Background: Preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis is classically a clinical one, but with the increasing use of technology for arriving at a fool proof diagnosis, surgeons rely on radiology to a considerable extent for decision making. Especially, in developing countries where time and resources are limited, a reliable Ultrasonography (USG) based score for diagnosing acute appendicitis improves decision making. This prospective study was carried out to compare Modified Alvarado Score & Tzanakis’s Score for diagnosing acute appendicitis. Methods: 146 patients undergoing emergency appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis were included in the study. This was a prospective study carried out from July 2014 to March 2016. Patients included in the study were scored according to Modified Alvarado Score (MAS) and Tzanakis Score (TS). The final diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and likelihood ratio of MAS were 94.95%, 92.6%, 98.26%, 80.64% and 0.05 respectively, and of TS were 98.32%, 96.29%, 99%, 92.85% and 0.02 respectively. Negative appendectomy rate was 1.74% for MAS (cutoff ≥7) and 0.84% for TS (cutoff ≥8). Overall negative appendectomy rate was 18.5%. Conclusion: Tzanakis score is simple, applicable and effective for diagnosing acute appendicitis.
| Published in | International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences (Volume 2, Issue 5) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijcems.20160205.13 |
| Page(s) | 90-93 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Modified Alvarado Score, Tzanakis’s Score, Acute Appendicitis
| [1] | Fitz R. Perforating inflammation of the vermiform appendix with special reference to its early diagnosis and treatment. Am J Med Sci. 1886; 92:321-346. |
| [2] | Stephens PL, Mazzucco JJ. Comparison of ultrasound and the Alvarado score for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Conn Med. 1999; 11:137–140. |
| [3] | Cuschieri A. In: Essential surgical practice. 3. Cuscheri A, Giles GR, Mossa AR, editor. London: Butter worth Heinman; 1995. The small intestine and vermiform appendix; pp. 1325–8. |
| [4] | Jaffe B&BD. In: The Appendix. Brunicardi FEiC, editor. Schwartz's Principles of Surgery New York: Mc-Graw Hill Companies lnc; 2005. |
| [5] | Schwerk WB, Wichtrup B, Ruschoff J, Rothmund M. Acute and perforated appendicitis: current experience with ultrasound-aided diagnosis. World J Surg. 1990; 14:271-276. |
| [6] | Gilmore OJA, Jones D, Ynag Q. Appendicitis and mimicking conditions. Lancet. 1975; 11:421–424. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(75)90841-7. |
| [7] | Kalan M, Talbot D, Cunliffe WJ, Rich AJ. Evaluation of the modified Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Ann R Coll Surg. 1994; 11:418–419. |
| [8] | Ohmann C, Yang Q, Franke C. Diagnostic scores for acute appendicitis. Eur J Surg. 1995;11:273–281 |
| [9] | Fenyo G, Lindberg G, Blind P, Enochsson L, Oberg A. Diagnostic decision support in suspected acute appendicitis: validation of a simplified scoring system. Eur J Surg Med. 1997; 11:831–8. |
| [10] | Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg. 1986; 11:557–565. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(86)80993-3. |
| [11] | Tzanakis NE, Efstathiou SP, Danulidis K, et al. A new Approach to Accurate Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis. World J Surg. 2005; 29:1151-1156. |
| [12] | Townsend CM, Beauchamp DR, EversBM, Mattos KL. Sabiston Text book of Surgery. 19th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2012. P1279-93. |
| [13] | Ohene-Yeboah M. Acute Surgical Admissions for abdominal Pains in adult in Kumasi, Ghana. ANZ Surg. 2006;76:898-903. |
| [14] | Lui CD, Mcfadden DW, Acute abdomen and appendix. Surgery:Scientific principles and Practice. Edited by: Greenfield LJ, Mulholand MW, Zelenock GB, Oldham KT, Lillemoe KD. Philedelphia: Lippencott-Raven;1997. pg 1246-1261. |
| [15] | Jones K, Penna AA, Dunn EL, Nadalo L, Mangram AJ. Are negative appendectomies still acceptable? Am J Surg. 2004; 188:748-754. |
| [16] | Hansen AJ, Young SW, De Petris G, Tessic DJ. Histologic severity of appendicitis can be predicted by computed tomography. Arch Surg. 2004; 139:1304-1308. |
| [17] | Sigdel GS, Lakhey PJ, Mishra PR. Tzanakis score Vs. Alvarado score in acute appendicitis. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2010; 49:96-99. |
| [18] | Yu SH, Kim CB, Park JW, et al. Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis: evaluation by meta-analysis. Korean journal of Radiology. 2005; 6:267. |
| [19] | Harsha BK, Bhaskaran A, Prasad CSBR, Basavarajappa M, Ambikavathy M, Vasanth Kumar G. Evaluation of Modified Alvarado Score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and its correlation with ultrasonography and histopathology. J Clin Biomed Sci. 2011; 1: 149-157. |
APA Style
Malik A. A., Mir M. F., Khurshid S. U., Imtiaz Wani, Riyaz Dagga. (2016). Modified Alvarado Score Versus Tzanakis Score for Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis in Changing Clinical Practice. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences, 2(5), 90-93. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcems.20160205.13
ACS Style
Malik A. A.; Mir M. F.; Khurshid S. U.; Imtiaz Wani; Riyaz Dagga. Modified Alvarado Score Versus Tzanakis Score for Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis in Changing Clinical Practice. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. Sci. 2016, 2(5), 90-93. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcems.20160205.13
AMA Style
Malik A. A., Mir M. F., Khurshid S. U., Imtiaz Wani, Riyaz Dagga. Modified Alvarado Score Versus Tzanakis Score for Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis in Changing Clinical Practice. Int J Clin Exp Med Sci. 2016;2(5):90-93. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcems.20160205.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijcems.20160205.13,
author = {Malik A. A. and Mir M. F. and Khurshid S. U. and Imtiaz Wani and Riyaz Dagga},
title = {Modified Alvarado Score Versus Tzanakis Score for Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis in Changing Clinical Practice},
journal = {International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences},
volume = {2},
number = {5},
pages = {90-93},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijcems.20160205.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcems.20160205.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijcems.20160205.13},
abstract = {Background: Preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis is classically a clinical one, but with the increasing use of technology for arriving at a fool proof diagnosis, surgeons rely on radiology to a considerable extent for decision making. Especially, in developing countries where time and resources are limited, a reliable Ultrasonography (USG) based score for diagnosing acute appendicitis improves decision making. This prospective study was carried out to compare Modified Alvarado Score & Tzanakis’s Score for diagnosing acute appendicitis. Methods: 146 patients undergoing emergency appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis were included in the study. This was a prospective study carried out from July 2014 to March 2016. Patients included in the study were scored according to Modified Alvarado Score (MAS) and Tzanakis Score (TS). The final diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and likelihood ratio of MAS were 94.95%, 92.6%, 98.26%, 80.64% and 0.05 respectively, and of TS were 98.32%, 96.29%, 99%, 92.85% and 0.02 respectively. Negative appendectomy rate was 1.74% for MAS (cutoff ≥7) and 0.84% for TS (cutoff ≥8). Overall negative appendectomy rate was 18.5%. Conclusion: Tzanakis score is simple, applicable and effective for diagnosing acute appendicitis.},
year = {2016}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Modified Alvarado Score Versus Tzanakis Score for Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis in Changing Clinical Practice AU - Malik A. A. AU - Mir M. F. AU - Khurshid S. U. AU - Imtiaz Wani AU - Riyaz Dagga Y1 - 2016/08/26 PY - 2016 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcems.20160205.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijcems.20160205.13 T2 - International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences JF - International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences JO - International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences SP - 90 EP - 93 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2469-8032 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcems.20160205.13 AB - Background: Preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis is classically a clinical one, but with the increasing use of technology for arriving at a fool proof diagnosis, surgeons rely on radiology to a considerable extent for decision making. Especially, in developing countries where time and resources are limited, a reliable Ultrasonography (USG) based score for diagnosing acute appendicitis improves decision making. This prospective study was carried out to compare Modified Alvarado Score & Tzanakis’s Score for diagnosing acute appendicitis. Methods: 146 patients undergoing emergency appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis were included in the study. This was a prospective study carried out from July 2014 to March 2016. Patients included in the study were scored according to Modified Alvarado Score (MAS) and Tzanakis Score (TS). The final diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and likelihood ratio of MAS were 94.95%, 92.6%, 98.26%, 80.64% and 0.05 respectively, and of TS were 98.32%, 96.29%, 99%, 92.85% and 0.02 respectively. Negative appendectomy rate was 1.74% for MAS (cutoff ≥7) and 0.84% for TS (cutoff ≥8). Overall negative appendectomy rate was 18.5%. Conclusion: Tzanakis score is simple, applicable and effective for diagnosing acute appendicitis. VL - 2 IS - 5 ER -
Information
Email: