| Peer-Reviewed

The Impact of Board Gender and Multiple Directorship on Cash Holdings: Evidence from Jordan

Received: 11 April 2019    Accepted: 14 June 2019    Published: 6 August 2019
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This study examined the influence of corporate governance on company cash holding by explaining the relationship between board gender, multiple directorship and cash holding using a sample of 87 non-financial companies including industrial and service companies that listed on the Amman Stock Exchange from 2011 to 2017. By using Ordinary Last Square regression model (OLS). The findings indicate that board gender, multiple directorship positively influence cash holdings, supporting the agency theory. The findings of this study contribute to the formulation of better corporate governance policies that can help improve corporate cash holdings. This study has several empirical implications for policy makers in Jordan; it is important for policy makers to improve the role of the board of directors in monitoring the firm. One possible way of doing so is to encourage firms in Jordan to employ female that can provide better monitoring services and also firms can benefit from their experiences. In addition, these rules and regulations need to be activated by the policy makers to ensure that firms comply with their requirements. Moreover, developing countries are in need of providing better compliance with international governance standards. This can be done by adopting good governance practices, improving shareholder rights and activating laws and regulations that govern firms’ performance.

Published in International Journal of Finance and Banking Research (Volume 5, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijfbr.20190504.12
Page(s) 71-75
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Agency Cost, Corporate Governance, Cash Holdings, Board Gender, Multiple Directorship, Jordan Stock Market

References
[1] Bates, T. W., Kahle, K. M., & Stulz, R. M. (2009). Why do US firms hold so much more cash than they used to? The Journal of Finance, 64 (5), 1985-2021.
[2] Ozkan, A., & Ozkan, N. (2004). Corporate cash holdings: An empirical investigation of UK companies. Journal of Banking & Finance, 28 (9), 2103-2134.
[3] Uyar, A., & Kuzey, C. (2014). Determinants of corporate cash holdings: evidence from the emerging market of Turkey. Applied Economics, 46 (9), 1035-1048.
[4] García-Teruel, P. J., & Martínez-Solano, P. (2008). On the determinants of SME cash holdings: Evidence from Spain. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 35 (1-2), 127-149.
[5] Maheshwari, Y., & Rao, K. V. (2017). Determinants of Corporate Cash Holdings. Global Business Review, 18 (2), 1-12.
[6] Dittmar, A., Mahrt-Smith, J., & Servaes, H. (2003). International corporate governance and corporate cash holdings. Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 38 (01), 111-133.
[7] Garcia-Appendini, E., & Montoriol-Garriga, J. (2013). Firms as liquidity providers: Evidence from the 2007-2008 financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 109 (1), 272-291.
[8] Chen, N. (2012). Corporate Thrift And Economic Growth: A Comparative Study Of Developing And Developed Countries. Journal of International Development, 24 (2), 167-184.
[9] Gill, A., & Shah, C. (2012). Determinants of corporate cash holdings: Evidence from Canada. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4 (1), 70.
[10] Gill, A. S., & Biger, N. (2013). The impact of corporate governance on working capital management efficiency of American manufacturing firms. Managerial Finance, 39 (2), 116-132.
[11] PWC. (2017). Presure in the system: Unlocking enterprise value through working capital management. Retrieved from UK.
[12] ASE. (2017). Amman Stock Exchange. http://www.ammanstockex.com.jo.
[13] Shubita, M. F. (2013). Working capital management and profitability: a case of industrial Jordanian companies. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4 (8), 108-115.
[14] Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (4), 305-360.
[15] Harford, J., Mansi, S. A., & Maxwell, W. F. (2008). Corporate governance and firm cash holdings in the US. Journal of Financial Economics, 87, 535-555.
[16] Abed, S., Al-Attar, A., & Suwaidan, M. (2012). Corporate governance and earnings management: Jordanian evidence. International Business Research, 5 (1), 216.
[17] Iskandar, T. M., Rahmat, M. M., Noor, N. M., Saleh, N. M., & Ali, M. J. (2011). Corporate governance and going concern problems: evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Corporate Governance, 2 (2), 119-139.
[18] EBRD. (2016). Corporate governance in transition economies Jordan country report. In G. P. Cigna & A. Sigheartau (Eds.): European Bank for reconstruction and development.
[19] Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial review, 38 (1), 33-53.
[20] Byoun, S., Chang, K., & Kim, Y. S. (2016). Does corporate board diversity affect corporate payout policy?. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 45 (1), 48-101.
[21] Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic literature, 47 (2), 448-74.
[22] Faccio, M., & Lang, L. H. (2002). The ultimate ownership of Western European Journal of Financial Economics, 65 (3), 365-395.
[23] Huang, J., & Kisgen, D. J. (2013). Gender and corporate finance: Are male executives overconfident relative to female executives?. Journal of Financial Economics, 108 (3), 822-839.
[24] Van Uytbergen, S., & Schoubben, F. (2015). The effect of gender diversity on corporate cash policy. In Annual conference EUROPEAN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, Date: 2015/06/24-2015/06/27, Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
[25] Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of financial economics, 94 (2), 291-309.
[26] Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of business ethics, 83 (3), 435-451.
[27] Council, F. R. (2016). The UK corporate governance code. London: Financial Reporting Council.
[28] IFC. (2015). Gender diversity in jordan. Research on the impact of gender diversity on the economic performance of companies in Jordan. USA: International Finance Corporation, World Bank.
[29] Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76 (2), 323-329.
[30] Harford, J. (1999). Corporate cash reserves and acquisitions. The Journal of Finance, 54 (6), 1969-1997.
[31] Opler, T., Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R., & Williamson, R. (1999). The determinants and implications of corporate cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 52 (1), 3-46.
[32] Schoubben, F., & Van Uytbergen, S. (2014). The effect of gender diversity on corporate cash policy.
[33] Chou, T. K., Chen, J. C., & Hwang, T. C. (2014). Multiple directorships and value of cash. Paper presented at the 24th conference on the theories and practices of securities and financial markets, Taiwan.
[34] Bacon, J., & Brown, J. (1974). Corporate directorship practices: Role, selection and legal status of the board. A joint Research Report from the Conference Board and the American Society of Corporate Secretaries. New York.
[35] Booth, J. R., & Deli, D. N. (1996). Factors affecting the number of outside directorships held by CEOs. Journal of Financial Economics, 40 (1), 81-104.
[36] Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15 (2), 291-334.
[37] Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
[38] Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26 (2), 301-325.
[39] Carpenter, M. A., & Westphal, J. D. (2001). The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management journal, 44 (4), 639-660.
[40] Ferris, S. P., Jagannathan, M., & Pritchard, A. C. (2003). Too busy to mind the business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments. The Journal of finance, 58 (3), 1087-1111.
[41] Fich, E. M., & Shivdasani, A. (2006). Are busy boards effective monitors? The Journal of Finance, 61 (2), 689-724.
[42] Perry, T., & Peyer, U. (2005). Board seat accumulation by executives: A shareholder's perspective. The Journal of Finance, 60 (4), 2083-2123.
[43] Ahn, S., Jiraporn, P., & Kim, Y. S. (2010). Multiple directorships and acquirer returns. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34 (9), 2011-2026.
[44] Masulis, R. W., & Mobbs, S. (2011). Are all inside directors the same? Evidence from the external directorship market. the Journal of Finance, 66 (3), 823-872.
[45] Jiraporn, P., Singh, M., & Lee, C. I. (2009). Ineffective corporate governance: Director busyness and board committee memberships. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33 (5), 819-828.
[46] Jaafar, A., & El-Shawa, M. (2009). Ownership concentration, board characteristics and performance: evidence from Jordan. In Accounting in Emerging Economies (pp. 73-95). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
[47] Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, P. L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: the effect of gender. Journal of Corporate finance, 11 (1-2), 85-106.
[48] Khan, W. A., & Vieito, J. P. (2013). CEO gender and firm performance. Journal of Economics and Business, 67, 55-66.
[49] Kang, E., Ding, D. K., & Charoenwong, C. (2010). Investor reaction to women directors. Journal of Business Research, 63(8), 888-894.
[50] Alquhaif, A. S., Latif, R. A., & Chandren, S. (2017). Employee stock options and real earnings management through accretive share buyback in Malaysia. Journal of Advanced Research in Business and Management Studies, 1 (1), 76-84.
[51] Loukil, N., & Yousfi, O. (2016). Does gender diversity on corporate boards increase risk-taking?. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 33 (1), 66-81.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Mohammad Yousef Alghadi, Ahmad Rizal Mazlan, Adilah Azhari. (2019). The Impact of Board Gender and Multiple Directorship on Cash Holdings: Evidence from Jordan. International Journal of Finance and Banking Research, 5(4), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfbr.20190504.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Mohammad Yousef Alghadi; Ahmad Rizal Mazlan; Adilah Azhari. The Impact of Board Gender and Multiple Directorship on Cash Holdings: Evidence from Jordan. Int. J. Finance Bank. Res. 2019, 5(4), 71-75. doi: 10.11648/j.ijfbr.20190504.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Mohammad Yousef Alghadi, Ahmad Rizal Mazlan, Adilah Azhari. The Impact of Board Gender and Multiple Directorship on Cash Holdings: Evidence from Jordan. Int J Finance Bank Res. 2019;5(4):71-75. doi: 10.11648/j.ijfbr.20190504.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijfbr.20190504.12,
      author = {Mohammad Yousef Alghadi and Ahmad Rizal Mazlan and Adilah Azhari},
      title = {The Impact of Board Gender and Multiple Directorship on Cash Holdings: Evidence from Jordan},
      journal = {International Journal of Finance and Banking Research},
      volume = {5},
      number = {4},
      pages = {71-75},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijfbr.20190504.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfbr.20190504.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijfbr.20190504.12},
      abstract = {This study examined the influence of corporate governance on company cash holding by explaining the relationship between board gender, multiple directorship and cash holding using a sample of 87 non-financial companies including industrial and service companies that listed on the Amman Stock Exchange from 2011 to 2017. By using Ordinary Last Square regression model (OLS). The findings indicate that board gender, multiple directorship positively influence cash holdings, supporting the agency theory. The findings of this study contribute to the formulation of better corporate governance policies that can help improve corporate cash holdings. This study has several empirical implications for policy makers in Jordan; it is important for policy makers to improve the role of the board of directors in monitoring the firm. One possible way of doing so is to encourage firms in Jordan to employ female that can provide better monitoring services and also firms can benefit from their experiences. In addition, these rules and regulations need to be activated by the policy makers to ensure that firms comply with their requirements. Moreover, developing countries are in need of providing better compliance with international governance standards. This can be done by adopting good governance practices, improving shareholder rights and activating laws and regulations that govern firms’ performance.},
     year = {2019}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - The Impact of Board Gender and Multiple Directorship on Cash Holdings: Evidence from Jordan
    AU  - Mohammad Yousef Alghadi
    AU  - Ahmad Rizal Mazlan
    AU  - Adilah Azhari
    Y1  - 2019/08/06
    PY  - 2019
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfbr.20190504.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijfbr.20190504.12
    T2  - International Journal of Finance and Banking Research
    JF  - International Journal of Finance and Banking Research
    JO  - International Journal of Finance and Banking Research
    SP  - 71
    EP  - 75
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2472-2278
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfbr.20190504.12
    AB  - This study examined the influence of corporate governance on company cash holding by explaining the relationship between board gender, multiple directorship and cash holding using a sample of 87 non-financial companies including industrial and service companies that listed on the Amman Stock Exchange from 2011 to 2017. By using Ordinary Last Square regression model (OLS). The findings indicate that board gender, multiple directorship positively influence cash holdings, supporting the agency theory. The findings of this study contribute to the formulation of better corporate governance policies that can help improve corporate cash holdings. This study has several empirical implications for policy makers in Jordan; it is important for policy makers to improve the role of the board of directors in monitoring the firm. One possible way of doing so is to encourage firms in Jordan to employ female that can provide better monitoring services and also firms can benefit from their experiences. In addition, these rules and regulations need to be activated by the policy makers to ensure that firms comply with their requirements. Moreover, developing countries are in need of providing better compliance with international governance standards. This can be done by adopting good governance practices, improving shareholder rights and activating laws and regulations that govern firms’ performance.
    VL  - 5
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • School of Economic Finance and Banking, University Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Malaysia

  • School of Economic Finance and Banking, University Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Malaysia

  • School of Economic Finance and Banking, University Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Malaysia

  • Sections