Comparison of Corporate Culture in Croatia and Germany

Marko Sharich; Bojan Rosi

doi:doi:10.11648/j.jbed.20190404.14

| Peer-Reviewed |

Comparison of Corporate Culture in Croatia and Germany

Marko Sharich, Bojan Rosi

Received: 10 October 2019 Accepted: 12 November 2019 Published: 13 December 2019

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The topic of the paper is a law that has found its place and application in Germany, and in Croatia it comes in a different form: the Law on the Co-decision of Workers. The co-decision law directly influences German corporate culture. The paper will outline the Act itself, its division, its structure, some general facts about how, when and where it was published, when it came into force, then we will enter into the history of co-decision. Also, a link to the Croatian Labor Code and a part equivalent to German law will be shown. At the end of the paper, a survey on the quality of corporate governance in the Republic of Croatia is presented. The principles of corporate governance of the OECD are important for the successful development of corporate culture. We used scientific methods to produce the work: The historical method involves the process by which various documents can be used to find out what has happened in the past and the course and causes of a particular event, the inductive-deductive method is used in explaining established or discovering new insights and laws, proving the set points, testing hypotheses and predicting future events, and the comparative method involves the process of comparing facts and phenomena with a tendency to identify differences and similarities.

DOI	10.11648/j.jbed.20190404.14
Published in	Journal of Business and Economic Development (Volume 4, Issue 4, December 2019)
Page(s)	149-154
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Corporate Culture, Co-decision, Union, Worker, Croatia, Germany, OECD

References

[1]	Lever P.; Kako Berlin vlada Europom, Profil 2018.
[2]	Tipurić D. Korporativno upravljanje, Sinergija, 2008.
[3]	Šarić, M. (2013). VAŽNOST RESTRUKTURIRANJA HRVATSKOG JAVNOG SEKTORA. Tranzicija, 15 (32), 131-143. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/112868 19.9.2018.
[4]	Šarić M., Šprem B. Elementi za formiranje kreditnog rejtinga, poglavlje u knjizi: „Instrumenti kontrolinga“, poslovna učinkovitost, Zagreb, 2017.
[5]	Šarić, Marko. 2018. “Croatia and Hungary, a Geo-Economical Position Within the European Union”. Account and Financial Management Journal 3 (04), 1472-79.
[6]	Šarić M. Važnost predstečajnog postupka, poslovna učinkovitost, Zagreb 2019.
[7]	Šarić M. 24. Diverzifikacija u funkciji poslovne izvrsnosti, poglavlje u knjizi: “MENADŽMENT I KONTROLING”, poslovna učinkovitost, Zagreb, 2018.
[8]	Zakon o suodlučivanju radnika, preuzet s poveznice: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/mitbestg/index.html posjećena stranica (2.9.2016.).
[9]	Časopis Mitbestimmung, 12/2007 dostupan na poveznici: http://www.boeckler.de/34820.htm (31.8.2016.).
[10]	Zakon o radu, preuzet s poveznice: http://www.zakon.hr/z/307/Zakon-o-radu (2.9.2016.).
[11]	Glas Koncila 36, od 5.9.2004. preuzeto sa stranice: http://www.glas-koncila.hr/index.php?option=com_php&Itemid=41&news_ID=1695, (31.8.2016.).
[12]	Deklaracija o pravima čovjeka, preuzeta s poveznice: https://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Op%C4%87a_deklaracija_o_pravima_%C4%8Dovjeka zadnji put posjećena (31.8.2016).
[13]	https://www.scribd.com/doc/297413656/Indeks-ekonomskih-sloboda-2016-Grafovi 19.8.2017.
[14]	Šarić M. Restrukturiranje i organizacija velikih javnih poduzeća: specijalistički poslijediplomski rad, Ekonomski fakultet Zagreb (2012).
[15]	Vlada RH: Strateški okvir za razvoj 2006-2013, Središnji državni ured za strategiji, ZAGREB, 2006.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Marko Sharich, Bojan Rosi. (2019). Comparison of Corporate Culture in Croatia and Germany. Journal of Business and Economic Development, 4(4), 149-154. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20190404.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Marko Sharich; Bojan Rosi. Comparison of Corporate Culture in Croatia and Germany. J. Bus. Econ. Dev. 2019, 4(4), 149-154. doi: 10.11648/j.jbed.20190404.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Marko Sharich, Bojan Rosi. Comparison of Corporate Culture in Croatia and Germany. J Bus Econ Dev. 2019;4(4):149-154. doi: 10.11648/j.jbed.20190404.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jbed.20190404.14,
  author = {Marko Sharich and Bojan Rosi},
  title = {Comparison of Corporate Culture in Croatia and Germany},
  journal = {Journal of Business and Economic Development},
  volume = {4},
  number = {4},
  pages = {149-154},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jbed.20190404.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20190404.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jbed.20190404.14},
  abstract = {The topic of the paper is a law that has found its place and application in Germany, and in Croatia it comes in a different form: the Law on the Co-decision of Workers. The co-decision law directly influences German corporate culture. The paper will outline the Act itself, its division, its structure, some general facts about how, when and where it was published, when it came into force, then we will enter into the history of co-decision. Also, a link to the Croatian Labor Code and a part equivalent to German law will be shown. At the end of the paper, a survey on the quality of corporate governance in the Republic of Croatia is presented. The principles of corporate governance of the OECD are important for the successful development of corporate culture. We used scientific methods to produce the work: The historical method involves the process by which various documents can be used to find out what has happened in the past and the course and causes of a particular event, the inductive-deductive method is used in explaining established or discovering new insights and laws, proving the set points, testing hypotheses and predicting future events, and the comparative method involves the process of comparing facts and phenomena with a tendency to identify differences and similarities.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Comparison of Corporate Culture in Croatia and Germany
AU  - Marko Sharich
AU  - Bojan Rosi
Y1  - 2019/12/13
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20190404.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.jbed.20190404.14
T2  - Journal of Business and Economic Development
JF  - Journal of Business and Economic Development
JO  - Journal of Business and Economic Development
SP  - 149
EP  - 154
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2637-3874
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20190404.14
AB  - The topic of the paper is a law that has found its place and application in Germany, and in Croatia it comes in a different form: the Law on the Co-decision of Workers. The co-decision law directly influences German corporate culture. The paper will outline the Act itself, its division, its structure, some general facts about how, when and where it was published, when it came into force, then we will enter into the history of co-decision. Also, a link to the Croatian Labor Code and a part equivalent to German law will be shown. At the end of the paper, a survey on the quality of corporate governance in the Republic of Croatia is presented. The principles of corporate governance of the OECD are important for the successful development of corporate culture. We used scientific methods to produce the work: The historical method involves the process by which various documents can be used to find out what has happened in the past and the course and causes of a particular event, the inductive-deductive method is used in explaining established or discovering new insights and laws, proving the set points, testing hypotheses and predicting future events, and the comparative method involves the process of comparing facts and phenomena with a tendency to identify differences and similarities.
VL  - 4
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Marko Sharich

Faculty of Logistics, University of Maribor, Slovenia, Europa
Bojan Rosi

Faculty of Logistics, University of Maribor, Slovenia, Europa

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Marko Sharich, Bojan Rosi. (2019). Comparison of Corporate Culture in Croatia and Germany. Journal of Business and Economic Development, 4(4), 149-154. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20190404.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Marko Sharich; Bojan Rosi. Comparison of Corporate Culture in Croatia and Germany. J. Bus. Econ. Dev. 2019, 4(4), 149-154. doi: 10.11648/j.jbed.20190404.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Marko Sharich, Bojan Rosi. Comparison of Corporate Culture in Croatia and Germany. J Bus Econ Dev. 2019;4(4):149-154. doi: 10.11648/j.jbed.20190404.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jbed.20190404.14,
  author = {Marko Sharich and Bojan Rosi},
  title = {Comparison of Corporate Culture in Croatia and Germany},
  journal = {Journal of Business and Economic Development},
  volume = {4},
  number = {4},
  pages = {149-154},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jbed.20190404.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20190404.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jbed.20190404.14},
  abstract = {The topic of the paper is a law that has found its place and application in Germany, and in Croatia it comes in a different form: the Law on the Co-decision of Workers. The co-decision law directly influences German corporate culture. The paper will outline the Act itself, its division, its structure, some general facts about how, when and where it was published, when it came into force, then we will enter into the history of co-decision. Also, a link to the Croatian Labor Code and a part equivalent to German law will be shown. At the end of the paper, a survey on the quality of corporate governance in the Republic of Croatia is presented. The principles of corporate governance of the OECD are important for the successful development of corporate culture. We used scientific methods to produce the work: The historical method involves the process by which various documents can be used to find out what has happened in the past and the course and causes of a particular event, the inductive-deductive method is used in explaining established or discovering new insights and laws, proving the set points, testing hypotheses and predicting future events, and the comparative method involves the process of comparing facts and phenomena with a tendency to identify differences and similarities.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Comparison of Corporate Culture in Croatia and Germany
AU  - Marko Sharich
AU  - Bojan Rosi
Y1  - 2019/12/13
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20190404.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.jbed.20190404.14
T2  - Journal of Business and Economic Development
JF  - Journal of Business and Economic Development
JO  - Journal of Business and Economic Development
SP  - 149
EP  - 154
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2637-3874
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20190404.14
AB  - The topic of the paper is a law that has found its place and application in Germany, and in Croatia it comes in a different form: the Law on the Co-decision of Workers. The co-decision law directly influences German corporate culture. The paper will outline the Act itself, its division, its structure, some general facts about how, when and where it was published, when it came into force, then we will enter into the history of co-decision. Also, a link to the Croatian Labor Code and a part equivalent to German law will be shown. At the end of the paper, a survey on the quality of corporate governance in the Republic of Croatia is presented. The principles of corporate governance of the OECD are important for the successful development of corporate culture. We used scientific methods to produce the work: The historical method involves the process by which various documents can be used to find out what has happened in the past and the course and causes of a particular event, the inductive-deductive method is used in explaining established or discovering new insights and laws, proving the set points, testing hypotheses and predicting future events, and the comparative method involves the process of comparing facts and phenomena with a tendency to identify differences and similarities.
VL  - 4
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download