A New Approach on Imprecise Stochastic Orders of Fuzzy Random Variables
International Journal of Management and Fuzzy Systems
Volume 3, Issue 1, February 2017, Pages: 10-14
Received: Dec. 6, 2016; Accepted: Dec. 26, 2016; Published: Mar. 17, 2017
Views 1534      Downloads 99
Authors
Daniel Rajan, Department of Mathematics, Tranquebar Bishop Manickam Lutheran College, Porayar, South India
Dhanabal Vijayabalan, Full-Time Research Scholor, Department of Mathematics, Tranquebar Bishop Manickam Lutheran College, Porayar, South India
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
In this paper the extension of stochastic dominance to an imprecise frame work are discussed in fuzzy nature. Also stochastic dominance between sets of fuzzy Probabilities can be studied by means of a P-box representation. The extension of pair of sets of distribution function by means of fuzzy random variables has been carried out.
Keywords
Fuzzy Distribution Function, Stochastic Dominance, Imprecise Stochastic Dominance, Fuzzy Random Variable, Probability Boxes
To cite this article
Daniel Rajan, Dhanabal Vijayabalan, A New Approach on Imprecise Stochastic Orders of Fuzzy Random Variables, International Journal of Management and Fuzzy Systems. Vol. 3, No. 1, 2017, pp. 10-14. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmfs.20170301.12
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Artzner, P. H Delbaen, F Eber, J. M and Heath. H. Coherent measures of risk, Mathematical Finance, 9:203-228, 1999.
[2]
Atkinson. A. On the measurement of poverty, Econometrica, 55:749-764,1987.
[3]
Bawa. V. S. Optimal rules for ordering uncertain prospects, Journal of Financial Economics, 2 (1): 95-121, 1975.
[4]
Berger. J. O. Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis, Springer-Verlag, NewYork, 1985.
[5]
Choquet. G. Theory of capacities, Annales de l'Institut Fourier, 5:131-295, 1953-1954.
[6]
Denoeux. T. Extending stochastic ordering to belief functions on the real line, Information Sciences, 179: 1362-1376, 2009.
[7]
Denuit, M Dhaene, JGoovaerts, M and Kaas. R. Actuarial theory for dependent risks, John Wiley and Sons, 2005.
[8]
Fuchs F and Neumaier. A Potential based clouds in robust design optimization, Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice, 3 (1): 225-238, 2008.
[9]
Goovaerts, M. JKaas, R. Van Heerwaarden, A. E and Bauwelinckx. T EffectiveActuarial Methods, North Holland, 1990.
[10]
Gilboa I and Schmeidler. D. Maxmin expected utility with a non-uniquePrior, Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18:141-153, 1989.
[11]
Islam. M and Braden. J Bio-economics development of floodplains: Farming versus fishing in Bangladesh, Environment and Development Economics, 11 (1): 95-126, 2006.
[12]
Ignacio Montes, Enrique Miranda, Susan Montes. Stochastic dominance with imprecise information, Elsevier, 15: 1-31, 2012.
[13]
Krätschmer. V When fuzzy measures are upper envelopes of probability measures. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 138: 455-468, 2003.
[14]
Levy. H. Stochastic dominance, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.
[15]
Müller A and Stoyan. D Comparison Methods for Stochastic Models and Risks, Wiley, 2002.
[16]
Satia J. K andLave. R. E. Markovian decision processes with uncertain transition probabilities, Operations Research, 21: 728-740, 1973.
[17]
Noyan, NRudolf, G and Ruszczynski. A Relaxations of linear programming problems with first order stochastic dominance constrains, Operations Research L, 34: 653-659, 2006.
[18]
Shaked M and Shanthikumar. J. G. Stochastic Orders and their applications. Springer, 2006.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186