Please enter verification code
Empathize and Sympathize with Less Privileged Academic Fraternity
Higher Education Research
Volume 5, Issue 4, August 2020, Pages: 162-166
Received: Jul. 15, 2020; Accepted: Aug. 3, 2020; Published: Aug. 13, 2020
Views 192      Downloads 49
Adhikarla Suryanarayana Rao, Department of Biotechnology, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, India
Article Tools
Follow on us
Academic fraternity in different countries of the world though work honestly, face several hurdles to project themselves—a fact that needs to be realized. In this context it is definitely fair to say that it was unfortunate in the past to defame a very a large number of authors and journals and continue to nurture this attitude till today. Authors pursuing their endeavors honestly are demoralized. Personal experiences cannot be documented but are only spread by word of mouth. Both on the basis of personal experiences and available documented data, no one is so sacrosanct. Fact of enormous pressure of gargantuan expansion in higher education has to be viewed from all angles. One most important aspect of this is, authors all over the world-even with all their limitations- wish to establish an evidence of their work & contribution and project their academic concern and caliber at the earliest. Maligning publishers and maligning authors / academic institutions is an unfortunate thing. International scientific community should adopt a friendly policy towards all. Let every candidate-at whatever level one may be-be interrogated and evaluated in person by the concerned employer for whatever may be the purpose. Hence, maligning of journals and candidates in any form may be avoided.
Journal Controversy, Differential Relevance of Research, Gargantuan Number of Researchers, Resource Crunch, Academic Pressures, Limitation of Publishing Space
To cite this article
Adhikarla Suryanarayana Rao, Empathize and Sympathize with Less Privileged Academic Fraternity, Higher Education Research. Vol. 5, No. 4, 2020, pp. 162-166. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20200504.17
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Cathy Vakil (2019) Predatory journals-Authors and readers beware. Canadian Family Physicians, 65: 92-94. PMC 6515480.
Countries in Asia-
Countries in Africa-
List of African countries by population-
How much does your country invest in R & D?
GDP per capita-
GDP by country-
Shen, C. and Björk, B. C. (2015) Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Med. 13: 230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2.
Moher D. et al (2017) Stop this waste of people, animals and money. Nature, 549: 23-25. doi:/10.1038/549023a.
Ish Kumar Dhammi and Rehan-Ul-Haq (2018) Rejection of Manuscripts: Problems and Solutions. Indian J Orthop. 52: 97-99. doi:/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtha_68_18.
Hall, S. A. and Wilcox, A. J. (2007). The fate of epidemiologic manuscripts: A study of papers submitted to epidemiology. Epidemiology. 18: 262-265. 10.1097/01.ede.0000254668.63378.32.
Wager, E. Getting Research Published. Oxon, UK: Radcliffe Publishing Ltd; 2005.
[24] (November 13, 2018).
Retractions rise to nearly 700 in fiscal year 2015- this-is-our-3000th-post/.
The Retraction Watch Retrieved 2019-08-06.
Jeffrey Brainard (2018) Rethinking retractions. Science, 362: 390-393. doi: 10.1126/science.362.6413.390.
Alison Maccok (2018) One publisher, more than 700 retractions. Science, 362: 393. doi: 10.1126/science.362.6413.394.
Alison Maccok (2018) Fallout for co-authors. Science, 362: 394-395. doi: 10.1126/science.362.6413.394-b.
Countries in the world-
How many countries are there 2020?--
World University Rankings 2019 | Times Higher Education (THE) › 2019.
David Cyranoski, Natasha Gilbert, Heidi Ledford, Anjali Nayar and Mohammed Yahia (2011). The PhD factory. 472: Nature, 276-279. doi: /10.1038/472276a.
Taylor, M. (2011). Reform the PhD system or close it down. Nature 472: 261. doi: /10.1038/4722761a.
Fiske, P. (2011). What is a PhD really worth?. Nature 472: 381. doi: /10.1038/472280a.
Alison McCook (2011) Education: Rethinking PhDs. Nature 472: 280-282.
Editorial-Fix the PhD (2011). Nature 472: 259-260. doi: /10.1038/472259b.
Anjali Nayar (2011). Developing world: educating India. Nature, 472: 24-26. doi: /10.1038/472024a.
Bharath Kancharla (2019)-October 22 Factly- higher-education-improves-but-challenges-remain%EF%BB%BF/.
Max Roser and Esteban Ortiz-Ospina (2013) Tertiary Education-
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186