The Morphometric Values of the Native Duck and Gooses' Heads: A Computed Tomography Study
Animal and Veterinary Sciences
Volume 2, Issue 6, November 2014, Pages: 175-178
Received: Nov. 4, 2014;
Accepted: Nov. 11, 2014;
Published: Nov. 20, 2014
Views 2937 Downloads 182
Mustafa Orhun Dayan, Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Selcuk, Konya, TURKEY
Yasin Demiraslan, Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Mehmet Akif Ersoy, Burdur, TURKEY
Yalcin Akbulut, Collage of Health, University of Kafkas, Kars, TURKEY
Mahmut Duymus, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kafkas, Kars, TURKEY
Murat Sirri Akosman, Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Afyon Kocatepe, Afyonkarahisar, TURKEY
Computed tomography (CT) is used for anthropomorphometrical studies for creating macroscopic and microscopic models and revealing the phenotypic differences quickly in small animals. This study aimed to determine the morphometric differences of the head native duck and goose, and to presented measurements (length and volume) of their heads, using CT images. For this purpose, the heads of ten male geese and ducks were used. Moreover, nine different anatomic structures were measured on the CT images, and six indexes were calculated. Consequently, each parameter of duck and goose heads showed significant difference between each other, except head volume and greatest high (p<0.05 or 0.01). Besides, it was settled that the calculated indexes had statistically differences among the native goose and ducks' head (p<0.05 or 0.01). According to this result, it was concluded that the morphometric CT measurements would be used to difference of the native goose and ducks’ head.
Mustafa Orhun Dayan,
Murat Sirri Akosman,
The Morphometric Values of the Native Duck and Gooses' Heads: A Computed Tomography Study, Animal and Veterinary Sciences.
Vol. 2, No. 6,
2014, pp. 175-178.
Testik, A. 1995. The situation of ducks and geese production in Turkey. Proc. of 10th European Symposium on Waterfowl. 43-45 pp.
Demirsoy, A. 1992. Basic Rules of Life. Vertebrates (reptiles, birds and mammals) 1 Print Volume 3 Part 2 Meteksan Inc. Ankara.
Selcuk, E. and Akyurt, I. 1986. Breeding duck. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Publications, No: 8, Ankara.
Tilki, M. and Saatci, M. 2013. Goose Breeding Ground Up. 1th Ed., Salmat Publishing and Printing, Ankara, 15-40 pp.
Turkish Statistical Institute. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id =1002. Accessed:11.09.2013
Rohlf, F.J. and Marcus, L.F. 1993. A revolution in morphometrics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 8, 129-132.
Turner, C.H., Sun, Q., Schriefer, J., Pitner, N., Price, R., Bouxsein, M.L., Rosen, C.J., Donahue, L.R., Shultz, K.L. and Beamer, W.G. 2003. Congenic mice reveal sex-specific genetic regulation of femoral structure and strength. Calcified Tissue International, 73, 297-303.
Silha, J.V., Mishra, S., Rosen, C.J., Beamer, W.G., Turner, R.T., Powell, D.R. and Murphy, L.J. 2003. Perturbations in bone formation and resorption in insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 transgenic mice. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 18, 1834-1841.
Moverare, S., Venken, K., Eriksson, A.L., Andersson, N., Skrtic, S., Wergedal, J., Mohan, S., Salmon, P., Bouillon, R., Gustafsson, J.A., Vanderschueren, D. and Ohlsson, C. 2003. Differential effects on bone of estrogen receptor alpha and androgen receptor activation in orchidectomized adult male mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 13573-13578.
Paulus, M.J., Gleason, S.S., Easterly, M.E. and Foltz, C.J. 2001. A review of high-resolution X-ray computed tomography and other imaging modalities for small animal research. Laboratory Animals, 30, 36-45.
Kindlmann, G.L., Weinstein, D.M., Jones, G.M., Johnson, C.R., Capecchi, M.R. and Keller, C. 2005. Practical vessel imaging by computed tomography in live transgenicmouse models for human tumors. Moleculer Imaging, 4, 417-424.
Barbee, D.D., Allen, J.R. and Gavin, P.R. 1987. Computed tomography in horses: Technique. Veterinary Radiology&Ultrasound. 28, 144-151.
Gibbs, C. 1999. Dental imaging. In, Baker GJ, Easley J (Eds): Equine Dentistry. Philadelphia, WB Saund, 139-169.
Forbes, N.A. 2011. Advanced Imaging Diagnostics in Avian Veterinary Practice. Parrots, 34 -35.
Regedon, S., Franco, A., Garin, J.M., Robina, A. and Lignereux, Y. 1991. Computed tomographic determination of the cranial volume of the dog applied to racial and sexual differentiation. Acta Anatomica, 142, 347-350.
Regedon, S., Franco, A., Lignereux, Y., Garin, J.M., Robina, A. and Martin, A. 1992. Skull volume in Pekingese dogs. Tomodensitometry and sex-linked difference. Revue de Medecine Veterinaire, 143, 745-748.
Robina, A., Regedon, S., Guillen, M.T. and Lignereux, Y. 1991. Utilization of computed tomography for the determination of the volume of the cranial cavity of the Galgo hound. Acta Anatomica, 140, 108-111.
Onuk, B., Kabak, M,. Sahin, B., Ince, N.G. and Selcuk, M.B. 2013. New method for estimating the volume and volume fractions of the nasal structures in the goose (Anser anser domesticus) using computed tomography images. British Poultry Science, 54, 441-446.
Duymus, M., Demiraslan, Y., Akbulut, Y., Orman, G., Aslan, K. and Ozcan, S. 2013. The Statistical Analysis of Some Volumetric Measurements in the Japanese Quails’ Head with Different Feather Color: A Computed Tomography Study. Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Kafkas University, 19, 681-686.
Driesch, Von Den A. 1976. A Guide to the measurement of animal bones from archaeological sites. Peabody Museum Bulletin I. Cambridge M.A. Harvard University. pp: 31-34.
Baumel, J.J., King, S.A., Breasile, J.E., Evans, H.E. and Berge, J.C.V. 1993. Nomina Anatomica Avium. 2nd edition, prepared by the international committee on avian anatomical nomenclature, A Committee of The World Association of Veterinary Anatomists. Nuttall Ornithological Club. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Adams, J. 2008. Paternity Testing: Blood Types and DNA. Nature Education.