Neologism and the Media in Contemporary Cameroon English; a Sociopragmatic Approach
International Journal of Language and Linguistics
Volume 8, Issue 5, September 2020, Pages: 192-204
Received: Aug. 10, 2020;
Accepted: Sep. 3, 2020;
Published: Sep. 19, 2020
Views 62 Downloads 29
Willie Mushing Tamfuh, Department of English, Faculty of Arts, Letters and Social Sciences, Adamawa Region, Ngaoundere, Cameroon
Contemporary Cameroon English is a reflection of many decades of its historical, political, social and linguistic development. The aim of this investigation, as descriptive linguistics, is to observe what, how and why the common Cameroonian citizen creates, coins and form new words in English speech, collect and analyse this as naturally occurring sociolinguistic data, characteristic of contemporary Cameroon English speech. The objective is to highlight on the linguistic and cultural diversity of Cameroon as a leit motive to create and introduce new words into the vocabulary system, thus, enriching contemporary Cameroon English. Both quantitative and qualitative research was carried to obtain valid data typical of Cameroon society based on the sociolinguistic and ethnographic methods of inquiry and analyses using a combination of the critical discourse analysis, semantico-pragmatic and speech act theories. After the analysis, contemporary Cameroon English is enhanced through different linguistic techniques such as dialectal and cultural borrowing, self-explained compounds, neologisms, eponym, and inflections, among others, which is of great interest to English language learners and teachers of today. These linguistic techniques have enriched Cameroon English vocabulary as a variety of speech typical of Cameroon English.
Willie Mushing Tamfuh,
Neologism and the Media in Contemporary Cameroon English; a Sociopragmatic Approach, International Journal of Language and Linguistics.
Vol. 8, No. 5,
2020, pp. 192-204.
Widdowson H. G (1979). “Rules and Procedures in Discourse Analysis”, in T. Myers (ed.), The Development of Conversation and Discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University, University press.
Breton, Roland and Fohtung, Bikia (1991): Atlas administratif des langues nationales du Cameroun, Yaoundé, Paris.
Wolf, Hans-Georg (2001): English in Cameroon. Berlin/New York.
Boum Ndongo-Semengue, M. A./Sadembouo, Etienne (1999): "L'Atlas linguistique du Cameroun: les langues nationales et leur gestion," In Mendo Ze, Gervais (ed.): Le français langue africaine: enjeux et atouts pour la Francophonie.
Ethnologue (2002) Languages of the World; Cameroon, published by the Summer Institute of Linguistics (SIL) International, www.ethnologue.com.
Mendo Ze, Gervais (ed.) (1999): Le français langue africaine: Enjeux et atouts pour la Francophonie. Paris.
Bot Ba Njok, Henri Marcel (1966): "Le problème linguistique au Cameroun". L'Afrique et l'Asie No. 73: 3-13.
Ngo Bitja'a Kody, Zachée Denis (1999): "Problématique de la cohabitation des Langues". In: Mendo Ze, Gervais (éd.): Le français langue africaine: Enjeux et atouts pour la Francophonie. Paris: 80-95.
Biloa, Edmond (1999): "Bilingual Education in the University of Yaounde I: The Teaching of French to English Speaking Students" in Echu, George/Grundstrom, Allan W. (eds.): Bilinguisme officiel et communication linguistique au Cameroun. New York: 53-74.
Chumbow, Sammy Beban (1996): "The Role of National Languages within a Comprehensive Language Policy for Cameroon". Academic Discourse presented at the University of Buea.
Mbangwana P, Mpoche K., Mbuh T., (eds.) (2006), Language, Literature and Identity, CUVILLIER VERLAG, Gottingen.
Mushing W. T. (2007), “The Spoken Language of the Wimbum Ruling Class, A Study in Discourse Structure and Function”, A Ph. D. thesis defended at the Department of English, FALSS, University of Yaounde 1, Cameroon.
Chomsky, Noam (1957). Syntactic Structure. The Hague: Mouton. ISBN 3-11-017279-8.
Chomsky, Noam (2012) with James McGilvray; The Science of Language, Cambridge University Press.
Holmes, J. (2001) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences.
Pennycook A. D (2016), Critical Approaches to English Language Teaching, Shangai Foreign Language Education Press, Shangai.
Carroll, J. B et al. (2012), Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, Second Edition, the MIT Press.
Saville-Troike, M (2003) The Ethnography of Communication: An Introduction (3rd ed.) Blackwell Publishing, UK.
Hilbert, Richard, (1992), The Classical Roots of Ethnomethodology; Durkheim, Weber, and Garfinkel, p. 13, Chapel Hill, NC; The University of North Carolina Press.
Ritzer, George (2011) “Ethnomethodology.” Pp. 301-415 in Sociological Theory, 8th Ed. New York, NY, McGraw Hill.
Garfinkel H. (2017) published in Jacobson, Micheal Hviid; The Interactionist Imagination studying Meaning, Situation and Micro-Social Order, London, Palgrave-Macmillian, PP. 233-261.
Skinner B. F. (1957) Verbal Behaviour Appleton Century, New York, USA.
Todd J. T. and Morris E. K. (1995) in Modern Perspectives of John B Watson and Classical Behaviourism, ed. Todd and Morris, Greenwood Press.
Grice H. P. (1989) Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press, 385 pp., Volume 65 Issue 251.
Austin J. L (1962) How to do Things with Words, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Leech, G. N. (1983), Principles of Pragmatics, London, England, Longman, p. 11.
Gumperz John J. and Jenny Cook-Gumperz, (2008) "Studying language, culture, and society: Sociolinguistics or linguistic anthropology”? Journal of Sociolinguistics 12 (4), 2008: 532–545.