| Peer-Reviewed

Review Paper on Mutation Breeding as Applied in Groundnut (Arachis Hypogea L.) Improvement

Received: 30 January 2017    Accepted: 3 March 2017    Published: 21 March 2017
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Groundnut or peanut is one among the five extensively grown oil crops of Ethiopia where it is grown and utilized for extracting cooking oil, and also for confectionary under rain fed condition. As a legume, groundnut improves soil by fixing nitrogen biologically without consuming non-renewable energies and without disturbing agro-ecological balance. Aflatoxin is one of the major problems in groundnut, which hinders not only the domestic consumption but also export of groundnut since the international regulation for minimum standards for aflatoxin contamination is becoming stringent. To reduce the harmful effect of Aflatoxin and meeting other agronomic and breeding objectives, mutation breeding is an important breeding strategy. The objective of this review paper was to refer the works done so far to improve the groundnut varieties through mutation breeding. Mutation breeding relies on the implementation of either physical or chemical agents in order to create variability in the population of interest through the process called mutagenesis. Mutagenesis is the process by which the genetic information of an organism is changed in a stable manner. Mutagenesis can be physical (the use of physical agents) or chemical (the use of chemical agents) to create variability. Development of high-yielding peanut mutants through chemical mutagenesis such as Flower injection of ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS), Seed treatment with chemical mutagens such as sodium azide (NaN3) was resulted in yield increment over untreated local varieties. Physical mutagens include electromagnetic radiation, such as gamma rays, X-rays and UV light and particle radiation such as fast and thermal neutrons, ß and alfa particles were also used in ground nut improvement.

Published in Gene and Cell Therapy (Volume 1, Issue 5)
DOI 10.11648/j.gct.20160105.11
Page(s) 35-40
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Previous article
Keywords

Mutation Breeding, Mutagen, Mutagenesis, Groundnut

References
[1] Wijnands JHM, Biersteker J, Van Loo EN (2009) Oil seed business opportunity in Ethiopia. Oil seed research report, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[2] Kudama G (2013). Economics of Groundnut Production in East Hararghe Zone of Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. Science, Technology & Arts Research Journal 2: 135-139.
[3] Geleta T, Purshotum KS, Wijnand S, Tana T (2007) Integrated management of groundnut root rot using seed quality and fungicide seed treatment. International Journal of Pest Management 53: 53-57.
[4] Pazderka C, Emmott A (2010) African groundnuts procurement for development case study, London, Pp 1-15.
[5] Reddy LJ, Kaul AK (1986). Status and prospects of groundnut in Bangladesh. Agriculture Research Council, Dhaka, Bangladesh, Pp 1–51.
[6] Javed, M. A., Khatri, A., Khan, I. A., Ahmad, M., Siddiqui, M. A., Arain, A. G., 2000 - Utilization of gamma irradiation for the genetics improvement of oriental mustard (Brassica juncea Coss.). Pakstan J. Bot. 32: 77-83.
[7] Maluszynski, K. N., L. V. Zanten and B. S. Ahlowalia. 2000. Officially released mutant varieties. The FAO/IAEA Databse. Mut. Breed. Rev., 12: 1-12.
[8] Ahloowalia, B. S., M. Aaluszynski and K. Nichterlein. 2004. Global impact of mutation derived varieties. Euphytica, 135: 187-204.
[9] Khatri, A., I. A. Khan, M. A. Siddiqui, S. Raza and G. S. Nizamani. 2005. Evaluation of high yielding mutant of Brassica juncea cv. S-9 developed through gamma rays and EMS. Pak J. Bot., 37 (2): 279-284.
[10] Micke, A. 2004. Mutation breeding of grain legumes. Journal of Plant and Soil, 152 (1): 81-85.
[11] Gaur, P. M., V. K Gour and S Srinivasan. 2007. An induced brachytic mutant of chickpea and its possible use in ideotype breeding. Euphytica, 159 (1-2): 35-41.
[12] Naeem-ud-Din, G. Shabbir, M. Ramzan and A. Mahmood. 2005. BARI-2000: A new bold seeded, semi bunch groundnut variety. PJST., Vol. 1 (6).
[13] Krapovikas A, Gregory WC (1994) Taxonomia del genero Arachis (Leguminosae). Bonplandia VIII:1-187. (In Spanish). (English translation by Williams DE, Simpson CE 2007). Taxonomy of the genus Arachis (Leguminosae). Bonplandia 16 (suppl): 1–205.
[14] Gregory WC, Krapovickas A, Gregory MP (1980) Structure, variation, evolution and classification. In: Summerfield RJ, Bunting AH (eds) Arachis. Advances in legume science, vol 2. Kew, London, pp 469–481.
[15] Krapovickas A (1969). The origin, variability and spread of the groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) (English translation by Smartt J) In: Ucko RJ, Dimbledy CW (eds) The domestication and exploitation of plants and animals. Duckworth, London, pp 427–441.
[16] Gregory WC, Gregory MP (1976) Groundnuts. In: Simmonds NW (ed) Evolution of crop plants. Longman, London, pp 151–154.
[17] Singh AK, Nigam SN (1997) Groundnut In: Fuccillo D, Sears L, Stapleton P (eds) Biodiversity in trust—conservation and use of plant genetic resources in CGIAR center. Cambridge University Press Cambridge UK, pp 113–124.
[18] Wang CT, Wang XZ, Tang YY, Chen DX, Zhang JC, Cui FG, Yu SL. High yielding mutants achieved by injecting EMS into peanut flower organs. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences 2010; 24(2):239–242.
[19] 19. Wang CT, Wang XZ, Tang YY, Zhang JC, Chen DX, Xu JZ, Yang XD, Song GS, Cui FG. Huayu 40, a groundnut cultivar developed through EMS mutagenesis. Journal of SAT Agricultural Research 2011; 9. ejournal.icrisat.org/Volume9/Groundnut/Huayu40.pdf (accessed 6 June 2012).
[20] Gowda M. V. C., Nadaf H. L. and Sheshagiri R.1996. The role of mutations in intraspecific differentiation of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Euphytica. 90: 105-113.
[21] Murty, G. S. S., A. M. Badigannavar, S. Mondal and D. M. Kale. 2004. Research and impact of groundnut mutation breeding in India. In: Groundnut Research in India, (Eds.): M. S. Basu and N. B. Singh, NRCG, Junagadh, India pp. 57-69.
[22] Khattak, G. S. S., M. Ashraf, R. Zamir and I. Saeed. 2007. High yielding desi chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) variety “NIFA-2005”. Pak. J. Bot., 39 (1): 93-102.
[23] Khattak,G. S. S., I. Saeed and S. A. Shah. 2008. Breeding high yielding and disease resistant mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) genotypes. Pak. J. Bot., 40 (4): 1411-141.
[24] Branch, W. D.2002. Variability among advanced gamma-irradiation induced large-seeded mutant breeding lines in the ‘Georgia Brownw’ peanut cultivar. Plant Breeding, 121: 275.
[25] Suvendu M., A. M. Badigannavar, D. M. Kale and G. S. S. Murty. 2007. Induction of genetic variability in a disease-resistant groundnut breeding line. BARC. Newsletter. Issue No. 285: 237-247.
[26] Dhanayanth, K. P. M., Reddy, V., 2000. Cytogenetic effect of gamma rays and ethyle methane sulphonate in chilli piper (Capsicum annum). Cytologia 65, 129-133.
[27] Bhat, T. A., Khan, A. H., Parveen, S., 2005. Comparative analysis of meiotic abnormalities induced by gamma rays, EMS and MMS in Vicia faba L. Journal of Indian Botanical society 84, 45-58.
[28] Zeerak, N. A., 1991. Cytogenetical effect of gamma rays and ethylmethane sulphonate in brinjal (Solanum melongena L.). Cytologia 56, 639-643.
[29] Mashenkov, A., 1986. Induced mutation process as a source of new Mutants. Maize Genetics Cooperation newsletter 60, 70-71.
[30] Kleinhofs, A., Owais, W._., Nilan, R. A., 1978. Azide; Mutation Research 55, 165–195.
[31] Reddy, P. S., Reddi, M. V., Thammiraju, B. and Mahaboob Ali, S., 1987. Creation of genetic variability by recourse to irradiation in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Oleagineux, 32: 59-63.
[32] Ramanathan, T., 1979. Mutational studies in groundnut. Ph. D. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agri. Uni., Coimbatore, India.
[33] Mouli, C. and Kale, D. M., 1982. Gamma ray induced Spanish Bunch mutant with large pod groundnut. Oleagineux, 37: 583-588.
[34] Lewis L, Onsongo M, Njapau H, Schurz-Rogers H, Luber G et al. (2005) Aflatoxin contamination of commercial maize products during an outbreak of acute aflatoxicosis in eastern and central Kenya. Environmental Health Perspectives 113: 1763–1767.
[35] Bhat RV, Vasanthi S, Rao BS, Rao RN, Rao VS et al. (1996) Aflatoxin B1 contamination in groundnut samples collected from different geographical regions of India: a multicentre study. Food Additives and Contaminants 13: 325-331.
[36] Chen, Y. C., Liao, C. D., Lin, H. Y., Chiueh, L. C., 2013. Survey of aflatoxin contamination in peanut products in Taiwan from 1997 to 2011. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis, 21, 247-252.
[37] Hajare SS, Hajare SH, Sharma A (2005) Aflatoxin inactivation using aqueous extract of Ajowan (Trachyspermum ammi) seeds. J Food Sci 70: 29-34.
[38] H. J. Muller 1927. Evidence that natural radioactivity is inadequate to explain the frequency of "natural" mutations.
[39] Charlotte Auerbach and J. M. Robson (March 1942). Problems in Chemical mutagenesis.
[40] Altenburg, E. and L. S. Browning 1961. The relatively high frequency of whole-body mutations compared with fractionals induced by X-rays in Drosophila sperm. Genetics 16: 203-212.
[41] MuLLER, H. J-., ELOF CARLSON & ABRAHAM HH) SCHALET 1961.-~ Mutation by alteration of the already existing gene. Genetics, 4 (-), 218-226.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Habtamu Alemu. (2017). Review Paper on Mutation Breeding as Applied in Groundnut (Arachis Hypogea L.) Improvement. Gene and Cell Therapy, 1(5), 35-40. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.gct.20160105.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Habtamu Alemu. Review Paper on Mutation Breeding as Applied in Groundnut (Arachis Hypogea L.) Improvement. Gene Cell Ther. 2017, 1(5), 35-40. doi: 10.11648/j.gct.20160105.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Habtamu Alemu. Review Paper on Mutation Breeding as Applied in Groundnut (Arachis Hypogea L.) Improvement. Gene Cell Ther. 2017;1(5):35-40. doi: 10.11648/j.gct.20160105.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.gct.20160105.11,
      author = {Habtamu Alemu},
      title = {Review Paper on Mutation Breeding as Applied in Groundnut (Arachis Hypogea L.) Improvement},
      journal = {Gene and Cell Therapy},
      volume = {1},
      number = {5},
      pages = {35-40},
      doi = {10.11648/j.gct.20160105.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.gct.20160105.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.gct.20160105.11},
      abstract = {Groundnut or peanut is one among the five extensively grown oil crops of Ethiopia where it is grown and utilized for extracting cooking oil, and also for confectionary under rain fed condition. As a legume, groundnut improves soil by fixing nitrogen biologically without consuming non-renewable energies and without disturbing agro-ecological balance. Aflatoxin is one of the major problems in groundnut, which hinders not only the domestic consumption but also export of groundnut since the international regulation for minimum standards for aflatoxin contamination is becoming stringent. To reduce the harmful effect of Aflatoxin and meeting other agronomic and breeding objectives, mutation breeding is an important breeding strategy. The objective of this review paper was to refer the works done so far to improve the groundnut varieties through mutation breeding. Mutation breeding relies on the implementation of either physical or chemical agents in order to create variability in the population of interest through the process called mutagenesis. Mutagenesis is the process by which the genetic information of an organism is changed in a stable manner. Mutagenesis can be physical (the use of physical agents) or chemical (the use of chemical agents) to create variability. Development of high-yielding peanut mutants through chemical mutagenesis such as Flower injection of ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS), Seed treatment with chemical mutagens such as sodium azide (NaN3) was resulted in yield increment over untreated local varieties. Physical mutagens include electromagnetic radiation, such as gamma rays, X-rays and UV light and particle radiation such as fast and thermal neutrons, ß and alfa particles were also used in ground nut improvement.},
     year = {2017}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Review Paper on Mutation Breeding as Applied in Groundnut (Arachis Hypogea L.) Improvement
    AU  - Habtamu Alemu
    Y1  - 2017/03/21
    PY  - 2017
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.gct.20160105.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.gct.20160105.11
    T2  - Gene and Cell Therapy
    JF  - Gene and Cell Therapy
    JO  - Gene and Cell Therapy
    SP  - 35
    EP  - 40
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.gct.20160105.11
    AB  - Groundnut or peanut is one among the five extensively grown oil crops of Ethiopia where it is grown and utilized for extracting cooking oil, and also for confectionary under rain fed condition. As a legume, groundnut improves soil by fixing nitrogen biologically without consuming non-renewable energies and without disturbing agro-ecological balance. Aflatoxin is one of the major problems in groundnut, which hinders not only the domestic consumption but also export of groundnut since the international regulation for minimum standards for aflatoxin contamination is becoming stringent. To reduce the harmful effect of Aflatoxin and meeting other agronomic and breeding objectives, mutation breeding is an important breeding strategy. The objective of this review paper was to refer the works done so far to improve the groundnut varieties through mutation breeding. Mutation breeding relies on the implementation of either physical or chemical agents in order to create variability in the population of interest through the process called mutagenesis. Mutagenesis is the process by which the genetic information of an organism is changed in a stable manner. Mutagenesis can be physical (the use of physical agents) or chemical (the use of chemical agents) to create variability. Development of high-yielding peanut mutants through chemical mutagenesis such as Flower injection of ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS), Seed treatment with chemical mutagens such as sodium azide (NaN3) was resulted in yield increment over untreated local varieties. Physical mutagens include electromagnetic radiation, such as gamma rays, X-rays and UV light and particle radiation such as fast and thermal neutrons, ß and alfa particles were also used in ground nut improvement.
    VL  - 1
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Assosa Agricultural Research Center, Assosa, Ethiopia

  • Sections