A Reflection on the Research Method and Exemplary Application to the College and University Rankings
Volume 4, Issue 5, September 2015, Pages: 270-282
Received: Sep. 27, 2015;
Accepted: Oct. 11, 2015;
Published: Oct. 24, 2015
Views 4659 Downloads 106
Kiyoung Kim, The Legal Research Institute, College of Law, Chosun University, Kwang-ju, South Korea
Hyun-Meong Ju, The Legal Research Institute, Chosun University, Kwang-ju, South Korea
Marium Khatun, The Legal Research Institute, Chosun University, Kwang-ju, South Korea
It was a precious opportunity as a teacher and researcher that I had completed two research method classes with the peers of Laureate Education Inc. Since the generation of creative knowledge and meaningful contribution to the field is charged on the professional researcher, the classes are foundational, but unfortunately with less an attention by the scholars, and, if more problematically, even lack of courses for some graduate or training programs. Within this paper, I can be gladly reminiscent of the course learning, and can present a work of demonstration by employing the issues of global college rankings. In this article, my purpose is gone with three basic aims; (i) present the brief summary of my experience on the two method classes (ii) suggest a new perspective and mindset within the changing technology and post-modern transformation of society (iii) finally show two examples of mixed method involved with the global college rankings and provide a view for the students situated within the temporal boundary I had set forth.
A Reflection on the Research Method and Exemplary Application to the College and University Rankings, Education Journal.
Vol. 4, No. 5,
2015, pp. 270-282.
Armstrong, D., Gosling, A., Weinman, J. & Marteau, T. (1997). The place of interrater reliability in qualitative research: An empirical study. Sociology, 31, 597–606.
Atkinson, P., Coffey, A., & Delamont, S. (2003). Key themes in qualitative research: continuities and changes. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
Bloland, H. G. (1995). Postmodernism and higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 66, 521–559.
Carter, K. (1993). The place of a story in the study of teaching and teacher education. Educational Researcher, 22, 5–12, 18.
Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2–14.
Creswell, J.W. (2009), Research design :Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed approach, (Laureate Education, Inc., custom ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Eaves, YD (2001). A synthesis technique for grounded theory data analysis. J. Adv. Nurs. 35(5), 654-63.
Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, & practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Gergen, K. (1994). Realities and relationships: Soundings in social construction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Hashemi, S.H., Dastani, H. Sadri, J. (2013). A new data analysis technique to examine crack tip opening angle values tested in API X65 pipe steel. Retrieved July 28, 2015 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264636060_A_new_data_analysis_technique_to_examine_crack_tip_opening_angle_values_tested_in_API_X65_pipe_steel.
Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Heinze, A. (2008). Blended learning: An interpretive action research study. Retrieved Aug. 11, 2015 from http://usir.salford.ac.uk/1653/1/Heinze_2008_blended_e-learning.pdf.
Henry, T. 1989. Break all rules! Punk rock and the making of a style. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Research Press.
Holmes, U.T. (1962). Daily living in the twelfth century, Madison. WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Huber, J., & Whelan, K. (1999). A marginal story as a place of possibility: Negotiating self on the professional knowledge landscape. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 381–396.
Hurteau, M., Houle, S., & Mongiat, S. (2009). "How Legitimate and Justified are Judgments in Program Evaluation?". Evaluation 15 (3): 307–319. doi: 10.1177/1356389009105883.
Husserl, E. (1931). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology (D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology (D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
JHSPH OPEN COURSEWARE. Qualitative Data Analysis. Retrieved July, 29, 2015 from http://ocw.jhsph.edu/index.cfm/go/viewCourse/course/QualitativeDataAnalysis/coursePage/index/.
Kim, K., Concerning the Research and Science (April 10, 2015). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2592858 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2592858.
Kim, K., Some Temperance on the Doctoral Studies and On-Line Education (April 3, 2015). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2589531 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2589531.
Koro-Ljungberg, M., & Greckhamer, T. (2005). Strategic turns labeled “ethnography”: From description to openly ideological production of cultures. Qualitative Research, 5(3), 285–306.
Kvale, S. (2006). Dominance through interviews and dialogues. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 480–500.
Laureate Education, Inc. (2008). Research theory, design, and methods. Baltimore, MD: Author. “Doctoral Research: Social Change.”
Marty, M. E., and R. S. Appleby, (eds.) (1993). Fundamentalism and the state. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mills, W. C. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
Merrill et al (2000). Qualitative Data Analysis Chapter 10, Retrieved from July 28, 2015 from http://www.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/43454_10.pdf.
National Academy of Sciences. (2000). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Leech, N.L., Collins, K.M.T. (2012). Qualitative Analysis Techniques for the Review of the Literature The Qualitative Report 2012, Vol. 17, Art. 56, 1-28. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR17/onwuegbuzie.pdf.
Parson, T., (2009). The role of theory in social research. American Sociological Review, 3(1), pp.13-20.
Patton, M.Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv. Res. 1999 Dec; 34(5 Pt 2): 1189–1208.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Ratcliff, D. (2015). Methods of Data Analysis in Qualitative Research. Retrieved July 28, 2015 from https://connect.ssri.duke.edu/sites/connect.ssri.duke.edu/files/upload/help-resource/Ratcliff.15%20methods%20of%20qualitative%20data%20analysis.pdf.
Reynold, P. D. (2007). A primer in theory construction. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Rosenau, P. M. (1992). Post-modernism and the social sciences: Insights, inroads, and intrusions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Saldaña, J. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scott, J. 1985. Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Sanjek, R. (1990). Fieldnotes: The makings of anthropology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.