International Journal of Business and Economics Research

| Peer-Reviewed |

Performance Measurement and Benchmarking of Large-Scale Tourist Hotels

Received: 09 August 2018    Accepted:     Published: 13 August 2018
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Taiwanese tourism policy underwent a major change in 2008 when restrictions were gradually relaxed on Chinese tourists visiting Taiwan. According to the Tourism Bureau of Taiwan’s statistics, the overall number of mainland tourists increased from 329,204 in 2008 to 4,184,102 in 2015; however, there was a 16.1% reduction (670,000) occurring in 2016. This significant event will cause more harm than good to Taiwan’s all-important tourism industry. In response to such contractions, this study applied cluster analysis combined with entropy to derive suitable clusters useful towards identifying the best market performers among hoteliers through a measurement of large-scale tourist hotels’ operational performance. This may signal a benchmark for the improvement of poor performance hotels. Entropy is used as an objective weight method to calculate the relative importance of all salient attributes by comparing the entropy values of each given attribute. Large-scale international tourist hotels have become the market mainstream in Taiwan; therefore, 17 tourist hotels with more than 5000 employees yearly were selected to become part of this study. Operational performance was measured by attributive means of occupancy rate, average room rate, average production-value-per-employee, total number of domestic tourists, and total number of foreign tourists (including overseas Chinese). A significant F value of the ANOVA analysis indicates that there is at least one significant difference found between the two clusters. Further post-hoc analysis uses the Scheffé method to identify any difference found between clusters and to determine the best performance cluster useful as a benchmark. The methods of this study are different from those of previous studies because of the use of a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) technique or mix, while there is also applied cluster analysis combined with entropy. Clear indicators are deemed useful for exacting improvement standards among under-performing tourist hotel properties.

DOI 10.11648/j.ijber.20180704.13
Published in International Journal of Business and Economics Research (Volume 7, Issue 4, August 2018)
Page(s) 97-101
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Performance Measurement, Cluster Analysis, Entropy, Tourist Hotels

References
[1] Y. H. Lai, “The Impacts of Contraction in the Cross-Strait Relations on Tourism Industry in Taiwan.” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Chinese Culture University, 2017.
[2] E. Claver-Cortés, J. F. Molina-Azorín, J. Pereira-Moliner, “The impact of strategic behaviours on hotel performance,” International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 19 (1), 2007, pp.6-20.
[3] Y. L. Lin, S. Y. Chen, “Data Mining of Operation Performance of Tourist Hotels in Taiwan Journal of Tourism and Leisure Management 2, 2014, pp.20-29.
[4] H. Cheng, Y. C. Lu, J. T. Chung, “Performance benchmarking by improved slack-based context dependent DEA for the hotel industry in Taiwan,” Management Review, 28, 2009, pp.141-146.
[5] J. Wu, H. Tsai, Z. Zhou, “Improving efficiency in international tourist hotels in Taipei using a non-radial DEA model,” International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 23 (1), 2011, pp.66-83.
[6] C. Bernini and A. Guizzardi, “Improving performance measurement and benchmarking in the accommodation sector,” International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27 (5), 2015, pp. 980-1002.
[7] W. E. Chiang, M. H. Tsai, L. S. M. Wang, “A DEA evaluation of Taipei hotels,” Annals of Tourism Research 31 (3), 2004, pp.712-715.
[8] J. Wu, H. Song, “Operational performance and benchmarking: A case study of international tourist hotels in Taipei,” African Journal of Business Management, 5 (22), 2011, 9455.
[9] W. W. Wu, L. W. Lan, Y. T. Lee, “Benchmarking hotel industry in a multi-period context with DEA approaches: A case study,” Benchmarking: An International Journal, 20 (2), 2013, pp.152-168.
[10] K. Poldrugovac, M. Tekavcic, S. Jankovic, “Efficiency in the hotel industry: an empirical examination of the most influential factors,” Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 29 (1), 2016, pp.583-597.
[11] A. J. Singh, R. S. Schmidgall, “Analysis of financial ratios commonly used by US lodging financial executives,” Journal of Retail & Leisure Property, 2 (3), 2002, pp.201-213.
[12] P. K. CHATHOTH, “The impact of information technology on hotel operations, service management and transaction costs: A conceptual framework for full-service hotel firms.” International Journal of Hospitality Management, 26, 2007, 395-408.
[13] S. MELIñN-GONZñLEZ, & J. BULCHAND-GIDUMAL, “A model that connects information technology and hotel performance. ” Tourism Management, 53, 2016, 30-37.
[14] S. SUN & W.-M., LU. “Evaluating the performance of the Taiwanese hotel industry using a weight slacks-based measure.”Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 22, 2005, 487-512.
[15] G. SANTORO, “Evaluating performance in the hotel industry: An empirical analysis of Piedmont.” Journal of Investment and Management, 4, 2015, 17-22.
[16] S. N. Hwang, T. Y. Chang, “Using data envelopment analysis to measure hotel managerial efficiency change in Taiwan,” Tourism management, 24 (4), 2003, pp.357-369.
[17] K. W. Wöber, “Benchmarking for tourism organizations. An eGuide for Tourism Managers,” National Laboratory for Tourism and eCommerse. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Osoitteessa http://fama2. us. es, 2011, 8080.
[18] C. Yang, W. M. Lu, “Performance benchmarking for Taiwan’s international tourist hotels,” INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research, 44.3: 2006, pp.229-245.
[19] C. F. Chen, “Applying the Stochastic Frontier Approach to Measure Hotel Managerial Efficiency in Taiwan,” Tourism Management, 28, 2007, pp. 696-702.
[20] S. Setyaningsih, “Using cluster analysis study to examine the successful performance entrepreneur in Indonesia,” Procedia Economics and Finance, 4, 2012, pp.286-298.
[21] O. Yim, K. T. Ramdeen, “Hierarchical cluster analysis: comparison of three linkage measures and application to psychological data,” The quantitative methods for psychology, 11 (1), 2015, pp.8-21.
[22] J. J. Shuai, W. W. Wu, (2011). “Evaluating the influence of E-marketing on hotel performance by DEA and grey entropy,” Expert Systems with Applications, 38 (7), 2011, pp.8763-8769.
Author Information
  • Department of International Business, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

  • Department of International Business, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Tien-Chin Wang, Huang Shu-Li. (2018). Performance Measurement and Benchmarking of Large-Scale Tourist Hotels. International Journal of Business and Economics Research, 7(4), 97-101. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20180704.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Tien-Chin Wang; Huang Shu-Li. Performance Measurement and Benchmarking of Large-Scale Tourist Hotels. Int. J. Bus. Econ. Res. 2018, 7(4), 97-101. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20180704.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Tien-Chin Wang, Huang Shu-Li. Performance Measurement and Benchmarking of Large-Scale Tourist Hotels. Int J Bus Econ Res. 2018;7(4):97-101. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20180704.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijber.20180704.13,
      author = {Tien-Chin Wang and Huang Shu-Li},
      title = {Performance Measurement and Benchmarking of Large-Scale Tourist Hotels},
      journal = {International Journal of Business and Economics Research},
      volume = {7},
      number = {4},
      pages = {97-101},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijber.20180704.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20180704.13},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijber.20180704.13},
      abstract = {Taiwanese tourism policy underwent a major change in 2008 when restrictions were gradually relaxed on Chinese tourists visiting Taiwan. According to the Tourism Bureau of Taiwan’s statistics, the overall number of mainland tourists increased from 329,204 in 2008 to 4,184,102 in 2015; however, there was a 16.1% reduction (670,000) occurring in 2016. This significant event will cause more harm than good to Taiwan’s all-important tourism industry. In response to such contractions, this study applied cluster analysis combined with entropy to derive suitable clusters useful towards identifying the best market performers among hoteliers through a measurement of large-scale tourist hotels’ operational performance. This may signal a benchmark for the improvement of poor performance hotels. Entropy is used as an objective weight method to calculate the relative importance of all salient attributes by comparing the entropy values of each given attribute. Large-scale international tourist hotels have become the market mainstream in Taiwan; therefore, 17 tourist hotels with more than 5000 employees yearly were selected to become part of this study. Operational performance was measured by attributive means of occupancy rate, average room rate, average production-value-per-employee, total number of domestic tourists, and total number of foreign tourists (including overseas Chinese). A significant F value of the ANOVA analysis indicates that there is at least one significant difference found between the two clusters. Further post-hoc analysis uses the Scheffé method to identify any difference found between clusters and to determine the best performance cluster useful as a benchmark. The methods of this study are different from those of previous studies because of the use of a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) technique or mix, while there is also applied cluster analysis combined with entropy. Clear indicators are deemed useful for exacting improvement standards among under-performing tourist hotel properties.},
     year = {2018}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Performance Measurement and Benchmarking of Large-Scale Tourist Hotels
    AU  - Tien-Chin Wang
    AU  - Huang Shu-Li
    Y1  - 2018/08/13
    PY  - 2018
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20180704.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijber.20180704.13
    T2  - International Journal of Business and Economics Research
    JF  - International Journal of Business and Economics Research
    JO  - International Journal of Business and Economics Research
    SP  - 97
    EP  - 101
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-756X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20180704.13
    AB  - Taiwanese tourism policy underwent a major change in 2008 when restrictions were gradually relaxed on Chinese tourists visiting Taiwan. According to the Tourism Bureau of Taiwan’s statistics, the overall number of mainland tourists increased from 329,204 in 2008 to 4,184,102 in 2015; however, there was a 16.1% reduction (670,000) occurring in 2016. This significant event will cause more harm than good to Taiwan’s all-important tourism industry. In response to such contractions, this study applied cluster analysis combined with entropy to derive suitable clusters useful towards identifying the best market performers among hoteliers through a measurement of large-scale tourist hotels’ operational performance. This may signal a benchmark for the improvement of poor performance hotels. Entropy is used as an objective weight method to calculate the relative importance of all salient attributes by comparing the entropy values of each given attribute. Large-scale international tourist hotels have become the market mainstream in Taiwan; therefore, 17 tourist hotels with more than 5000 employees yearly were selected to become part of this study. Operational performance was measured by attributive means of occupancy rate, average room rate, average production-value-per-employee, total number of domestic tourists, and total number of foreign tourists (including overseas Chinese). A significant F value of the ANOVA analysis indicates that there is at least one significant difference found between the two clusters. Further post-hoc analysis uses the Scheffé method to identify any difference found between clusters and to determine the best performance cluster useful as a benchmark. The methods of this study are different from those of previous studies because of the use of a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) technique or mix, while there is also applied cluster analysis combined with entropy. Clear indicators are deemed useful for exacting improvement standards among under-performing tourist hotel properties.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections