Please enter verification code
Decentralization Education System and Its Effects on Teachers Performance
Journal of Investment and Management
Volume 6, Issue 3, June 2017, Pages: 75-78
Received: Jul. 1, 2017; Accepted: Jul. 24, 2017; Published: Oct. 18, 2017
Views 2047      Downloads 117
Sadia Shabbir, Department of English Literature, National College of Business Administration & Economic Lahore (Multan Campus), Lahore, Pakistan
Ishtiaq Ahmed, Department of Management Science, Virtual University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
Muhammad Imran, Department of Computer Science, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan
Article Tools
Follow on us
In this world, just those countries have survived and contended with challenges which have a quality and sound training framework. The nature of training relies upon use of labor and inspiration level of organization and educators. The education system throughout the world has been changed by the passage of time. Unfortunately, Pakistan government not gives proper attention to the education sector. After the creation of fifty-four years of Pakistan the decentralization education system introduced by the military government and some power has been devolved to at local level. This study conducted in district Lodhran (Punjab). The qualitative study method and convenient sampling technique was used to get the data. The present study main aim to know how decentralization education system affects the teacher and school performance and what role of the politician is negative or positive. Finally, in conclusion putting some suggestions that how to make the performance of teachers fruitful for education system and how local representatives play their positive role to provide the standard education to people.
Decentralization, Education System, Education, Teacher Performance, Pakistan
To cite this article
Sadia Shabbir, Ishtiaq Ahmed, Muhammad Imran, Decentralization Education System and Its Effects on Teachers Performance, Journal of Investment and Management. Vol. 6, No. 3, 2017, pp. 75-78. doi: 10.11648/j.jim.20170603.11
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L. (1990). Relations between policy and practice: A commentary. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 331-338.
Ministry of Finance. (2015). Economic Survey of Pakistan. Islamabad: Ministry of Finance, Government of Pakistan.
Farah, I. and K. Bacchus. (1999). Educating girls in Pakistan: Tensions between economics and culture. In Education, culture and economics: Dilemmas for development, ed. L. Fiona and L. Angela, 225–37. New York: Garland.
Reimers, F., & Warwick, D. P. (1995). Hope or despair? Learning in Pakistan's primary schools. London: Praeger.
Andrabi, T. J., Das, A. I., Khawja, T., Vishwanath and Zajonc. (2008). Learning and Educational Achievement in Punjab Schools LEAPS Lahore: 197.
Warraich, N. A. 2008. Causes of Low Enrolment and Possible Local Options to Address Them. Multan: Canada Pakistan Basic Education Project (CPBEP) 18.
Chen, D. (2011). School-Based Management, School Decision-Making and Education Outcomes in Indonesian Primary Schools, The World Bank East Asia and Pacific Region Education Sector Unit.
Androniceanu, A. (2011). Transparency of the Romanian Local Public Administration. Administration and Public Management Review, 17, 33.
Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. C. (2008). Educational Administration: Concepts and Practice. Belmont, CA: Wadswoth/Cengage.
Aasen, P. (2004). What happened to social-democratic progressivism in Scandinavia? Restructuring education in Sweden and Norway in the 1990s. In: M. W. Apple (Ed.), The state and the politics of knowledge London: Taylor & Francis e-Library, pp. 1-24.
Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. C. (1996). Educational Administration: Concepts and Practice. Wadsworth Publishing Company. USA.
Richardson, Michael, D., Gentry., Linda, R., Kenneth, E., Vanberkum, Dennis, W. (1994). Science La Liability for Teacher: Protect yourself when Administrators Don’t. J. Chem. Educ, 71 (8).
Vientian, Lao (2002). Designing and Implementing Local Curricula. Final report of Building the Capacities of Curriculum specialists for Educational Reform. UNESCO, International Bureau of Education. Bangkok.
Amin Khanadaghi, M., & Dehghani, M. (2010). Reflecting on Centralization, Decentralization and Returning to Centralization. Journal of Educational and Psychological Studies. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.
Gershberg, I A. (1998). Decentralisation, Recentralisation and Performance Accountability: Building an Operationally Useful Framework for Analysis, Development Policy Review, 16 (4), 405-431.
Winkler, D. R., & Cohen, J. (2005). The s tatus of decentralization: A three-day workshop for national and sub-national stakeholders. Washington, D. C: USAID. Retrieved March 13, 2009, from docs/e2-DecentralizationWorkshop.pdf
Bray, M. (1994). Centralization/Decentralization and Privatization/Publicization: Conceptual issue and the need for more research, International Journal of Educational Research, 21 (8), 817-824.
Fisher, R. J. (2000). Decentralization and Centralization in Forest Management: A Conceptual Overview. In: Enters.
Geo-JaJa, M. A. (2006). Educational decentralization, public spending, and social justice in Nigeria. International Review of Education, 52 (1–2), 129–153.
Goll, I., & Rasheed. A. A. (2004). The Moderating Effect of Environmental Munificence and Dynamism on the Relationship between Discretionary Social Responsibility and Firm Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 49 (1).
GOP (2017). Government pof the Punjab, Retrieved April, 14, 2017,
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186