Information Management and Accountability for Multisectoral Nutrition Implementation in Burkina-Faso
Science Journal of Public Health
Volume 8, Issue 5, September 2020, Pages: 130-140
Received: Aug. 29, 2020; Accepted: Sep. 16, 2020; Published: Sep. 23, 2020
Views 51      Downloads 42
Authors
Dieudonne Diasso, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University Joseph KI-ZERBO, Ouagadougou, Burkina-Faso
Maimouna Halidou Doudou, School of Public Health, Free University of Brussels (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
Florence Tonnoir, United Nations Network for the Scaling Up Nutrition Movement, World Food Programme (WFP), Rome, Italy
Sarah Cruz, United Nations Network for the Scaling Up Nutrition Movement, World Food Programme (WFP), Rome, Italy
Aly Savadogo, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University Joseph KI-ZERBO, Ouagadougou, Burkina-Faso
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
The successful implementation of multisectoral operational plans in Burkina-Faso depends largely on the involvement and commitment of the technical departments from the key contributing sectors. The objective of this evaluation study is to analyze the capacities of the technical structures at the central level, and Regional Directorates level in the 13 regions of the country in terms of data management and accountability to identify gaps and challenges to the multisectoral process. The new Framework for Nutrition Capacity developed by the United Nations Network for Scaling Up Nutrition was used and adapted. Data collection and analysis consisted of triangulation of information: (1) literature reviews, (2) data collection and analysis from the evaluation guide and questionnaire and (3) observations. Cumulatively more than 20 technical departments, including those at the central and regional levels, did not have appropriate equipment or other means to record and monitor data. Among the thirty technical structures at the central level, only six had a nutrition focal point, and 47.3% (35out of the 74) had one. The existence of diverse kinds of data collected by different departments at all levels was observed, and a strong demand of information and data was expressed particularly at the level of the 13 regions of Burkina Faso. The lack of a functional national system on nutrition monitoring and evaluation to ensure accountability on the multisectoral approach at country level was noted. The needs and gaps identified, at different levels, among the key structures of the ministries involved in the multisectoral process, have made it possible to formulate strategic responses to better support the operationalization of the national nutrition policy.
Keywords
Capacity Assessment, Accountability, Nutrition, Regional Directions, Technical Structures, Central Level, Regional Level, Data Management
To cite this article
Dieudonne Diasso, Maimouna Halidou Doudou, Florence Tonnoir, Sarah Cruz, Aly Savadogo, Information Management and Accountability for Multisectoral Nutrition Implementation in Burkina-Faso, Science Journal of Public Health. Vol. 8, No. 5, 2020, pp. 130-140. doi: 10.11648/j.sjph.20200805.11
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Rapport sur la nutrition mondiale. Sensibiliser pour stimuler l’action en matière de nutrition. Available from: https://globalnutritionreport.org/reports/global-nutrition-report-2018/. Accessed July 12, 2019.
[2]
Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations/World Health Organisation. Framework for Action. Second International Conference on Nutrition, Report ICN2 2014/3; November 19–21, 2014; Rome, Italy.
[3]
International Food Policy Research Institute. Global nutrition report. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute, 2017.
[4]
Heaver R. Strengthening country commitment to human development: lessons from nutrition. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2005.
[5]
Gillespie S, Haddad L, Mannar V, Nisbett N, Menon P. The Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group. The politics of reducing malnutrition: building commitment and accelerating progress. Lancet. 2013; 382 (9891): 552-569.
[6]
Baker P, Hawkes C, Wingrove K, et al. What drives political commitment for nutrition? A review and framework synthesis to inform the United Nations Decade of Action on Nutrition. BMJ Glob Health. 2018; 0: e000485. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000485.
[7]
Mejía AA, Fanzo J. Fighting Maternal and Child Malnutrition: Analysing the Political and Institutional Determinants of Delivering a National Multisectoral Response in Six Countries. Brighton, UK: Institute for Development Studies Report to the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development; April 2012. Available from: https://www.ids.ac.uk/files/dmfile/DFID_ANG_Synthesis_April2012.pdf. Accessed July 11, 2018.
[8]
Balarajan Y. Creating political priority for micronutrient deficiencies: a qualitative case study from Senegal. BMJ Open 2014; 4: e004784. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004784.
[9]
Hodge J, Herforth Anna, Gillespie S, Beyero M, Wagah M, Semakula R. Is There an Enabling Environment for Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture in East Africa? Stakeholder Perspectives From Ethiopia, Kenya, and Uganda. Food Nutr Bull. 2015; 3 6 (4): 503-19. doi: 10.1177/0379572115611289. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
[10]
Annan K. «Data can help to end malnutrition across Africa». Nature, 555: 7, 2018. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-02386-3. Accessed July 12, 2019.
[11]
Ministère de la santé. Plan stratégique multisectoriel de nutrition (2020-2024). Burkina Faso; 2019.
[12]
Garrett J, Natalicchio M, eds. Working Multisectorally in Nutrition: Principles, Practices, and Case Studies. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute; 2011.
[13]
Jacob S, Ouvrard L. L’évaluation participative. Avantages et difficultés d’une pratique innovante. Cahiers de la performance et de l’évaluation Automne 2009, n°1 ISBN 978-2-9811262-0-7 Québec; 2009.
[14]
Greene JC. «Communication of Results and Utilization in Participatory Program Evaluation» Evaluation and Program Planning. 1988; 11 (4): 341-351.
[15]
King JA. «Making Sense of Participatory Evaluation Practice» New Directions for Evaluation. 1998; (80): 57-67.
[16]
O’Sullivan RG, Agostino A. «Promoting Evaluation through Collaboration: Findings from Community-Based Programs for Young Children and their Families» Evaluation. 2002; 8 (3): 372-387.
[17]
Patton MQ. Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2011. 187 p.
[18]
Alkin, MC. Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists’ views and influences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2004.
[19]
Ridde V. Suggestions d’amélioration d’un cadre conceptuel de l’évaluation participative. Revue canadienne d’évaluation de programme. 2006; 21 (2): 1–23
[20]
Dozois E, Langlois M, Blanchet-Cohen N. Guide du praticien de l’évaluation évolutive. Montréal, QC: La fondation de la famille J. W. McConnell et l’Institut international des droits de l’enfant et du développement; 2010. Available from: https://mcconnellfoundation.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/DE-201-FR.pdf. Accessed January 10, 2019.
[21]
Rey L, Brousselle A, Dedobbeleer N, Trembla MC. Les défis de l’évaluation Développementale en recherche: Une analyse d’implantation d’un Projet «hôpital promoteur de santé». The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. 2013; 28 (1): 1–26. ISSN 0834-1516.
[22]
United Nations Network (UNN). Nutrition Capacity Assessment Guidance Package - Part I Guidance Note; 2016a. 36 p. Available from: https://www.reachpartnership.org/documents/312104/dc7e2066-93ab-4a8f-82c7-fba3e4d24163. Accessed April 16, 2017.
[23]
United Nations Network (UNN). Nutrition Capacity Assessment. Tools and Resources Guidance Package - Part II; 2016b. 34 p. Available from: https://www.reachpartnership.org/documents/312104/aa2cbe79-3b4e-48c4-9bd6-3a6088554240. Accessed April 16, 2017.
[24]
Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO). Approaches to Capacity Development in Programming Processes and Tools. Module d'apprentissage 2, édition révisée. Available from: https://www.fao.org/3/a-i5243e.pdf. Accessed April 16, 2017.
[25]
Gillespie S, van den Bold M; the SoC Study Team. Stories of change in nutrition: an overview. Glob Food Sec. 2017; 13: 1-11.
[26]
Webb P, Ghosh S, Shrestha R, et al. Measuring Nutrition Governance: An Analysis of Commitment, Capability and Collaboration in Nepal. Food and Nutrition Bulletin. 2016; 37 (4S): S170-S182.
[27]
Suresh B, Ergeneman A. A framework for evaluating food security and Nutrition monitoring systems. African Journal of Food Agriculture and Nutritional Development (AJFAND). 2005; 5 (2).
[28]
Eele D Indicators for food security and nutrition monitoring. Food Policy. 1994; 19: 314-32.
[29]
Babu SC, Mthindi GB and D Ng'ong'ola Developing decentralized capacity for development policy analysis — lessons from food security and nutrition monitoring in Malawi. African Development Review, 1996; 8: 127-145.
[30]
Du Plessis LM, McLachlan MH, Drimie SE. What does an enabling environment for infant and young child nutrition look like at implementation level? Perspectives from a multi-stakeholder process in the Breede Valley Sub-District, Western Cape, South Africa. BMC Public Health. 2018; 18 (1): 240. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5165-7.
[31]
Habicht JP Nutritional surveillance in China: results of user survey. Mimeo, Cornell Food and Nutrition Policy Program, Ithaca, New York, 1991.
[32]
Report for the Second International Early Warning Conference (EWC II). Synthesis of the findings of the early warning regional consultations in Africa, Asia, the American Hemisphere and Europe. Bonn, Germany, October 16-18, 2003.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186