Please enter verification code
Thematic Progression in the Academic Writing of Non-English Major Postgraduates in Mainland China
International Journal of Language and Linguistics
Volume 7, Issue 1, January 2019, Pages: 1-7
Received: Dec. 12, 2018; Accepted: Dec. 25, 2018; Published: Jan. 21, 2019
Views 887      Downloads 175
Wenna Dou, Department of Foreign Languages, School of Human and Law, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing, China
Hu Zhao, School of Environment and Energy Engineering, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing, China
Article Tools
Follow on us
Through combing out eight patterns of Thematic Progression which are most frequently used in English scientific and technological academic papers, this study aims to examine the usage tendency and internal influencing factors of Thematic Progression patterns in English research abstracts written by postgraduates majoring in architecture and civil engineering in mainland China. Combining corpus-based analyses and group-focus interviews, results show that the overall writing level of Chinese non-English major postgraduates could reach the publishing standards of international journals in the facet of the number of words and sentences. Especially, “Simple Linear Thematic Progression” and “Thematic Progression with a Constant Theme” were the most frequently used in the students’ abstracts. Findings suggest that the tendency of using “Simple Linear Thematic Progression” was driven by the logic of students’ thinking in the academic writing process, while the application of “Thematic Progression with a Constant Theme” was correlate with genre types. The specific Move Structure in research abstracts was also found to be potentially affecting the usage tendency of special Thematic Progression patterns. Both theoretical and practical implications were discussed in this study.
Thematic Progression, Academic Writing, Non-English Major Postgraduates, Corpus-Based Analyses, Case Study
To cite this article
Wenna Dou, Hu Zhao, Thematic Progression in the Academic Writing of Non-English Major Postgraduates in Mainland China, International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 7, No. 1, 2019, pp. 1-7. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20190701.11
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Seyyedeh, N.and Esmaeel, N. (2017). Thematic structure and translation: A case study of the translation of English news into Persian, Lingua, 194, 26-50.
Fang, L. and David, K. (2018). A science for verbal art: Elizabeth Gaskell’s contribution to a critique of political economy, Language Sciences, 70, 92-102.
Cao, Z. H. And Li, L. (2015). Analysis of the Thematic Progression in the Abstracts of Nature’s Articles. Journal of Xidian University(Social Science Edition), 25-6, 104-111.
Derya A.and Yasemin, B.(2019). An exploratory study on factors influencing undergraduate students’ academic writing practices in Turkey, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 37, 88-103.
Xu, F. (2016). Coherence Modeling for English Student Essay Based on Theme-rheme Structure Theory. Journal of Chinese Information Processing, 1, 115-123.
Feng, Y. T. (2017). A Study on Cognitive Thinking of Thematic Progression Patterns in English Thesis Writing for Application-Oriented University English Major Students. The Guide of Science & Education, 11, 48-50.
Mathesius, V. (1929). Zur Satzperspektive in modern English. Herrigs Archiv, 155, 202-210.
Danes, F. (1974). Functional sentence on the semantic structure of the sentence. In F. Danes (ed.). Papers on the Functional Sentence Perspective. Prague: Academia, 106-128.
Huang, Y. (1985). On Theme and Rheme in English. Journal of Foreign Languages, 5, 32-36.
Huang, G. W. (2001). Theory and Practice of Discourse Analysis. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Hu, Z. L. (1994). Cohesion and Coherence of Text. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Liu, D. (2012). English-Chinese Thematic Structure Contrast and English Writing Teaching Method Study. Foreign Language Research, 3,121-125.
Santos, M. (1996). The textual organization of research paper abstracts in applied linguistic. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 4, 481-500.
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. New York: Longman Group UK Limited.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186