American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry

| Peer-Reviewed |

Efficacy of Pre-emergence Herbicides for the Control of Major Weeds in Maize (Zea mays L.) at Bako, Western Oromia, Ethiopia

Received: 19 July 2017    Accepted: 1 August 2017    Published: 17 October 2017
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to evaluate efficacy of pre-emergence herbicides against major weeds in maize at Bako during the main rainy season of 2016/17. The trial was laid out in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replication, and consisted of five treatments including pre-emergence application of Lunar 537.5 SE at 3L/ha, Venus 500 SC at 6L/ha and Prima gram dual Gold 660sc at 3 L/ha, and two times hand weeding at 25 and 40 DAS and weedy check for comparison. Application treatments boosted maize grain yield over weedy check plots there by reducing weed infestation. Analysis of variance showed statistically significance difference (P < 0.01) for total weed density (m-2) and dry weight (gm. -2). Significantly the minimum density (8.5 m-2) was observed in plots treated two times hand weeding which was statistically similar with evaluated herbicides. In contrary, the highest (39.1 m-2) was observed in weedy check plots. All the herbicide treatments provided significant control of weeds causing significant reduction in density of target weed flora and also significantly improved the grain yield in comparison with the weedy check. However, no crop injury was observed in any of the herbicide treatments. The maximum grain yield (57.57 qt ha-1) was obtained from Lunar 537.5 SE at 3L/ha followed by two times hand weeding (57.08 qt ha-1) and Venus 500 SC at 6L/ha (54.03 qt ha-1) having the yield advantage of 67.92, 67.64 and 65.82 respectively, whereas; the minimum (18.47 qt ha-1) was from weedy check plots. In general application pre-emergence herbicides effectively control weeds in maize and reduce yield losses. Thus, the newly tested pre-emergence herbicides (Lunar 537.5 SE at 3L/ha and Venus 500 SC at 6L/ha) alone could be option to major weeds and increase maize grain yield.

DOI 10.11648/j.ajaf.20170505.15
Published in American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 5, Issue 5, September 2017)
Page(s) 173-180
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Efficacy, Maize Yield, Major Weeds, Pre-emergence Herbicides, Residual Action

References
[1] Adetunji M (2007). Economics of maize storage techniques in Kwara State, Nigeria. Pakistan J. Soc. Sci. 4: 442-450.
[2] Legesse B. W., K. V. Pixley, & A. M. Botha, 2009. Combining ability and heterotic grouping of highland transition maize inbred lines. Maydica 54: 1-9.
[3] CSA (Central Statistical Agency). 2008. Agricultural Sample Survey of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia 2004/05. Report on land utilization of private peasant holdings, ‘Meher’ season. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[4] Benti, T., Kebede, M., Legese W., Mosisa W. and Lata T., 1997. Reflections on the successful achievements of hybrid maize breeding program in Ethiopia. In: Ransom J. K., Palmer A. F. E, Zambezi Z. O., Waddington S. R., Pixley K. V. and Jewell D. C., (eds). Maize productivity gains through research and technology dissemination. pp 67-71.
[5] Mosisa W., J. Abdurehman, L. Tulu, H. Juna, L. Wolde, K. Yihun, W. Abera, A. Guta, S. Tariku, T. Asefa, T. Birhanu, Y. Beyene and H. Zeleke. 2001. Development of improved maize germplasm for the mid and low altitude sub-humid agro-ecologies of Ethiopia. Proceedings of the second National Maize Workshop of Ethiopia. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. November 12-16, 2001. Pp 27-30.
[6] Farnham, D. E., Benson, G. O. & Pearce, R. B. 2003. Corn perspective and culture. Pp. 1-33. In: P. J. White & L. A. Johnson (eds). Corn: Chemistry and Technology. American Association of Cerial Chemists, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA. ng of highland transition maize inbred lines. Maydica 54: 1-9.
[7] Troyer, A. F. 2004. Background of US hybrid corn II: Breeding, climate and food. Crop Sci., 44: 370-380.
[8] Abate T, Shiferae B, Menkir A, Wegary D, Kebede Y, Tesfaye K, Kassie M, Bogale G, Tadesse B, Keno T. 2015. Factors that transformed maize productivity in Ethiopia. Food security 7 (5): 965-981.
[9] Fassil Reda, Matias Mekuria, Rezene Fessehayie and Tamado Tana, 2006. Weed research in sorghum and maize. Pp. 303-323. In: Abraham Tadesse (eds.) proceeding of the 14th annual conference of the plant protection society of Ethiopia (PPSE) 19-22 December 2006, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[10] Karlen, L. D., D. D. Buhler, M. M. Ellusbury, S. S. Andrews, 2002. Soil, weeds and insect management strategies for sustainable agriculture. J. Biol. Sci. 2, 58-62.
[11] Chikoye, D., F. Ekeleme, 2003. Cover crops for cogon grass management and effects on subsequent yield. Weed Sci. 51, 792-797.
[12] Gupta, O. P. 2004. Modern weed management (2nd Ed.). Agrobios Jodhpur, India. pp. 18-23.
[13] Khan, SA, N Hussain, IA Khan, M Khan and M Iqbal. 1998. Study on weed control in maize. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 14: 581-586.
[14] Tesfaye A, Amin M, Mulugeta N (2014) Management of Weeds in Maize (Zea mays L.) through Various Pre and Post Emergency Herbicides. Adv Crop Sci Tech 2: 151.
[15] Chikoye, D, J Ellis- Jone, C Riches and L Kanyomeka. 2007. Weed management in Africa: Experiences, Challenges and Opportunities. Pp. 652-653. In: 16th International plant Protection Congress.
[16] Ali, R, SK Khali, SM Raza and H Khan. 2003. Effects of herbicides and row spacing on maize (Zeamays L.) Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 9: 171-178.
[17] Chikoye, D., S. Schulz, F. Ekeleme, 2004. Evaluation of integrated weed manage¬ment practices for maize in the northern Guinea savanna of Nigeria. Crop Prot. 23, 895–900.
[18] Chikoye D, Udensi UE and Lum AF (2005) Evaluation of a new formulation of atrazine and metolachlor mixture for weed control in maize in Nigeria. Crop Protection 24 (11) 1016-1020.
[19] Shakoor, A, M Nadeem and CO Ahmed. 1986. Efficiency of different herbicides for control of weed in maize under rain-fed conditions. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 7: 264-268.
[20] Correa AJA, De La Rosa Mora MM, Dominguez YJA (1990). Demonstration plots for chemical weed control in rain fed maize (Zea mays L.) sown with minimum tillage in Acolmn Mexico Revist Chapingo 15: 164-166.
[21] Owen MDK, Hartzler RG, Lux J (1993). Wooly cup grass (Eriochloaviosa) control in corn (Zea. mays L.) with Chloroacetamide herbicides. Weed Technology 7: 925-929.
[22] Malik, M. A., F. Zahoor, S. H. Abbas and M. Ansar. 2006. Comparative study of different herbicides for control of weeds in rainfed maize (Zea mays L.). WSSP Absts. Weed Sci. Soc. Pak. Pp: 62.
[23] Khan, M. A., K. B. Marwat, G. Hassan and N. Khan. 2002. Impact of weed management on maize (Zea mays L.) planted at night. Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res. 8 (1-2): 57-61.
[24] Sharma, R. K., K. S. Sandhu, 1985. Residual effect of atrazine and simazine applied to odder maize sown on different dates on the succeeding wheat. Indian J. Weed Sci. 17, 29-34.
[25] Sunitha, N., R. P. Maheshwara and S. Malleswari, 2010. Effect of cultural manipulation and weed management practices on weed dynamics and performance of sweet corn (Zea mays L.). Indian J. Weed Sci. 42, 184 -188.
[26] Hassan, A. A. A. and M. K. A. Ahmed. 2005. The influence of some herbicides and additional hoeing in maize growth and yield and yield components. Int. J. Agri. Biol. 7 (5): 708-711.
[27] Owen, M. J., M. J. Walsh, R. Llewellyn and S. B. Powles. 2007. Wide-spread occurrence of multiple herbicide resistance in Western Australian annual ryegrass (Lolium riyidum) populations. Aus. J. Agric. Res. 58 (7): 711–718.
[28] Cruz, E. D., Moody, K. and Ramos, M. B. D. 1986. Reducing variability in sampling weeds in transplant aman rice (Oryza sativa L.). Philippines J. Weed Sci. 13: 56-59.
[29] Sawant, A. C. and Jadhav, S. N. 1985. Efficiency of different herbicides for weed control in transplanted rice in Konkan. Indian J. Weed Sci. 17 (3): 35-39.
[30] Mehmeti AA, Demaj I, Demelezi, Rudari H (2012) Effect of Post-Emergence Herbicides on Weeds and Yield of Maize. Pak J Weed Sci Res 18: 27 37.
[31] Mahadi MA, Dadari SA, Mahmud M, Babaji BA, Mani H (2007) Effect of some rice based herbicides on yield and yield components of maize. Crop Protection 26, 1601-1605.
[32] Khan MA, Marwat KB, Khan N, Khan IA (2003) Efficacy of different herbicides on the yield and yield components of maize. Asian Journal of plant Sciences 2, 300-304.
[33] Muhammad, N., M. Ashiq, A. Gaffar, A. Sattar, M. Arshad, 2012. Comparative efficacy of new herbicides for weed control in maize (Zea mays L.). Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res. 18, 247-254.
[34] Abdullah, G. Hassan, I. A. Khan, S. A. Khan, H. Ali, 2008. Impact of planting methods and herbicides on weed biomass and some agronomic traits of maize. Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res. 14, 121-130.
[35] Hassan G, Tanveerl S, Khan and NU, Munir M (2010). Integrating cultivars with reduced herbicide Rates for weed management in maize. Pak J Bot 42: 1923-1929.
[36] Subhan, F., N. U. Din, A. Azim, Z. Shah, 2007. Response of maize crop to various her¬bicides. Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res. 13, 9-15.
[37] Shah, M. H. and P. K. Koul, (1990). Fertilizer and herbicide compatibility to control weeds in maize under moisture stress conditions. Annals Agric. Res., 11: 21.
[38] Thakur, D. R. (1994). Weed management in intercropping systems based on maize under rain fed mid Hill condition. Indian J. Agron., 39: 203.
[39] Waheedullah, M. A. Khan. S. Arifullah and M. Sadiq. 2008. Evaluation of Integrated weed management practices for maize (Zea mays L.). Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res. 14 (1-2): 19-32.
[40] Malik, M. A., F. Zahoor, S. H. Abbas and M. Ansar. 2006. Comparative study of different herbicides for control of weeds in rainfed maize (Zea mays L.). WSSP Absts. Weed Sci. Soc. Pak., 62p.
[41] Khan, M., N. Haq and A. Q. Syed. 1991. The effect of pre and post-emergence herbicide on weeds control and grain yield of maize. Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res. 4: 118-124.
[42] Khan, M., N. Haq and M. Khan. 1993. The effect of pre-emergence herbicides on weed control and maize grain yield, on farmers’ field. Sarhad J. Agric. 9 (5): 415-421.
[43] Khan, M and W Hassan. 2003. Effect of s-metolachlor on weed control and yield in different crops. Journal of Agriculture, 19: 333-339.
[44] Marwat KB, Khan MA (2007) Climatic variation and growth of Holy Thistle (Silybum marianum Gearth.). Pakistan Journal of Botany 39, 319-327.
[45] Khogali I, Dafalla A, and Hassan A. 2015. Herbicidal Efficacy of atrazine for Weed Control in Maize (Zea mays L.). SUST Journal of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, 16 (2): 37-48.
[46] Rasool S, Khan M. 2016. Growth and Yield of Maize (Zea mays L.) as Influenced by Integrated Weed Management under Temperate Conditions of North Western Himalayas. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 14 (1): 1-9.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Megersa Kebede, Fufa Anbasa. (2017). Efficacy of Pre-emergence Herbicides for the Control of Major Weeds in Maize (Zea mays L.) at Bako, Western Oromia, Ethiopia. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 5(5), 173-180. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20170505.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Megersa Kebede; Fufa Anbasa. Efficacy of Pre-emergence Herbicides for the Control of Major Weeds in Maize (Zea mays L.) at Bako, Western Oromia, Ethiopia. Am. J. Agric. For. 2017, 5(5), 173-180. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20170505.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Megersa Kebede, Fufa Anbasa. Efficacy of Pre-emergence Herbicides for the Control of Major Weeds in Maize (Zea mays L.) at Bako, Western Oromia, Ethiopia. Am J Agric For. 2017;5(5):173-180. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20170505.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20170505.15,
      author = {Megersa Kebede and Fufa Anbasa},
      title = {Efficacy of Pre-emergence Herbicides for the Control of Major Weeds in Maize (Zea mays L.) at Bako, Western Oromia, Ethiopia},
      journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry},
      volume = {5},
      number = {5},
      pages = {173-180},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20170505.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20170505.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20170505.15},
      abstract = {A field experiment was conducted to evaluate efficacy of pre-emergence herbicides against major weeds in maize at Bako during the main rainy season of 2016/17. The trial was laid out in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replication, and consisted of five treatments including pre-emergence application of Lunar 537.5 SE at 3L/ha, Venus 500 SC at 6L/ha and Prima gram dual Gold 660sc at 3 L/ha, and two times hand weeding at 25 and 40 DAS and weedy check for comparison. Application treatments boosted maize grain yield over weedy check plots there by reducing weed infestation. Analysis of variance showed statistically significance difference (P < 0.01) for total weed density (m-2) and dry weight (gm. -2). Significantly the minimum density (8.5 m-2) was observed in plots treated two times hand weeding which was statistically similar with evaluated herbicides. In contrary, the highest (39.1 m-2) was observed in weedy check plots. All the herbicide treatments provided significant control of weeds causing significant reduction in density of target weed flora and also significantly improved the grain yield in comparison with the weedy check. However, no crop injury was observed in any of the herbicide treatments. The maximum grain yield (57.57 qt ha-1) was obtained from Lunar 537.5 SE at 3L/ha followed by two times hand weeding (57.08 qt ha-1) and Venus 500 SC at 6L/ha (54.03 qt ha-1) having the yield advantage of 67.92, 67.64 and 65.82 respectively, whereas; the minimum (18.47 qt ha-1) was from weedy check plots. In general application pre-emergence herbicides effectively control weeds in maize and reduce yield losses. Thus, the newly tested pre-emergence herbicides (Lunar 537.5 SE at 3L/ha and Venus 500 SC at 6L/ha) alone could be option to major weeds and increase maize grain yield.},
     year = {2017}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Efficacy of Pre-emergence Herbicides for the Control of Major Weeds in Maize (Zea mays L.) at Bako, Western Oromia, Ethiopia
    AU  - Megersa Kebede
    AU  - Fufa Anbasa
    Y1  - 2017/10/17
    PY  - 2017
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20170505.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20170505.15
    T2  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    JF  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    JO  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    SP  - 173
    EP  - 180
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8591
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20170505.15
    AB  - A field experiment was conducted to evaluate efficacy of pre-emergence herbicides against major weeds in maize at Bako during the main rainy season of 2016/17. The trial was laid out in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replication, and consisted of five treatments including pre-emergence application of Lunar 537.5 SE at 3L/ha, Venus 500 SC at 6L/ha and Prima gram dual Gold 660sc at 3 L/ha, and two times hand weeding at 25 and 40 DAS and weedy check for comparison. Application treatments boosted maize grain yield over weedy check plots there by reducing weed infestation. Analysis of variance showed statistically significance difference (P < 0.01) for total weed density (m-2) and dry weight (gm. -2). Significantly the minimum density (8.5 m-2) was observed in plots treated two times hand weeding which was statistically similar with evaluated herbicides. In contrary, the highest (39.1 m-2) was observed in weedy check plots. All the herbicide treatments provided significant control of weeds causing significant reduction in density of target weed flora and also significantly improved the grain yield in comparison with the weedy check. However, no crop injury was observed in any of the herbicide treatments. The maximum grain yield (57.57 qt ha-1) was obtained from Lunar 537.5 SE at 3L/ha followed by two times hand weeding (57.08 qt ha-1) and Venus 500 SC at 6L/ha (54.03 qt ha-1) having the yield advantage of 67.92, 67.64 and 65.82 respectively, whereas; the minimum (18.47 qt ha-1) was from weedy check plots. In general application pre-emergence herbicides effectively control weeds in maize and reduce yield losses. Thus, the newly tested pre-emergence herbicides (Lunar 537.5 SE at 3L/ha and Venus 500 SC at 6L/ha) alone could be option to major weeds and increase maize grain yield.
    VL  - 5
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Bako Agricultural Research Center, Bako, West Shoa, Ethiopia

  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Bako Agricultural Research Center, Bako, West Shoa, Ethiopia

  • Sections