American Journal of Chemical Engineering

| Peer-Reviewed |

Water Reuse: Extenuating Membrane Fouling in Membrane Processes

Received: 29 March 2018    Accepted: 13 April 2018    Published: 04 May 2018
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Membrane fouling has been recognized as a serious barrier in microfiltration and ultrafiltration of secondary effluent. Feed pre-treatment is a frequent use for fouling extenuation. Numerous techniques have been employed to monitor membrane fouling. These include: Pre-treatment of the feedwater, modification of membrane properties, optimization of module configuration and operating conditions, periodic membrane cleaning, evaluation of system performance using pilot plant, and use of predictive models. However, membrane fouling remains complicated task for both technico-economic reasons depending on water characteristics and pre-treatment processes and efficiencies. The large majority of the membranes employed in water and wastewater treatment are produced of polymeric materials. Nevertheless, it has been expected that ceramic membranes will be competitive options in the following years.

DOI 10.11648/j.ajche.20180602.12
Published in American Journal of Chemical Engineering (Volume 6, Issue 2, March 2018)
Page(s) 25-36
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), Microfiltration (MF), Ultrafiltration (UF), Membrane Fouling, Feedwater (FW)

References
[1] S. T. Nguyen, Mitigation of membrane fouling in microfiltration and ultrafiltration of activated sludge effluent for water reuse, PhD Thesis, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia, December 2012.
[2] Kennedy, MD, Kamanyi, J, Heijman, BGJ, Amy, G 2008, ‘Colloidal organic matter fouling of UF membranes: role of NOM composition & size’, Desalination, vol. 220, pp. 200-13.
[3] Xiang, Y 2016, ‘Understanding membrane fouling mechanisms through computational simulations’, PhD Thesis, George Washington University, Washington.
[4] Blandin, G, Vervoort, H, Le-Clech, P, Verliefde, ARD 2016, ‘Fouling and cleaning of high permeability forward osmosis membranes’, Journal of Water Process Engineering, vol. 9, pp. 161-9.
[5] You, M, Wang, P, Xu, M, Yuan, T, Meng, J 2016, ‘Fouling resistance and cleaning efficiency of stimuli-responsive reverse osmosis (RO) membranes’, Polymer, vol. 103, pp. 457-67.
[6] Al-Amoudi, AS 2010, ‘Factors affecting natural organic matter (NOM) and scaling fouling in NF membranes: A review’, Desalination, vol. 259, pp. 1-0.
[7] Huang, W, Chu, H, Dong, B 2012, ‘Characteristics of algogenic organic matter generated under different nutrient conditions and subsequent impact on microfiltration membrane fouling’, Desalination, vol. 293, 104-11.
[8] Qu, F, Liang, H, Tian, J, Yu, H, Chen, Z, Li, G 2012, ‘Ultrafiltration (UF) membrane fouling caused by cyanobateria: Fouling effects of cells and extracellular organics matter (EOM)’, Desalination, vol. 293, pp. 30-7.
[9] Adham, S, Chiu, K-P, Lehman, G, Howe, K, Marwah, A, Mysore, C, Clouet, J, Do-Quang, Z & Cagnard, O 2006, Optimization of Membrane Treatment for Direct and Clarified Water Filtration, AWWA Research Foundation.
[10] Kim, JO, Jung, JT, Yeom, IT, Aoh, GH 2006, ‘Electric fields treatment for the reduction of membrane fouling, the inactivation of bacteria and the enhancement of particle coagulation’, Desalination, vol. 202, pp. 31-7.
[11] Maartens, A, Swart, P, Jacobs, EP 1999, ‘Feed-water pretreatment: methods to reduce membrane fouling by natural organic matter’, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 163, pp. 51-62.
[12] Dixon, M, Staaks, C, Fabris, Vimonses, V, Chow, CWK, Panglisch, S, van Leeuwen, JA, Drikas, M 2013, ‘The impact of optimised coagulation on membrane fouling for coagulation/ultrafiltration process’, Desalination and Water Treatment, vol. 51, pp. 2718-25.
[13] D. Ghernaout, B. Ghernaout, A. Saiba, A. Boucherit, A. Kellil, Removal of humic acids by continuous electromagnetic treatment followed by electrocoagulation in batch using aluminium electrodes, Desalination 239 (2009) 295-308.
[14] D. Ghernaout, B. Ghernaout, A. Boucherit, M. W. Naceur, A. Khelifa, A. Kellil, Study on mechanism of electrocoagulation with iron electrodes in idealised conditions and electrocoagulation of humic acids solution in batch using aluminium electrodes, Desalin. Water Treat. 8 (2009) 91-99.
[15] D. Ghernaout, A. Mariche, B. Ghernaout, A. Kellil, Electromagnetic treatment-bi-electrocoagulation of humic acid in continuous mode using response surface method for its optimization and application on two surface waters, Desalin. Water Treat. 22 (2010) 311-29.
[16] D. Ghernaout, S. Irki, A. Boucherit, Removal of Cu2+ and Cd2+, and humic acid and phenol by electrocoagulation using iron electrodes, Desalin. Water Treat. 52 (2014) 3256-70.
[17] Zhu, H, Wen, X, Huang, X 2012, ‘Characterization of membrane fouling in a microfiltration ceramic membrane system treating secondary effluent’, Desalination, vol. 284, pp. 324-31.
[18] Chen, D, Weavers, LK, Harold W. Walker, HW, Lenhart, JJ 2006, ‘Ultrasonic control of ceramic membrane fouling caused by natural organic matter and silica particles’, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 276, pp. 135-44.
[19] Rowe, D & Abdel-Magid, IM 1995, Handbook of Wastewater Reclamation and Reuse, 1st Ed., CRC Press, New York.
[20] Vesilind, AP (Ed.) 2003, Wastewater Treatment Plant Design, 1st Ed., Water Environment Federation, USA.
[21] Yu, W, Qu, J, Gregory, J 2015, ‘Pre-coagulation on the submerged membrane fouling in nano-scale: Effect of sedimentation process’, Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 262, pp. 676-82.
[22] Yu, W, Graham, N, Liu, H, Li, H, Qu, J 2013, ‘Membrane fouling by Fe-Humic cake layers in nano-scale: Effect of in-situ formed Fe (III) coagulant’, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 431, pp. 47-54.
[23] Water Environment Federation, 2006, ‘Membrane Systems for Wastewater Treatment’, 1st Ed., McGraw-Hill, USA.
[24] Clever, M, Jordt, F, Knauf, R, Räbiger, N, Rüdebusch, M & Hilker-Scheibel, R 2000, 'Process water production from river water by ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis', Desalination, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 325-36.
[25] Sui, P, Wen, X, Huang, X 2008, ‘Feasibility of employing ultrasound for on-line membrane fouling control in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor’, Desalination, vol. 219, pp. 203-13.
[26] Cerón-Vivas, A, Morgan-Sagastume, JM, Noyola, A 2012, ‘Intermittent filtration and gas bubbling for fouling reduction in anaerobic membrane bioreactors’, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 423-424, pp. 136-42.
[27] Le-Clech, P, Chen, V, Fane, AG 2006, 'Review: Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment', Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 284, no. 1-2, pp. 17-53.
[28] Contreras, AE, Kim, A, Li, Q 2009, ‘Combined fouling of nanofiltration membranes: Mechanisms and effect of organic matter’, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 327, pp. 87-95.
[29] Stephenson, T, Judd, S, Jefferson, B, Brindle, K 2000, ‘Membrane Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment’, IWA Publishing, London, UK.
[30] Teixeira, MR, Sousa, VS 2013, ‘Fouling of nanofiltration membrane: Effects of NOM molecular weight and microcystins’, Desalination, vol. 315, pp. 149-55.
[31] Gautam, AK, Menkhaus, TJ 2014, ‘Performance evaluation and fouling analysis for reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes during processing of lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysate’, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 451, pp. 252-65.
[32] Li, Q, Elimelech, M 2006, ‘Synergistic effects in combined fouling of a loose nanofiltration membrane by colloidal materials and natural organic matter’, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 278, pp. 72-82.
[33] Lee, S, Cho, J, Elimelech, M 2005, ‘Combined influence of natural organic matter (NOM) and colloidal particles on nanofiltration membrane fouling’, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 262, pp. 27-41.
[34] Mulder, M 1996, Basic Principles of Membrane Technology, 2nd Ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
[35] Huang, X, Leal, M, Li, Q 2008, ‘Degradation of natural organic matter by TiO2 photocatalytic oxidation and its effect on fouling of low-pressure membranes’, Water Research, vol. 42, pp. 1142-50.
[36] Heng, L, Yanling, Y, Weijia, G, Xing, L, Guibai, L 2008, ‘Effect of pretreatment by permanganate/chlorine on algae fouling control for ultrafiltration (UF) membrane system’, Desalination, vol. 222, pp. 74-80.
[37] Antony, A, Subhi, N, Henderson, RK, Khan, SJ, Stuetz, RM, Le-Clech, P, Chen, V, Leslie, G 2012, ‘Comparison of reverse osmosis membrane fouling profiles from Australian water recycling plants’, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 407-408, pp. 8-16.
[38] Bellona, C, Drewes, JE, Xua, P & Amy, G 2004, 'Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment - a literature review', Water Research, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 2795-809.
[39] Li, Q, Xu, Z, Pinnau, I 2007, Fouling of reverse osmosis membranes by biopolymers in wastewater secondary effluent: Role of membrane surface properties and initial permeate flux, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 290, pp. 173-81.
[40] Chae, SR, Yamamura, H, Ikeda, K, Watanabe, Y 2008, ‘Comparison of fouling characteristics of two different poly-vinylidene fluoride microfiltration membranes in a pilot-scale drinking water treatment system using pre-coagulation/sedimentation, sand filtration, and chlorination’, Water Research, vol. 42, pp. 2029-42.
[41] Owen, G, Bandi, M, Howell, JA & Churchouse, SJ 1995, 'Economic assessment of membrane processes for water and waste water treatment', Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 102, no. 1-2, pp. 77-91.
[42] Heijman, SGJ & Bakker, S 2007, ‘Ceramic microfiltration as the first treatment step in surface water treatment (report to the European Commission)’, TECHNEAU, Europe.
[43] Jin, X, Jawor, A, Kim, S, Hoek, EMV 2009, ‘Effects of feed water temperature on separation performance and organic fouling of brackish water RO membranes’, Desalination, vol. 239, pp. 346-59.
[44] Bottino, A, Capannelli, C, Borghi, AD, Colombino, M & Conio, O 2001, 'Water treatment for drinking purpose: ceramic microfiltration application', Desalination, vol. 141, no. 1-3, pp. 75-9.
[45] Ning, RY, Troyer, TL, Tominello, RS 2005, ‘Chemical control of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis systems’, Desalination, vol. 172, pp. 1-6.
[46] Babel, S, Takizawa, S 2011, ‘Chemical pretreatment for reduction of membrane fouling caused by algae’, Desalination, vol. 274, pp. 171-6.
[47] Schlichter, B, Mavrov, V & Chmiel, H 2004, 'Study of a hybrid process combining ozonation and microfiltration/ultrafiltration for drinking water production from surface water', Desalination, vol. 168, no. 1-3, pp. 307-17.
[48] Djafer, L, Ayral, A & Ouagued, A 2010, 'Robust synthesis and performance of a titania-based ultrafiltration membrane with photocatalytic properties', Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 198-203.
[49] Daufin, G, Escudier, J-P, Carrère, H, Bérot, S, Fillaudeau, L & Decloux, M 2001, 'Recent and emerging applications of membrane processes in the food and dairy industry', Trans IChemE, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 89-102.
[50] Finley, J 2005, 'Ceramic membranes: a robust filtration alternative', Filtration & Separation, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 34-7.
[51] Ciora, RJ & Liu, PKT 2003, 'Ceramic membranes for environmental related applications', Fluid/Particle Separation Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 51-60.
[52] Mueller, U & Witte, M 2008, Ceramic membrane applications for filter backwash water treatment (report to the European Commission), TECHNEAU, Germany.
[53] Park, HG, Cho, SG, Kim, KJ, Kwon, YN 2016, ‘Effect of feed spacer thickness on the fouling behavior in reverse osmosis process — A pilot scale study’, Desalination, vol. 379, pp. 155-63.
[54] Park, M, Lee, J, Boo, C, Hong, C, Snyder, SA, Kim, JH 2013, ‘Modeling of colloidal fouling in forward osmosis membrane: Effects of reverse draw solution permeation’, Desalination, vol. 314, pp. 115-23.
[55] Howell, JA, Arnot, TC, Chua, HC, Godino, P, Hatziantoniou, D & Metsämuuronen, S 2002, 'Controlled flux behaviour of membrane processes', Macromolecular Symposia, vol. 188, no. 1, pp. 23-35.
[56] Drewes, JE & Fox, P 1999, 'Fate of natural organic matter (NOM) during groundwater recharge using reclaimed water', Water Science and Technology, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 241-8.
[57] Lee, NH, Amy, G, Croué, JP 2006, ‘Low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) fouling associated with allochthonous versus autochthonous natural organic matter’, Water Research, vol. 40, pp. 2357-68.
[58] Barker, DJ & Stuckey, DC 1999, 'A review of soluble microbial products (SMP) in wastewater treatment systems', Water Research, vol. 33, no. 14, pp. 3062-82.
[59] Jiang, T, Kennedy, MD, van der Meer, WGJ, Vanrolleghem, PA & Schippers, JC 2003, 'The role of blocking and cake filtration in MIBR fouling', Desalination, vol. 157, no. 1-3, pp. 335-43.
[60] Meng, F, Chae, S-R, Drews, A, Kraume, M, Shin, H-S & Yang, F 2009, 'Review – Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): Membrane fouling and membrane material', Water Research, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1489-512.
[61] Brindle, K & Stephenson, T 1996, 'The application of membrane biological reactors for the treatment of wastewaters', Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 49, pp. 601-10.
[62] Mousa, HA 2007, ‘Investigation of UF membranes fouling by humic acid’, Desalination, vol. 217, pp. 38-51.
[63] Al-Halbouni, D, Traber, J, Lyko, S, Wintgens, T, Melin, T, Tacke, D, Janot, A, Dott, W, Hollender, J 2008, ‘Correlation of EPS content in activated sludge at different sludge retention times with membrane fouling phenomena’, Water Research, vol. 42, pp. 1475-88.
[64] Sagle, AS 2009, ‘PEG hydrogels as anti-fouling coatings for reverse osmosis membranes’, The University of Texas at Austin.
[65] Barger, M & Carnahan, RP 1991, 'Fouling prediction in reverse osmosis processes', paper presented to The Twelfth International Symposium on Desalination and Water Re-Use, Malta, April 15-18.
[66] Caothien, S, Liu, C & O’Connell, P 2003, Reducing fouling and the cost of membrane systems, Pall Corporation, accessed 22 March 2018, .
[67] Kim, JY, Lee, JH, Chang, IS, Lee, JH, Yi, CW 2011, ‘High voltage impulse electric fields: Disinfection kinetics and its effect on membrane bio-fouling’, Desalination, vol. 283, pp. 111-6.
[68] She, F, Wong, YKW, Zhao, S, Tang, CY 2013, ‘Organic fouling in pressure retarded osmosis: Experiments, mechanisms and implications’, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 428, pp. 181-9.
[69] Cong, CS 2015, ‘Membrane fouling in engineering osmosis processes’, PhD Thesis, National University of Singapore.
[70] Kimura, K, Maeda, T, Yamamura, H, Watanabe, Y 2008, ‘Irreversible membrane fouling in microfiltration membranes filtering coagulated surface water’, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 320, pp. 356-62.
[71] Zularisam, A, Ismail, A & Salim, R 2006, 'Behaviours of natural organic matter in membrane filtration for surface water treatment - a review', Desalination, vol. 194, no. 1-3, pp. 211-31.
[72] Lin, YL, Chiou, JH, Lee, CH 2014, ‘Effect of silica fouling on the removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes’, Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 277, pp. 102-9.
[73] Katsoufidou, K, Yiantsios, SG, Karabelas, AJ 2008, 'An experimental study of UF membrane fouling by humic acid and sodium alginate solutions: the effect of backwashing on flux recovery', Desalination, vol. 220, pp. 214-27.
[74] Her, N, Amy, G, Chung, J, Yoon, J & Yoon, Y 2008, 'Characterizing dissolved organic matter and evaluating associated nanofiltration membrane fouling', Chemosphere, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 495-502.
[75] MacCarthy, P & Suffet, IH 1989, 'Aquatic Humic Substances and Their Influence on the Fate and Treatment of Pollutants', in IH Suffet & P MacCarthy (eds), Aquatic Humic Substances: Influence on Fate and Treatment of Pollutants, American Chemical Society, Washington, pp. xvii-xxx.
[76] [76] Vik, EA & Eikebrokk, B 1989, 'Coagulation process for removal of humic substances from drinking water', in IH Suffet & P MacCarthy (eds), Aquatic Humic Substances: Influence on Fate and Treatment of Pollutants, American Chemical Society, Washington, pp. 385-408.
[77] Bessiere, Y, Jefferson, B, Goslan, E, Bacchin, P 2009, ‘Effect of hydrophilic/hydrophobic fractions of natural organic matter on irreversible fouling of membranes’, Desalination, vol. 249, pp. 182-7.
[78] Jarusutthirak, C, Amy, G & Croué, J-P 2002, 'Fouling characteristics of wastewater effluent organic matter (EfOM) isolates on NF and UF membranes', Desalination, vol. 145, no. 1-3, pp. 247-55.
[79] Lee, N, Amy, G, Croue, J-P & Buisson, H 2004, 'Identification and understanding of fouling in low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) filtration by natural organic matter (NOM)', Water Research, vol. 38, no. 20, pp. 4511-23.
[80] Lee, M, Kim, J 2012, 'Analysis of local fouling in a pilot-scale submerged hollow-fiber membrane system for drinking water treatment by membrane autopsy', Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 95, pp. 227-34.
[81] Jarusutthirak, C & Amy, G 2006, 'Role of soluble microbial products (SMP) in membrane fouling and flux decline', Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 969-74.
[82] Fan, L, Harris, JL, Roddick, FA & Booker, NA 2001, 'Influence of the characteristics of natural organic matter on the fouling of microfiltration membranes', Water Research, vol. 35, no. 18, pp. 4455-63.
[83] Laabs, C, Amy, G & Jekel, M 2006, 'Understanding the size and character of fouling-causing substances from effluent organic matter (EfOM) in low-pressure filtration', Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 40, no. 14, pp. 4495-9.
[84] Haberkamp, J, Ruhl, AS, Ernst, M & Jekel, M 2007, 'Impact of coagulation and adsorption on DOC fractions of secondary effluent.
[85] Henderson, RK, Subhi, N, Antony, A, Khan, SJ, Murphy, KR, Leslie, GL, Chen, V, Stuetz, RM, Le-Clech, P 2011, 'Evaluation of effluent organic matter fouling in ultrafiltration treatment using advanced organic characterisation techniques', Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 382, no. 1-2, pp. 20-59.
[86] Schäfer, AI 1999, 'Natural organics removal using membranes', PhD thesis, The University of New South Wales.
[87] Shon, HK, Vigneswaran, S, Kim, IS, Cho, J & Ngo, HH 2006, 'Fouling of ultrafiltration membrane by effluent organic matter: A detailed characterization using different organic fractions in wastewater', Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 278, pp. 232-8.
[88] Wang, J, Guan, J, Santiwong, SR, David Waite, T 2008, ‘Characterization of floc size and structure under different monomer and polymer coagulants on microfiltration membrane fouling’, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 321, pp. 132-8.
[89] Aoustin, E, Schäfer, AI, Fane, AG & Waite, TD 2001, 'Ultrafiltration of natural organic matter', Separation and Purification
[90] Combe, C, Molis, E, Lucas, P, Riley, R & Clark, M 1999, 'The effect of CA membrane properties on adsorptive fouling by humic acid', Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 154, no. 1, pp. 73-87.
[91] Kim, HC & Dempsey, BA 2010, 'Removal of organic acids from EfOM using anion exchange resins and consequent reduction of fouling in UF and MF', Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 364, no. 1-2, pp. 325-30.
[92] Kim, HC & Dempsey, BA 2012, ‘Comparison of two fractionation strategies for characterization of wastewater effluent organic matter and diagnosis of membrane fouling’, Water Research, vol. 46, pp. 3714-22.
[93] Elimelech, M, Zhu, X, Childress, AE, Hong, S 1997, ‘Role of membrane surface morphology in colloidal fouling of cellulose acetate and composite aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membranes’, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 127, pp. 101-9.
[94] Kabsch-Korbutowicz, M, Majewska-Nowak, K, Winnicki, T 1999, ‘Analysis of membrane fouling in the treatment of water solutions containing humic acids and mineral salts’, Desalination, vol. 126, pp. 179-85.
[95] Nanda, D, Tung, KL, Li, YL, Lin, NJ, Chuang, CJ 2010, ‘Effect of pH on membrane morphology, fouling potential, and filtration performance of nanofiltration membrane for water softening, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 349, pp. 411-20.
[96] Dong, BZ, Chen, Y, Gao, NY, Fan, JC 2006, ‘Effect of pH on UF membrane fouling’, Desalination, vol. 195, pp. 201-8.
[97] Seidel, A & Elimelech, M 2002, 'Coupling between chemical and physical interactions in natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes: implications for fouling control', Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 203, pp. 245-55.
[98] Ghosh, K & Schnitzer, M 1980, 'Macromolecular structures of humic substances', Soil Science, vol. 129, no. 5, pp. 266-76.
[99] Ahn, WY, Kalinichev, AG, Clark, MM 2008, ‘Effects of background cations on the fouling of polyethersulfone membranes by natural organic matter: Experimental and molecular modeling study’, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 309, pp. 128-40.
[100] Liu, C, Caothien, S, Hayes, J, Caothuy, T, Otoyo, T & Ogawa, T 2001, 'Membrane chemical cleaning: from art to science', paper presented to The AWWA Water Quality Technology Conference, San Antonio, Texas, USA, March 4-7.
[101] Cho, J, Amy, G & Pellegrino, J 2000, 'Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: factors and mechanisms affecting rejection and flux decline with charged ultrafiltration (UF) membrane', Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 164, no. 1-2, pp. 89-110.
[102] Cheryan, M 1986, ‘Ultrafiltration handbook’, 1st Ed., Technomic Publishing, Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
[103] Crozes, GF, Jacangelo, JG, Anselme, C & Laîné, JM 1997, 'Impact of ultrafiltration operating conditions on membrane irreversible fouling', Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 63-76.
[104] Sheikholeslami, R 1999, 'Fouling mitigation in membrane processes', Desalination, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 45-53.
[105] Field, RW, Wu, D, Howell, JA & Gupta, BB 1995, 'Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling', Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 100, no. 1-2, pp. 259-72.
[106] Van den Berg, GB & Smolders, CA 1990, 'Flux decline in ultrafiltration processes', Desalination, vol. 77, pp. 101-33.
[107] Jung, CW, Son, HJ 2009, ‘Evaluation of membrane fouling mechanism in various membrane pretreatment processes’, Desalination and Water Treatment, vol. 2, pp. 195-202.
[108] Ghernaout, D, El-Wakil, A 2017, ‘Requiring reverse osmosis membranes modifications – An overview’, American Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 5, pp. 81-8.
[109] Ghernaout, D 2017, ‘Reverse osmosis process membranes modeling – A historical overview’, Journal of Civil Construction and Environmental Engineering Civil, vol. 2, pp. 112-22.
[110] Huang, H, Schwab, K & Jacangelo, J 2009, 'Pretreatment for low pressure membranes in water treatment: a review', Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 3011-9.
[111] Mao, R, Wang, Y, Zhang, B, Xu, W, Dong, M, Gao, B 2013, ‘Impact of enhanced coagulation ways on flocs properties and membrane fouling: Increasing dosage and applying new composite coagulant’, Desalination, vol. 314, 161-8.
[112] Ghernaout, D 2017, ‘Entropy in the Brownian motion (BM) and coagulation background’, Colloid Surface Science, vol. 2, pp. 143-61.
[113] Ghernaout, D, Simoussa, A, Alghamdi, A, Ghernaout, B, Elboughdiri, N, Mahjoubi, A, Aichouni, M, El-Wakil, AEA 2017, ‘Combining lime softening with alum coagulation for hard Ghrib dam water conventional treatment’, International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, vol. 5, pp. 61-70.
[114] Ghernaout, D, Ghernaout, B, Kellil, A 2009, ‘Natural organic matter removal and enhanced coagulation as a link between coagulation and electrocoagulation’, Desalination and Water Treatment, vol. 2, pp. 209-28.
[115] Ghernaout, B, Ghernaout, D, Saiba, A 2010, ‘Algae and cyanotoxins removal by coagulation/flocculation: A review’, Desalination and Water Treatment, vol. 20, pp. 133-43.
[116] Ghernaout, D 2014, ‘The hydrophilic/hydrophobic ratio vs. dissolved organics removal by coagulation - A review’, Journal of King Saud University – Science, vol. 26, pp. 169-80.
[117] Ghernaout, D, Al-Ghonamy, AI, Boucherit, A, Ghernaout, B, Naceur, MW, Ait Messaoudene, N, Aichouni, M, Mahjoubi, AA, Elboughdiri, NA 2015, ‘Brownian motion and coagulation process’, American Journal of Environmental Protection, vol. 4, pp. 1-15.
[118] Ghernaout, D, Al-Ghonamy, AI, Naceur, MW, Boucherit, A, Ait Messaoudene, N, Aichouni, M, Mahjoubi, AA, Elboughdiri, NA 2015, ‘Controlling coagulation process: From Zeta potential to streaming potential’, American Journal of Environmental Protection, vol. 4, pp. 16-27.
[119] Ghernaout, D, Boucherit, A 2015, ‘Review of coagulation’s rapid mixing for NOM removal’, Journal of Research & Developments in Chemistry, DOI: 10.5171/2015.926518.
[120] Ghernaout, D, Badis, A, Braikia, G, Matâam, N, Fekhar, M, Ghernaout, B, Boucherit, A 2017, ‘Enhanced coagulation for algae removal in a typical Algeria water treatment plant’, Environmental Engineering Management Journal, vol. 16, pp. 2303-15.
[121] Van Geluwe, S, Braeken, L, Van der Bruggen, B 2011, ‘Ozone oxidation for the alleviation of membrane fouling by natural organic matter: A review’, Water Research, vol. 45, pp. 3551-70.
[122] Abdessemed, D, Nezzal, G & Aim, RB 2000, 'Coagulation-adsorption-ultrafiltration for wastewater treatment reuse', Desalination, vol. 131, no. 1-3, pp. 307-14.
[123] Guo, WS, Vigneswaran, S, Ngo, HH & Chapman, H 2004, 'Experimental investigation of adsorption-flocculation-microfiltration hybrid system in wastewater reuse', Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 242, no. 1-2, pp. 27-35.
[124] Lehman, SG & Liu, L 2009, 'Application of ceramic membranes with pre-ozonation for treatment of secondary wastewater effluent', Water Research, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 2020-8.
Author Information
  • National Initiative on Creativity and Innovation Project, College of Engineering, University of Ha’il, Ha’il, Saudi Arabia; Chemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Blida, Blida, Algeria

  • National Initiative on Creativity and Innovation Project, College of Engineering, University of Ha’il, Ha’il, Saudi Arabia

  • National Initiative on Creativity and Innovation Project, College of Engineering, University of Ha’il, Ha’il, Saudi Arabia

  • National Initiative on Creativity and Innovation Project, College of Engineering, University of Ha’il, Ha’il, Saudi Arabia

  • National Initiative on Creativity and Innovation Project, College of Engineering, University of Ha’il, Ha’il, Saudi Arabia

  • National Initiative on Creativity and Innovation Project, College of Engineering, University of Ha’il, Ha’il, Saudi Arabia

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Djamel Ghernaout, Yasser Alshammari, Abdulaziz Alghamdi, Mohamed Aichouni, Mabrouk Touahmia, et al. (2018). Water Reuse: Extenuating Membrane Fouling in Membrane Processes. American Journal of Chemical Engineering, 6(2), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajche.20180602.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Djamel Ghernaout; Yasser Alshammari; Abdulaziz Alghamdi; Mohamed Aichouni; Mabrouk Touahmia, et al. Water Reuse: Extenuating Membrane Fouling in Membrane Processes. Am. J. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6(2), 25-36. doi: 10.11648/j.ajche.20180602.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Djamel Ghernaout, Yasser Alshammari, Abdulaziz Alghamdi, Mohamed Aichouni, Mabrouk Touahmia, et al. Water Reuse: Extenuating Membrane Fouling in Membrane Processes. Am J Chem Eng. 2018;6(2):25-36. doi: 10.11648/j.ajche.20180602.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajche.20180602.12,
      author = {Djamel Ghernaout and Yasser Alshammari and Abdulaziz Alghamdi and Mohamed Aichouni and Mabrouk Touahmia and Noureddine Ait Messaoudene},
      title = {Water Reuse: Extenuating Membrane Fouling in Membrane Processes},
      journal = {American Journal of Chemical Engineering},
      volume = {6},
      number = {2},
      pages = {25-36},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajche.20180602.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajche.20180602.12},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajche.20180602.12},
      abstract = {Membrane fouling has been recognized as a serious barrier in microfiltration and ultrafiltration of secondary effluent. Feed pre-treatment is a frequent use for fouling extenuation. Numerous techniques have been employed to monitor membrane fouling. These include: Pre-treatment of the feedwater, modification of membrane properties, optimization of module configuration and operating conditions, periodic membrane cleaning, evaluation of system performance using pilot plant, and use of predictive models. However, membrane fouling remains complicated task for both technico-economic reasons depending on water characteristics and pre-treatment processes and efficiencies. The large majority of the membranes employed in water and wastewater treatment are produced of polymeric materials. Nevertheless, it has been expected that ceramic membranes will be competitive options in the following years.},
     year = {2018}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Water Reuse: Extenuating Membrane Fouling in Membrane Processes
    AU  - Djamel Ghernaout
    AU  - Yasser Alshammari
    AU  - Abdulaziz Alghamdi
    AU  - Mohamed Aichouni
    AU  - Mabrouk Touahmia
    AU  - Noureddine Ait Messaoudene
    Y1  - 2018/05/04
    PY  - 2018
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajche.20180602.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajche.20180602.12
    T2  - American Journal of Chemical Engineering
    JF  - American Journal of Chemical Engineering
    JO  - American Journal of Chemical Engineering
    SP  - 25
    EP  - 36
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8613
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajche.20180602.12
    AB  - Membrane fouling has been recognized as a serious barrier in microfiltration and ultrafiltration of secondary effluent. Feed pre-treatment is a frequent use for fouling extenuation. Numerous techniques have been employed to monitor membrane fouling. These include: Pre-treatment of the feedwater, modification of membrane properties, optimization of module configuration and operating conditions, periodic membrane cleaning, evaluation of system performance using pilot plant, and use of predictive models. However, membrane fouling remains complicated task for both technico-economic reasons depending on water characteristics and pre-treatment processes and efficiencies. The large majority of the membranes employed in water and wastewater treatment are produced of polymeric materials. Nevertheless, it has been expected that ceramic membranes will be competitive options in the following years.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections