The Role of Predictors Parameters in the Management Policy and Outcome of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia with the Lack of Resources in Single Pediatric Surgery Unit
International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery
Volume 3, Issue 3, June 2017, Pages: 30-38
Received: Apr. 3, 2017; Accepted: Apr. 21, 2017; Published: May 19, 2017
Views 221      Downloads 21
Author
Mohammed Joudi Aboud, Pediatric Surgery Unit, the Maternity and Child Teaching Hospital, Al Qadisiya, Iraq
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Background: The objective of this study is to have the interest to know how far the present study underscores the improved survival rate for patients with CDH and risk factors affecting the outcome with the lack of many essential facilities. Our inquiries: shall we proceed without ECMO and related resources! Patients and Methods: The records of patients admitted with CDH to the pediatric surgery unit at the Maternity and Children Teaching Hospital Al Qadisiya, Iraq, from January 1, 2005, to the end of December 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Reports obtained about operative findings, respiratory complications, although attempts were made to confirm a suspected diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension using echocardiography. Despite that, the permissive hypercapnia and ECMO were not practiced during the study period (these facilities still unavailable in our unit), we considering that the studied patients suspected to have such facilities according to ECMO protocol. All presentation factors with some of the predictive parameters are studied and taken as background to analyze our study. Statistical analyses performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 software and Excel 2016. Independent t-test used for analysis of normally distributed continuous data. A p-value of <.0001 considered statistically significant. Results: Thirty-one patients (26 neonates) were managed at our unit with an overall survival 19 of the total patients 73.07% and 14 (53.84%) of the neonates. Male presented 18 (69.23%) out of the total. Birth weight in grams (range) 3100 (2100 to 4390). Apgar (mean) at 5 min. after delivery (range) 6.2±2.1. At the level of Prenatal factors, chest to head circumference ratio <0.80 presented as the most important risk factor (Odd ratio 27.50, 95% confidence intervals (CI) upper 289.13 and p-value <.0001). At birth factors, associated major anomalies (Odd ratio 3.50, 95% CI upper 17.89 and p-value <.0001) formed risk parameter. Overall, both favorable and unfavorable factors had significant correlation and predictive effects on both survival and mortality groups respectively. Conclusion: A composite of prognostic and predictive parameters, however, organize our workup and can magnify our management future policy despite that, these prognostic indicators measure different aspects of CDH.
Keywords
Predictive Parameters, Management Policy, Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia
To cite this article
Mohammed Joudi Aboud, The Role of Predictors Parameters in the Management Policy and Outcome of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia with the Lack of Resources in Single Pediatric Surgery Unit, International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery. Vol. 3, No. 3, 2017, pp. 30-38. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcps.20170303.12
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Fitzgerald RJ. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a study of mortality factors. Irish J Med Sci 1997; 146: 280-4.
[2]
Bohn D, Tamura M, Perrin D, Barker G, Rabinovitch M. Ventilatory predictors of pulmonary hypoplasia in congenital diaphragmatic hernia confirmed by morphologic assessment. J Pediatr 1987; 3: 423- 31.
[3]
Sakai H, Tamura M, Hasokama Y, Bryan AC, Barber GA, Bohn D. Effect of surgical repair in respiratory mechanics in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr 1987; 3: 432-8.
[4]
Hussein Khawahur, MD; Abdulhakiem Kattan, MD; Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a local experience. Annals of Saudi Medicine, Vol 19, No 6, 1999.
[5]
Clark RH, Hardin WD Jr, Hirschl RB, Jaksic T, Lally KP, Langham MR Jr, Wilson JM. Current surgical management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a report from the congenital diaphragmatic hernia study group. J Pediatr Surg 1998; 33: 1004-9.
[6]
Beresford MW, Shaw NJ. Outcome of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatr Pulmonol 2000; 30: 249-256.
[7]
The Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group. Estimating disease severity of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in the first 5 minutes of life. J Pediatr Surg 2001; 36: 141-5.
[8]
Do-Hyun Kim, June Dong Park, Han-Suk Kim, So-Yeon Shim, Survival Rate Changes in Neonates with Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia and its Contributing Factors, J Korean Med Sci 2007; 22: 687-92.
[9]
Jason C. Fisher⁎, Rashida A. Jefferson, Marc S. Arkovitz, Charles J. H. Stolar, Redefining outcomes in right congenital diaphragmatic hernia, Journal of Pediatric Surgery (2008) 43, 373–379.
[10]
Thibeault DW, Haney B. Lung volume, pulmonary vasculature, and factors affecting survival in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg 1998; 101: 289-295.
[11]
Macken MB, Thompson DL. Antenatal diagnosis of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Can Assoc Radiol J 1993; 44: 439-42.
[12]
Midrio P, Gobbi D, Baldo V, et al. Right congenital diaphragmatic hernia: an 18-year experience. J Pediatr Surg 2007; 42: 517-21.
[13]
SteinhornRH, KriesmerPJ, GreenTP, McKayCJ, PayneNR. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia in Minnesota: impact of antenatal diagnosis on survival. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1994; 148: 626–631.
[14]
Lewis DA, Reickert C, Bowerman R, Hirschl RB. Prenatal ultrasonography frequently fails to diagnose congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 1997; 32: 352–356.
[15]
Laudy JA, Van Gucht M, Van Dooren MF, Wladimiroff JW, Tibboel D. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: an evaluation of the prognostic value of the lung-to-head ratio and other prenatal parameters. Prenat Diagn 2003; 23: 634–639.
[16]
Lipshutz GS, Albanese CT, Feldstein VA et al. Prospective analysis of lung-to-head ratio predicts survival for patients with prenatally diagnosed congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg 1997; 32: 1634–1636.
[17]
Nio M, Haase G, Kennaugh J, Bui K, Atkinson JB. A prospective randomized trial of delayed versus immediate repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg 1994; 29: 618-21.
[18]
Norden MA, Butt W, McDougall P. Predictors of survival for infants with CDH. J Pediatr Surg 1994; 29: 1442-6.
[19]
Joanne Colvin, Carol Bower, Jan E. Dickinson and Jenni Sokol, Outcomes of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: A Population-Based Study in Western Australia, Pediatrics: DOI: 10.1542/peds.2004-2845 2005; 116; e356-e363.
[20]
Skari H, bjornland K, Frenckner b, Friberg LG, Heikkinen M, Hurme T, Loe b, Mollerlokken G, Nielsen OH, Qvist N, Rintala R, Sandgren K, Wester T, Emblem R: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia in Scandinavia from 1995 to 1998: Predictors of mortality. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37 (9): 1269–1275.
[21]
Lieke van den Hout, Ilona Sluiter, Saskia Gischler, Annelies de Klein, Robert Rottier, Hanneke IJsselstijn, Irwin Reiss, Dick Tibboel, Can we improve outcome of congenital diaphragmatic hernia? Pediatr Surg Int, 2009; 25 (9): p. 733-743.
[22]
Bancalari E, Claure N. Definitions and diagnostic criteria for bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Semin Perinatol. Aug 2006; 30 (4): 164-170.
[23]
Bancalari E, Claure N, Sosenko IR. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia: changes in pathogenesis, epidemiology and definition. Semin Neonatol. Feb 2003; 8 (1): 63-71.
[24]
Paul D. Robinson and Dominic A. Fitzgerald, Congenital diaphragmatic hernia, pediatric respiratory review (2007) 8, 323–335.
[25]
Paret G, Ziv T, Barzilai A, Ben¬Abraham R, Vardi A, Manisterski Y, Barzilay Z. Ventilation index and outcome in children with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1998 Aug; 26 (2): 1258.
[26]
Z lçe, C Güney, N Eray, B Ilikkan, S Celayir. The Role of Modified Ventilatory Index in Defining the Prognosis in Surgical and Nonsurgical Pediatric Patients. The Internet Journal of Pulmonary Medicine. 2004 Volume 5 Number 1.
[27]
Luis R. Longo dos Santos, João G. Maksoud-Filho, Uenis Tannuri, Wagner C. Andrade, João G. Maksoud. Prognostic factors and survival in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2003; 79 (1): 81-6.
[28]
Ruano R, Bunduki V, Silva MM, Yoshizaki CT, Tanuri U, Macksoud JG, et al. Prenatal diagnosis and perinatal outcome of 38 cases with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: 8-year experience of a tertiary Brazilian center. Clinics 2006; 61: 197-202.
[29]
Smith NP, Jesudason EC, Featherstone NC, Corbett HJ, Losty PD: Recent advances in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Arch Dis Child 2005; 90 (4): 426–428.
[30]
28. Baglaj M: Late-presenting congenital diaphragmatic hernia in children: a clinical spectrum. Pediatr Surg Int 2004; 20 (9): 658– 669.
[31]
Wilson JM, Fauza DO, Lund DP, Benacerraf BR, Hendren WH. Antenatal diagnosis of isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia is not an indicator of outcome. J Pediatr Surg 1994; 29: 815-9.
[32]
Langer JC, Filler RM, bohn DJ, Shandling b, Ein SH, Wesson DE, Superina RA: Timing of surgery for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: is emergency operation necessary? J Pediatr Surg 1988; 23 (8): 731–734.
[33]
Smith NP, Jesudason EC, Featherstone NC, Corbett HJ, Losty PD: Recent advances in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Arch Dis Child 2005; 90 (4): 426–428.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
548 FASHION AVENUE
NEW YORK, NY 10018
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-688-8931