Classroom Interaction and Communicative Language Teaching: Challenges of Using Authentic Oral Interaction in EFL Context the Case EFL Learners of Ambo University
International Journal of Language and Linguistics
Volume 7, Issue 6, November 2019, Pages: 255-262
Received: Jun. 28, 2019; Accepted: Aug. 6, 2019; Published: Oct. 10, 2019
Views 57      Downloads 22
Author
Tegbar Kibret Muluneh, Department of English Language and Literature, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Ambo University, Oromia, Ethiopia
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) is an approach to language teaching that emphasizes interaction as both the means and the ultimate goal of study. Language learners learn and practice the target language through the interaction with one another and the instructor by using authentic texts. The aim of this study was to develop a deep understanding of authentic interaction in English as a foreign language classroom so as to improve communicative language teaching approach. Participants in this study were seven experienced English language instructors of Ambo University whom they are selected purposively. Semi-structured interview, focus group discussion and classroom observation were used as the basic tools of data. The gathered data was analyzed according to systematic design of grounded theory analysis method. The developed model of interaction for language classroom in the light of communicative language teaching is notably to give deep descriptions on how classroom interaction substantially occurs and what factors affect it in foreign language context from different perspectives in the view of authentication. Thus, authentic classroom interaction can be more comprehended under the background of interrelated factors: interaction practices, teacher and student factors, learning objectives, content materials, classroom contexts, and outer contexts surrounding the interaction practices. Thus, in order to achieve the desired goal of communicative language teaching, the dimension of verbal interaction practic­es, teacher speech, questions, and feedback should be revised in the light of classroom authentication.
Keywords
Authentic, Foreign Language, Oral Interaction, Communicative Language Teaching
To cite this article
Tegbar Kibret Muluneh, Classroom Interaction and Communicative Language Teaching: Challenges of Using Authentic Oral Interaction in EFL Context the Case EFL Learners of Ambo University, International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 7, No. 6, 2019, pp. 255-262. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20190706.12
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Pearson Education.
[2]
Consolo, D. A. (2006). Classroom oral interaction in foreign language lessons and implications for teacher development. Linguagem & Ensino, 9 (2), 33–55.
[3]
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Research (Vol. 4). Boston: Pearson Education. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
[4]
Ellis, R. (1991). The Interaction Hypothesis: A Critical Evaluation. In Regional Language Centre Seminar (pp. 1–46). Singapore: EDRS & ERIC. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=ED338037
[5]
Farahian, M., & Rezaee, M. (2012). A Case Study of an EFL Teacher’s Type of Questions: An Investigation into Classroom Interaction. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.631
[6]
Hall, G. (2011). Exploring English Language Teaching: Language in Action. New York: Routledge.
[7]
Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Learning. Malaysia: Pearson Education Limited.
[8]
Hermanto, H. (2015). Understanding Teacher Talk to Support Students’ Communicative Competence Hermanto. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, 8 (2), 143–159.
[9]
Kang, D. M. (2013). EFL teachers’ language use for classroom discipline: A look at complex interplay of variables. System, 41 (1), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.01.002
[10]
Kharaghani, N. (2013). Patterns of interaction in EFL classrooms. In The Global Summit on Education (pp. 859–864). Kuala Lumpur: WorldConferences.net.
[11]
Krashen, S. D. (1989). Language Acquisition and Langauge Education. UK: Prentice Hall.
[12]
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (1991). Input Modification and Second Language Comprehension. An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research.
[13]
Liskinasih, A. (2016). Corrective Feedbacks in CLT-Adopted Classrooms’ Interactions. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6 (1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v 6i1.2662
[14]
Mackey, A., Abbuhl, R., & Gass, S. M. (2012). Interactionist Approach. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 7–23). New York: Routlege Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000423
[15]
Maolida, E. H. (2013). A Descriptive Study of Teacher’s Oral Feedback In an ESL Young Learner Classroom in Indo Indonesia. K@Ta, 15 (2), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.9744/kata.15.2.117-124
[16]
Mayo, M. D. P. G., & Soler, E. A. (2013). Negociated Input and Output/Interaction. In J. Herschensohn & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (p. 842). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[17]
Murray, D. E., & Christison, M. (2011). What English Language Teachers Need to Know Volume I: New York: Taylor & Fancis e-Libaray. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv00216
[18]
Nasruloh, M. I. (2013). Teacher-Student Interaction in a Project-based Learning Classroom. Journal of English and Education, 1 (1), 142–153.
[19]
Petek, E. (2013). Teacher’s Beliefs about Classroom Interaction and their Actual Practices: A Qualitative Case Study of a Native and a Non-native English Teacher’s In-class Applications. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1195–1199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sb-spro.2013.01.176
[20]
Pujiastuti, R. T. (2013). Classroom Interaction: An Analysis of Teacher talk and Student Talk in English for Young Learner (EYL). Journal of English and Education, 1 (1), 163–172.
[21]
Rashidi, N., & Rafieerad, M. (2010). Analyzing patterns of classroom interaction in EFL classrooms in Iran. Journal of Asia TEFL, 7 (3), 93–120.
[22]
Roostini, K. E. (2011). A Reflection on Teacher Questioning Types. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, I (1), 9–22.
[23]
Savaşçı, M. (2014). Why are Some Students Reluctant to Use L2 in EFL Speaking Classes? An Action Research at Tertiary Level. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2682–2686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.635
[24]
Seedhouse, P., & Jenks, C. J. (2015). International Perspectives on ELT Classroom Interaction. In C. J. Jenks & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), International Perspectives on ELT Classroom Interaction (pp. 1–9). Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.
[25]
Swain, M. (2000). The Output Hypothesis and Beyond- Mediating Acquisition through Collaborative Dialogue. In Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning (pp. 97–114). https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/18.3.401
[26]
Thoms, J. J. (2012). Classroom Discourse in Foreign Language Classrooms: A Review of the Literature. Foreign Language Annals, 45 (S1), 8–27. https://doi.org/10.111/j.1944-9720.2012.01177.x.FOREIGN
[27]
Ur, P. (2009). A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory. UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
[28]
Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring Classroom Discourse: Language in Action. Oxon: Routlege Taylor & Francis Group.
[29]
Yamat, H., Fisher, R., & Rich, S. (2013). Young Malaysian Children’s Silence in a Multicultural Classroom. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 1337–1343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.464
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186