The Effect of Clinoptilolite on Long Bone Morphometry in Japanese Quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica)
Animal and Veterinary Sciences
Volume 2, Issue 6, November 2014, Pages: 179-183
Received: Nov. 3, 2014; Accepted: Nov. 12, 2014; Published: Nov. 17, 2014
Views 3388      Downloads 178
Authors
Yasin Demiraslan, Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Turkey
Tuncay Tufan, Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafkas University, Kars, Turkey
Mehmet Sari, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Turkey
Yalcin Akbulut, Kars College of Health, Kafkas University, Kars, Turkey
Mustafa Orhun Dayan, Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey
Abdulsamed Kukurt, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafkas University, Kars, Turkey
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
This study was aimed to investigate the effect of clinoptilolite long bone morphometry in Japanese quail. In the study, 100 female Japanese quails were used. The animals were slaughtered in 42nd day of study. The long bones of the animals were macerated by boiling. Twenty-three values were measured from the bones. Consequently, it was determined that the addition of clinoptilolite to feed ration in various ratios caused some statistical changes in the morphometry of long bones. The reason of this case is considered as high silicate ingredient available in clinoptilolite.
Keywords
Bone, Japanese quail, Morphometry, Silicon, Zeolite
To cite this article
Yasin Demiraslan, Tuncay Tufan, Mehmet Sari, Yalcin Akbulut, Mustafa Orhun Dayan, Abdulsamed Kukurt, The Effect of Clinoptilolite on Long Bone Morphometry in Japanese Quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica), Animal and Veterinary Sciences. Vol. 2, No. 6, 2014, pp. 179-183. doi: 10.11648/j.avs.20140206.14
References
[1]
Ayvaz Z. 2004.The Raw Material of 21st Century: Zeolite. Ekoloji Magazin, 1
[2]
Erener G and Sarıcicek BZ. 1995. The use of zeolite in poultry animal feeding. Teknik Tavukculuk Dergisi, 82, 18-22.
[3]
Leung S. 2004. The Effect of Clinoptilolite Properties and Supplementation Levels on Swine Performance. Department of Bioresource Engineering, McGill University, PhD Thesis Montreal.
[4]
Virta RL. 1998. Zeolites. Geological Survey Puplication. U.S., p: 4, 1998.
[5]
Çolpan I., Yalçın S., Ergün A., Tuncer SD., Küçükersan K., Onol AG., Yıldız G. 1995. Studies on Zeolite Using in Animal Feeding. Marmara Region II. Animal Husbandry Congress, October 25-27, Bursa, Turkey.
[6]
Yalcin S., Ergun A., Colpan I., Kucukersan K. 1987. The Effects of Zeolite on Laying Hens. Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 27, 28-49.
[7]
Melenova L., Ciahotny K., Jirglova H., Kusa H., Ruzek P. 2003. Removal of ammonia from waste gas by means of adsorption on zeolites and their subsequent use in agriculture (in Czech). Chemicke Listy, 97, 562-568.
[8]
Altan O., Cabuk M., Bozkurt M., Altan A., Ozkan K., Alcicek A. 1998. III. Effect of Zeolite on Performance, Egg Quality, Some Parameters of Tibia and Blood of Laying Hen. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 35, 25-32.
[9]
Bozkurt M., Basmacioglu H., Alcicek A., Cabuk M. 2001. Effect of Natural Zeolite on Laying Hen Performance. Tavukculuk Arastırma Dergisi, 3, 8-11.
[10]
Fethiere R., Miles RD., Harms RH. 1990. Influence of Synthetic Sodium Aluminosilicate on Laying Hens Fed Different Phosphorus Levels. Poultry Science, 69, 2195-8.
[11]
Nakaue HS and Koelliker JK. 1981. Studies with clinoptilolite in poultry. 1. effect of feeding varying levels of clinoptilolite (zeolite) to dwarf single comb white leghorn pullets and ammonia production. Poultry Science. 60, 944-9.
[12]
Ozturk E., Erener G., Sarica M. 1996. Influence of natural zeolite on performance of laying hens and egg quality. Turkish Journal of Agriculture Forestry. 22, 623-628.
[13]
NRC. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th rev. ed. National Academy Press, Washington.
[14]
Driesch A Von Den. 1976. A guide to the measurements of animal bones from Archaeological Sites. Harvard Peabody Museum Bulletins. 1, 1-137.
[15]
AOAC. 2000. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 1th Ed., AOAC International, Maryland, USA.
[16]
Baumel JJ., King SA., Breasile JE., Evans HE., Berge JCV. 1993. Nomina Anatomica Avium. 2nd edition, prepared by the international committee on avian anatomical nomenclature, A Committee of The World Association of Veterinary Anatomists. Nuttall Ornithological Club. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
[17]
Rath NC., Balog JM., Huff WE., Huff GR., Kulkarni GB., Tierce JF. 1999. Comparative difference in the composition and biomechanical properties of tibiae of seven-and seventy-two-week-old male and female broiler breeder chickens. Journal of Poultry Science. 78, 1232-9.
[18]
Williams B., Waddington D., Solomon S., Thorp B., Farquharson C. 2000. Skeletal development in the meat-type chicken. British Poultry Science, 41, 141–149, 2000.
[19]
Alfonso-Torres KA., Gargaglioni LH., Pizauro JM., Faria Filho DE., Furlan RL., Macari M. 2009. Breeder age and bone development in broiler chicken embryos. Arquivo Brasileiro De Medicina Veterinaria Zootecnia, 61, 219-226.
[20]
Farquharson C and Jefferies D. 2000. Chondrocytes and longitudinal bone growth: the development of tibial dyschondroplasia. Poultry Science, 79, 994-1004.
[21]
Magnusson P., Larsson L., Magnusson M., Davie MWJ., Sharp CA. 1999. Isoforms of bone alkaline phosphatase: Characterization and origin in human trabecular and cortical bone. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 14, 1926-33.
[22]
Risteli L and Risteli J. 1993. Biochemical markers of bone metabolism. Annals of Medicine, 25, 385-393.
[23]
Safaeikatouli M., Jafariahangari Y., Baharlouei A. 2011. An Evaluation on the Effects of Dietary Kaolin and Zeolite on Broilers Blood Parameters, T4, TSH and Growth Hormones. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 10, 233-237.
[24]
Elliot MA and Edwards HM. 1991. Comparison of the Effects of Synthetic and Natural Zeolite on Laying Hen and Broiler Chicken Performance. Poultry Science, 70, 2115-30.
[25]
Rabon HW., Roland DA., Bryant MM., Robert SC., Barnes DG., Lurent SM. 1995. Absorbtion of Silicon and Aluminum by Hens Fed Sodium Zeolite A with Various Levels of Dietary Cholecalciferol. Poultry Science, 74, 352-359.
[26]
Schiano A., Eisinger F., Detolle P., Laponche AM., Brisou B., Eisinger J. 1979. Silicon, bone tissue and immunity. Revue du Rhumatisme et Maladies Osteoarticularies, 46, 483–486.
[27]
Brady MC, Dobson PRM, Thavarajah M, Kanis JA. 1991. Zeolite A stimulates proliferation and protein synthesis in human osteoblast-like cells and the osteosarcoma cell line MG 63. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 6: 39.
[28]
Carlisle EM. 1972. Silicon: an essential element for the chick. Science, 178, 619.
[29]
Carlisle EM. 1986. Silicon as an essential trace element in animal nutrition. In: Evered, D., O'Connor, M., editors. Silicon Biochemistry Ciba Foundation Symposium 121. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. Chichester, 123-139.
[30]
Schwarz K and Milne DB. 1972. Growth promoting effects of silicon in rats. Nature 239, 333–334.
[31]
Carlisle EM. 1976. In vivo requirement for silicon in articular cartilage and connective tissue formation in the chick. Journal of Nutrition, 106, 478–484.
[32]
Seaborn CD and Nielsen FH. 2002. Silicon deprivation decreases collagen formation in wounds and bone, and ornithine transaminase enzyme activity in liver. Biological Trace Element Research, 89, 251–261.
[33]
Visser JJ and Hoekman K. 1994. Arginine supplementation in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Medical Hypotheses, 43, 339–342.
[34]
Hashimoto M., Hitoshi H., Sirisoontorn I., Nakano T., Arita K., Tanaka M., Yoshida N. 2013. The effect of bone morphometric changes on orthodontic tooth movement in an osteoporotic animal model. Angle Orthodontist, 83, 776-83.
[35]
Pederson L., Kremer M., Judd J., Pascoe D., Spelsberg TC., Riggs BL., Oursler MO. 1999. Androgens regulate bone resorption activity of isolated osteolasts in vitro. Proceding of the National Academy of Science, 96, 505-516.
[36]
Kocabagli N. 2001. The effect of dietary phytase supplementation at different levels on tibial bone characteristics and strength in broilers. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science, 25, 797-802.
[37]
Neumann J. 1986. Changes in bone tissue of broilers treated with growth promoters. Acta Veterinaria Brno, 55, 285-291.
[38]
Buckner GD., Insko WMJ., Harms A., Wachs EF. 1950. The comparative rates of growth and calcification of the femur, tibia and metatarsus bones of the male and female New Hampshire chicken having straight keel. Poultry Science, 29, 332–335.
[39]
Jendral MJ., Korver DR., Church JS., Feddes JJR. 2008. Bone mineral density and breaking strength of White Leghorns housed in conventional, modified, and commercially available colony battery cages. Poultry Science, 87, 828–837.
[40]
Lilburn MS. 1994. Skeletal growth of commercial poultry species. Poultry Science, 73, 897–903.
[41]
Norman AW and Hurwitz S. 1993. The role of the vitamin D endocrine system in avian bone biology. Journal of Nutrition, 123, 310–316.
[42]
Applegate TJ and Lilburn MS. 2002. Growth of the femur and tibia of a commercial broiler line. Poultry Science, 81, 1289–1294.
[43]
Dibner JJ., Richards JD., Kitchell ML., Quiroz MA. 2007. Metabolic challenges and early bone development. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 16, 126–137.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186