Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

| Peer-Reviewed |

Long-Term Outcomes of Pelvic Organ Prolapse by Laparoscopic Butterfly Suspension

Received: 21 May 2018    Accepted: 04 June 2018    Published: 28 June 2018
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Aim The study aimed to investigate the long clinic value of laparoscopic colpo-uterine butterfly suspension for pelvic organ prolapse. Methods Ninety-three patients who underwent the laparoscopic colpo-uterine butterfly suspension from December 2012 to May 2018 at the first affiliated hospital of zhengzhou university were analyzed in a retrospective study. Baseline characteristics and perioperative data were recorded. The POP quantification (POP-Q) system indicates the pre- and post-operative data. Respectively,the symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQL) and Sexual function were evaluated by the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) and the Pelvic organ prolapse urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Results In 5 years’ follow-up, the objective cure ratio reached 97.8%, and the subjective success rate of the laparoscopic colpo-uterine butterfly suspension was 93.5%. Two cases was identified as clinical relapse. There was only one abdominal erosion during the long-term follow-up. The quality of life had improved significantly without any genital symptoms. No patients abstained from sex due to the operation or postoperative sexual discomfort. Conclusions The laparoscopic colpo-uterine butterfly suspension is a safe, feasible and highly effective technique that offers a good long-term results for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, also a good option for sexually active women.

DOI 10.11648/j.jgo.20180603.15
Published in Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Volume 6, Issue 3, May 2018)
Page(s) 67-70
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Colpo-uterine Suspension, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Laparoscopic, Erosion, Sexually Active

References
[1] Rortveit G, Brown JS, Thom DH, et al. Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: prevalence and risk factors in a population-based, racially diverse cohort. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 1396-1403.
[2] Gyhagen M, Bullarbo M, Nielsen TF, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse 20 years after childbirth: a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or caesarean delivery. BJOG 2013; 120: 152-60.
[3] Digesu G, Chaliha C, Salvatore S, et al. The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life. BJOG 2005: 112: 971-976.
[4] Chan SS, Cheung RY, Yiu KW, et al. Symptoms, quality of life, and factors affecting women's treatment decisions regarding pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2012; 23: 1027-33.
[5] Haya N, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, et al. Prolapse and continence surgery in countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in 2012. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 755 e751-27.
[6] Cheon C, Maher C. Economics of pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J 2013; 24: 1873-6.
[7] Withagen, M. I., Milani, A. L., den Boon, J. Trocar-guided mesh compared with conventional vaginal repair in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117, 242-50.
[8] Sivaslioglu, A. A., Unlubilgin, E., Dolen, I. A randomized comparison of polypropylene mesh surgery with site-specific surgery in the treatment of cystocoele. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008; 19, 467-71.
[9] Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. AmJ Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175: 10-7.
[10] Chan SS, Cheung RY, Yiu AK, et al. Chinese validation of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ). Int Urogynecol J 2011; 22: 1305-12.
[11] Zhu L, Yu S, Xu T, Yang X, Lu Y, Lang J. Validation of the Chinese version of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire short form (PISQ-12). Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2012; 116 (2): 117-9.
[12] Swift SE, Tate SB, Nicholas J. Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 372-377.
[13] Shunshuang Li, Mei Ji, Zhao Zhao. The effectiveness of two different laparoscopic surgeries for apical support of pelvic organ prolapse. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2015; 188: 74-78.
[14] Maher CF, Feiner B, DeCuyper EM, et al. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy versus total vaginal mesh for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204: 360. e1-360.e7.
[15] Withagen MI, Milani AL, den Boon J, et al. Trocar-guided mesh compared with conventional vaginal repair in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 242-250.
[16] de Landsheere, L. Changes in elastin density in different locations of the vaginal wall in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2014; 25, 1673-1681.
[17] Vollebregt, A., Fischer, K., Gietelink, D. et al. Primary surgical repair of anterior vaginal prolapse: a randomised trial comparing anatomical and functional outcome between anterior colporrhaphy and trocar-guided transobturator anterior mesh. BJOG 2011; 118, 1518-27.
[18] Nieminen, K, Hiltunen R, Takala T, et al. Outcomes after anterior vaginal wall repair with mesh: a randomized, controlled trial with a 3 year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203, e1-8.
[19] F. CECI, E. SPAZIANI, S. CORELLI, et al. Technique and outcomes about a new laparoscopic procedure: the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Suspension (POPS). G Chir 2013; 34: 141-144.
[20] Bousserghine Y, Droupy S, Wagner L, et al. Denovo stress urinary incontinence following sacral colpopexy. Prog Urol 2011; 21: 631-5.
[21] Diwadkar GB, Barber MD, Feiner B, et al. Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113: 367-373.
Author Information
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China

  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China

  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China

  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Shunshuang Li, Mei Ji, Xianlan Zhao, Xiaoyan Zhang. (2018). Long-Term Outcomes of Pelvic Organ Prolapse by Laparoscopic Butterfly Suspension. Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 6(3), 67-70. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20180603.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Shunshuang Li; Mei Ji; Xianlan Zhao; Xiaoyan Zhang. Long-Term Outcomes of Pelvic Organ Prolapse by Laparoscopic Butterfly Suspension. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2018, 6(3), 67-70. doi: 10.11648/j.jgo.20180603.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Shunshuang Li, Mei Ji, Xianlan Zhao, Xiaoyan Zhang. Long-Term Outcomes of Pelvic Organ Prolapse by Laparoscopic Butterfly Suspension. J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;6(3):67-70. doi: 10.11648/j.jgo.20180603.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.jgo.20180603.15,
      author = {Shunshuang Li and Mei Ji and Xianlan Zhao and Xiaoyan Zhang},
      title = {Long-Term Outcomes of Pelvic Organ Prolapse by Laparoscopic Butterfly Suspension},
      journal = {Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics},
      volume = {6},
      number = {3},
      pages = {67-70},
      doi = {10.11648/j.jgo.20180603.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20180603.15},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jgo.20180603.15},
      abstract = {Aim The study aimed to investigate the long clinic value of laparoscopic colpo-uterine butterfly suspension for pelvic organ prolapse. Methods Ninety-three patients who underwent the laparoscopic colpo-uterine butterfly suspension from December 2012 to May 2018 at the first affiliated hospital of zhengzhou university were analyzed in a retrospective study. Baseline characteristics and perioperative data were recorded. The POP quantification (POP-Q) system indicates the pre- and post-operative data. Respectively,the symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQL) and Sexual function were evaluated by the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) and the Pelvic organ prolapse urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Results In 5 years’ follow-up, the objective cure ratio reached 97.8%, and the subjective success rate of the laparoscopic colpo-uterine butterfly suspension was 93.5%. Two cases was identified as clinical relapse. There was only one abdominal erosion during the long-term follow-up. The quality of life had improved significantly without any genital symptoms. No patients abstained from sex due to the operation or postoperative sexual discomfort. Conclusions The laparoscopic colpo-uterine butterfly suspension is a safe, feasible and highly effective technique that offers a good long-term results for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, also a good option for sexually active women.},
     year = {2018}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Long-Term Outcomes of Pelvic Organ Prolapse by Laparoscopic Butterfly Suspension
    AU  - Shunshuang Li
    AU  - Mei Ji
    AU  - Xianlan Zhao
    AU  - Xiaoyan Zhang
    Y1  - 2018/06/28
    PY  - 2018
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20180603.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.jgo.20180603.15
    T2  - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
    JF  - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
    JO  - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
    SP  - 67
    EP  - 70
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2376-7820
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20180603.15
    AB  - Aim The study aimed to investigate the long clinic value of laparoscopic colpo-uterine butterfly suspension for pelvic organ prolapse. Methods Ninety-three patients who underwent the laparoscopic colpo-uterine butterfly suspension from December 2012 to May 2018 at the first affiliated hospital of zhengzhou university were analyzed in a retrospective study. Baseline characteristics and perioperative data were recorded. The POP quantification (POP-Q) system indicates the pre- and post-operative data. Respectively,the symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQL) and Sexual function were evaluated by the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) and the Pelvic organ prolapse urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Results In 5 years’ follow-up, the objective cure ratio reached 97.8%, and the subjective success rate of the laparoscopic colpo-uterine butterfly suspension was 93.5%. Two cases was identified as clinical relapse. There was only one abdominal erosion during the long-term follow-up. The quality of life had improved significantly without any genital symptoms. No patients abstained from sex due to the operation or postoperative sexual discomfort. Conclusions The laparoscopic colpo-uterine butterfly suspension is a safe, feasible and highly effective technique that offers a good long-term results for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, also a good option for sexually active women.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections