Please enter verification code
Some Factors Affecting the Performance of the Principal
Education Journal
Volume 3, Issue 6, November 2014, Pages: 377-383
Received: Dec. 5, 2014; Accepted: Dec. 18, 2014; Published: Jan. 4, 2015
Views 3178      Downloads 186
Martua Manullang, State University of Medan, North Sumatra, Indonesia
Article Tools
Follow on us
This paper describes some of the factors that affect the performance of the principal. Research conducted by the survey, involving a total of 116 persons of Secondary School Principals in Medan, North Sumatra, Indonesia, which was taken by random sampling technique. Data captured with three types of instruments, namely instrument tests, observation sheet and questionnaire which is developed by the researchers. This research is explanatory, which is intended to explain the effect of exogenous variables on the endogenous variables, either directly or indirectly. Based on the results of path analysis, found that the principal organizational knowledge affect the performance of the principal, either directly or through achievement motivation, the accuracy of decision-making, and organizational commitment. Even so that the performance of the principal affected by the achievement motivation, the accuracy of decision-making, and the organizational commitment directly.
Performance, Organizaional Knowledge, Need of Achievement, Decision Making, Organization Commitment
To cite this article
Martua Manullang, Some Factors Affecting the Performance of the Principal, Education Journal. Vol. 3, No. 6, 2014, pp. 377-383. doi: 10.11648/
Serevino, at al. (2009). Education in Indonesia:From Crisis to Recovery. Jakarta: World Bank
Lindsay, William M. and Joseph A. Petrick, (1997). Total Quality and Organization Development. Delray Beach, FI: St. Lucie Press.
Drenth, Pieter J.D. (1998). Thierty Henk, dan The Wolff Charles J., Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology. Wilts: Francis Group.
Robbins, Stephen P. (1991). Organizational Behavior Concept, Controvercies, Aplications. New Jersey: Prentice Hall International,Inc.
Unesco (2007). Peringkat Pendidikan 130 Negara di Dunia, Badan Perserika Bangsa- Bangsa.
Fred C. Lunenburg and Allan C. Ornstein. (2000). Educational Administration. Belmont: Wadsworth
Castetter. William B. (1981). The Personnel Function in Educational Administration. New York: Mc Millan Publishing, Co.
Rao, T.V. (1996). Penilaian Prestasi Kerja: Teori dan Praktek, diterjemahkan oleh Ny. L. Maulana. Jakarta: PT. Pustaka Binaman Pressindo.
Fleishman, Edwin A. (1984). Marilyn K. Quaintance and Laurie A., Broadling. Taxonomies of Human Resources: The Description of Human Tasks. California: Academic Press, Inc.
George, Jenifer M. and Gareth R. Jones. (2005). Organizational Behavior. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Haynes, Marion E. (1984). Managing Performance:A Comprehensive Guide to Effective Supervision. Belmont: Life-time Learning Publications.
Colquitt, Jason A. et al. (2009). Organizational Behaviour Improving Performance and Commitment in the Workplace. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
Mathis, Robert L, Jacson, and John H. Jackson. (2006). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia terjemahan Dian Agelia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat
Robin Stuart-Kotze. (2006). Performance. London: Prentice Hall.
Grifin. (2004). Manajemen.Jilid 2 Edisi 7 Terjemahan Gina Gani. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Luthans, Fred . (2006). Perilaku Organisasi, Terjemahan Vivin, dkk. Yogyakarta: ANDI.
Hoy, Wayne K, and Miskel Cecil G. (1991).Educational Administration. New York: Mc Graw Hill Inc.
Kolb David A., Osland Joyce S., and Rubin Irwin M. (1995). Organizational Behavior An Experimental Approach. New Jersey: Prentice Hall International Inc.
Sandra, Johnson L. and Rush, Sean C. (1995). Reinventing The University Manging and Financing Institution of Higher Education. New York: John Wiley and Son Inc.
Gilley, Jerry W. and Eggland, Steven A. (1989).Principles of Human Resource Development. New York: Addison Weskey Publishing Company,Inc.
O’Connor, Carol A.(1993). The Handbook for Organizational Change. London: McGraw Hill Book Company.
Jackson David (1997). Dynamic Organization, The Challenge of Change. London: Macmilian Press. LTD.
Bryson, John M. (1995). Strategic Planning for Public and Nonpropit Organizations, A Guide to Strengthening and Sustaining Organizational Achievement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Bradford, David L. and Cohen, Allan R. (1997). Managing For Excellence, The Guide to Developing High Performance in Contemperorary Organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Yaple, Ronald N. (1997). The Success Principle. New York : Mac Milland.
John, Sheldracke. (1996). Management Theori for Taylorism to Japanization. London: International Thomson Bussiness Press.
Schein, Edgar H. (1992). Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Fransisco: Yossey Bass Publishers.
Fiske Edward B. (1996). Decentralization Politics and Consensus. Washington D.C.: The International Bank For Recontructions.
Schmidt, Warren H. and Finnigan, Jerome P. (1993). TQ manager A practical Guide forManaging in a Total Quality Qrganization. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publisher.
Sorenson, Richard D. and Goldsmith, Lloyd M. (2009). The Principal’s Guide to Managing School Personnel. California: Corwin Press.
Noble, Audrey J. (2002).School Based Management.
Matteson, Michael T., and Ivancevich, John M. (1989). Management and Organizational. Behavior Classics, llinois: Richard D. Irwin, Inc
Chapman Judith. (1990). School Based Decision Making and Management. London: The Falmer Press.
Moherman, Susan Albers, and Wohlstetter, Priscilla. (1994). School Based Management Organizing for High Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Baron, Robert A, and Byme Donn. (1991). Social Psychology, Understanding Human Interaction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Mondy, R. Wayne and Premeaux, Shane R. (1993). Management, Concepts, Proctices, and Skills. Masasuset : Allyn and Bachon.
Johnsu, Interpersonal Relationship, (2002). ( topic/interpersonal-relationship).
Mondy, R. Wayne and Premeaux, Shane R. (1993). Management, Concepts, Proctices, and Skills. Masasuset : Allyn and Bachon.
Oktaviani, Ayu. (2003). Pengaruh Desentralisasi Pengambilan Keputusan Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Kantor Dinas: Sistem PengendalianAkuntansi sebagai variabel Intervening, (Studi Empiris: Otonomi Daerah Kalimatan Selatan.
Wahidil. (2007). Pengaruh Desentralisasi Pengambilan Keputusan Terhadap Kinerja Satuan Kerja daerah: Sistem Kontrol Akuntansi sebagai variabel Intervening (Studi Empiris pada Penyelenggara Pemerintah daerah Kabupaten Kudus, Semarang
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186