| Peer-Reviewed

Overview of the Basel Capital Adequacy Framework

Received: 23 January 2016    Accepted: 17 May 2016    Published: 30 June 2016
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This paper examines Capital Adequacy Framework that specifies the approaches for quantifying the Risk-Weighted Assets (RWA) for credit risk, market risk and operational risk. The computation of the risk-weighted assets is consistent with Pillar 1 requirements set out by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and the Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB) in their respective documents - “International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: A Revised Framework” issued in June 2006 and the “Capital Adequacy Standard (CAS)” issued in December 2005. While the Bank believes that such customization could be justified, a pragmatic approach is adopted for implementation. Higher prudential requirements and risk management standards would be introduced gradually taking into consideration industry feedback during the consultation process.

Published in International Journal of Finance and Banking Research (Volume 2, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijfbr.20160203.15
Page(s) 102-115
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Basel Agreement, Capital Adequacy, Pillars 1

References
[1] “The impact of the euro on money and bond markets” by J. Santillán, M. Bayle andC. Thygesen, July 2000.
[2] “The effective exchange rates of the euro” by L. Buldorini, S. Makrydakis and C. Thimann,February 2002.
[3] “Estimating the trend of M3 income velocity underlying the reference value for monetary growth” by C. Brand, D. Gerdesmeier and B. Roffia, May 2002.
[4] “Labour force developments in the euro area since the 1980s” by V. Genre and R. Gómez-Salvador, July 2002.
[5] “The evolution of clearing and central counterparty services for exchange-tradedderivatives in the United States and Europe: a comparison” by D. Russo, T. L. Hart and A. Schönenberger, September 2002.
[6] “Banking integration in the euro area” by I. Cabral, F. Dierick and J. Vesala,December 2002.
[7] “Economic relations with regions neighbouring the euro area in the ‘Euro Time Zone’” byF. Mazzaferro, A. Mehl, M. Sturm, C. Thimann and A. Winkler, December 2002.
[8] “An introduction to the ECB’s survey of professional forecasters” by J. A. Garcia,September 2003.
[9] “Fiscal adjustment in 1991-2002: stylised facts and policy implications” by M. G. Briotti,February 2004.
[10] “The acceding countries’ strategies towards ERM II and the adoption of the euro:an analytical review” by a staff team led by P. Backé and C. Thimann and includingO. Arratibel, O. Calvo-Gonzalez, A. Mehl and C. Nerlich, February 2004.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Orobah Ali Barghouthi, Mohammed Bayyoud. (2016). Overview of the Basel Capital Adequacy Framework. International Journal of Finance and Banking Research, 2(3), 102-115. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfbr.20160203.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Orobah Ali Barghouthi; Mohammed Bayyoud. Overview of the Basel Capital Adequacy Framework. Int. J. Finance Bank. Res. 2016, 2(3), 102-115. doi: 10.11648/j.ijfbr.20160203.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Orobah Ali Barghouthi, Mohammed Bayyoud. Overview of the Basel Capital Adequacy Framework. Int J Finance Bank Res. 2016;2(3):102-115. doi: 10.11648/j.ijfbr.20160203.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijfbr.20160203.15,
      author = {Orobah Ali Barghouthi and Mohammed Bayyoud},
      title = {Overview of the Basel Capital Adequacy Framework},
      journal = {International Journal of Finance and Banking Research},
      volume = {2},
      number = {3},
      pages = {102-115},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijfbr.20160203.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfbr.20160203.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijfbr.20160203.15},
      abstract = {This paper examines Capital Adequacy Framework that specifies the approaches for quantifying the Risk-Weighted Assets (RWA) for credit risk, market risk and operational risk. The computation of the risk-weighted assets is consistent with Pillar 1 requirements set out by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and the Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB) in their respective documents - “International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: A Revised Framework” issued in June 2006 and the “Capital Adequacy Standard (CAS)” issued in December 2005. While the Bank believes that such customization could be justified, a pragmatic approach is adopted for implementation. Higher prudential requirements and risk management standards would be introduced gradually taking into consideration industry feedback during the consultation process.},
     year = {2016}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Overview of the Basel Capital Adequacy Framework
    AU  - Orobah Ali Barghouthi
    AU  - Mohammed Bayyoud
    Y1  - 2016/06/30
    PY  - 2016
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfbr.20160203.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijfbr.20160203.15
    T2  - International Journal of Finance and Banking Research
    JF  - International Journal of Finance and Banking Research
    JO  - International Journal of Finance and Banking Research
    SP  - 102
    EP  - 115
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2472-2278
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfbr.20160203.15
    AB  - This paper examines Capital Adequacy Framework that specifies the approaches for quantifying the Risk-Weighted Assets (RWA) for credit risk, market risk and operational risk. The computation of the risk-weighted assets is consistent with Pillar 1 requirements set out by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and the Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB) in their respective documents - “International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: A Revised Framework” issued in June 2006 and the “Capital Adequacy Standard (CAS)” issued in December 2005. While the Bank believes that such customization could be justified, a pragmatic approach is adopted for implementation. Higher prudential requirements and risk management standards would be introduced gradually taking into consideration industry feedback during the consultation process.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Faculty of Business and Economics, Department of Banking & Finance, Alquds University, Abu Dis, Palestine

  • Faculty of Business and Economics, Department of Banking & Finance, Alquds University, Abu Dis, Palestine

  • Sections