Determinants of Risk-Dependent Agricultural Field Behaviours in Bhutan

Bryan Gensits; Rekha Chhetri; Tshotsho

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijae.20190403.14

| Peer-Reviewed

Determinants of Risk-Dependent Agricultural Field Behaviours in Bhutan

Bryan Gensits, Rekha Chhetri, Tshotsho

Published in International Journal of Agricultural Economics (Volume 4, Issue 3)

Received: 3 April 2019 Accepted: 9 May 2019 Published: 5 June 2019

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This article investigates the power of individual risk preference in combination with socio-economic and demographic characteristics to predict ten agricultural field behaviours in a developing country. A sample of 163 farmers from western-central Bhutan was interviewed regarding their farm management practices. Their risk preference was then experimentally elicited using a modified Multiple Price List. The results show farm size as being a primary determinant of income diversification, nitrogenous fertiliser application, and pesticide use. Farm diversification is most dependent on the household head’s level of education and the quantity of farm labour available. Finally, both income diversification and farm diversification are shown to have an inverse relationship with loss risk aversion. On the basis of the findings of this article, agricultural policy and programmes can increase their efficacy and efficiency by targeting agrarian Bhutanese households based on their characteristics.

Published in	International Journal of Agricultural Economics (Volume 4, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijae.20190403.14
Page(s)	109-119
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Farm Diversification, Farmers’ Risk Preferences, Income Diversification, Nitrogenous Fertiliser Use, Pesticide Use

References

[1]	Chavas, J. P., R. G. Chambers, and R. D. Pope, Production Economics and Farm Management: a Century of Contributions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2010. 92 (2): p. 356-375.
[2]	Lin, W., G. W. Dean, and C. V. Moore, An Empirical Test of Utility vs. Profit Maximization in Agricultural Production. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1974. 56 (3): p. 497-508.
[3]	Lusk, J. L. and K. H. Coble, Risk Perceptions, Risk Preference, and Acceptance of Risky Food. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2005. 87 (2): p. 393-405.
[4]	Anderson, L. R. and J. M. Mellor, Predicting health behaviors with an experimental measure of risk preference. J Health Econ, 2008. 27 (5): p. 1260-74.
[5]	Dohmen, T., et al., Are Risk Aversion and Impatience Related to Cognitive Ability? American Economic Review, 2010. 100 (3): p. 1238-1260.
[6]	National Statistics Bureau, 2017 Population and Housing Census of Bhutan: National Report, N. S. B. o. Bhutan, Editor. 2018, Loday Natshog Communications: Thimphu, Bhutan.
[7]	National Statistics Bureau, Statistical Yearbook of Bhutan 2018, N. S. Bureau, Editor. 2018: Thimphu, Bhutan.
[8]	Just, R. E., An Investigation of the Importance of Risk in Farmers' Decisions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1974. 56 (1): p. 14-25.
[9]	Liu, E. M. and J. Huang, Risk preferences and pesticide use by cotton farmers in China. Journal of Development Economics, 2013. 103: p. 202-215.
[10]	Le Cotty, T., et al., Linking Risk Aversion, Time Preference and Fertiliser Use in Burkina Faso. The Journal of Development Studies, 2017. 54 (11): p. 1991-2006.
[11]	Khor, L. Y., et al., Impact of risk aversion on fertiliser use: evidence from Vietnam. Oxford Development Studies, 2018. 46 (4): p. 483-496.
[12]	Gong, Y., et al., Farmers’ risk preferences and pesticide use decisions: evidence from field experiments in China. Agricultural Economics, 2016. 47 (4): p. 411-421.
[13]	Asravor, R. K., Farmers’ risk preference and the adoption of risk management strategies in Northern Ghana. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2018: p. 1-20.
[14]	Hellerstein, D., N. Higgins, and J. Horowitz, The predictive power of risk preference measures for farming decisions. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2013. 40 (5): p. 807-833.
[15]	Vollmer, E., D. Hermann, and O. Mußhoff, Is the risk attitude measured with the Holt and Laury task reflected in farmers’ production risk? European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2017. 44 (3): p. 399-424.
[16]	Department of Agriculture, National Framework for Organic Farming in Bhutan, D. o. A. M. o. Agriculture, Editor. 2006. p. 1-43.
[17]	Tashi, S. and K. Wangchuk, Prospects of Organic Farming in Bhutan: A SWOT Analysis. Advances in Agriculture, 2016. 2016: p. 1-9.
[18]	World Bank, South Asia: Extremes of Water Scarcity and Excess, in Turn down the heat: climate extremes, regional impacts, and the case for resilience. 2013, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, World Bank: Washington, DC. p. 105-146.
[19]	Dem, P. and N. Minot, Agricultural trade in Bhutan: Patterns, trends; and economic impact. 2010, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and Ministry of Agriculture and Forests (MoAF): Washington, D. C.
[20]	Tanaka, T., C. F. Camerer, and Q. Nguyen, Risk and Time Preferences: Linking Experimental and Household Survey Data from Vietnam. American Economic Review, 2010. 100 (1): p. 557-571.
[21]	Liu, E. M., Time to Change What to Sow: Risk Preferences and Technology Adoption Decisions of Cotton Farmers in China. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2013. 95 (4): p. 1386-1403.
[22]	Holt, C. A. and S. K. Laury, Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects. American Economic Review, 2002. 92 (5): p. 1644-1655.
[23]	Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman, Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1991. 106 (4): p. 1039-1061.
[24]	Von-Neumann, J. and O. Morgenstern, Theory of games and economic behavior. 1944: Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ.
[25]	Hirschauer, N., et al., Eliciting risk attitudes – how to avoid mean and variance bias in Holt-and-Laury lotteries. Applied Economics Letters, 2013. 21 (1): p. 35-38.
[26]	Lin, B. B., Resilience in Agriculture through Crop Diversification: Adaptive Management for Environmental Change. BioScience, 2011. 61 (3): p. 183-193.
[27]	Baumgärtner, S. and M. F. Quaas, Managing increasing environmental risks through agrobiodiversity and agrienvironmental policies. Agricultural Economics, 2010. 41 (5): p. 483-496.
[28]	Joshi, P. K., et al., Agriculture diversification in South Asia: patterns, determinants and policy implications. Economic and Political Weekly, 2004. 39 (24): p. 2457-2467.
[29]	Dasgupta, P., Uncertainty, Insurance, and Social Norms, in An inquiry into well-being and destitution. 1993, Oxford University Press: Oxford. p. 189-217.
[30]	Zhu, Y., et al., Genetic diversity and disease control in rice. Nature, 2000. 406 (6797): p. 718-22.
[31]	Keesing, F., et al., Impacts of biodiversity on the emergence and transmission of infectious diseases. Nature, 2010. 468 (7324): p. 647-52.
[32]	Birthal, P. S., et al., Agricultural diversification in North eastern region of India: Implications for growth and equity. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2006. 61 (3): p. 328-340.
[33]	Michler, J. D. and A. L. Josephson, To Specialize or Diversify: Agricultural Diversity and Poverty Dynamics in Ethiopia. World Development, 2016. 89: p. 214-226.
[34]	Di Falco, S., et al., Agrobiodiversity, farm profits and land fragmentation: Evidence from Bulgaria. Land Use Policy, 2010. 27 (3): p. 763-771.
[35]	Waha, K., et al., Agricultural diversification as an important strategy for achieving food security in Africa. Global Change Biology, 2018. 24 (8): p. 3390-3400.
[36]	Di Falco, S., J.-P. Chavas, and M. Smale, Farmer management of production risk on degraded lands: the role of wheat variety diversity in the Tigray region, Ethiopia. Agricultural Economics, 2007. 36 (2): p. 147-156.
[37]	McNamara, K. T. and C. Weiss, Farm Household Income and On- and Off-Farm Diversification. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 2005. 37 (01): p. 37-48.
[38]	Berry, C. H., Corporate Growth and Diversification. The Journal of Law and Economics, 1971. 14 (2): p. 371-383.
[39]	Pope, R. D. and R. Prescott, Diversification in Relation to Farm Size and Other Socioeconomic Characteristics. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1980. 62 (3): p. 554-559.
[40]	Shannon, C. E., A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 1948. 27: p. 379-423 and 623-656.
[41]	Wiener, N., Cybernetics: Control and communication in the animal and the machine. 1948, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[42]	Campbell, K. and A. Mínguez-Vera, Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Financial Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 2007. 83 (3): p. 435-451.
[43]	Levy, H. and M. Sarnat, International diversification of investment portfolios. The American Economic Review, 1970. 60 (4): p. 668-675.
[44]	Rossi, S. P. S., M. S. Schwaiger, and G. Winkler, How loan portfolio diversification affects risk, efficiency and capitalization: A managerial behavior model for Austrian banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2009. 33 (12): p. 2218-2226.
[45]	Weltin, M., et al., Analysing behavioural differences of farm households: An example of income diversification strategies based on European farm survey data. Land Use Policy, 2017. 62: p. 172-184.
[46]	González, M., et al., Family firms and debt: Risk aversion versus risk of losing control. Journal of Business Research, 2013. 66 (11): p. 2308-2320.
[47]	Eckel, C. C., et al., Debt Aversion and the Demand for Loans for Postsecondary Education. Public Finance Review, 2016. 35 (2): p. 233-262.
[48]	Shrestha, S., An economic impact assessment of the rice research program in Bhutan. 2004, Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute. 51.
[49]	Feder, G., Farm size, risk aversion and the adoption of new technology under uncertainty. Oxford Economic Papers, 1980. 32 (2): p. 263-283.
[50]	Knight, J., S. Weir, and T. Woldehanna, The role of education in facilitating risk-taking and innovation in agriculture. Journal of Development Studies, 2003. 39 (6): p. 1-22.
[51]	Roosen, J. and D. A. Hennessy, Tests for the Role of Risk Aversion on Input Use. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2003. 85 (1): p. 30-43.
[52]	Tshewang, S., et al., Weed management challenges in rice (Oryza sativa L.) for food security in Bhutan: A review. Crop Protection, 2016. 90: p. 117-124.
[53]	Ghadim, A. K. A., D. J. Pannell, and M. P. Burton, Risk, uncertainty, and learning in adoption of a crop innovation. Agricultural Economics, 2005. 33 (1): p. 1-9.
[54]	Tobin, J., Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 1958. 26: p. 24-36.
[55]	Barham, B. L., et al., The roles of risk and ambiguity in technology adoption. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2014. 97: p. 204-218.
[56]	Engle Warnick, J. C., J. Escobal, and S. C. Laszlo, Ambiguity Aversion and Portfolio Choice in Small-Scale Peruvian Farming. The B. E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 2011. 11 (1).
[57]	Harrison, G. W., J. A. List, and C. Towe, Naturally occurring preferences and exogenous laboratory experiments: A case study of risk aversion. Econometrica, 2007. 75 (2): p. 433-458.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Bryan Gensits, Rekha Chhetri, Tshotsho. (2019). Determinants of Risk-Dependent Agricultural Field Behaviours in Bhutan. International Journal of Agricultural Economics, 4(3), 109-119. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20190403.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Bryan Gensits; Rekha Chhetri; Tshotsho. Determinants of Risk-Dependent Agricultural Field Behaviours in Bhutan. Int. J. Agric. Econ. 2019, 4(3), 109-119. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20190403.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Bryan Gensits, Rekha Chhetri, Tshotsho. Determinants of Risk-Dependent Agricultural Field Behaviours in Bhutan. Int J Agric Econ. 2019;4(3):109-119. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20190403.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijae.20190403.14,
  author = {Bryan Gensits and Rekha Chhetri and Tshotsho},
  title = {Determinants of Risk-Dependent Agricultural Field Behaviours in Bhutan},
  journal = {International Journal of Agricultural Economics},
  volume = {4},
  number = {3},
  pages = {109-119},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijae.20190403.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20190403.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijae.20190403.14},
  abstract = {This article investigates the power of individual risk preference in combination with socio-economic and demographic characteristics to predict ten agricultural field behaviours in a developing country. A sample of 163 farmers from western-central Bhutan was interviewed regarding their farm management practices. Their risk preference was then experimentally elicited using a modified Multiple Price List. The results show farm size as being a primary determinant of income diversification, nitrogenous fertiliser application, and pesticide use. Farm diversification is most dependent on the household head’s level of education and the quantity of farm labour available. Finally, both income diversification and farm diversification are shown to have an inverse relationship with loss risk aversion. On the basis of the findings of this article, agricultural policy and programmes can increase their efficacy and efficiency by targeting agrarian Bhutanese households based on their characteristics.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Determinants of Risk-Dependent Agricultural Field Behaviours in Bhutan
AU  - Bryan Gensits
AU  - Rekha Chhetri
AU  - Tshotsho
Y1  - 2019/06/05
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20190403.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijae.20190403.14
T2  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
JF  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
JO  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
SP  - 109
EP  - 119
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-3843
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20190403.14
AB  - This article investigates the power of individual risk preference in combination with socio-economic and demographic characteristics to predict ten agricultural field behaviours in a developing country. A sample of 163 farmers from western-central Bhutan was interviewed regarding their farm management practices. Their risk preference was then experimentally elicited using a modified Multiple Price List. The results show farm size as being a primary determinant of income diversification, nitrogenous fertiliser application, and pesticide use. Farm diversification is most dependent on the household head’s level of education and the quantity of farm labour available. Finally, both income diversification and farm diversification are shown to have an inverse relationship with loss risk aversion. On the basis of the findings of this article, agricultural policy and programmes can increase their efficacy and efficiency by targeting agrarian Bhutanese households based on their characteristics.
VL  - 4
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Bryan Gensits

College of Natural Resources, Royal University of Bhutan, Lobesa, Punakha, Bhutan
Rekha Chhetri

College of Natural Resources, Royal University of Bhutan, Lobesa, Punakha, Bhutan
Tshotsho

College of Natural Resources, Royal University of Bhutan, Lobesa, Punakha, Bhutan

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Bryan Gensits, Rekha Chhetri, Tshotsho. (2019). Determinants of Risk-Dependent Agricultural Field Behaviours in Bhutan. International Journal of Agricultural Economics, 4(3), 109-119. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20190403.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Bryan Gensits; Rekha Chhetri; Tshotsho. Determinants of Risk-Dependent Agricultural Field Behaviours in Bhutan. Int. J. Agric. Econ. 2019, 4(3), 109-119. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20190403.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Bryan Gensits, Rekha Chhetri, Tshotsho. Determinants of Risk-Dependent Agricultural Field Behaviours in Bhutan. Int J Agric Econ. 2019;4(3):109-119. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20190403.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijae.20190403.14,
  author = {Bryan Gensits and Rekha Chhetri and Tshotsho},
  title = {Determinants of Risk-Dependent Agricultural Field Behaviours in Bhutan},
  journal = {International Journal of Agricultural Economics},
  volume = {4},
  number = {3},
  pages = {109-119},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijae.20190403.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20190403.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijae.20190403.14},
  abstract = {This article investigates the power of individual risk preference in combination with socio-economic and demographic characteristics to predict ten agricultural field behaviours in a developing country. A sample of 163 farmers from western-central Bhutan was interviewed regarding their farm management practices. Their risk preference was then experimentally elicited using a modified Multiple Price List. The results show farm size as being a primary determinant of income diversification, nitrogenous fertiliser application, and pesticide use. Farm diversification is most dependent on the household head’s level of education and the quantity of farm labour available. Finally, both income diversification and farm diversification are shown to have an inverse relationship with loss risk aversion. On the basis of the findings of this article, agricultural policy and programmes can increase their efficacy and efficiency by targeting agrarian Bhutanese households based on their characteristics.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Determinants of Risk-Dependent Agricultural Field Behaviours in Bhutan
AU  - Bryan Gensits
AU  - Rekha Chhetri
AU  - Tshotsho
Y1  - 2019/06/05
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20190403.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijae.20190403.14
T2  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
JF  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
JO  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
SP  - 109
EP  - 119
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-3843
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20190403.14
AB  - This article investigates the power of individual risk preference in combination with socio-economic and demographic characteristics to predict ten agricultural field behaviours in a developing country. A sample of 163 farmers from western-central Bhutan was interviewed regarding their farm management practices. Their risk preference was then experimentally elicited using a modified Multiple Price List. The results show farm size as being a primary determinant of income diversification, nitrogenous fertiliser application, and pesticide use. Farm diversification is most dependent on the household head’s level of education and the quantity of farm labour available. Finally, both income diversification and farm diversification are shown to have an inverse relationship with loss risk aversion. On the basis of the findings of this article, agricultural policy and programmes can increase their efficacy and efficiency by targeting agrarian Bhutanese households based on their characteristics.
VL  - 4
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download