SW-HP Model for Formulating Environmental Education Strategies for Environmental Experts of Tehran Municipality
Education Journal
Volume 3, Issue 3, May 2014, Pages: 133-139
Received: Mar. 29, 2014; Accepted: Apr. 12, 2014; Published: Apr. 30, 2014
Views 3034      Downloads 134
Shaho Karami, Department of Environmental Education, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
Seyed Mohammad Shobeiri, Department of Environmental Education, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
Vafa Ghaemmaghami, HSE, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Article Tools
Follow on us
Environmental Education (EE) refers to organized efforts to teach about how natural environments function and, particularly, how human beings can manage their behavior and ecosystems in order to live sustainably. One of the important aspects of the city is the urban environment. For this reason, Environmental experts in municipal should be trained on environmental matters. One of the tools that help us to formulate strategies for Environmental experts of Tehran municipality is the use of a SWOT analysis. Also the AHP model is could be used to prioritize the factors of strategy environmental educations options. In this study, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of Tehran municipality in environmental educations field are identified and strategies for environmental educations are formulated. Finally all of these strategies are prioritized using a combination of SWOT analysis and AHP (SW-HP model). Results show that although the presented offensive patterns ranked best among strategies, but it was found that the use of a combination of all strategies with attention to their rankings provides the best opportunity to educations of Environmental experts
Environmental Education, SW-HP Model, Urban Environment, Environmental Experts, Tehran Municipality
To cite this article
Shaho Karami, Seyed Mohammad Shobeiri, Vafa Ghaemmaghami, SW-HP Model for Formulating Environmental Education Strategies for Environmental Experts of Tehran Municipality, Education Journal. Vol. 3, No. 3, 2014, pp. 133-139. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20140303.13
Alonso, J. A. 2006. Consistency in The Analytic Hierarchy Process a New Approach, International Journal of Uncertainty, Vol. 14, No. 4, 445−459.
Amal nick, S., Ansari nezhad, A., ansari nezhad, S., and Miri Nargesi, S., 2010, causality relationships and rank critical success factors and failure of information systems to help implement projects combined ANP and DEMATEL, fuzzy group method, Journal of Industrial Engineering, Volume 44, No 2, Page 195-212
Byun, D.H., 2001. The AHP approach for selecting an automobile purchase model. Inf. Manage. 38, 289–297.
EETAP, 2002, Federal Legislative Authorities that Deal with Environmental Education, Resource Library "Advancing Education & Environmental Literacy", 1-3.
Fered, R.D., A. Persian Translation, S.M. Arabi, 2011. Strategic Management, 19th Edition, Publications Office of Cultural Research, Tehran.
Han JW, Meng Q. 2009. The Study on the Development of Bio-energy Industry in China. Ecological Economy; 218:125-127.
Hardin.G., 1968, The Tragedy of the commons. Science.162: reprinted in G. Hardin and J.Baden(eds). Managing the commons. W.H. Freeman and co
Hoelscher, David W. 2009. "Cultivating the Ecological Conscience: Smith, Orr, and Bowers on Ecological Education." M.A. thesis, University of North Texas.
Karahalios, H., Yang, Z.L., Williams, V., Wang, J., 2011. A proposed System of Hierarchical Scorecards to assess the implementation of maritime regulations. Safety Science 49 (3), 450–462.
Karimi, E. 2006. Appropriateness of farmer’s adoption of irrigation methods: The application of the AHP model. Agricultural Systems 87, 101–119.
Malone, K., 1999, "Environmental education researchers as environmental activists, "Environmental Education Research 5(2): 163-177.
Manteghi. N., Zohrabi, A. 2011. A proposed comprehensive framework for formulating strategy: a Hybrid of balanced scorecard, SWOT analysis, porter`s generic strategies and Fuzzy quality function deployment, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 15, 2068–2073.
Mmat, N. J. Z., Daniel, J. K. 2007. Statistical analyses on time complexity and rank consistency between singular value decomposition and the duality approach in AHP: A case study of faculty member selection. Mathematical and Computer Modeling 46, 1099–1106.
Nabi Bidhendi, Gh., Amiri, M.J., Karami, Sh., 2013, Application of multi-criteria decision-making methods in environment, Kiajor publication, Tehran, Iran.
Nikolaou, I.E., Evangelinos, K.I. 2010. A SWOT analysis of environmental management practices in Greek Mining and Mineral Industry. Resources Policy, 35, 226–234.
Palmer, J.A, 1998. Environmental Education in the 21st Century: Theory, Practice, Progress, and Promise. Routledge.
Pines, L. U., Barnett, D. J., Sapsin, J. W., Bishai., D. M., Balicer., R. D. 2007. A systematic analysis of influenza vaccine shortage policies. Public Health 122, 183–191.
Stapp, W.B., et al. 1969. "The Concept of Environmental Education," The Journal of Environmental Education 1(1): 30-31.
Stokes, David and Crawshaw, Bruce, 1986, teaching strategies for environmental education, Environmentalist, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 35-43.
Swan, J.A. 1969, the challenge of environmental education" Phi Delta Kappan, 51, 26-28.
Swan J.A, 2010, SWOT on Bioenergy for North America. Bioenergy. Conference and Exhibition, Prince George, British Columbia, June9-10, 2010, p.3-4.
UNESCO, 1978, Tbilisi Declaration
Zheng, G., Zhu, N., Tian, Z., Chen, Y., Sun B. 2012. Application of a trapezoidal fuzzy AHP method for work safety evaluation and early warning rating of hot and humid environments. Safety Science 50, 228–239.
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186