Checking of New Vocabulary Instruction Improves Iranian Female Intermediate Students’ Pronunciation
Education Journal
Volume 5, Issue 4, July 2016, Pages: 49-52
Received: Dec. 20, 2015; Accepted: Jan. 5, 2016; Published: Jun. 30, 2016
Views 2755      Downloads 86
Author
Hemati Kolavani Fatemeh, Department of Human Science, English Guilan University, Rasht, Iran
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Pronunciation is an important concept in Second language learning. In this article at first I selected 30 girl students randomly. They are intermediate level. Then I took an oral exam in order to find their level in pronunciation. Most of the students didn’t get good marks. Then during classes, teacher checked students’ pronunciation and check instruction of new vocabularies one by one. Students practiced instructions themselves. After that, I got a post-test and calculate differences between post-test and pre-test. At last, I resulted in improving students pronunciation. In conclusion, students can pronounce better by checking instructions.
Keywords
Pronunciation, Instruction, Vocabulary
To cite this article
Hemati Kolavani Fatemeh, Checking of New Vocabulary Instruction Improves Iranian Female Intermediate Students’ Pronunciation, Education Journal. Vol. 5, No. 4, 2016, pp. 49-52. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20160504.12
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Anderson-Hsieh, J. R., & Koehler, K. (1988). The effect of foreign accent and speaking rate on native speaker comprehension. Language Learning, 38, 561-593.
[2]
Anderson-Hsieh, J., Johnson, R., & Koehler, K. (1992). The relationship between nativespeaker judgments of nonnative pronunciation and deviance in segmental, prosody and syllable structure. Language Learning, 42, 529-555.
[3]
Beebe, L. M. (Ed.). (1988). Issues in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
[4]
Cotterall, S. (2000). Promoting learner autonomy through the curriculum: Principles for designing language courses. ELT Journal, 54, 109-117.
[5]
Dörnyei, Z., & Csizér, K. (2002). Some dynamics of language attitudes and motivation: Results of a longitudinal nationwide survey. Applied Linguistics, 23, 421-462.
[6]
Deng, J., Holtby, A., Howden-Weaver, L., Nessim, L., Nicholas, B., Nickle, K., et al. (2009). English pronunciation research: The neglected orphan of second language acquisition studies? PMC Working Paper WPO5-09, The University of Alberta.
[7]
Venkatagiri, H., & Levis, J. (2007). Phonological awareness and speech comprehensibility: An exploratory study. Language Awareness, 16 (4), 263-277.
[8]
Wang, X., & Munro, M. (2004). Computer-based training for learning English vowel contrasts. System, 32, 539-552.
[9]
Wennerstrom, A. (1998). Intonation as cohesion in academic discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20 (1), 1-25.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186