Humanities and Social Sciences

| Peer-Reviewed |

A Critical Reflection on the Rights and Exploitation of Non-Humans in Omo-river Valley (Gibe-III) Areas

Received: 11 May 2020    Accepted: 01 June 2020    Published: 29 June 2020
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

The paper explores the critical reflection of the exploitation of the natural environment, specifically forest in Omo-river valley areas. Forests and trees have been destructed and cut down of trees, for charcoal business to fulfill their personal financial/economic interest. The researchers also disclosed the multiple impacts of the cut down of trees and forests for charcoal trade. Hence, the researchers attempts to critically understand and analyze such over exploitation of land and natural environment. In this paper, the researchers explained the genuine causes of the charcoal production beyond the immediate benefit they could get. Accordingly, the researchers found both the anthropocentric and divine approaches of environment problematic and factors for the exploitation of the natural environment. In this paper, the central emphasis is the unwise utilization of the environment for different purpose (which we can call it violation of rights of the non-human creatures from the view point of the biocentrism perspective; the diversified species who live in the area and the destruction of the forest coverage for the sake of temporary economic gain) Generally, to solve the problem the researchers came up with Aldo Leopold’s new environmental argument of the “land ethic” and other apparatuses of environmental conversation. With this regard Leopold’s argument of “land ethic” argued that, our approach towards the land, and natural environment should be those are the environment friendly strategies and holistic reforms to be taken by the government and specifically optional energy sources for the society.

DOI 10.11648/j.hss.20200803.12
Published in Humanities and Social Sciences (Volume 8, Issue 3, May 2020)
Page(s) 92-99
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Charcoal Trade, Non-human, Exploitation, Anthropocentric, Bio-diversity

References
[1] Claudia J. Carr. River Basin Development and Human Rights in eastern Africa- a policy crossroads, 2017.
[2] http://www.ucsusa.org/resources/environmental-impacts-hydroelectric-power.
[3] UNEP. (2006). Africa Environment Outlook 2: Our Environment, Our Wealth. Nairobi: Progress Press Ltd, Malta.
[4] Leopold, A. (1949/1968). A Sand County Almanac, and Sketches Here and There. New York: NY: Oxford University Press.
[5] Jamieson, D. (2008). Ethics and the Environment. New York: Cambiridge University Press.
[6] James Bohman and Bill Rehg (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001), pp. 193-224
[7] S. E. (2009). The potential for species conservation in tropical secondary forests. Conservation Biology, Vol. 23, No. 6, 1406-1417.
[8] Miller, E. D. (1984). Questions that Matter: An Invitation to Philosophy. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
[9] Porteous, J. (1996). ENVIRONMENTAL AESTHETICS: ideas, politics and planning. USA and Canada: Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2003.
[10] Roel Slootweg, R. R. (2010). Biodiversity in Environmental Assessment: Enhancing Ecosystem Services for Human Well-being. New york: Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press.
[11] Moutinho, P. (2012). DEFORESTATION AROUND THE WORLD. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech.
[12] Sandler, R. L. (2018). Environmental Ethics: Theory in Practice. New York: Oxford university press.
[13] Jacques P. Thiroux, K. W. (2012). Ethics: theor and pracice. New York: Nancy Roberts.
[14] Taylor, Paul, 2011 [1986]. Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[15] https://www.hydropower.org/sites/default/files/publications-docs/Better%20Hydro%20Compendium%20of%20Case%20Studies%202017.pdf
[16] Vogel, S. (2015). Thinking like a mall: environmental philosophy after the end of nature. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: The MIT Press.
[17] Callicott, J. Baird. In Defense of the Land Ethic: Essays in Environmental Philosophy. Albany: SUNY Press, 1989.
Author Information
  • Department of Civics & Ethical Education, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia

  • Department of Civics & Ethical Education, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Daniel Techan, Bisrat Tesfay. (2020). A Critical Reflection on the Rights and Exploitation of Non-Humans in Omo-river Valley (Gibe-III) Areas. Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(3), 92-99. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20200803.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Daniel Techan; Bisrat Tesfay. A Critical Reflection on the Rights and Exploitation of Non-Humans in Omo-river Valley (Gibe-III) Areas. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2020, 8(3), 92-99. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20200803.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Daniel Techan, Bisrat Tesfay. A Critical Reflection on the Rights and Exploitation of Non-Humans in Omo-river Valley (Gibe-III) Areas. Humanit Soc Sci. 2020;8(3):92-99. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20200803.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.hss.20200803.12,
      author = {Daniel Techan and Bisrat Tesfay},
      title = {A Critical Reflection on the Rights and Exploitation of Non-Humans in Omo-river Valley (Gibe-III) Areas},
      journal = {Humanities and Social Sciences},
      volume = {8},
      number = {3},
      pages = {92-99},
      doi = {10.11648/j.hss.20200803.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20200803.12},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hss.20200803.12},
      abstract = {The paper explores the critical reflection of the exploitation of the natural environment, specifically forest in Omo-river valley areas. Forests and trees have been destructed and cut down of trees, for charcoal business to fulfill their personal financial/economic interest. The researchers also disclosed the multiple impacts of the cut down of trees and forests for charcoal trade. Hence, the researchers attempts to critically understand and analyze such over exploitation of land and natural environment. In this paper, the researchers explained the genuine causes of the charcoal production beyond the immediate benefit they could get. Accordingly, the researchers found both the anthropocentric and divine approaches of environment problematic and factors for the exploitation of the natural environment. In this paper, the central emphasis is the unwise utilization of the environment for different purpose (which we can call it violation of rights of the non-human creatures from the view point of the biocentrism perspective; the diversified species who live in the area and the destruction of the forest coverage for the sake of temporary economic gain) Generally, to solve the problem the researchers came up with Aldo Leopold’s new environmental argument of the “land ethic” and other apparatuses of environmental conversation. With this regard Leopold’s argument of “land ethic” argued that, our approach towards the land, and natural environment should be those are the environment friendly strategies and holistic reforms to be taken by the government and specifically optional energy sources for the society.},
     year = {2020}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - A Critical Reflection on the Rights and Exploitation of Non-Humans in Omo-river Valley (Gibe-III) Areas
    AU  - Daniel Techan
    AU  - Bisrat Tesfay
    Y1  - 2020/06/29
    PY  - 2020
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20200803.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.hss.20200803.12
    T2  - Humanities and Social Sciences
    JF  - Humanities and Social Sciences
    JO  - Humanities and Social Sciences
    SP  - 92
    EP  - 99
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8184
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20200803.12
    AB  - The paper explores the critical reflection of the exploitation of the natural environment, specifically forest in Omo-river valley areas. Forests and trees have been destructed and cut down of trees, for charcoal business to fulfill their personal financial/economic interest. The researchers also disclosed the multiple impacts of the cut down of trees and forests for charcoal trade. Hence, the researchers attempts to critically understand and analyze such over exploitation of land and natural environment. In this paper, the researchers explained the genuine causes of the charcoal production beyond the immediate benefit they could get. Accordingly, the researchers found both the anthropocentric and divine approaches of environment problematic and factors for the exploitation of the natural environment. In this paper, the central emphasis is the unwise utilization of the environment for different purpose (which we can call it violation of rights of the non-human creatures from the view point of the biocentrism perspective; the diversified species who live in the area and the destruction of the forest coverage for the sake of temporary economic gain) Generally, to solve the problem the researchers came up with Aldo Leopold’s new environmental argument of the “land ethic” and other apparatuses of environmental conversation. With this regard Leopold’s argument of “land ethic” argued that, our approach towards the land, and natural environment should be those are the environment friendly strategies and holistic reforms to be taken by the government and specifically optional energy sources for the society.
    VL  - 8
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections