International Journal of Sustainable Development Research

| Peer-Reviewed |

Effects of Trade Openness and Industrial Value Added on Economic Growth in Bangladesh

Received: 4 August 2016    Accepted: 1 September 2016    Published: 17 October 2016
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

This study is an attempt to study the empirical relationship among trade openness, industrial value added and economic growth in Bangladesh. Annual time series data set (1981 to 2015) are utilized to detect the connections among the indicators of interest. Unit root test was applied to determine the time series properties of the variables: Gross Domestic Product (GDP), export, import and industrial value added while Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) technique of estimation and Granger causality test were employed to find out direction of causality. The results from the econometric model indicate that imports have a negative relationship while exports positively influence economic growth. The industrial value added also has positive influence on economic growth. It is recommended that Bangladesh should engage in export promotion and import substitution with a view to strengthening the economy and consequently enhance the living standards of its population.

DOI 10.11648/j.ijsdr.20160203.11
Published in International Journal of Sustainable Development Research (Volume 2, Issue 2, March 2016)
Page(s) 6-11
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Industrial Value Added, Trade Openness, Economic Growth, Bangladesh

References
[1] Abbas, S. (2014). Trade Liberalization and its Economic Impact on Developing and Least Developed Countries. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 13 (3), 215–221. doi: 10.1108/jitlp-06-2013-0018.
[2] Abhayaratne, A. S. (1996). Foreign trade and economic growth evidence from Sri Lanka, 1960-1992. Applied Economics Letters, 3 (9), 567-570.
[3] Adebayo, A., & Ogunrinola, I. O. (2006). Contemporary Dimensions of Unemployment Problem in Nigeria: A Special Challenge under the National Economic Empowerment and Development Strategy. The Nigerian Economic Society, Nigeria.
[4] Adenikinju and Olofin (2000). Economic Policy and Manufacturing Sector Performance in Africa. The Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies. Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 1-22.
[5] Barua A. and Chakraborty D (2006) “Liberalization, Trade and Industrial Performance: An Empirical Analysis of India.”
[6] Carmen M, G. and Pilar (2004) “The Impact of Industry and Foreign Trade on Economic Growth in China. An Inter-Sector Econometric Model, 1976-2002” Euro-American Association of Economic Development Studies Working Paper Series Economic Development. No. 76.
[7] Din, Muslehud E. Ghani and O. Siddique (2003) “Openness and Economic Growth in Pakistan” Pakistan Development Review 42 (4): 795-807.
[8] Dutta, D. and Ahmad, N. (2004) “Trade Liberalization and Industrial growth in Pakistan: a Cointegration analysis,” Applied Economics, Vol. 36, pp. 1421-1429.
[9] Gries, T., & Redlin, M. (2012). Trade Openness and Economic Growth: A Panel Causality Analysis. University of Paderborn, Germany. Available from internet: https://faculty.washington.edu/karyiu/confer/sea12/papers/SG12-112%20Redlin.pdf
[10] Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Quality ladders in the theory of growth. The Review of Economic Studies, 58 (1), 43-61.
[11] Guerrieri, P. (2002). Trade Openness, Industrial Change and Economic Development. Finance and Competitiveness in Developing Countries, 19, 257.
[12] Guisan, M. Carmen, and Pilar Exposito. The Impact of Industry and Foreign Trade on Economic Growth in China. An Inter-Sector Econometric Model, 1976-2002. No. 76. Working Paper Series Economic Development, 2004.
[13] Helpman, E., & Grossman, G. M. (1989). Growth and Welfare in a Small Open Economy. National Bureau of Economic Research.
[14] Hossain, Mohammad A., and Neil Dias Karunaratne. On export-led growth: is manufacturing exports a new engine of growth for Bangladesh? No. Discussion Paper No 297. The University of Queensland, 2001.
[15] Hulton C. W. (1967). “Exports expansion and economic growth: A survey, Land Economics”, Vol. 43, pp. 148-157.
[16] Hussain, I, (2007) “Trade and Economic Growth Linkages” Address on a national level seminar at Quaied e Azam University Islamabad at June 17, 2007.
[17] Iqbal, Zafar and G. M. Zahid (1998) “Macroeconomic determinants of Economic growth in Pakistan” Pakistan Development Review 37 (2): 125-48.
[18] Kemal A. R. et al (2003) An assessment of the impact of Trade Liberalization in Welfare in Pakistan (Islamabad: MIMAP, Technical Paper Series 16, PIDE.
[19] Khan, M. A and A. Qayyum (2007) “Trade Liberalization, Financial Development and Economic Growth”: Pakistan Institute of Development Economics Working Paper 2007: 19, Islamabad.
[20] Krueger, A. O. (1997). Trade policy and economic development: how we learn (No. w5896). National Bureau of Economic Research.
[21] Krueger, A. (1998). Why trade liberalisation is good for growth. The Economic Journal, 108 (450), 1513-1522.
[22] Lucas, R. E. Jr. (1988) On the Mechanics of Economic Development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22, July.
[23] M. A. Adebiyi (2006) “Trade Liberalization Policy and Industrial Growth Performance in Nigeria: An Error Correction Mechanism Technique”.
[24] MILNER, C. and ZGOVU, E., 2006. A natural experiment for identifying the impact of ‘natural’ trade barriers on exports Journal of Development Economics. 80 (1), 251-268.
[25] Mohsin, M. H. et al (2001) “Impact of Trade Reforms on Poverty” PIDE 16th Annual General Meeting: Islamabad.
[26] Musila, J. W., & Yiheyis, Z. (2015). The Impact of Trade Openness on Growth: The Case of Kenya. Journal of Policy Modelling, 37 (2), 342–354. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2014.12.001.
[27] Naryan, Paresh Kumar and Smyth, R. (2005), “Trade Liberalization and Economic Growth in Fiji: an Empirical. 20. International Financial Statistics (2008)”, by International Monetary Fund (IMF).
[28] Nath, H., & Al Mamun, K. (2004, October). Trade Liberalization, Growth and Inequality in Bangladesh: An Empirical Analysis. In This paper was presented at the 41st Annual Conference of the Missouri Valley Economic Association held in October.
[29] Njikam, O. (2009). “Trade Liberalization, Infrastructure and Industrial Performance in Cameroon”. Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Yaounde.
[30] Noland, M., & Pack, H. (2003). Industrial policy in an era of globalization: Lessons from Asia (Vol. 69). Peterson Institute.
[31] O’Neill, Jim. "Building better global economic BRICs." (2001).
[32] Rahman, M. M. (2003). A panel data analysis of Bangladesh’s trade: the gravity model approach. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference of the European Trade Study Group (ETSG2003). European Trade Study Group.
[33] Romer, Paul M. "The origins of endogenous growth." The journal of economic perspectives 8.1 (1994): 3-22.
[34] Sinha, Dipendra, and Tapen Sinha. "Openness and economic growth in India." Indian Journal of Economics 77.1 (1996): 115-125.
[35] Sinha, T. and Sinha D. (1999), “The Relation between Openness and Economic Growth: Postwar evidence from 124 countries,” Seoil Journal of Economics, Vol. 12, pp. 67-83.
[36] Sultan P. (2008), “Trade, Industry and Economic Growth in Bangladesh” Journal of Economic cooperation 29, 4 (2008) pp. 71-92.
[37] Tahir, M., & Azid, T. (2015). The Relationship Between International Trade Openness and Economic Growth in the Developing Economies. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 8 (2), 123–139. doi: 10.1108/jcefts-02-2015-0004
[38] Taylor, A. M. (1998). On the costs of inward-looking development: price distortions, growth, and divergence in Latin America. The Journal of Economic History, 58 (01), 1-28.
[39] Ulasan, B. (2012). Openness to International Trade and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Investigation. Economics Discussion Paper No. 2012-25.
[40] Verspagen, B. (1992). Uneven growth between interdependent economies: an evolutionary view on technology gaps, trade and growth (Doctoral dissertation, Universiteit Maastricht).
[41] Wacziarg, R. (2001). Measuring the dynamic gains from trade. The World Bank economic review, 15 (3), 393-429.
[42] Wade, R. (2005), “What Strategies Are Viable for Developing Countries Today? The World Trade Organization and Shrinking of Development Space”, in Gallagher (ed.) (2005), 80-101.
[43] Winter, L. A., McCulloch, N., & McKay, A. (2004). Trade liberalization and poverty: the evidence so far. Journal of economic literature, 42 (1), 72-115.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Shahjahan Ali, Khandaker Jahangir Alam, Md. Shafiul Islam. (2016). Effects of Trade Openness and Industrial Value Added on Economic Growth in Bangladesh. International Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 2(2), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsdr.20160203.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Shahjahan Ali; Khandaker Jahangir Alam; Md. Shafiul Islam. Effects of Trade Openness and Industrial Value Added on Economic Growth in Bangladesh. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Res. 2016, 2(2), 6-11. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsdr.20160203.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Shahjahan Ali, Khandaker Jahangir Alam, Md. Shafiul Islam. Effects of Trade Openness and Industrial Value Added on Economic Growth in Bangladesh. Int J Sustain Dev Res. 2016;2(2):6-11. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsdr.20160203.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijsdr.20160203.11,
      author = {Shahjahan Ali and Khandaker Jahangir Alam and Md. Shafiul Islam},
      title = {Effects of Trade Openness and Industrial Value Added on Economic Growth in Bangladesh},
      journal = {International Journal of Sustainable Development Research},
      volume = {2},
      number = {2},
      pages = {6-11},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijsdr.20160203.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsdr.20160203.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsdr.20160203.11},
      abstract = {This study is an attempt to study the empirical relationship among trade openness, industrial value added and economic growth in Bangladesh. Annual time series data set (1981 to 2015) are utilized to detect the connections among the indicators of interest. Unit root test was applied to determine the time series properties of the variables: Gross Domestic Product (GDP), export, import and industrial value added while Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) technique of estimation and Granger causality test were employed to find out direction of causality. The results from the econometric model indicate that imports have a negative relationship while exports positively influence economic growth. The industrial value added also has positive influence on economic growth. It is recommended that Bangladesh should engage in export promotion and import substitution with a view to strengthening the economy and consequently enhance the living standards of its population.},
     year = {2016}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Effects of Trade Openness and Industrial Value Added on Economic Growth in Bangladesh
    AU  - Shahjahan Ali
    AU  - Khandaker Jahangir Alam
    AU  - Md. Shafiul Islam
    Y1  - 2016/10/17
    PY  - 2016
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsdr.20160203.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijsdr.20160203.11
    T2  - International Journal of Sustainable Development Research
    JF  - International Journal of Sustainable Development Research
    JO  - International Journal of Sustainable Development Research
    SP  - 6
    EP  - 11
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-1832
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsdr.20160203.11
    AB  - This study is an attempt to study the empirical relationship among trade openness, industrial value added and economic growth in Bangladesh. Annual time series data set (1981 to 2015) are utilized to detect the connections among the indicators of interest. Unit root test was applied to determine the time series properties of the variables: Gross Domestic Product (GDP), export, import and industrial value added while Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) technique of estimation and Granger causality test were employed to find out direction of causality. The results from the econometric model indicate that imports have a negative relationship while exports positively influence economic growth. The industrial value added also has positive influence on economic growth. It is recommended that Bangladesh should engage in export promotion and import substitution with a view to strengthening the economy and consequently enhance the living standards of its population.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Economics, Begum Rokeya University, Rangpur, Bangladesh

  • Department of Economics, Begum Rokeya University, Rangpur, Bangladesh

  • Department of Economics, Begum Rokeya University, Rangpur, Bangladesh

  • Sections