Mean Values, Normal Limits and Sex Differences of Anthropometry of Young Adults in a University Community in Nigeria
American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Volume 3, Issue 1, January 2015, Pages: 44-47
Received: Dec. 28, 2014;
Accepted: Jan. 26, 2015;
Published: Feb. 2, 2015
Views 2822 Downloads 242
Oluwadare Ogunlade, Department of Physiological Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
Olusoji Adeola Adalumo, Department of Physiological Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
This study assessed the weight, height, body mass index (BMI) and body surface area (BSA) of young adults at Ile-Ife with a view of determining the mean values, normal limits and sex differences in the anthropometric parameters. Four hundred and eighty four (242 males and 242 females) subjects aged between 18-41 years (inclusive) were recruited for the study. The participants were age and sex-matched (mean age: 22.81±3.83years). The weight and height of the subjects were obtained using standard techniques while BMI and BSA were calculated as derivatives of height and weight. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Normal limits for height, weight and BSA were determined using 5th and 95th percentiles while normal limits for BMI were determined using 5th and 85th percentiles. The mean ± SD and normal limits of weight, height, BMI and BSA for the 484 participants were 60.94 ± 9.60kg (47.00-79.75kg), 1.67± 0.85m (1.54-1.82m), 21.82±3.02kg/ m2 (17.80-24.83 kg/ m2) and 1.68 ± 0.15m2 (1.45-1.96 m2). Among males and females respectively, the mean weight [63.43± 9.11kg and 58.46 ± 9.46kg (p <0.001, t =5.9)], height [1.72 ± 0.07m and 1.62 ± 0.07 m2 (p < 0.001, t = 15.03)], BMI [21.43 ± 2.62 and 22.20 ± 3.33(p =0.01, t = -2.83)] and BSA [1.75±0.14m2 and 1.62 ±0.13m2 (p< 0.001, t =10.34] showed significant statistical differences. The normal limits for weight, height, BMI and BSA in males and females respectively were; 50.56-82.00kg and 45.56-75.00kg; 1.61-1.85m and 1.53-1.73m; 17.80-26.90 and 17.80-28.79 and 1.53-2.00m2 and 1.41-1.87m2. BMI was significantly higher in females while other anthropometric parameters were significantly higher in males. This study provides data on anthropometric parameters among young adult Nigerians as reference values for physiological and pathophysiological evaluation and clinical management. Significant sex differences exist among young adult Nigerians with regards to weight, height, BMI and BSA. So, sex should be taken into consideration in classification of young adult Nigerians using anthropometry.
Olusoji Adeola Adalumo,
Mean Values, Normal Limits and Sex Differences of Anthropometry of Young Adults in a University Community in Nigeria, American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine.
Vol. 3, No. 1,
2015, pp. 44-47.
WHO Expert Committee on Physical Status: The use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO expert committee. WHO technical report series: 854.
M.E.J. Lean, T.S. Han, H. Bush, A.S. Anderson, H. Bradby, and R. Williams, Ethnic differences in anthropometric and lifestyle measures related to coronary heart disease risk between South Asian , Italian and general population British women living in the west of Scotland. International Journal of Obesity.2001, 25pp 1800-1805.
L. Yu-Cheng, J.M. Wang and E. M. Wang, The comparison of anthropometric characteristics among four peoples in East Asia. Applied Ergonomics.2004; 35pp173-178.
R.D. Mosteller, Simplified calculation of body surface area. New England Journal of Medicine.1987; 317(17), pp1098.
W.P.T. James, C.Chen and S. Inoue, Appropriate Asian body mass indices? Obesity Review, 2002; 3 pp139.
WHO expert consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. The Lancet, 2004 pp157-163.
WHO/IASO/IOTF. The Asia-Pacific perspective: redefining obesity and its treatment. Health Communications Australia: Melbourne, 2000.
A. Igiri, M. Ekong, C. Ogan and P. Odey. Body mass index measure of young adult Nigerians residents in the Calabar Metropolis. The Internet Journal of Biological Anthropology. 2008,2 : 2.
R.A. Adedoyin, C. E. Mbada, L.A. Bisiriyu, R.A. Adebayo, M.O. Balogun and A.O. Akintomide, Relationship of anthropometric indicators with blood pressure levels and the risk of hypertension in Nigerian. Int J Gen Med. 2008, 1 pp33–40.
R. El Edelbi, S. Lindemalm and S. Eksborg. Estimation of body surface area in various childhood ages-validation of the Mosteller formula. Acta Paediatr.2012,101pp 540-544.
A. E. Orimolade and A.O. Omisanjo. Evaluation of five formulae for estimating body surface area of Nigerian children. Ann Med Health Sci Res.2014,4(6)pp 889-898.
R.H.J. Mathijssen, F.A. DeJong, W. J.Loos, J.M. Van Der Bol, J.Verweij. Flat-fixed dosing versus body surface-based dosing of anticancer drugs in adults: Does it make a difference?. The Oncologist. 2007,12 pp 913–923.
R.M. Lang, M. Bierig, R.B. Devereux, F. A. Flachskampf, E. Foster, P.A. Pellikka, M.H. Picard, M. J. Roman, J. Seward, J. Shanewise, S. Solomon, K.T. Spencer, M. J. Sutton and W. Stewart. Recommendation for chamber quantification. Eur J Echocardiography,2006,7 pp79-108
J. Wanger, J.L. Clausen, A. Coates, O.F. Pedersen, V. Brusasco, F. Burgos, R. Casaburi, R. Crapo, P. Enright, C.P.M. van der Grinten, P. Gustafsson, J. Hankinson, R. Jensen, D. Johnson, N. MacIntyre, R. McKay, M.R. Miller, D. Navajas, R. Pellegrino and G. Viegi. Standardisation of the measurement of lung volumes. Eur Respir J.2005, 26 pp511–522
M. Aslam, A. Saeed, G.R. Pasha and S. Altaf. Gender differences of body mass index in Adults of Pakistan: A case study of Multan City. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition.2010, 9 (2) pp162-166.
P. M. Lopez, R. Fernandez-Ballesteros, M.D. Zamarron and S. R. Lopez. Anthropometric, body composition and health determinants of active ageing: A gender approach. J. Biosoc. Sci.2011,43 pp 597-610.