Science, Technology & Public Policy

| Peer-Reviewed |

Carbon Footprints: Various Approaches to Clothing Care and Maintenance Practices Among Tertiary Students in Ghana

Received: 08 August 2018    Accepted: 20 August 2018    Published: 13 September 2018
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

The current study investigated the existing patterns of student laundry application. It distinguishes the environmental implications of these practices. Thus, the explanatory research design was adopted due to the nature of the study as there was the need to compare and analyse the responses from standardised questionnaires through the use of descriptive and inferential statistics which fit well into the explanatory survey design. This study hence adopted the quantitative methodology. The sample used for this study were tertiary students in Ghana. Convenience sampling method was used to select 150 students from four tertiary institutions and administered with questionnaires. The major findings of the study demonstrate that tertiary students are fully aware of the assertion that carbon footprint is something that leads to global warming and accepts that shaking, brushing and airing of clothes can be considered as an approach to clothing care and maintenance. They also appreciate that practising dry cleaning of clothes by the use of grease absorbents without the use of water should be considered as an approach to clothing care and maintenance. It was concluded that practicing dry cleaning of clothes by the use of grease absorbents without the use of water must be considered as an approach to clothing care and maintenance in tertiary institutions in Ghana.

DOI 10.11648/j.stpp.20180201.13
Published in Science, Technology & Public Policy (Volume 2, Issue 1, June 2018)
Page(s) 11-19
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Carbon Footprints, Clothes, Greenhouse Gas, Detergents

References
[1] Matthews, H. S., Hendrickson, C. T. & Weber, C. L. (2008). The Importance of Carbon Footprint Estimation Boundaries. Environmental Science & Technology 42, 5839-5842.
[2] Huang, Y. A., Weber, C. L. & Matthews, H. S. (2009). Categorization of Scope Emissions for Streamlined Enterprise Carbon Footprinting. Environmental Science & Technology 43, 8509-8515.
[3] IPCC (2007). Climate change 2007 synthesis report summary for policymakers, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr_spm.pdf
[4] Agarwal, R. (2010). Development of software to calculate the carbon footprint of any garment style in apparel manufacturing (Graduation project). Technova. National Institute of Fashion Technology (NIFT), Hyderabad, India. http://www.scribd.com/doc/49557088/technova-2010
[5] Hazardous Substance Research Centers/South and South-west Outreach Program (2005). Environmental hazards of the textile industry. Environmental Update #24, Business Week.
[6] Rugrungruang, F. Chua, B. H., & Low, S. C. (2009). Development of product carbon footprint assessment: a step towards sustainability for Singapore manufacturing industry. SIM Tech technical reports, 10(2), 112-117.
[7] Batra, S. (2013). Assessment of Carbon Footprint and Water Footprint of Apparel Manufacturing Units under OGTC. Poster presented at the 9th International Conference on Apparel & Home Textiles “Creative Thinking”. New Delhi, India: Okhla Garment Textile Cluster.
[8] United Kingdom Faculty of Public Health (2008), Sustaining a Healthy Future Taking Action on Climate Change. London. January 2008. http://www.fph.org.uk
[9] Wackernagel, M & Rees, W, E. (1996). Our Ecological Footprint: reducing human impact on the earth, New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, Canada.
[10] Global Footprint Network (2007). Ecological Footprint: Overview, Global Footprint Network, http://www.footprintnetwork.org/gfn_sub.php?content=footprint_overview
[11] Growcom, A. J. (2008). What is a Carbon Footprint? An overview of definitions and methodologies. Vegetable Industry Carbon Footprint Scoping Study - Discussion Paper. Sydney: Horticulture Australia Ltd.
[12] Carbon Trust (2011). Clothing. London: International Carbon Flows.
[13] Wiedmann, T. & Minx, J. (2007). A definition of ‘carbon footprint’, ISA Research and Consulting, Durham, United Kingdom, http://www.censa.org.uk/reports.html
[14] Carbon N Zero (2008). Glossary of commonly used terms, Landcare Research. http://www.carbonzero.co.nz/glossary.asp
[15] TreeVestors 2008, Green glossary, TreeVestors http://www.treevestors.com/?section=A_Greener_Life&page=Green_Glossary
[16] Triplepundit 2008, Carbon Market Terminology Deciphered by Climate Check, Triplepundit. http://www.triplepundit.com/pages/carbon-market¬terminology-deci-003010.php
[17] MCI (2008). MCi’s go green glossary http://www.mcicoach.com/gogreen/greenGlossary.htm
[18] Allwood, J. M., Laursen, S. E., de Rodriguez, C. M., & Bocken, N. M. (2006). Well dressed? The present and future sustainability of clothing and textiles in the United Kingdom. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge, Institute for Manufacturing.
[19] Khan, M. M. R., & Islam, M. M. (2015). Materials and manufacturing environmental sustainability evaluation of apparel product: knitted T-shirt case study. Textiles and Clothing Sustainability, 1(1), 1-12.
[20] Goworek, H. (2011). Social and environmental sustainability in the clothing industry: a case study of a fair-trade retailer. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(1), 74-86.
[21] Chancel L (2014) Are younger generations higher carbon emitters than their elders? Inequalities, generations and CO2 emissions in France and in the USA. Ecological Economics 100: 195–207.
[22] Meyer, A. (2001). What’s İn İt For the Customers? Successfully Marketing Green Clothes. Business Strategy and The Environment, 10 (5), 317–330.
[23] Moon, K. K. L., Youn, C., Chang, J. M., & Yeung, A. W. H. (2013). Product design scenarios for energy saving: A case study of fashion apparel. International Journal of Production Economics, 146(2), 392-401.
[24] Thomas, B., Fishwick, M., Joyce, J. & van Santen, A. (2012). A Carbon Footprint for UK Clothing and Opportunities for Savings. Final Report, UK: Environmental Resources Management Limited.
[25] Bio Intelligence service (2009, Unpublished) EC-funded IMPRO project on “Environmental improvement potential of textiles” (final report 2009, unpublished).
[26] Chen, H. L., & Burns, L. D. (2006). Environmental analysis of textile products. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 24(3), 248-261.
[27] Fletcher, K. (2008) Sustainable Fashion and Textiles: Design Journeys. Earthscan, London, and Sterling.
[28] Laitala, K., & Boks, C. (2012). Sustainable clothing design: use matters. Journal of Design Research 14, 10(1-2), 121-139.
[29] Badore, M. (2015, March 17). Levi’s wants you to help lower the impact of jeans. Retrieved from http://www.treehugger.com/corporateresponsibility/levis-wants-you-help-lower-impact-jeans.html.
[30] Vestel, L. B. (2009). With New Care Tags, Levi Strauss Aims to Reduce Its Footprint. The New York Times. http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/27/with-new-consumer-care-tagslevi-strauss-aims-to-reduce-its-carbon-footprint/?_r=0. 95.
[31] Fletcher, K. (2010). Slow fashion: an invitation for systems change. Fashion Practice, 2(2), 259- 265.
[32] Becker, T. (2014, April 4). Worn wear: Initiative for sustainability by Patagonia. http://www.ispo.com/en/companies/id_77743408/worn-wear-initiative-for sustainability-by-patagonia.html
[33] Liecke, A. D. (2015, June 17). This sweatshirt will last 30 years, guaranteed. http://www.esquire.com/style/mensfashion/news/a35775/the-30-year-sweatshirt/
[34] Fisher, T., Cooper, T., Woodward, S., Hiller, A., & Goworek, H. (2008). Public understanding of sustainable clothing: a report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. London, UK: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
[35] Kruschwitz, A., Karle, A., Schmitz, A., & Stamminger, R. (2014). Consumer laundry practices in Germany. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38(3), 265-277.
[36] Laitala, K., & Klepp, I. G. (2013). Environmental and ethical perceptions related to clothing labels among Norwegian consumers. Textile and Apparel Research Journal of Textile and Apparel, 17(1), 50-58.
[37] Laitala, K., Boks, C., & Klepp, I. G. (2011). Potential for environmental improvements in laundering. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35(2), 254-264.
[38] Thøgersen, J. (2000). Psychological determinants of paying attention to eco-labels in purchase decisions: Model development and multinational validation. Journal of Consumer Policy, 23(3), 285-313.
[39] Hanss, D., & Böhm, G. (2012). Sustainability seen from the perspective of consumers. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36(6), 678-687.
[40] El-Dessouki, H. A. (2015). A survey on knowledge about care label on garments by Residents in Egypt. Life Science Journal, 12(3), 49-53.
[41] Ryttinger, L., & Holtmaat, K. (2014). The work on sustainability in the use and disposal stage of a garment’s life cycle - The perspective of three Swedish clothing companies. Unpublished master’s thesis, The Swedish School of Textiles, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden.
[42] Norum, P. S. (2013). Examination of Apparel Maintenance Skills and Practices: Implications for Sustainable Clothing Consumption. Fam. Consum. Sci. Res. J., 42, 124–137.
[43] Klepp, I. G. (2007). Patched, louse-ridden, tattered: Clean and dirty clothes. Textile: The Journal of Cloth and Culture, 5(3), 254-275.
[44] Gram-Hanssen, K. (2007). Teenage consumption of cleanliness: How to make it sustainable? Sustainability: Science, practice & policy, 3(2), 15-23
[45] Jack, T. (2013). Nobody was dirty: Intervening in inconspicuous consumption of laundry routines. Journal of Consumer Culture, 13(3), 406-421.
[46] Jarvi, P., & Paloviita, A. (2007). Product-related information for sustainable use of laundry detergents in Finnish households. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(7), 681-689.
[47] Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research Methods in Education 7th (ed.). New York: Routledge.
[48] Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. Guilford Press.
[49] Creswell, R. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. USA: Sage Publications.
Author Information
  • Department of Fashion Designing and Textiles Studies, Tamale Technical University, Tamale, Ghana

  • Department of Fashion Designing and Textiles Studies, Tamale Technical University, Tamale, Ghana

  • Department of Fashion Designing and Textiles Studies, Tamale Technical University, Tamale, Ghana

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Joana Akweley Zanu, Rebecca Lartey, Gloria Adablah. (2018). Carbon Footprints: Various Approaches to Clothing Care and Maintenance Practices Among Tertiary Students in Ghana. Science, Technology & Public Policy, 2(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20180201.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Joana Akweley Zanu; Rebecca Lartey; Gloria Adablah. Carbon Footprints: Various Approaches to Clothing Care and Maintenance Practices Among Tertiary Students in Ghana. Sci. Technol. Public Policy 2018, 2(1), 11-19. doi: 10.11648/j.stpp.20180201.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Joana Akweley Zanu, Rebecca Lartey, Gloria Adablah. Carbon Footprints: Various Approaches to Clothing Care and Maintenance Practices Among Tertiary Students in Ghana. Sci Technol Public Policy. 2018;2(1):11-19. doi: 10.11648/j.stpp.20180201.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.stpp.20180201.13,
      author = {Joana Akweley Zanu and Rebecca Lartey and Gloria Adablah},
      title = {Carbon Footprints: Various Approaches to Clothing Care and Maintenance Practices Among Tertiary Students in Ghana},
      journal = {Science, Technology & Public Policy},
      volume = {2},
      number = {1},
      pages = {11-19},
      doi = {10.11648/j.stpp.20180201.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20180201.13},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.stpp.20180201.13},
      abstract = {The current study investigated the existing patterns of student laundry application. It distinguishes the environmental implications of these practices. Thus, the explanatory research design was adopted due to the nature of the study as there was the need to compare and analyse the responses from standardised questionnaires through the use of descriptive and inferential statistics which fit well into the explanatory survey design. This study hence adopted the quantitative methodology. The sample used for this study were tertiary students in Ghana. Convenience sampling method was used to select 150 students from four tertiary institutions and administered with questionnaires. The major findings of the study demonstrate that tertiary students are fully aware of the assertion that carbon footprint is something that leads to global warming and accepts that shaking, brushing and airing of clothes can be considered as an approach to clothing care and maintenance. They also appreciate that practising dry cleaning of clothes by the use of grease absorbents without the use of water should be considered as an approach to clothing care and maintenance. It was concluded that practicing dry cleaning of clothes by the use of grease absorbents without the use of water must be considered as an approach to clothing care and maintenance in tertiary institutions in Ghana.},
     year = {2018}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Carbon Footprints: Various Approaches to Clothing Care and Maintenance Practices Among Tertiary Students in Ghana
    AU  - Joana Akweley Zanu
    AU  - Rebecca Lartey
    AU  - Gloria Adablah
    Y1  - 2018/09/13
    PY  - 2018
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20180201.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.stpp.20180201.13
    T2  - Science, Technology & Public Policy
    JF  - Science, Technology & Public Policy
    JO  - Science, Technology & Public Policy
    SP  - 11
    EP  - 19
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2640-4621
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20180201.13
    AB  - The current study investigated the existing patterns of student laundry application. It distinguishes the environmental implications of these practices. Thus, the explanatory research design was adopted due to the nature of the study as there was the need to compare and analyse the responses from standardised questionnaires through the use of descriptive and inferential statistics which fit well into the explanatory survey design. This study hence adopted the quantitative methodology. The sample used for this study were tertiary students in Ghana. Convenience sampling method was used to select 150 students from four tertiary institutions and administered with questionnaires. The major findings of the study demonstrate that tertiary students are fully aware of the assertion that carbon footprint is something that leads to global warming and accepts that shaking, brushing and airing of clothes can be considered as an approach to clothing care and maintenance. They also appreciate that practising dry cleaning of clothes by the use of grease absorbents without the use of water should be considered as an approach to clothing care and maintenance. It was concluded that practicing dry cleaning of clothes by the use of grease absorbents without the use of water must be considered as an approach to clothing care and maintenance in tertiary institutions in Ghana.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections