Comparative Study of Consistency Behavior and Shear Strength of Clayey Soils of Rajshahi District, Bangladesh
Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering
Volume 4, Issue 1, February 2019, Pages: 28-34
Received: Feb. 19, 2019;
Accepted: Mar. 26, 2019;
Published: May 11, 2019
Views 90 Downloads 29
Ankur Nandy, Department of Civil Engineering, Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology, Rajshahi, Bangladesh
Noosrat Rashid, Department of Civil Engineering, Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology, Rajshahi, Bangladesh
Md. Ashikuzzaman, Department of Civil Engineering, Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology, Rajshahi, Bangladesh
Syed Abdul Mofiz, Department of Civil Engineering, Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology, Rajshahi, Bangladesh
This paper aims at introducing the Fall Cone Test (FCT) to obtain the shear strength of clayey soils and reveals its applicability by comparing the results obtained from that of Unconfined Compression Test (UCT). Furthermore, the liquid and plastic limit obtained from Casagrande method also compared with that obtained from FCT. For these, soils were collected from Godagari, Tanore, and Nauhata from Rajshahi District (RD). At first, Hydrometer analysis was performed in each soil to know the physical properties. Then Atterberg Limit test was carried out by considering Casagrande Method. After that UCT was shown in each land to find the shear strength of the clay soils. Lastly, FCT was conducted to find out the shear strength, LL and PL. FCT shows a lower amount of liquid and plastic limit than the values measured in the Casagrande Method except plastic limit for Tanore for FCT whereas Godagari shows the higher value of shear strength considering FCT. This research can be concluded with further research should be conducted to ensure its accuracy. On the other hand, it can be drawn which soil have more consistency and shear strength considering others.
Syed Abdul Mofiz,
Comparative Study of Consistency Behavior and Shear Strength of Clayey Soils of Rajshahi District, Bangladesh, Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering.
Vol. 4, No. 1,
2019, pp. 28-34.
Landris, T. L., and Freeman R. B. (2009). "Dual Weight Fall Cone Method for Simultaneous Liquid and Plastic Limit Determination". Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 135, No. 1, pp. 158-161, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2009)135%3A1(158).
Sivakumar, V., Glynn, D., Cairns, P. and Black, J. P. (2009). "A New Method of Measuring Plastic Limit of Fine Materials". Geotechnique, Vol. 59, No. 10, pp. 813-823, DOI: 10.1680/geot.2009.59.10.813.
Wood, D. M., and Worth, C. P. (1978). "The use of Cone Penetrometer to Determine the Plastic Limit of Soils". Journal of Ground Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 3, p. 37, ISSN: 0017-4653.
Wood D. M. (1985), "Some Fall Cone Tests". Geotechnique, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 64- 68, DOI: 10.1680/geot.1918.104.22.168.
Feng, T. W. (2004). "Using Small Ring and Fall Cone to Determine the Plastic Limit". Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 130, No. 6, pp. 630-635, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130%3A6(630).
Wasti, Y. and Bezirci, M. H. (1986). "Determination of the Consistency Limits of Soils by the Fall Cone Test". Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 241-246, DOI: 10.1139/t86-033.
Harrison, J. A. (1988). "Using the BS Cone Penetrometer for the Determination of the Plastic Limits of Soils". Geotechnique, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 433-438, DOI: 10.1680/geot.1922.214.171.1243.
Koumoto, T., and Houlsby, G. T. (2001). "Theory and Practice of the Fall Cone Test ". Geotechnique, Vol. 51, No. 8, pp. 701-712, DOI: 10.1680/geot.2001.51.8.701.
Muntohar A. S. and Hashim (2005). "Determination of Plastic Limits of Soils Using Cone Penetrometer: Re-Appraisal". Jurnal Teknik Sipil, Vol. 11, No. 2.
Rashid, A. S. B. A. (2005). "Determination of Plastic Limit of Soil using Modified Cone Penetration Method". M.Sc. Thesis, Univ. of Malaysia.
Prakash, K. and Sridharan, A. (2006). "Critical Appraisal of the Cone Penetration Method of Determining Soil Plasticity". Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 43, No. 8, pp. 884-888, DOI: 10.1139/t06-043.
Ying, G., and Wang, Q, (2009). "Experimental Research on Fall Cone Test to Determine Liquid Limit and Plastic Limit of Silts". Journal of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Vol. 30, No. 9, pp. 2569–2574.
Christaras, B. (1991). “A comparison of the Casagrande and fall cone penetrometer methods for liquid limit determination in marls from Crete, Greece”. Engineering Geology, ELSEVIER, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 131-142, DOI: 10.1016/0013-7952(91)90002-3.
Spagnoli. G. (2012). “Comparison between Casagrande and drop-cone methods to calculate liquid limit for pure clay”. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, Vol. 92, No. 6, pp. 859-864, DOI: 10.4141/cjss2012-011.
Hrubesova, E., Lunackova, B., and Brodzki. O. (2016). “Comparison of Liquid Limit of Soils Resulted from Casagrande Test and Modified Cone Penetrometer Methodology”. Procedia Engineering, ELSEVIER, Vol. 142, pp. 364-370, DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.02.063.
Namdar, A. (2008). "Identification of Mixed Soil Characteristics by Application of Laboratory Tests". Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, EJGE, Vol. 14, Bund.
Houlsby, G. T. (1982). "Theoretical Analysis of Fall Cone Tests". Geotechnique, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 111-118, DOI: 10.1680/geot.19126.96.36.199.
Sariosseiri, F., and Muhunthan, B. (2008). “Geotechnical Properties of Palouse Loess Modified with cement Kiln Dust and Portland Cement”. GeoCongress, ASCE, DOI: 10.1061/40972(311)12.
Lawrence, D. M. (1980). "Some properties associated with Kaolinite soils". M.Sc. Thesis, Cambridge University, UK.
Wasti, Y. (1987). “Liquid and Plastic Limits as Determination from the Fall Cone and the Casagrande Methods”. Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 26-30, DOI: 10.1520/GTJ10135J.
GEONOR (2010). "Fall Cone Apparatus- New Model Designed by Norwegian Geotechnical Institute NGI". Oslo, Norway.
Feng, T. W. (2000). “Fall Cone Penetration and Water Content Relationship of Clays”. Geotechnique, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 181-187, DOI: 10.1680/geot.2000.50.2.181.