Management and Policy Research Group, Southern University and A & M College, Baton Rouge, USA

  • Global Technology Management and Policy Research Group, Southern University and A & M College, Baton Rouge, USA

  • Global Technology Management and Policy Research Group, Southern University and A & M College, Baton Rouge, USA

  • Global Technology Management and Policy Research Group, Southern University and A & M College, Baton Rouge, USA

  • Global Technology Management and Policy Research Group, Southern University and A & M College, Baton Rouge, USA

  • Global Technology Management and Policy Research Group, Southern University and A & M College, Baton Rouge, USA

  • Global Technology Management and Policy Research Group, Southern University and A & M College, Baton Rouge, USA

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Felicitas Yari, Foluso Ayeni, Mary Adewunmi, Richard Ayo, Timothy Ayo, et al. (2020). Facebook as a Tool for Health Research: A Systematic Review. American Journal of Health Research, 8(2), 6-10. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajhr.20200802.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Felicitas Yari; Foluso Ayeni; Mary Adewunmi; Richard Ayo; Timothy Ayo, et al. Facebook as a Tool for Health Research: A Systematic Review. Am. J. Health Res. 2020, 8(2), 6-10. doi: 10.11648/j.ajhr.20200802.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Felicitas Yari, Foluso Ayeni, Mary Adewunmi, Richard Ayo, Timothy Ayo, et al. Facebook as a Tool for Health Research: A Systematic Review. Am J Health Res. 2020;8(2):6-10. doi: 10.11648/j.ajhr.20200802.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajhr.20200802.11,
      author = {Felicitas Yari and Foluso Ayeni and Mary Adewunmi and Richard Ayo and Timothy Ayo and God’swill Katchoua and Samson Adewole and Olumide Fawehinmi and Victor Mbarika},
      title = {Facebook as a Tool for Health Research: A Systematic Review},
      journal = {American Journal of Health Research},
      volume = {8},
      number = {2},
      pages = {6-10},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajhr.20200802.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajhr.20200802.11},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajhr.20200802.11},
      abstract = {Background: A lot of researches have been conducted on public health; however few studies have used social media such as Facebook as data source. Objectives: To conduct a systematic review on the use of Facebook in public health research, define a terminology to describe Facebook use and classify the current state of Facebook in health research. Search Methods: Researchers performed a wide literature search in PubMed, Southern University Online Library, Google Scholar and SCOPUS through December 2019. Data Collection and Analysis: Four authors independently screened studies and extracted data related to analysis of Facebook, methodology used to study Facebook and current state of Facebook Research. Main Results: Of the 2506 articles identified in the interim database search, researchers found 727 unique articles. Of these, 103 of these articles met the eligibility criteria (see appendix). Researchers identified ways in which Facebook data were used by other researchers: Network Analysis of Facebook post (16.5%; n=17), Intervention based post (12.6%; n=13), Advertisement (6.8%; n=7), Survey (3%; n=3), Content Analysis (15.5%, n=16), Engagement (7.8%; n=8), Recruitment (29%; n=30), Focus Group (3.9%; n=4; Table 1). Studies that used more than one methodology in studying Facebook was also included. Conclusions: New terminologies was used to describe Facebook’s role in health research with 8 categories. Facebook-based health research is a continuous rapidly growing area funded by numerous funding agencies. Public Health Implications: Future work should concentrate on Communicable and infectious diseases such as COVID-19, Ebola Viral Disease, Lassa Fever, SARS. Secondly issues of privacy and ethical concerns in social media research must be standardized in terms of reporting.},
     year = {2020}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Facebook as a Tool for Health Research: A Systematic Review
    AU  - Felicitas Yari
    AU  - Foluso Ayeni
    AU  - Mary Adewunmi
    AU  - Richard Ayo
    AU  - Timothy Ayo
    AU  - God’swill Katchoua
    AU  - Samson Adewole
    AU  - Olumide Fawehinmi
    AU  - Victor Mbarika
    Y1  - 2020/04/30
    PY  - 2020
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajhr.20200802.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajhr.20200802.11
    T2  - American Journal of Health Research
    JF  - American Journal of Health Research
    JO  - American Journal of Health Research
    SP  - 6
    EP  - 10
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8796
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajhr.20200802.11
    AB  - Background: A lot of researches have been conducted on public health; however few studies have used social media such as Facebook as data source. Objectives: To conduct a systematic review on the use of Facebook in public health research, define a terminology to describe Facebook use and classify the current state of Facebook in health research. Search Methods: Researchers performed a wide literature search in PubMed, Southern University Online Library, Google Scholar and SCOPUS through December 2019. Data Collection and Analysis: Four authors independently screened studies and extracted data related to analysis of Facebook, methodology used to study Facebook and current state of Facebook Research. Main Results: Of the 2506 articles identified in the interim database search, researchers found 727 unique articles. Of these, 103 of these articles met the eligibility criteria (see appendix). Researchers identified ways in which Facebook data were used by other researchers: Network Analysis of Facebook post (16.5%; n=17), Intervention based post (12.6%; n=13), Advertisement (6.8%; n=7), Survey (3%; n=3), Content Analysis (15.5%, n=16), Engagement (7.8%; n=8), Recruitment (29%; n=30), Focus Group (3.9%; n=4; Table 1). Studies that used more than one methodology in studying Facebook was also included. Conclusions: New terminologies was used to describe Facebook’s role in health research with 8 categories. Facebook-based health research is a continuous rapidly growing area funded by numerous funding agencies. Public Health Implications: Future work should concentrate on Communicable and infectious diseases such as COVID-19, Ebola Viral Disease, Lassa Fever, SARS. Secondly issues of privacy and ethical concerns in social media research must be standardized in terms of reporting.
    VL  - 8
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections