As a sign formation, text is fundamentally heterogeneous and heterostructural. Since the times of classical rhetoric, three layers have been identified in the text: the object layer, the logical layer, and the language layer. Each had relative independence, which enabled them to be the subject of analysis in a special section of the rhetorical canon. These layers were characterized by their own descriptive logic and ways of processing the material. Sense configuration could proceed in three directions under the influence of three molecular structures of the text: language, logic, theme. Hence, the possibility of three ways of understanding: literal, conceptual and paralogical. However, writing allowed dialogue with the text ("conversation with a book"), i.e. interacting with it as with a subject of communication and trying to understand the sense of the text as of the one which carries the sense of its self measure. The three ways of comprehension - the three semantic systems - must be coordinated, correlated to one another in order to appear as a semantic whole - the face of the text.
| Published in | International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 6, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijll.20180601.13 |
| Page(s) | 15-19 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Text, Sense, Spatial Focusing of Sense, Comprehension
| [1] | Gal'perin, I. R. Tekst kak obyekt lingvisticheskogo issledovanija. Monografija/I. R. Gal'perin. – M.: Nauka, 1981. 140 s. |
| [2] | Ginzburg K. Mify – jemblemy – primety: Morfologijaiistorija. Sb. statej/Per. s it. iposlesl. S. L. Kozlova. – M.: Novoe izdatel'stvo, 2004. 348 s. |
| [3] | Lotman, Ju. M. Semiotika kul'tury I ponjatie teksta// Istorija I tipologija russkoj kul'tury/ Ju. M. Lotman. – SPb.: Iskusstvo - SPB, 2002. S. 158–162. |
| [4] | Bart, R. Ot proizvedenija k tekstu//Bart R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika: Pojetika: Per.s fr./ R. Bart. – M.: Progress. 1989. S. 413-423. |
| [5] | Piaget, J. The development of object concept: The construction of reality in the child /J. Piaget.– New York: Basic Books, 1954. Pp. 3-96. |
| [6] | Nikitina, E. S. Smyslovoj analiz teksta: Psihosemioticheskij podhod/E. S. Nikitina.– M.: LENAND, 2016. 200 s. |
| [7] | Bahtin, M. M. Problema teksta v lingvistike, filologii i drugih gumanitarnyh naukah. Opyt filosofskogo analiza//Jestetika slovesnogo tvorchestva/M. M. Bahtin. – M.: Iskusstvo, 1979. 424 s. |
| [8] | Origen. O nachalah. Protiv Cel'sa. Kn. 4 (Po izdaniju Kazanskoj Duhovnoj Akademii, 1892)/Origen.–SPb.: Bibliopolis, 2008. 792 s. |
| [9] | Mak-Ljujen, Marshall. Galaktika Gutenberga: Sotvorenie cheloveka pechatnoj kul'tury/M.mak-Ljujen. – Kiev: Nika-Centr, 2004. 432 s. |
| [10] | Raushenbah. B. V. Logika troichnosti / B. V. Raushenbah // Voprosy filosofii. –1993– № 3. S. 63-70. |
APA Style
Nikitina Elena Sergeevna. (2018). Psychosemiotic Approach to Comprehension, or a Sense Text Model. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 6(1), 15-19. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20180601.13
ACS Style
Nikitina Elena Sergeevna. Psychosemiotic Approach to Comprehension, or a Sense Text Model. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2018, 6(1), 15-19. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20180601.13
AMA Style
Nikitina Elena Sergeevna. Psychosemiotic Approach to Comprehension, or a Sense Text Model. Int J Lang Linguist. 2018;6(1):15-19. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20180601.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijll.20180601.13,
author = {Nikitina Elena Sergeevna},
title = {Psychosemiotic Approach to Comprehension, or a Sense Text Model},
journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics},
volume = {6},
number = {1},
pages = {15-19},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.20180601.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20180601.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.20180601.13},
abstract = {As a sign formation, text is fundamentally heterogeneous and heterostructural. Since the times of classical rhetoric, three layers have been identified in the text: the object layer, the logical layer, and the language layer. Each had relative independence, which enabled them to be the subject of analysis in a special section of the rhetorical canon. These layers were characterized by their own descriptive logic and ways of processing the material. Sense configuration could proceed in three directions under the influence of three molecular structures of the text: language, logic, theme. Hence, the possibility of three ways of understanding: literal, conceptual and paralogical. However, writing allowed dialogue with the text ("conversation with a book"), i.e. interacting with it as with a subject of communication and trying to understand the sense of the text as of the one which carries the sense of its self measure. The three ways of comprehension - the three semantic systems - must be coordinated, correlated to one another in order to appear as a semantic whole - the face of the text.},
year = {2018}
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychosemiotic Approach to Comprehension, or a Sense Text Model
AU - Nikitina Elena Sergeevna
Y1 - 2018/03/02
PY - 2018
N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20180601.13
DO - 10.11648/j.ijll.20180601.13
T2 - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
JF - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
JO - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
SP - 15
EP - 19
PB - Science Publishing Group
SN - 2330-0221
UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20180601.13
AB - As a sign formation, text is fundamentally heterogeneous and heterostructural. Since the times of classical rhetoric, three layers have been identified in the text: the object layer, the logical layer, and the language layer. Each had relative independence, which enabled them to be the subject of analysis in a special section of the rhetorical canon. These layers were characterized by their own descriptive logic and ways of processing the material. Sense configuration could proceed in three directions under the influence of three molecular structures of the text: language, logic, theme. Hence, the possibility of three ways of understanding: literal, conceptual and paralogical. However, writing allowed dialogue with the text ("conversation with a book"), i.e. interacting with it as with a subject of communication and trying to understand the sense of the text as of the one which carries the sense of its self measure. The three ways of comprehension - the three semantic systems - must be coordinated, correlated to one another in order to appear as a semantic whole - the face of the text.
VL - 6
IS - 1
ER -
Information
Email: