Earthquake Vulnerability Zonation of Mashhad Urban Fabric by Combining the Quantitative Models in GIS, Northeast of Iran

Mohammad Reza Mansouri Daneshvar; Somayeh Rezayi; Sarah Khosravi

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijepp.20130104.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Earthquake Vulnerability Zonation of Mashhad Urban Fabric by Combining the Quantitative Models in GIS, Northeast of Iran

Mohammad Reza Mansouri Daneshvar, Somayeh Rezayi, Sarah Khosravi

Published in International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy (Volume 1, Issue 4)

Received: 27 August 2013 Accepted: Published: 30 September 2013

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

In this study, we determined vulnerability levels of urban fabrics against earthquake risk using spatial factors. Therefore to classify risk vulnerability zones of the Mashhad urban fabric we used parameters such as ratio of open spaces, size of lands differentiation, population density, occupied area by buildings, age of buildings, deteriorated urban fabrics, proximity to faults, and seismic grading. These parameters are derived based on Mashhad municipality districts then weighted by Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and combined by the Standard Score Model in geographic information system (GIS). The results indicated that: first, the central district and districts of eight, three and four in Mashhad have the most fabric vulnerability against earthquakes, respectively. Second, the urban texture of municipal districts containing districts of nine, seven, six and ten have less vulnerability against earthquakes, respectively. Third, the parameters analysis using AHP exhibited the weighty value for lands differentiation parameter while, the correlation test revealed that the strong correlation between deteriorated urban fabrics and the final zoning map (R2 equal to 0.75).

Published in	International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy (Volume 1, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijepp.20130104.11
Page(s)	44-49
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Geographic Information System (GIS), Standard Score Model, Vulnerability

References

[1]	Baz I, Geymen A (2009). Development and application of GIS-based analysis/ synthesis modeling techniques for urban planning of Istanbul Metropolitan Area, Advances in Engineering Software 40(2):128–140.
[2]	Clark JK, McChesney R, Munroe DK, Irwin EG (2009). Spatial characteristics of exurban settlement pattern in the United States, Landscape and Urban Planning 90(3–4):178–188.
[3]	Crichton D, Salt JE (2001). The implications of climate change for the insurance industry: an update and outlook to 2020, Building Research Establishment, Watford, England. 69 pp.
[4]	Cutter SL, Mitchell JT (2000). Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: a case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90 (4):713–737.
[5]	De Leon JCV (2006). Vulnerability a conceptual and methodological review, United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security. 64 pp.
[6]	Fedeski M, Gwilliam J (2007). Urban sustainability in the presence of flood and geological hazards: The development of a GIS-based vulnerability and risk assessment methodology, Landscape and Urban Planning 83(1):50–61.
[7]	Gueguen P, Michel C, LeCorre L (2007). A simplified approach for vulnerability assessment in moderate-to-low seismic hazard regions: application to Grenoble (France), Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 5(3):467–490.
[8]	Geological survey of Iran, Geological sheet of k-4, Scale 1:250,000. via http://www.gsi.ir.
[9]	Geological survey of Iran, Topographical sheets of 79623, 79624, 78621 and 78623, Scale 1:50,000. via http://www.gsi.ir.
[10]	Giammarinaro MS, Alletti M, Azzara RM, Canzoneri V, Maiorana S, Rovelli A, Tertulliani A, Vallone P (2003). Natural hazard assessment through an oriented GIS. Geophysical Research Abstracts 5:12961
[11]	Inel M, Senel SM, Toprak S, Manav Y (2008). Seismic risk assessment of buildings in urban areas: a case study for Denizli, Turkey. Natural Hazards 46(3):265–285.
[12]	Iranian meteorological organization; IRIMO, Statistical information of Mashhad synoptic station, in a 10-year time period of 1997-2006. via http://www.irimo.ir.
[13]	Japan International Cooperation Agency; JICA (2000). The study on seismic micro-zoning of greater Tehran area in the Iran, Tehran municipality, Iran.
[14]	Lantada N, Pujades LG, Barbat A (2003). Vulnerability and seismic damage scenarios for Barcelona (Spain) by using GIS, Geophysical Research Abstracts 5:09103.
[15]	Martelli L, Filippini M, Bagli S, Severi P, Tomasseti F (2007). Seismic risk reduction: a local effects map for territorial and urban planning; The example of the Rimini Territorial plan. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica e Applicata 48(2):151–162.
[16]	Menoni, S., (2001). Chains of damages and failures in a metropolitan environment: Some observations on the Kobe earthquake in 1995. Journal of Hazardous Materials 86(1–3):101–119.
[17]	Hampton SD, Lee JS, Tolbert NL, McLaren TM, Navarro CM, Myers JD, Spencer BF, Elnashai AS (2008). MAEviz: bridging the time-from discovery gap between seismic research and decision making, Proceedings of 4th IEEE international conference on e-science, Indianapolis, 7–12 Dec 2008.
[18]	Paskaleva, I, Silvia D, Panza Giuliano GF, Franco V (2007). An earthquake scenario for the micro zonation of Sofia and the vulnerability of structures designed by use of the Eurocodes, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 27(11):1028–1041.
[19]	Petermans T, Devleeschouwer X, Pouriel F, Rosset P (2006). Mapping the local seismic hazard in the urban area of Brussels, Belgium. Proceedings of the 10th IAEG congress, Nottingham.
[20]	Prowse, M., (2003). Towards a clear understanding of vulnerability in relation to chronic poverty. Chronic poverty research centre working paper, University of Manchester 24.
[21]	Ren AZ, Xie XY (2004). The simulation of post-earthquake fire-prone area based on GIS, Journal of Fire Sciences, 22(5):421–439.
[22]	Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2001). Models, methods, concepts, and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Kluwer Academic, Boston. 333 pp.
[23]	Saaty TL (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15(3):234– 281.
[24]	Saaty TL, (1980). The analytical hierarchy process. McGraw Hill, New York, 350 pp.
[25]	Statistical Centre of Iran, (2006). Macro results of statistical survey. via http://www.amar.org.ir.
[26]	Turner BL, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Eckley N, Kasperson J, Luers A, Martello ML, Polsky C, Pulsipher A, Schiller A (2003). A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(14): 8074-8080.
[27]	Umemura K., Murao O, Yamazaki F (2000). Development of GIS-based building damage database for the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Proceedings of 21th Asian conference on remote sensing, Taipei, Taiwan.
[28]	Voulgaris N, Vassilakis E, Parcharidis I, Soukis K, Alexopoulos J (2003). A GIS based application for seismic risk operational response support. Geophysical Research Abstracts 5:10195.
[29]	Xu F, Chen X, Aizhu R, Xinzheng L (2008). Earthquake disaster simulation for an urban area, with GIS, CAD, FEA and VR integration. Proceedings of the 12th international conference on computing in civil and building engineering, Beijing, China.
[30]	Youhai G, Qimin F, Jing j (2006). A GIS-based earthquake and tsunami emergency command system for seaside cities. Journal of Ocean University of China 5(2):181–186.
[31]	Zaincenco A, Alkaz V (2005). Urban seismic risk studies with utilization of GIS. NATO advanced workshop on "foresight, precaution and risk: preparing for the unexpected", Chisinau, Republic of Moldova.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Mohammad Reza Mansouri Daneshvar, Somayeh Rezayi, Sarah Khosravi. (2013). Earthquake Vulnerability Zonation of Mashhad Urban Fabric by Combining the Quantitative Models in GIS, Northeast of Iran. International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy, 1(4), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20130104.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Mohammad Reza Mansouri Daneshvar; Somayeh Rezayi; Sarah Khosravi. Earthquake Vulnerability Zonation of Mashhad Urban Fabric by Combining the Quantitative Models in GIS, Northeast of Iran. Int. J. Environ. Prot. Policy 2013, 1(4), 44-49. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepp.20130104.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Mohammad Reza Mansouri Daneshvar, Somayeh Rezayi, Sarah Khosravi. Earthquake Vulnerability Zonation of Mashhad Urban Fabric by Combining the Quantitative Models in GIS, Northeast of Iran. Int J Environ Prot Policy. 2013;1(4):44-49. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepp.20130104.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijepp.20130104.11,
  author = {Mohammad Reza Mansouri Daneshvar and Somayeh Rezayi and Sarah Khosravi},
  title = {Earthquake Vulnerability Zonation of Mashhad Urban Fabric by Combining the Quantitative Models in GIS, Northeast of Iran},
  journal = {International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy},
  volume = {1},
  number = {4},
  pages = {44-49},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijepp.20130104.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20130104.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijepp.20130104.11},
  abstract = {In this study, we determined vulnerability levels of urban fabrics against earthquake risk using spatial factors. Therefore to classify risk vulnerability zones of the Mashhad urban fabric we used parameters such as ratio of open spaces, size of lands differentiation, population density, occupied area by buildings, age of buildings, deteriorated urban fabrics, proximity to faults, and seismic grading. These parameters are derived based on Mashhad municipality districts then weighted by Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and combined by the Standard Score Model in geographic information system (GIS). The results indicated that: first, the central district and districts of eight, three and four in Mashhad have the most fabric vulnerability against earthquakes, respectively. Second, the urban texture of municipal districts containing districts of nine, seven, six and ten have less vulnerability against earthquakes, respectively. Third, the parameters analysis using AHP exhibited the weighty value for lands differentiation parameter while, the correlation test revealed that the strong correlation between deteriorated urban fabrics and the final zoning map (R2 equal to 0.75).},
 year = {2013}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Earthquake Vulnerability Zonation of Mashhad Urban Fabric by Combining the Quantitative Models in GIS, Northeast of Iran
AU  - Mohammad Reza Mansouri Daneshvar
AU  - Somayeh Rezayi
AU  - Sarah Khosravi
Y1  - 2013/09/30
PY  - 2013
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20130104.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijepp.20130104.11
T2  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
JF  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
JO  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
SP  - 44
EP  - 49
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-7536
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20130104.11
AB  - In this study, we determined vulnerability levels of urban fabrics against earthquake risk using spatial factors. Therefore to classify risk vulnerability zones of the Mashhad urban fabric we used parameters such as ratio of open spaces, size of lands differentiation, population density, occupied area by buildings, age of buildings, deteriorated urban fabrics, proximity to faults, and seismic grading. These parameters are derived based on Mashhad municipality districts then weighted by Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and combined by the Standard Score Model in geographic information system (GIS). The results indicated that: first, the central district and districts of eight, three and four in Mashhad have the most fabric vulnerability against earthquakes, respectively. Second, the urban texture of municipal districts containing districts of nine, seven, six and ten have less vulnerability against earthquakes, respectively. Third, the parameters analysis using AHP exhibited the weighty value for lands differentiation parameter while, the correlation test revealed that the strong correlation between deteriorated urban fabrics and the final zoning map (R2 equal to 0.75).
VL  - 1
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Mohammad Reza Mansouri Daneshvar

Department of Physical Geography, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
Somayeh Rezayi

Department of Geography and Rural Planning, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran
Sarah Khosravi

Department of Urban Planning and Design, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Mohammad Reza Mansouri Daneshvar, Somayeh Rezayi, Sarah Khosravi. (2013). Earthquake Vulnerability Zonation of Mashhad Urban Fabric by Combining the Quantitative Models in GIS, Northeast of Iran. International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy, 1(4), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20130104.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Mohammad Reza Mansouri Daneshvar; Somayeh Rezayi; Sarah Khosravi. Earthquake Vulnerability Zonation of Mashhad Urban Fabric by Combining the Quantitative Models in GIS, Northeast of Iran. Int. J. Environ. Prot. Policy 2013, 1(4), 44-49. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepp.20130104.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Mohammad Reza Mansouri Daneshvar, Somayeh Rezayi, Sarah Khosravi. Earthquake Vulnerability Zonation of Mashhad Urban Fabric by Combining the Quantitative Models in GIS, Northeast of Iran. Int J Environ Prot Policy. 2013;1(4):44-49. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepp.20130104.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijepp.20130104.11,
  author = {Mohammad Reza Mansouri Daneshvar and Somayeh Rezayi and Sarah Khosravi},
  title = {Earthquake Vulnerability Zonation of Mashhad Urban Fabric by Combining the Quantitative Models in GIS, Northeast of Iran},
  journal = {International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy},
  volume = {1},
  number = {4},
  pages = {44-49},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijepp.20130104.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20130104.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijepp.20130104.11},
  abstract = {In this study, we determined vulnerability levels of urban fabrics against earthquake risk using spatial factors. Therefore to classify risk vulnerability zones of the Mashhad urban fabric we used parameters such as ratio of open spaces, size of lands differentiation, population density, occupied area by buildings, age of buildings, deteriorated urban fabrics, proximity to faults, and seismic grading. These parameters are derived based on Mashhad municipality districts then weighted by Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and combined by the Standard Score Model in geographic information system (GIS). The results indicated that: first, the central district and districts of eight, three and four in Mashhad have the most fabric vulnerability against earthquakes, respectively. Second, the urban texture of municipal districts containing districts of nine, seven, six and ten have less vulnerability against earthquakes, respectively. Third, the parameters analysis using AHP exhibited the weighty value for lands differentiation parameter while, the correlation test revealed that the strong correlation between deteriorated urban fabrics and the final zoning map (R2 equal to 0.75).},
 year = {2013}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Earthquake Vulnerability Zonation of Mashhad Urban Fabric by Combining the Quantitative Models in GIS, Northeast of Iran
AU  - Mohammad Reza Mansouri Daneshvar
AU  - Somayeh Rezayi
AU  - Sarah Khosravi
Y1  - 2013/09/30
PY  - 2013
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20130104.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijepp.20130104.11
T2  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
JF  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
JO  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
SP  - 44
EP  - 49
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-7536
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20130104.11
AB  - In this study, we determined vulnerability levels of urban fabrics against earthquake risk using spatial factors. Therefore to classify risk vulnerability zones of the Mashhad urban fabric we used parameters such as ratio of open spaces, size of lands differentiation, population density, occupied area by buildings, age of buildings, deteriorated urban fabrics, proximity to faults, and seismic grading. These parameters are derived based on Mashhad municipality districts then weighted by Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and combined by the Standard Score Model in geographic information system (GIS). The results indicated that: first, the central district and districts of eight, three and four in Mashhad have the most fabric vulnerability against earthquakes, respectively. Second, the urban texture of municipal districts containing districts of nine, seven, six and ten have less vulnerability against earthquakes, respectively. Third, the parameters analysis using AHP exhibited the weighty value for lands differentiation parameter while, the correlation test revealed that the strong correlation between deteriorated urban fabrics and the final zoning map (R2 equal to 0.75).
VL  - 1
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download