| Peer-Reviewed

Modelling the Influence of Social Media on Collective Opinion

Received: 22 October 2020    Accepted: 13 November 2020    Published: 24 November 2020
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

When we divide our present society into real and cyber worlds, there exist no clear data on how the public attitude or opinion is formed and on what sort of opinion distribution is realized in the cyber world. We propose a methodology for the model calculation with which we can compare the observation of the public opinion formed under the environment of social media in the cyber world. The public viewpoint or the opinion about a certain matter, together with the standpoint of the information provided by the social media, can not be given by some discrete values, but they make fuzzy distributions within certain ranges of opinion around certain central values. With the assumption that the variation of the public opinion originates from the emotional contagion induced by the contact of the public with the social media, and that the force realized by this contagion is given in terms of the common area of such fuzzy distributions of the public opinion and the information on the social media, we derived an equation of motion for the variation of public opinion. By further assuming that the information diffuses from a top toward a bottom of a ramified tree structure of node networks, we exemplified some characteristic patterns of the distribution of collective opinion including the effect of echo-chamber, which are realized under certain input spectra of the information on the social media. Moreover, by using the observed data for the 2016 USA President election as an input, we made clear that the reversal of the approval rating might possibly occur between the political right and left wings in so far as the response character of supporters to the social media differ depending on the political situation of the public.

Published in American Journal of Physics and Applications (Volume 8, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajpa.20200806.11
Page(s) 78-87
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Collective Public Opinion, Social Media, Information Diffusion, Emotional Contagion, Fuzzy Function, Equation of Motion of Public Opinion, 2016 USA President Election

References
[1] C. Castellano, S. Fortunato, V. Loreto, Statistical physics of social dynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (2009) 591-646.
[2] L. Neuhauser, A. Mellor, R. Lambiotte, Multibody interactions and nonlinear consensus dynamics on network systems, Phys. Rev. E 101 (2020) 032310, and references therein.
[3] X. Dong, Y. Liu, C. Wu, Y. Lian, D. Tang, A double-identity rumor spreading model, Physica A 528 (2019) 121479.
[4] M. NeKoree, Y. Moreno, G. Bianconi, M. Marsili, Theory of rumor spreading in complex social network, Physica A 374 (2007) 457-470.
[5] J. Ma, H. Zhu, Rumor diffusion in heterogeneous networks by considering the individual subjective judgment and diverse characteristics, Physica A 499 (2018) 276-287, and references therein.
[6] T. Ohnishi, Can interactive dual field of information explain the prevalent phenomena, Am. J. Phys. Appl. 7 (2019) 144-155.
[7] Y. Lan, Z. Lian, R. Zeng, D. Zhu, Y. Xia, M. Liu, P. Zhang, A statistical model of the impact of online rumors on the information quantity of online public opinion, Physica A 541 (2020) 123623.
[8] Y. Yi, Z. Zhang, C. Gan, The outbreak threshold of information diffusion over social-physical networks, Physica A 526 (2019) 121128.
[9] M. Del Vicario, A. Scala, G. Caldarelli, H. E. Stanley, W. Quattrociocchi, Modeling confirmation bias and polarization, Sci. Rep. 7 (2017) 40391.
[10] H-W. Lee, N. Malik, F. Shi, P. Mucha, Social clustering in epidemic spread on coevolving networks, Phys. Rev. E 99 (2019) 062301.
[11] P. Jia, C. Wang, G.. Zhang, J. Ma, A rumor spreading model based on two propagation channels in social networks, Physica A 524 (2019) 342-353.
[12] Y. Lian, X. Dong, Y. Liu, Topological evolution of the internet public opinion, Physica A 486 (2017) 567-578.
[13] X. Yin, H. Wang, P. Yin, H. Zhu, Agent-based opinion formation modeling in social network: a perspective of social psychology, Physica A 532 (2019) 121786.
[14] N. Askitas, Explaining opinion polarization with opinion copulas, PLOS ONE 12 (2017) e0183277.
[15] R. Zeng, D. Zhu, A model and simulation of the emotional contagion of netizens in the process of rumor reputation, Sci. Rep. 9 (2019) 14164.
[16] A. D. I. Kramer, J. E. Guillory, J. T. Hancock, Experimental evidence of massive scale emotional contagion through social networks, PNAS 111 (2014) 8788-8790.
[17] A. Chmiel, J. Slenkiewicz, M. Thelwall, G. Paltoglou, K. Buckley, A. Kappas, J. A. Holyst, Collective emotions online and their influence on community life, PLOS ONE 6 (2011) e22207.
[18] R, Fan, K. Xu, J. Zhao, A agent-based model for emotion contagion and competition in online social media, Physica A 495 (2018) 245-259.
[19] A. L. Hill, D. G. Rand, M. A. Nowak, N. A. Christakis, Emotions as infections diseases in a large social networks; the SISa model, Proc. Roy. Soc. B 277 (2010) 3827-3835.
[20] E. Ferrara, Z. Yang, Measuring emotional contagion in social media, PLOS ONE (Nov. 6, 2015) e0142390.
[21] E. Cox, The fuzzy systems handbook: a practitioner’s guide to building, using, maintaining fuzzy systems (AP Professional, Boston, 1994).
[22] M. Kochen, Applications of Fuzzy Sets in Psychology (Academic Press, 1974).
[23] A-L. Barabasi, R. Albert, Emergence of scaling in random network, Science 286 (1999) 509-512.
[24] A-L. barabasi, R. Albert, H. Jeong, Mean field theory for scale-free random network, Physica A 272 (1999) 173-187.
[25] D. J. Watts, A simple model of global cascades on random networks, PNAS 99 (2002) 5766-5771.
[26] A. Bessi, F. Zollo, M. Del Vicaro, M. Puliga, A. Scala, G. Caldarelli, B. Uzzi, W. Quattrociocchi, Users polarization on Facebook and Youtube, PLOS ONE 11 (2016) e0159641.
[27] A. Boutyline, R. Willer, The social structure of political echo chambers: variation in ideological homophily in online networks, Pol. Psycho. 38 (2017) 551-569.
[28] N. Grinberg, K. Joseph, L. Friedland, B. Swire-Thompson, D. Lazer, Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U. S. Presidential election, Science 363 (2019) 374-378.
[29] A. Bovet, F. Marone, H. A. Makse, Validation of Twitter opinion trends with national polling aggregates: Hillary Clinton vs Donald Trump, Sci. Rep. 8 (2018) 8673.
[30] T. Lee, The global rise of “fake news” and the threat to democratic election in the USA, Pub. Admini. Policy, 22, (2019) 15-24.
[31] B. Monsted, P. Sapiezynski, E. Ferrara, S. Lehmann, Evidence of complex contagion of information in social media: an experiment using Twitter bots, PLOS ONE 12 (2017) e01841482.
[32] M. Maciel, A. C. R. Martins, Ideologically motivated biases in a multiple issue opinion model, Physica A 553 (2020) 124293.
[33] L. Zhao, J. Wang, R. Huang, H. Cui, X. Qiu, X. Wang, Sentiment contagion in complex network, Physica A 394 (2014) 17-23.
[34] C. A. Bail, L. P. Argyle, T. W. Brown, J. P. Bumpus, H. Chen, M. B. Fallin Hunzaker, J. Lee, M. Mann, F. Merhout, A. Volfovsky, Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization, PNAS 115 (2018) 9216-9221.
[35] C. A. Bail, B. Guay, E. Maloney, A. Combs, D. Sunshine, D. S. Hillygus, F. Merhout, D. Freelon, A. Volfovsky, Assessing the Russian Internet Research Agency’s impact on the political attitudes and behaviors of American Twitter Users in late 2017, PNAS 117 (2020) 243-250.
[36] D. R. Dewhurst, C. M. Danforth, P. S. Dodds, Noncooperative dynamics in election interference, Phys. Rev. E 101 (2020) 022307.
[37] E. Ferrara, O. Varol, C. Davis, F. Menczer, A. Flammini, The rise of social bots, Com. ACM 59 (2016) 96-104.
[38] H. Allcott, M. Gentzkow, Social media and fake news in the 2016 election, J. Economic Perspectives 31 (2017) 211-236.
[39] A. Bovet, H. A. Makse, Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election, Nature com. 10 (2019) 1-14.
[40] for instance, BBC News, What does Trump actually believe on climate change https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51213003 (retrieved Sept 9, 2020).
[41] J. S. Damico, M. Baildon, A. Panos, Media literacy and climate change in a post-truth society, J. Media Literacy Edu. 10 (2018) 11-32.
[42] N. Fleming, Fighting coronavirus misinformation, Nature 583 (2020) 155-156.
[43] D. Mocanu, L. Rossi, Q. Zhang, M. Karsai, W. Quattrociocchi, Collective attention in the age of (mis) information, Comp. Human Behav. 51 (2015) 1198-1204.
[44] M. Del Vicario, A. Bessi, F. Zollo, F. Petroni, A. Scala, G. Caldarella, H. E. Stanley, W. Quattrociocchi, The spreading of misinformation online, PNAS 113 (2016) 554-559.
[45] S. Vosoughi, D. Roy, S. Aral, Science 359 (2018) 1146-1151.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Teruaki Ohnishi. (2020). Modelling the Influence of Social Media on Collective Opinion. American Journal of Physics and Applications, 8(6), 78-87. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpa.20200806.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Teruaki Ohnishi. Modelling the Influence of Social Media on Collective Opinion. Am. J. Phys. Appl. 2020, 8(6), 78-87. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpa.20200806.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Teruaki Ohnishi. Modelling the Influence of Social Media on Collective Opinion. Am J Phys Appl. 2020;8(6):78-87. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpa.20200806.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajpa.20200806.11,
      author = {Teruaki Ohnishi},
      title = {Modelling the Influence of Social Media on Collective Opinion},
      journal = {American Journal of Physics and Applications},
      volume = {8},
      number = {6},
      pages = {78-87},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajpa.20200806.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpa.20200806.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajpa.20200806.11},
      abstract = {When we divide our present society into real and cyber worlds, there exist no clear data on how the public attitude or opinion is formed and on what sort of opinion distribution is realized in the cyber world. We propose a methodology for the model calculation with which we can compare the observation of the public opinion formed under the environment of social media in the cyber world. The public viewpoint or the opinion about a certain matter, together with the standpoint of the information provided by the social media, can not be given by some discrete values, but they make fuzzy distributions within certain ranges of opinion around certain central values. With the assumption that the variation of the public opinion originates from the emotional contagion induced by the contact of the public with the social media, and that the force realized by this contagion is given in terms of the common area of such fuzzy distributions of the public opinion and the information on the social media, we derived an equation of motion for the variation of public opinion. By further assuming that the information diffuses from a top toward a bottom of a ramified tree structure of node networks, we exemplified some characteristic patterns of the distribution of collective opinion including the effect of echo-chamber, which are realized under certain input spectra of the information on the social media. Moreover, by using the observed data for the 2016 USA President election as an input, we made clear that the reversal of the approval rating might possibly occur between the political right and left wings in so far as the response character of supporters to the social media differ depending on the political situation of the public.},
     year = {2020}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Modelling the Influence of Social Media on Collective Opinion
    AU  - Teruaki Ohnishi
    Y1  - 2020/11/24
    PY  - 2020
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpa.20200806.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajpa.20200806.11
    T2  - American Journal of Physics and Applications
    JF  - American Journal of Physics and Applications
    JO  - American Journal of Physics and Applications
    SP  - 78
    EP  - 87
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-4308
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpa.20200806.11
    AB  - When we divide our present society into real and cyber worlds, there exist no clear data on how the public attitude or opinion is formed and on what sort of opinion distribution is realized in the cyber world. We propose a methodology for the model calculation with which we can compare the observation of the public opinion formed under the environment of social media in the cyber world. The public viewpoint or the opinion about a certain matter, together with the standpoint of the information provided by the social media, can not be given by some discrete values, but they make fuzzy distributions within certain ranges of opinion around certain central values. With the assumption that the variation of the public opinion originates from the emotional contagion induced by the contact of the public with the social media, and that the force realized by this contagion is given in terms of the common area of such fuzzy distributions of the public opinion and the information on the social media, we derived an equation of motion for the variation of public opinion. By further assuming that the information diffuses from a top toward a bottom of a ramified tree structure of node networks, we exemplified some characteristic patterns of the distribution of collective opinion including the effect of echo-chamber, which are realized under certain input spectra of the information on the social media. Moreover, by using the observed data for the 2016 USA President election as an input, we made clear that the reversal of the approval rating might possibly occur between the political right and left wings in so far as the response character of supporters to the social media differ depending on the political situation of the public.
    VL  - 8
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Urayasu Branch, Institute of Science and Technology for Society, Urayasu, Chiba, Japan

  • Sections