Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning

| Peer-Reviewed |

A Comparative Study for Dynamic Responses of Tall Buildings Due to Wind Load Distribution Patterns

Received: 26 November 2016    Accepted: 27 December 2016    Published: 21 January 2017
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

In this study, the loading pattern of skewed and orthogonal wind condition is analysed to find how much increased or reduced response. As the height of the buildings increases, its vulnerability to wind effects also increases. Codes and Standards utilize the “gust loading factor” (GLF) approach for estimating dynamic effect on high-rise structures for 0, 45 and 90 degree. At the real situation of wind load, these conditions are not covered for strong wind responses. In order to get the responses of other skewed wind direction, various type of loading patterns is assumed to apply the wind load. For the dynamic response analysis of a structure under strong winds, the spectral response method in a frequency domain or the step-by-step integration of motion equation in a time domain is used. This paper aims to make a comparison of various loading patterns of skewed and orthogonal wind in along-wind and across-wind response with respect to the gust response factor (GRF) of dynamic wind load on tall buildings. In this study, the model building is analysed for strong wind in Yangon area and costal area. Then, comparison of maximum structural responses for strong wind is studied.

DOI 10.11648/j.larp.20160101.17
Published in Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning (Volume 1, Issue 1, December 2016)
Page(s) 49-54
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

High-Rise Flexible Structures, Gust Response Factor (GRF), Loading Patterns, Skewed Wind, Orthogonal Wind

References
[1] John D. Holmes. 2001. Wind Loading of Structures. Spon Press, London.
[2] Y.Tamura, A. Kareem. 2013. Advanced Structural Wind Engineering. Springer Press, New York.
[3] ASCE 7-05. 1995, 1998, 2002, 2005, 2010. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. American Society of Civil Engineers.
[4] H. Shirato. 2014. Special Lectures for Wind and EarthquakeEngineering Department of Civil and Earth Resources Engineering, Kyoto University.
[5] Davenport, A. G. 1961. “The Application of Statistical Concepts to the Windloading of structures”, Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers, London.
[6] Taranath, B. S. 2011. Structural Analysis and Design of Tall BuildingsSteel and Composite Construction. CRC Press.
[7] Bungale S.Taranath. 2005. Wind and Earthquake Resistant Buildings. Marcel Dekker Publication, New York, U.S.A.
[8] ASCE 7-10-Commentary. 2010. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. American Society of Civil Engineers.
[9] Nikhil Agrawal, V. K. Gupta, Amit Gupta, Achal Mittal. 2012, “Comparison of Codal Values and Experimental Data Pertaining to Dynamic Wind Characteristics”. Journal of Wind Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 1, January.
[10] Stathopoulos, T., Elsharawy, M., and Galal, K. 2013. “Wind load combinations including torsion for rectangular medium-rise buildings”. International Journal of High-Rise Buildings, 2(3), 1-11.
[11] AIJ-RLB. 2004. Recommendations on Loads for Buildings. Architectural Institute of Japan.
[12] NBCC 2010. National Building Code of Canada. National Research Council Canada, Ottawa.
Author Information
  • Department of Civil Engineering, Nationalities Youth Resource Development Degree College, Yangon, The Republic of the Union of Myanmar

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Thida Htun. (2017). A Comparative Study for Dynamic Responses of Tall Buildings Due to Wind Load Distribution Patterns. Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning, 1(1), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.larp.20160101.17

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Thida Htun. A Comparative Study for Dynamic Responses of Tall Buildings Due to Wind Load Distribution Patterns. Landsc. Archit. Reg. Plan. 2017, 1(1), 49-54. doi: 10.11648/j.larp.20160101.17

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Thida Htun. A Comparative Study for Dynamic Responses of Tall Buildings Due to Wind Load Distribution Patterns. Landsc Archit Reg Plan. 2017;1(1):49-54. doi: 10.11648/j.larp.20160101.17

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.larp.20160101.17,
      author = {Thida Htun},
      title = {A Comparative Study for Dynamic Responses of Tall Buildings Due to Wind Load Distribution Patterns},
      journal = {Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning},
      volume = {1},
      number = {1},
      pages = {49-54},
      doi = {10.11648/j.larp.20160101.17},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.larp.20160101.17},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.larp.20160101.17},
      abstract = {In this study, the loading pattern of skewed and orthogonal wind condition is analysed to find how much increased or reduced response. As the height of the buildings increases, its vulnerability to wind effects also increases. Codes and Standards utilize the “gust loading factor” (GLF) approach for estimating dynamic effect on high-rise structures for 0, 45 and 90 degree. At the real situation of wind load, these conditions are not covered for strong wind responses. In order to get the responses of other skewed wind direction, various type of loading patterns is assumed to apply the wind load. For the dynamic response analysis of a structure under strong winds, the spectral response method in a frequency domain or the step-by-step integration of motion equation in a time domain is used. This paper aims to make a comparison of various loading patterns of skewed and orthogonal wind in along-wind and across-wind response with respect to the gust response factor (GRF) of dynamic wind load on tall buildings. In this study, the model building is analysed for strong wind in Yangon area and costal area. Then, comparison of maximum structural responses for strong wind is studied.},
     year = {2017}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - A Comparative Study for Dynamic Responses of Tall Buildings Due to Wind Load Distribution Patterns
    AU  - Thida Htun
    Y1  - 2017/01/21
    PY  - 2017
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.larp.20160101.17
    DO  - 10.11648/j.larp.20160101.17
    T2  - Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning
    JF  - Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning
    JO  - Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning
    SP  - 49
    EP  - 54
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2637-4374
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.larp.20160101.17
    AB  - In this study, the loading pattern of skewed and orthogonal wind condition is analysed to find how much increased or reduced response. As the height of the buildings increases, its vulnerability to wind effects also increases. Codes and Standards utilize the “gust loading factor” (GLF) approach for estimating dynamic effect on high-rise structures for 0, 45 and 90 degree. At the real situation of wind load, these conditions are not covered for strong wind responses. In order to get the responses of other skewed wind direction, various type of loading patterns is assumed to apply the wind load. For the dynamic response analysis of a structure under strong winds, the spectral response method in a frequency domain or the step-by-step integration of motion equation in a time domain is used. This paper aims to make a comparison of various loading patterns of skewed and orthogonal wind in along-wind and across-wind response with respect to the gust response factor (GRF) of dynamic wind load on tall buildings. In this study, the model building is analysed for strong wind in Yangon area and costal area. Then, comparison of maximum structural responses for strong wind is studied.
    VL  - 1
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections